No limit to ChatGPT searches ‘remarkable' given environmental impact
Shielded from the midday blazing heat and the roar of motor cars in a darkened tent, Future Lab displayed technologies, robotics and virtual realities to excite the imaginations of festival goers in Chichester on Saturday.
Among the displays was a humanoid robot, with moving, re-active facial features powered by ChatGPT responses, creators call it Ameca.
Major Peake, the first British man to visit the International Space Station, has worked with Future Lab since its first iteration in 2017.
Despite his excitement about the new technologies and possible uses of artificial intelligence (AI), he acknowledged the environmental impact of data centres used to run them.
He told the PA news agency: 'There is no limit to how much they can use ChatGPT, they can be streaming cat videos and making avatars and doing what they want with no – no concern of how much energy that is using and how much water is using to cool.
'It's limitless, and it shouldn't be. Every single google search is having an impact, and an AI google search is a 30% increase in energy to function than a standard Google search and you don't even get the choice now.'
Tech companies have hugely increased their water consumption needs for cooling data centres in recent years, according to The Times, writing one 100 word email using the (GP-4) version of the chatbot is equivalent to a 500ml water bottle.
'Maybe that's what we need next to the google search box – 'please search responsibly',' the former astronaut added.
Business Energy UK has estimated that ChatGPT may presently use around 39.98 Million kWh per day — enough to charge eight million phones.
Major Peake was quick to argue that the answers lie in space, using 'orbital data centres', he added that he was working with a company, Axium Space, who were set to launch two nodes later this year.
He explained: 'The idea being that by the mid-2030s you have cost-parity between choosing an Orbital data centre vs a cloud server – you know, a database that would be here on earth.
'Because in space you've got clean, free limitless energy and you've got limitless ability to have thermal rejection into the vacuum of space with no impact on the environment.'
Critics of this approach, such as Dr Domenico Vicinanza – associate professor of intelligent systems and data science at Anglia Ruskin University in the UK, say it may not be that simple.
'Space-based data centres would require not only the data equipment but also the infrastructure to protect, power, and cool them. All of which add up in weight and complexity,' Dr Vicinanza told the BBC.
Asked about space and the environment, Major Peake said: 'It might not hold all the answers but it holds many answers and it forms a large percentage of the solution I think.
'In terms of right now, more than 50% of our climate data is coming from space so it's the finger on the pulse of the planet.'
The displays at Future Lab presented a window into the cutting edge of science, mapping deep space, exploring the depths of the ocean, and the latest AI and robotics.
The CEO of the National Robotarium, Stuart Miller, said the event 'helped people understand what's coming' and added that they wanted to ask how robots and humans can 'live in harmony together'.
Ameca, the humanoid robot created by Cornwall-based company Engineered Arts, was the star attraction for many – able to hold and double back to parts of a conversation and answer questions quickly.
Major Peake said: 'Her non-verbal responses really surprised me, and then you realise that's AI's interpretation of human interaction as well so it's not just the verbal responses you're getting, you're getting the AI response in terms of non-verbal skills.'
Surrounded by cars, in a corner of a field in Chichester, some of the UK's newest scientific innovations piqued the interest of the crowds, but Major Peake acknowledged there has to be 'a balance' in how much AI should do, and considered whether it erodes human curiosity.
'There is absolutely a balance and that's why it's important to educate people that AI's just a tool – a tool for humans to use.' he said.
Later asking: 'Does ChatGPT, does AI just make it too easy for us? Does it just give it to us rather than making us work for it? And how much pleasure is there in actually finding something out rather than just reading and learning something?'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
Meta's Zuckerberg bets hundreds of billions on AI data centers
Mark Zuckerberg said on Monday that Meta Platforms would spend hundreds of billions of dollars to build several massive AI data centers for superintelligence, intensifying his pursuit of a technology he has chased with a talent war for top engineers. Julian Satterthwaite reports.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Is the new Range Rover Electric worth £170,000? I drove it to find out
It's finally here. Sort of. The Range Rover Electric will not be available until 2026, despite initial suggestions of an on-sale date in the latter half of this year. Nothing more precise than that, with no indication of prices either. But prototypes and pre-production cars exist on the world's testing facilities as well as on the roads around Land Rover's Solihull base. And I have driven one of these prototypes, during the Goodwood Festival of Speed, to see how it measures up. The rumoured cost is about £170,000 – roughly equivalent to the V8 petrol version, which was the benchmark for this newcomer since gestation and during development. The Range Rover line-up starts at £105,675. Despite the lack of hard figures, Range Rover says that it has a 'client waiting list' of 62,000 souls. What we do know is that the battery is a 118kWh (useable) item. There's 550PS (542bhp) and 850Nm (627lb ft) of torque, with a range in the region of 300-330 miles and a 0-62mph sprint time of about 4.5 seconds, although no performance figures have been announced yet. 'It's a Range Rover first, an EV second,' can be heard a lot; all the engineers and development drivers have been well versed in this mantra. Test drive My all-too-brief introduction to the Range Rover Electric was to demonstrate its abilities over a series of daunting obstacles of the type used during development. Essentially the aim was for the EV to do everything the existing combustion models can – and perhaps a little more, since careful calibration of the torque delivery allows the electric drivetrain to 'talk' to existing electronic systems such as Hill Descent Control. The first is a series of crazy-looking ramps to simulate crawling over massive boulders, which pitch one (sometimes two) wheels in the air while balancing precariously. As with all off-roading, smooth and gentle is the key to progress (the desire not to prang a development car also prompts caution). Suffice to say that the car was more composed than its driver, imparting a feeling of stability and control via a zillion calculations monitoring progress. It's called Integrated Traction Management and ensures that the prodigious torque doesn't overwhelm the amount of grip. The second test is a ramp, which doesn't look that steep until you start to drive up it and can see only the sky. Fortunately the car's surround camera system displays images of ahead and below for guidance. Gently over the top, then let the car demonstrate its seamless integration of single-pedal driving and Hill Descent Control. How so? Simply take your foot off the accelerator and let the car creep its way down. The third is a simple-looking diagonal crossing of an obstacle, once again with the low-speed Rock Crawl setting engaged. The surprise comes as the vehicle's weight makes it tip, forcing the electronic systems to prevent it rolling off. It would have been interesting to do the same course in a V8 Range Rover for direct comparison, although the development engineers insist that the fast-responding electric drive units provide greater ease of use and improved control (compared with the complex sequence of sucking and pumping inherent in a combustion engine). JLR claims that in detecting and managing wheel slip, the EVs set-up is 100 times faster than the combustion cars. It's all about the calibration – a phrase that occurs frequently throughout the afternoon. What's all the fuss about? For those who still believe that electric cars should have futuristic, quasi-spaceship styling to emphasise their cutting-edge technology, the greatest surprise about this EV Range Rover is how normal it looks. Extra charging flap aside, they are identical. It's the same story inside. Land Rover has even retained its traditional capstan gearlever, although it performs different functions than it does in the combustion-engined cars; the S is for single-pedal driving (with regenerative braking) rather than Sport mode. It all emphasises that the Range Rover Electric is an alternative to the existing line-up, not a replacement. Electric drivetrain The advantages of battery power are a linear response to the accelerator along with effortless torque delivery. Initial rumours had suggested the Range Rover Electric might have three or even four drive motors, yet in the final set-up there are only two, one at each end of the car. It's four-wheel drive, obviously, with a slight rearward bias in the power delivery. The battery and control electronics were developed in-house and are currently produced in Wolverhampton, which has the added benefit of bolstering Land Rover's credentials for Britishness. Chief engineer Simon Fairbrother explained that the 118kWh battery has 344 cells using NMC chemistry, in two decks of 172, made possible by the vehicle's height. With a 350kW charging capability (assuming you can find any such super-fast chargers in the UK), charging the battery from 10 to 80 per cent is claimed to take only 20 minutes. The clever bit is the thermal management, so that heat can be directed to where it is needed (to warm the electric motors or optimise charging in cold weather, for instance). Range Rover claims that its Thermal Assist system is so sophisticated that it can recover heat even when the external temperature is minus 15 degrees centigrade. It's a claim that's hard to dispute, but impressive none the less. In reverse, the system channels excess heat within the battery pack to the atmosphere via a system of radiators and vents. Electric always planned The current Range Rover, which has the internal designation L460, was designed to be an EV from the outset. Hence it can be built on the same production line as the existing models. Currently, the combustion cars have the engine, gearbox, mechanical four-wheel-drive gubbins and associated subframes lifted in the bodyshell. In the EV, the battery and electric motors are raised instead (obviously there's no longer a mechanical linkage between engine and driveshafts). The only difference is that it takes slightly longer to 'marry' the EV drivetrain, as there are more bolts to tighten. Fairbrother added that the frame around the battery pack improves the torsional stiffness of the car, while the centre of gravity is also lowered compared with a combustion model. The suspension has twin-chamber air springs as standard, to better manage pitch and squat under acceleration and braking, which are potentially more pronounced in this version than in the current combustion cars due to the virtually instantaneous torque delivery. Do you want one? Although Jaguar announced long ago that it's going to be an all-electric brand, this Range Rover is in fact parent company JLR's first battery-powered production car. Lessons learnt during its ongoing development will no doubt inform Jaguar's controversial electric GT. Range Rovers have always featured V8 engines, so the concept of a battery-powered version is still alien to some. For that tranche of buyers, there will still be petrol, diesel and hybrid options. But in truth the silence and smoothness of an electric powertrain suits a luxury car; the improvements in these areas (not that combustion-engined Range Rovers are particularly bothersome) ensure the electric version complements the existing line-up. We'll have to see when we drive the finished car, but on the evidence thus far the Range Rover Electric might just be the best of the bunch.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
To hoard or not to hoard? UK consumers on the pros and cons of cash
It was while walking to his local Co-op that Ty, a 27-year-old student in Brighton, noticed a strangely long queue for the cashpoint. In the shop, a staff member told Ty the payment systems were down after a cyber-attack. It was cash only. But Ty didn't need to join the queue. Instead, he felt vindicated. It was another instance that justified his recent switch to using physical currency instead of digital payments. 'I've started in the last few months to favour cash again, using it almost exclusively, to the point where I refuse to shop in places that take card only,' he says. Ty is one of a number of people in the UK who have turned back to banknotes in recent years. Despite cash being used for only 12% of UK payments in 2023, collapsing from 51% in 2013, according to UK Finance, data from the Bank of England suggests the value of banknotes in circulation has jumped 23% since before the pandemic. The Bank's chief cashier, Victoria Cleland, has said UK households are building cash contingency pots as they did during the pandemic and cost of living crisis in response to high-profile incidents such as the recent energy blackout in Spain and Portugal and the cyber-attacks on Marks & Spencer, The Co-op and Harrods. Repeated IT outages at Britain's largest banks and building societies will not have helped consumer confidence in under-pressure digital systems. Ty says: 'Unlike card, cash is private and doesn't leave data about the purchase, it doesn't cost the merchant transaction fees, it's easier to manage owing to its physicality – using a card makes spending too easy – and it won't fail you in the event of a systems outage.' Ty's preference for cash began while working at a building society. He says he witnessed first-hand that, if the electronic systems went down, it was 'exceedingly difficult to do anything', which made him doubt the reliability of modern payment methods. For David, it was being in Granada when Spain's energy blackout struck that changed his behaviour. He says there was a sense of uncertainty about power returning, and that 'if you didn't have cash you weren't going to eat or drink and the ATMs were down'. The retired 64-year-old, who is based in Bury, had a little cash on him so he was able to buy a warm beer from an out-of-action fridge. David says he had switched to become a cashless household in recent years, but since experiencing the blackout he has taken out physical currency. 'We now have cash easily accessible at home just in case,' he says. The preference for cash is so strong for Annie*, in her early 40s and living in East Sussex, that she walks out of businesses which are card-only. 'I love cash,' she says. 'It's reliable and doesn't break like electronic payment systems, which seem to be breaking, crashing and going down more and more these days.' Annie says her mother feels the same way, and recently, while in Lewes, the pair visited – and left – several cafes before finding one that accepted cash. She says the decision showed her displeasure at what in her view is a slow creep towards a cashless society, which she feels is 'heading down the wrong track' and erasing freedom of choice. 'It's like making a stand,' she says. 'I know it's just me, one lonely little person … At the moment, I feel like it probably isn't making a difference. But it's my own principles and morals. I don't want to see the death of cash.' Nearly 33m withdrawals were made from Nationwide's ATMs last year, up 4.6% on 2023 and building on budgeting trends seen during the cost of living crisis such as 'cash stuffing'. Not everyone, however, is convinced that a return to cash is necessary. Dave, a 61-year-old in Preston, hates using physical money. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion 'I just found the whole business – of carrying cash, extracting cash from cash points, ending up with pockets full of change, throwing it into jars when you got home – just nonsense,' he says. 'Pockets are thin cotton. You shove a load of metal in there, it weighs down and wears out your pocket.' He was happy to jettison notes and coins and feels that 'people panic too much' about a potential emergency. 'If the infrastructure went down for a week I might worry about it,' he says, and he does keep about £100 in the house. 'But I'm not hoarding money just for the sake of hoarding money.' In Essex, Ruth's distaste for cash and fondness for Apple Pay – 'it's so convenient' – meant she travelled to Italy's Amalfi coast for a family holiday last year without taking out any euros for the trip. She didn't use cash once in Italy, and barely even used her bank card. 'The only time I used my card was when I actually paid for the hotel,' she says, and she could barely recall her pin number. Ruth, a 63-year-old social housing worker in Essex, says handling cash is too inconvenient. 'I hate [it] if I get coppers or 5ps. I think, what do you do with them? I feel like throwing them away,' she says. 'As much as many of my friends scowl, I actually like being cashless.' Ruth also says that 'some, not all' people she's aware of who prefer to use only cash 'are doing dodgy deals, tax avoidance'. Seeing the blackout and chaos in Spain and Portugal, however, has meant she plans to take about €400 (£345) in cash for her next holiday, just in case. And she did find cash useful when teaching her children maths, letting them go to the shops and keep the change if they counted it correctly. After the Iberian blackout, she also took out £100 for emergencies. 'I put it in the cupboard,' she says. *Some names changed.
