Israel-Iran conflict: G7 leaders including Trump urge 'de-escalation' on Iran
The Group of Seven (G7) countries meeting in Canada for 51st Summit in a joint statement has urged for 'de-escalation' on Iran as tensions in the Middle East continue to rise.
The countries in their joint statement said that Israel has 'right to defend itself', adding that 'Iran can never have a nuclear weapon'.
"We affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself," the statement said. "We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
by Taboola
by Taboola
"We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza."
Trump leaves G7 Summit early
US President Donald Trump abruptly left the Group of Seven summit on Monday, departing a day early as the conflict between Israel and Iran intensified and the U.S. leader declared that Tehran should be evacuated 'immediately.'
Live Events
World leaders had gathered in Canada with the specific goal of helping to defuse a series of global pressure points, only to be disrupted by a showdown over Iran's nuclear program that could escalate in dangerous and uncontrollable ways. Israel launched an aerial bombardment campaign against Iran four days ago.
At the summit, Trump warned that Tehran needs to curb its nuclear program before it's 'too late.' He said Iranian leaders would 'like to talk' but they had already had 60 days to reach an agreement on their nuclear ambitions and failed to do so before the Israeli aerial assault began. 'They have to make a deal,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
13 minutes ago
- India Today
Chinese chatter: Why Beijing is worried about Modi's G7 visit
As Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits Canada to attend the G7 talks, two big concerns seem to have gripped China's strategic G7 jointly deal with China's rare-earth control?Beijing's restrictions on rare earth exports in recent months disrupted global supply chains, particularly in the defence and automobile sectors. The Indian automobile industry was not Chinese sources, Beijing has been actively negotiating the issue with various countries, including India. On June 12, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong visited New Delhi and met Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri and National Security Advisor Doval. The key agenda reportedly was to see if a deal could be reached where India's requirement for rare earths was exchanged for China's requirement of resuming direct flights between New Delhi and Direct flights are important for China from an economic perspective, because they ensure more Indian customers purchase raw materials and semi-finished products from the Chinese the Chinese side is upset that while on one hand, India is negotiating with China, on the other hand, it is publicly criticising it for abusing its dominant position in key minerals, portraying it as an "unreliable or untrustworthy" supplier, and loudly warning the world to be vigilant against China's "weaponisation of resources."India, the Chinese argued, is also threatening to look for alternative sources of rare earths around the world and accelerate the development of domestic rare earth reserves so as to reduce its dependence on China. The Chinese side noted that India was not the only one. On the eve of the G7 Summit, the United States, the European Union, Japan, and other countries jointly called for the establishment of a "rare earth security supply chain" to reduce dependence on China. Given the global trends, there is concern in Beijing that G7 leaders could take up the issue of jointly dealing with China's control of rare-earth prevent the formation of a global front against China's export control measures, the Chinese strategy has been to avoid a "one-size-fits-all" blockade for all. Chinese officials have also been negotiating individually with each nation on a case-by-case India, the overall sentiment is that, given India's continued unfriendly attitude, it rightly "deserves the pain". Chinese strategists further issued a warning that the G7 could do little to address India's rare-earth crisis. On the other hand, given India's industrial strength, it will probably take a long time for Indian companies to use the rare earth materials produced independently. Therefore, India has little choice but to continue importing rare earths from China, on Chinese Indian diplomacy balance the West and South?The other question that dominated the Chinese discourse was whether Indian diplomacy could balance the interests of the West and the Global has always been suspicious of the G7 platform. Despite the intergovernmental body actively inviting China to join it from 1999 to 2006, China has repeatedly refused, stating it would have to accept and abide by the rules set by the West and assume the international responsibilities assigned by them. It feared that joining the G7 would mean that China would either be subjected to a second 'Plaza Accord', humiliated like Russia, or lose the trust of the vast third world or the developing India, they noted, has chosen a different path. Foreign Minister S Jaishankar once positioned India as a "southwest country", implying it was a bridge between the West and the global South. India, they argued, is seeking to leverage the support of the G7, a Western camp platform, to demonstrate the international community's recognition of its economic size, to strengthen its global economic voice, and thereby enhance its influence in the global goal of becoming a developed country by 2045 is, in a way, also putting pressure on China, whose official stance is that "it will always be a developing country". China has long complained that the West's continuous attempts to force China to become a developed country are really only a ploy, aimed at slowing down China's economic development."India cannot have its cake and eat it too', argued Hu Shisheng, deputy secretary-general of the Academic Committee at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, adding that 'the roles it plays in the West and the global South are mutually contradictory, and India will sooner than later find itself in a rather isolated situation, where it fails to please either side'.advertisementHe cited India's absence from Russia's Victory Day parade or its refusal to criticise the US tariff war at the BRICS Foreign Ministers' Meeting as evidence of India's policy of being a fence-sitter, 'playing both sides', thereby causing dissatisfaction among countries of the South, and diluting their Minister Modi's C position in the group photo of the 2024 G7 summit created ripples on the Chinese internet last year. This year too, China will keep a close eye on the G7 Summit to accurately grasp the geopolitical headwinds.(Antara Ghosal Singh is Fellow, ORF, New Delhi. She is a graduate from Tsinghua University, China, and has been a Chinese language fellow at the National Central University, Taiwan)(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Tune InMust Watch
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘They are spreading hatred': Damdami Taksal criticises pro-Khalistan groups in Canada ahead of G7 Summit
In a rare public statement, Sikh seminary Damdami Taksal Monday openly criticised pro-Khalistan groups in Canada for their recent anti-India demonstrations ahead of the G7 Summit, which Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to attend. Professor Sarchand Singh Khyala, spokesperson for Damdami Taksal and a BJP leader, said in a statement, 'In the video, I can see that innocent children aged between five and seven years disrespecting the pictures of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The pro-Khalistani people are spewing venom against India. They are spreading hatred by brainwashing children, and I strongly condemn this,' Khyala said. Khyala also praised PM Modi, who reached Canada Tuesday for the G7 Summit at Kananaskis in Alberta, for his efforts on behalf of the Sikh community. 'Sikhs are known for their brotherly harmony and for helping people. PM Modi has done a lot for our Sikh community. Whatever has not been done in the last 70 years, PM Modi has done it. This is the reason PM Modi has been awarded the Qaumi Seva Award by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) for his contributions to the Sikh community,' he said. Khyala was the spokesperson for Damdami Taksal, and he has continued to communicate with the media on behalf of the organisation even after joining the BJP in January 2022 during the Punjab Assembly elections campaign. Damdami Taksal, which primarily focuses on training Sikh preachers, previously supported the BJP in Maharashtra during the 2024 Assembly polls. It maintains influence within the Sikh community through its network of trained preachers and maintains links to several gurdwaras, including some under SGPC management and others in countries such as the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. It was once led by Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, the radical Sikh preacher who was killed in Operation Bluestar in 1984. Bhindranwale was seen as a prominent figure by many within the Damdami Taksal.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump order denies treatment to US army veterans; political allegiance and marital status new criteria; doctors allowed to reject patients
AP file photo New rules at US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals now allow doctors and healthcare staff to refuse treatment to veterans who are Democrats or unmarried. The changes were introduced quietly after an executive order signed by US President Donald Trump in January, and they have already taken effect in some facilities. Earlier, VA staff were explicitly prohibited from discriminating based on political affiliation, marital status, or union membership. That language has now been removed from the department's bylaws. The VA says that 'all eligible veterans will always be welcome' and that they are still entitled to treatment. However, under the new rules, individual staff members can now refuse to treat patients based on personal traits that are not specifically protected under federal law. The new rules, accessed by The Guardian, apply not just to doctors but also to psychologists, dentists, and several other healthcare roles. They also permit hiring discrimination against medical staff based on similar personal factors. The executive order was mainly aimed at removing federal protections for transgender individuals. It also banned the use of terms like 'transgender' in VA clinics and led to cuts in gender-affirming care. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Doctor: This 10-Second Morning Ritual Helps Drain Swollen Legs (See How) goldentree Learn More Undo These changes are part of a wider policy shift under the Trump administration. VA health researchers are now facing tighter controls, including a requirement to get political approval before publishing in scientific journals. Veterans advocacy groups warn that the new rule may impact rural veterans and survivors of military sexual trauma the most. According to Tia Christopher, a Navy veteran, some patients could be forced to travel more than 100 miles just to find a doctor willing to treat them. Experts are also concerned by the lack of consultation, as VA doctors were not involved in the changes. The VA has not denied this. Medical organisations, including the American Medical Association, are also pushing back. At a meeting this week, the AMA passed a resolution urging hospitals to preserve doctors' autonomy and involve them in rule-making. The Department of Veterans Affairs runs the largest integrated hospital system in the United States, with over 170 hospitals and 1,000 clinics. It employs around 26,000 doctors and provides care to nearly 9 million patients each year.
