Trump Avoids Media Interaction As Putin Questioned On Civilian Killings In Ukraine
One journalist directed a sharp question at President Putin, asking when Russia would stop killing civilians in Ukraine.
US President Donald Trump welcomed Russian President Vladimir Putin to Anchorage, Alaska, with a red carpet reception as the much-anticipated summit between the two leaders officially began. The two presidents briefly posed for the media before proceeding to the meeting venue, but not before facing a barrage of pointed questions from reporters.
One journalist directed a sharp question at President Putin, asking when Russia would stop killing civilians in Ukraine. The Russian leader appeared startled and responded by pretending not to hear the question. President Trump glanced at Putin, and the two briefly exchanged words in what seemed to be a light, private conversation.
Moments later, both leaders were seen smiling as Trump placed a hand on Putin's back, guiding him toward the presidential limousine, nicknamed 'The Beast." The pair then made their way to the main summit venue.
Inside, the summit commenced under the banner 'Pursuing Peace." Seated with their respective envoys, Trump and Putin again posed for the press. Yet once more, Putin faced uncomfortable questions about civilian casualties in Ukraine. The moment was cut short when Trump abruptly ended the photo op, thanking the media. Putin, meanwhile, maintained a bemused expression, appearing surprised by the press's persistence.
🚨BREAKING: Shortly after a reporter asks Putin if he'll commit to stop killing innocent civilians, Trump KICKS out the press pool.He is protecting Putin. pic.twitter.com/e3ykyIfRtZ
— CALL TO ACTIVISM (@CalltoActivism) August 15, 2025
The two leaders are expected to find a possible solution for the Russia-Ukraine conflict in today's high-stakes meet.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
a minute ago
- Economic Times
Waiting for US citizenship? Immigration authorities to now scrutinize applicants' good moral character
In an effort to tighten access to U.S. immigration benefits, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced a major policy shift, restoring a stricter and more comprehensive assessment of the 'good moral character' (GMC) requirement for foreign nationals seeking American citizenship. "Among other eligibility factors, aliens applying for naturalization must demonstrate that he or she has been and continues to be an individual of good moral character (GMC). Evaluating GMC involves more than a cursory mechanical review focused on the absence of wrongdoing. It entails a holistic assessment of an alien's behavior, adherence to societal norms, and positive contributions that affirmatively demonstrate good moral character," the policy memorandum, issued on August 15, read. The policy highlights that while certain offenses—such as murder, aggravated felonies, torture, or genocide—remain permanent and unconditional bars to naturalization, officials must now also assess evidence of rehabilitation and reformation in other cases. Read more: Trump's DOJ ramps up push to strip naturalized Americans of citizenship In fiscal 2024 (year ended Sept 30), 8.18 lakh foreign nationals acquired US citizenship. Mexicans led with as many as 1.07 lakh becoming American citizens (13% of the total), this was followed by Indians, with a little over 49,000 (or 6% of the total) acquiring US citizenship. Positive attributes and contributions such as sustained community involvement and contributions in the US; family caregiving, responsibility, and ties in the US; educational attainments; stable and lawful employment history and achievements; length of lawful residence in the US, compliance with tax obligations and financial responsibility in the US will carry greater weight. Read more: US tightens family immigration policy with stricter vetting and interview rules What are key features of the policy? As per the policy published by the USCIS, the officers must account for positive attributes and not simply the absence of misconduct. "In evaluating whether or not an alien has met the requirement of establishing GMC, the officer must take a holistic approach in evaluating whether or not an alien seeking naturalization has affirmatively established that he or she has met their burden of establishing that they are worthy of assuming the rights and responsibilities of United States Citizenship," according to the document. USCIS will place greater emphasis on the applicant's positive attributes and contributions in GMC determinations. These positive factors include, but are not limited to: • Sustained community involvement and contributions in the United States. • Family caregiving, responsibility, and ties in the United States. • Educational attainment. • Stable and lawful employment history and achievements. • Length of lawful residence in the United States. • Compliance with tax obligations and financial responsibility in the United States. Any hope for applicants with past 'wrongdoing'? However, there is a glimmer of hope for applicants with a record of past 'wrongdoing.' Under the new guidelines, USCIS officials will consider concrete evidence of rehabilitation—such as repayment of taxes, adherence to court-ordered conditions, or testimonials from community members. Such proof may still support a determination of good moral character, despite a negative history, as long as no permanent bar is in place.
The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
New start: on the Alaska summit and the Ukraine war
The much-anticipated summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, did not yield a breakthrough on the Ukraine war but appeared to narrow the gaps between their positions on how to end the conflict. While Ukraine was the most contentious issue on the agenda, the summit was significant for several reasons. Relations between the world's two largest nuclear powers have been defined by hostility and mutual distrust. A stable, predictable relationship and the prospect of a new arms control pact — hinted at by Mr. Putin — are critical not just for stability in Eastern Europe but also for broader global stability. Yet, rebuilding Russo-American ties is inconceivable without peace in Ukraine. All sides in the Ukraine war publicly claim that they are committed to peace, but they differ sharply on how to achieve it. Ukraine and its European partners have called for an immediate ceasefire, a demand reiterated by Mr. Trump before meeting Mr. Putin. Russia has resisted calls for a ceasefire, insisting instead on a comprehensive peace agreement that addresses what Mr. Putin calls the conflict's 'root causes'. Mr. Trump appeared to endorse the Russian line when he said 'the best way to end the horrific war' is to go directly to a peace agreement. While the downside of the summit was its failure to deliver a breakthrough, the positive side is that it opened a diplomatic path that could lead to conflict resolution. Mr. Trump, who claimed that he and Mr. Putin agreed on 'many points', spoke with European, NATO and Ukrainian leaders after the meeting. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to visit the White House on Monday to discuss Mr. Putin's proposal. Mr. Trump also suggested that it is now 'up to Zelenskyy' to strike a deal with Russia, 'a very big power'. Russia has consistently made three core demands to end the war — recognition for the Ukrainian territories it has annexed and Ukraine's 'neutrality' and 'demilitarisation'. Post-summit reports suggest that Mr. Putin is open to freezing the war along the frontlines in the south (Zaporizhzhia and Kherson) provided Russia retains full control of Donbas (Donetsk and Luhansk). A settlement could also involve Russian withdrawal in the northeast (Kharkiv). Ukraine has so far said that it would not concede land for peace. The challenge before Mr. Trump is to sustain the talks aimed at narrowing the differences further to reach a workable compromise. While it makes perfect sense to end the war on practical terms, Mr. Trump should not impose an agreement on Kyiv. Peace would prevail in Eastern Europe only if Ukraine's security concerns are addressed and it is provided with credible assurances that Russia would not invade it again.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘One language, one voice': Trump admin enforces English-only policy; Housing Dept removes translated material from website
Department of Housing and Urban Development (Image: X/@HUDgov) The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is moving to make English the sole language for nearly all of its services and operations, New York Post reported quoting an internal memo. HUD Deputy Secretary Andrew Hughes wrote that the policy shift follows President Trump's March executive order declaring English the official language of the United States. The memo, to be sent Monday, instructs HUD leadership to begin implementing the changes immediately. 'We are one people, united, and we will speak with one voice and one language to deliver on our mission of expanding housing that is affordable, helping those in need, caring for our most vulnerable Americans, and revitalizing rural, tribal, and urban communities,' the memo read. The policy does include limited exceptions. HUD will still provide translation services in cases required by law, such as under the Americans with Disabilities Act or the Violence Against Women Act. The department will also continue to provide accommodations for people who are hearing- or vision-impaired. 'HUD will continue to ensure that all persons have meaningful access to HUD programs and services,' Hughes stressed, adding that the department also 'will continue to provide communication services to the hearing and seeing impaired, and persons with related disabilities.' Until now, HUD supported translation into more than 200 languages and even operated a dedicated interpretation line for immigrants with limited English proficiency. That approach began under President Bill Clinton in 2001, who signed an executive order to expand language access to federal services. Trump's executive order revoked Clinton's directive and HUD officials say rolling back translation services will cut costs. It noted that 'nothing in this order, however, requires or directs any change in the services provided by any agency.' Hughes directed that all non-English materials be removed from HUD offices and websites and replaced with English-only versions. The new changes at department are set to be 'effective immediately'. 'All HUD communications, correspondence, and physical and digital published materials will be produced exclusively in English and that we will no longer offer non-English translation services,' Hughes' memo states. 'Additionally, please immediately remove all printed or digital collateral about non-English translation services currently displayed in HUD offices or HUD-funded facilities. Printed or digital collateral not in English can be replaced with an English-only version.' The justice department issued guidance to all federal agencies last month on implementing Trump's executive order. It plans to release updated instructions in about six months, along with a public comment period to consider possible revisions.
