Rep. Madeleine Dean's Banana Burn Against Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Goes Viral
President Donald Trump's Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick got burned badly by Rep. Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.) ― with a banana, no less.
It happened during a meeting of the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday, where the former stockbroker insisted the major effect of the president's controversial tariff proposals would be teaching self-reliance to American businesses.
But then the congresswoman asked Lutnick about the tariff on bananas, adding, 'Americans, by the way, loooove bananas. We buy billions of them a year. I love bananas. What's the tariff on bananas?'
Lutnick responded that the tariff on that fruit 'would be representative of the countries that produce them,' which he said was 'generally 10%.'
Dean then pointed out that Walmart has already increased the cost of bananas by 8%.
Lutnick claimed prices would go back down as countries continue to make new deals with the U.S.
However, Dean was focused on the very real present and not Lutnick's nebulous future predictions.
″But the cost is on the American consumer now, and on the businesses with the confusion now,' she said. 'Mr. Secretary, I believe you know better. I believe you recognize that a trade deficit is not something to fear. I believe you know that predictability, stability, is essential for businesses. I wish you would show that truth to this administration.'
Lutnick then added one more point: 'There's no uncertainty that if you build in America and produce your product in America, there will be no tariff.'
Dean then held up a banana and noted to Lutnick: 'We cannot build bananas in America.'
Although bananas can be grown in parts of the country such as Hawaii and southern Florida, the current domestic crop isn't nearly enough to satisfy the cravings of Americans, who eat an average of 26 pounds of the fruit each year.
You can see the complete exchange below.
Dean later commented on the exchange on her X account, expressing surprise that 'as a former writing professor, I would be giving economic lessons to the Commerce Secretary, but here we are.'
She followed up with a post noting that 'not everything can be produced in the U.S.'
Other people also went bananas over Dean's exchange with Lutnick.
Jasmine Crockett Slams Trump Tariffs And Explains The 1 Difference Between Parties
Appeals Court Reinstates Most Of Trump's Tariffs For Now
Ex-Obama Adviser Spots Exactly How Trump Caught A Big Break With Tariff Decision
White House Lashes Out At Judges After Court Blocks Trump's Tariffs
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S., Chinese delegates in London to talk trade, rare earths
June 9 (UPI) -- Delegates from the United States and China are set to meet Monday in London after a phone call between the nations' leaders seemingly led to a cooling of tensions related to their otherwise heated recent trade dispute. "We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks," said a British government spokesperson. The U.K. has provided the space for the countries to chat but hasn't publicly disclosed its location. American attendees are slated to include U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, while Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng will lead his country's delegation. It is expected the discussion will put a fair amount of focus on the rare earth minerals situation. The Trump administration had expected China to back down on export restrictions it had imposed in April on such minerals after talks held in May. China imposed those restrictions in response to tariffs levied by Trump on Chinese goods. The resulting trade disruption has led to a 2.9% decrease on exports to the United States from April to May, the decrease from May 2024 is 3.4% and the cumulative year-on-year decrease from January to May is at 4.9%, according to Chinese customs data. However President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on the phone last week, and the conversation was reportedly so friendly it not only led to Monday's meeting but each invited the other to make a personal visit. American and Chinese representatives had met last month in Geneva and reportedly reached an agreement to suspend most of the tariffs that had been reciprocally imposed, but both countries have since been accused of agreement violations by the other.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Letters to the Editor: When it comes to Trump immigration policy, 'the chaos and cruelty are the point'
To the editor: I couldn't agree more with guest contributor David J. Bier that immigration, like many other things in the country, should be subject to the rule of law ('Voters wanted immigration enforcement, but not like this,' June 5). Prior to the Trump era, the problem was that those responsible for determining immigration policy couldn't reach consensus on what the policy and the law should be. Well, maybe they could have if Donald Trump hadn't intervened to block proposed bipartisan immigration legislation, just to keep the issue alive for the 2024 presidential campaign. Against that backdrop, I'm baffled that Bier doesn't point out that, for President Trump, the chaos and the cruelty are the point. June Ailin Sewell, Marina del Rey .. To the editor: The article raises an important point: Support for border enforcement doesn't justify extreme or harmful policies. Many voters expected a more thoughtful, humane approach, not one that detains families or rushes deportations without considering individual circumstances. These methods don't reflect the values of fairness and dignity most Americans still believe in. People say that tough enforcement is about following the law, but without compassion, the law does more harm than intended. Enforcing immigration policies should involve smart case-by-case judgment and not punishment for everyone. A better approach would balance safety with empathy and recognize that real solutions come from true understanding, not fear. Patricia Geronimo, Redondo Beach This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NATO chief calls for 400% boost in the alliance's missile defenses
LONDON (AP) — NATO members need to increase their air and missile defenses by 400% to counter the threat from Russia, the head of the military alliance plans to say on Monday. Secretary-General Mark Rutte will say during a visit to London that NATO must take a 'quantum leap in our collective defense' to face growing instability and threats, according to extracts released by NATO before Rutte's speech. Rutte is due to meet U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer at 10 Downing St. ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands where the 32-nation alliance is likely to commit to a big hike in military spending. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Starmer has pledged to increase British defense spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 and to 3% by 2034. Rutte has proposed a target of 3.5% of economic output on military spending and another 1.5% on 'defense-related expenditure' such as roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports. He said last week he is confident the alliance will agree to the target at its summit in The Hague on June 24-25. At the moment, 22 of the 32 member countries meet or exceed NATO's current 2% target. The new target would meet a demand by U.S. President Donald Trump that member states spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't contribute enough. Rutte plans to say in a speech at the Chatham House think tank in London that NATO needs thousands more armored vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defense. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' he plans to say. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' European NATO members, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Last week the U.K. government said it would build new nuclear-powered attack submarines, prepare its army to fight a war in Europe and become 'a battle-ready, armor-clad nation.' The plans represent the most sweeping changes to British defenses since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago.
