Trump team looks to end $37B program designed to help minority business saying it violates the Constitution
The Trump administration has joined with two white-owned construction companies looking to end a $37 billion program designed to help minority-owned businesses, saying it is 'unconstitutional.'
The Indiana -based companies, Mid-America Milling Company and Bagshaw Trucking Inc., sued the Department of Transportation in 2023 over the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program, arguing that it should be permanently dismantled.
On Wednesday the Department of Justice filed a proposal for a settlement with the DOT to dismantle the program – which was first authorized by Congress in 1983, and serves roughly 49,000 businesses that have been deemed to be disadvantaged.
The program is funded by the federal government but administered by states, and allocates at least 10 percent of government funding for transportation infrastructure to such contracting firms.
The original complaint described the DBE as 'the largest, and perhaps oldest affirmative action program in U.S. history' and claimed that the program's 'goals' were in fact 'discriminatory barriers' targeting nondesignated racial groups including white Americans.
'The word 'disadvantaged' is simply code for women and certain minorities,' the complaint stated, adding that: 'Disfavored racial groups must compete with the preferred racial groups on an unequal footing.
'Because the DBE program violates the Constitution 's 'promise of equal treatment,' it must be permanently dismantled.'
Last January, under the Biden administration, the DOT hit back at the suit, saying that the plaintiffs had 'notably' not identified any current transport construction contracts that had 'race- or gender-based subcontracting goals due to the DOT DBE program.'
However, in a new filing on Wednesday, the administration said it had 're-evaluated its position,' in light of a 2023 Supreme Court ruling which blocked race-conscious college admissions.
'Defendants, upon review of the DBE program and their position in this litigation, have determined that the program's use of race- and sex-based presumptions is unconstitutional,' the filing stated.
'Over the past five decades, the federal government imposed a policy of race discrimination in the roadbuilding industry,' Dan Lennington, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, the conservative nonprofit representing the plaintiffs, told The Washington Post.
'Thousands of workers and small businesses have been victimized, and hundreds of billions have been spent, distorting the market and inflating construction costs for the taxpayers. That ends now.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
Lutnick downplays impact of tariff court ruling on US, EU talks
WASHINGTON, June 1 (Reuters) - U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick downplayed the impact of legal uncertainty around U.S. tariffs on negotiations with the European Union during an interview with Fox News Sunday, saying talks were ongoing. Lutnick was asked about a Reuters report quoting an unnamed EU official close to negotiations who said the legal uncertainty of the tariffs in the U.S. gave the E.U. "extra leverage." "You can't listen to silly people making silly comments," Lutnick said. "All of the countries that are negotiating with us understand the power of Donald Trump and his ability to protect the American worker." A U.S. trade court blocked most of President Donald Trump's tariffs in a sweeping ruling last week that found the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from U.S. trading partners. A U.S. federal appeals court paused that ruling a day later, allowing the tariffs to go into effect while it considered an appeal by the Trump administration. Lutnick said the ruling "maybe cost us a week, but then everybody came right back to the table." Trump in late May threatened 50% tariffs on all European goods by June 1 but days later delayed the effective date to July 9 to allow for time to negotiate. Trump also said on Friday that he would increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%, leading the European Commission on Saturday to say it could consider countermeasures. Speaking on ABC News' 'This Week,' White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said the U.S. needed to protect its steel industry for national security reasons in light of economic rival China's steel production. "We have to show strength," Hassett said. "We have to have a steel industry that's ready for American defense."
The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Australian high-speed rail has barely left the station – some experts say a new US project shows a better way
Progress has been slow on the proposed high-speed rail line between Sydney and Newcastle since the establishment of the High Speed Rail Authority (HSRA) in 2023, and the federal government is yet to commit to building the megaproject. But some experts say there may be a cheaper and easier way to do it, pointing to a US example of what can be achieved. The Newcastle-Sydney high-speed rail line is estimated to cost at least $30bn and take well over a decade to build. The HSRA has spent its infancy developing yet another business case, starting with Sydney-Newcastle, to ultimately form part of a Melbourne-Brisbane line in the second half of this century. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Geotechnical drilling has begun to determine how to tackle the mammoth task of traversing the Hawkesbury River with services that can reach a top speed of 320km/h. Meanwhile, Infrastructure Australia is evaluating its business case and will shortly make a recommendation. By contrast, a longer line linking the eastern outskirts of Los Angeles with Las Vegas at similar speeds is being built for a fraction of the cost and time. The private-led Brightline West represents an approach that is in many ways the polar opposite of how Labor is pursuing the technology in Australia, experts say. With construction estimates soaring, experts are now questioning if Australia is letting perfect be the enemy of good and risking a cost blowout that would crush the chance of the line ever being built. The HSRA plans to establish a service between central Sydney and Newcastle's Broadmeadow, running end-to-end in an hour, with a stop at Gosford. The journey on the existing Newcastle-Sydney line takes about 2.5 hours, almost half an hour longer than an express service achieved in the mid-20th century. The HSRA chief executive, Tim Parker, wants to build dedicated dual tracks so that high-speed trains won't have to interact with slower trains, a contrasting approach to how high-speed rail expanded in most countries. Spain's high-speed train, for example, shares sections of track with slower services. While it must slow down in certain sections, this philosophy presents an opportunity to roll out fast train technology in stages and more cheaply. Not only is building a dedicated line more expensive, the Sydney-Newcastle corridor will require an engineering feat to construct what would be the world's longest rail tunnel to allow trains to cross the Hawkesbury River without compromising speed. 'They've picked a starting stretch that is the hardest and most expensive part of the entire east coast,' says Garry Glazebrook, an associate professor at the University of Technology Sydney. The business case has not yet been made public, but the price tag is expected to be eye-watering. Modelling for the New South Wales government's 2019 plan to build a line without federal help reportedly predicted it would cost about $30bn and take 12 years to build just the first stage from Gosford through the Hawkesbury to a station at Sydney Olympic Park – a cheaper option than Central. The costs proved too great. The then Perrottet government abandoned the plan at the end of 2022. Brightline West broke ground in April 2024. Despite covering a 315km point-to-point distance – nearly three times as long as Newcastle-Sydney – construction is expected to be completed swiftly, with services for the 2hr 10min trip to be operating in time for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. The project's most up-to-date budget is US$12.5bn (about A$19.5bn), already overrun from a 2020 estimate of US$8bn, but still a fraction of the cost of the Australian proposal. Brightline West – owned by Fortress Investment Group – is funded by a mix of equity, private finance, federal government grants and California and Nevada state-issued tax-exempt bonds for private ventures in the public interest. It is entirely unrelated to the California state government's plan for an LA-San Francisco line, which has been held up as an example of disastrous infrastructure projects in the US. Approved in 2008, no track has yet been laid and cost estimates have more than tripled to US$128bn. Donald Trump has vowed to block federal funds previously promised to the LA-San Francisco project, but administration officials appear satisfied with Biden-era commitments to the Brightline model. Those costs and timeframe may appear ambitious, but Brightline has already established a Miami-Orlando line that reaches 200km/h – just shy of the high-speed definition. The first section, between Miami and West Palm Beach, broke ground in 2014 and was in service by 2018. Brightline West's impressive price tag and timeframe are only achievable through several compromises. Most of the line will initially run along a single track with passing loops , reducing speed accordingly. It will also share its corridor with the Interstate 15 Highway. The track will be built down the I-15's median strip, with trains travelling alongside road traffic, similar to a number of existing rail lines in Perth. This delivers serious savings. Building just one track is cheaper, and land acquisition and permissions are streamlined. Perhaps the greatest compromise is that Brightline West will terminate in Rancho Cucamonga, on the eastern outskirts of LA. While avoiding costly construction in built-up urban areas, passengers will need to connect to existing, slower rail to make the 67km journey to Union station in the heart of the city's downtown. Building anything in Australia is expensive, and rail even more so. Alon Levy is the co-lead of the transportation and land use program at New York University's Marron Institute, and researches why construction costs differ between countries. He believes Newcastle-Sydney already has unnecessary costs baked in thanks to overly prescriptive demands from government. 'It's a foolish requirement this early on to not share any tracks with commuter lines,' Levy says. 'You leave less space for the experts to find cheaper workarounds and drive innovation.' Australia's rail industry is another problem, Levy believes. Australian governments rely heavily on consultants for infrastructure planning, a symptom of the hollowing out of departments of expertise. 'This problem is common in Anglosphere governments,' Levy says. They bring in outside consultants who work on one thing then disband and the expertise vanishes.' Levy believes an Australian government – either the commonwealth or NSW – should establish a 'public sector consultant unit' for rail expertise, which it can then provide to other states to work on their projects at cost, a model successfully proven in France and Italy. The profit motive of companies such as Brightline can also bring down costs by pushing the limits of what is possible. 'They go out to the market and challenge their suppliers … to push the technical limits, so trains can move through difficult stretches and save the company from spending billions moving dirt around,' one rail source who requested anonymity says. 'But in Australia, governments want already proven technology, they want a safer bet that is future-proofed, and that often means being overengineered and double the cost necessary. It's always got to be the gold standard.' Rail unions also increase construction and operating costs. 'Unions have enormous say, it's just the way we work in Australia,' Glazebrook says. Union pressure is broadly seen as having pushed NSW to build new metro tracks for driverless trains with a private operator. A separate rail source, unable to be named due to their work, said the new metro extension under Sydney harbour could not have been built had it been subject to existing Sydney Trains union agreements, due to the line's gradient. Herein lies a catch-22, Glazebrook says. By adopting the proven European approach – staged building using existing tracks already subject to union agreements – construction and operation are beholden to stringent standards that increase the cost and timeframes of projects. Building dedicated tracks is a way to bypass such pressures and can allow for the automation of driving and fewer staffing requirements, saving money on operations once the line is running. But construction costs will soar. 'You throw everything together and you get a real bloody mess,' Glazebrook says. Experts are now questioning if Newcastle-Sydney is the smartest place to start. Glazebrook still backs the proposal put by his group, Fastrack Australia, for the HSRA to begin by upgrading the Sydney-Canberra line in stages to high-speed capability. Its easier terrain makes it lower-hanging fruit, even if trains don't run along the Federal Highway's median strip. Others say Canberra-Sydney more closely resembles the value proposition of Brightline West – the potential to capture market share where air or car trips have dominated. Taxpayers currently foot the huge travel bill of bureaucrats and politicians flying between Canberra and Sydney. The existing train service takes about four and a half hours – a 90-minute high-speed alternative could attract that business to rail instead. The existing Newcastle-Sydney service – ticketed at $11 – takes only an hour and a half longer than the proposed high-speed trip. While local rail experts are not proposing to copy Brightline's model exactly, most agree there are attitudes worth adopting to avoid Australia's high-speed rail ambition being shelved. 'We don't want to let perfect be the enemy of the good,' Glazebrook says.
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Realtors panic as buyers pull out of deals at near record levels
The US housing market is teetering — and buyers are running for the exits. Spooked by high mortgage rates, mounting insurance premiums, and growing fears of a shaky economy, an astonishing one in seven buyers are bailing at the last minute. In April alone, 56,000 home purchase contracts were canceled — equal to 14.3 percent of all pending deals, according to a new report from Redfin. That's the second-highest April cancellation rate ever recorded, topped only by the early pandemic chaos in 2020. Reasons for would-be buyers to bail are stacking up fast. A shaky economy and fear of jobs as a result has caused many to get cold feet as they worry they will not be able to cover the monthly payment. Stubbornly-high mortgage rates that hit 7 percent mean those payments are higher than many want to pay. Growing evidence of the house price bubble burst are the icing on the cake for many. They do not want to buy now, only to see property values plummet. The Miami housing market is on a knife-edge as spiraling numbers of homebuyers pull out of deals. It's the latest area in the Sunshine State at risk of a crash. Desiree Bourgeois (pictured), a Redfin realtor in Detroit, said that at a recent open house, younger buyers were worried about how tariffs, and the economic uncertainty around them, was going to impact the housing market. 'They're hearing the words "tariffs" and "recession," and it's making them nervous that if they buy now, the value of their home will decline, and they don't know whether mortgage rates will go up or down. 'There's a lot of uncertainty out there, with buyers trying to understand how their purchase would fit into their personal finances and the broader economic puzzle.' Meanwhile, Efosa, CEO of Fire Cash Buyer , said he has pulled out of two contracts recently because he's not optimistic about where the US housing market is headed. Instead, he's waiting for the market to crash, then he plans to buy. 'I'm waiting on the market to cycle as it did in 2008. This is a perfect storm for an eventual market crash due to this affordability crisis,' he says. 'I will be one of the smart ones waiting on the sideline to buy at the right time, not at the top of the market.' Once again, Florida is proving to be a problem. The Sunshine State accounts for five of the ten areas with the highest cancellation rates, including Orlando (19.4 percent), Tampa (19.1 percent), and Miami (18.9 percent). Other cities hit hard with last minute cancellations include Atlanta, with 20 percent of pending sales falling through, That was followed by Riverside, CA (19.1 percent) and Fort Worth, TX (18.7 percent.) Buyers are also being met with too many choices, which is causing them to back out of deals at the last minute. Housing inventory is at a five-year high, and some buyers are backing out during inspection in hopes of finding something better. In disaster prone areas like California and Louisiana, skyrocketing insurance premiums are killing deals. 'Some lenders won't sign off if buyers can't insure the home affordably,' Efosa says. But despite many potential buyers ability to seal the deal, savvy house hunters are on alert. Redfin reports that when deals fall through, there's a window of opportunity for those who are serious about buying. 'Two of my buyers got great homes this way,' said Alison Williams, a Sacramento-based agent. 'When a deal collapses, we jump in before the home even relists.' Williams advises that if a buyer is outbid, they should have their real estate agent submit a backup offer anyway. If the winning bidder backs out, you're up next – likely at a discount. In the current housing market, sellers are also having to come back to reality on pricing on concessions. It's a buyer's market. 'When buyers pull out, sellers are lowering prices and offering concessions just to seal the deal' Efosa says. While Florida sits atop the cancellation study, the biggest year-over-year jumps in contract fails came from Anaheim, CA (up 3.1 points), Seattle, Milwaukee, and Los Angeles — areas all dealing with too many listings flooding the market. On the low end, Nassau County, NY had the lowest cancellation rate in the US at 4.8 percent. With the mass cancellations, Efosa says believe a market correction is inevitable. 'It's already happening,' Efosa warned. 'Foreclosures are up. The market will have to come down. The numbers don't lie.' Meanwhile, sellers are panicking about just how much they will have to lower the price of their homes in order to sell. Over the next year, home prices will drop by 1, according to Redfin, marking the end of more than a decade of almost uninterrupted price hikes. Before and during the pandemic, when there were record-low mortgage rates, buyers would often face bidding wars and lose out on homes. Now, the ball is in their court. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 7 percent on Memorial Day. Redfin predicts rates are likely to hover around 6.8 percent through 2025. Meanwhile, inventory keeps rising. The number of homes on the market has shot up 16.7 percent in just a year — to the highest level in 5 years.
