It's supposed to bring medical care to the homeless. Why isn't it operational?
Some people are worried and wonder if the program will ever become what was promised.
In October 2024, the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (TPCHD) and the City of Tacoma announced the Street Medicine Pilot Program — funded by a $1 million grant from the Washington State Health Care Authority.
According to an Oct. 22 news release announcing the program, the street medicine teams would be composed of medical and behavioral health professionals, including a medical provider, a behavioral health professional and a community health worker.
'This program will bring crucial healthcare services directly to people living unsheltered,' the release stated. 'The program will deploy specially trained Street Medicine Teams to provide care to individuals living in encampments, tent cities, vehicles, and other unsheltered locations.'
During a Tacoma Pierce County Coalition to End Homelessness meeting on May 2, a representative from the department gave an update on the program.
Bianca Shell, program manager for the street medicine program, said the department is working on hiring staff for the team. She was hired in March.
Shell reported the program had hired two peer-support specialists, a homelessness liaison and a nurse with a behavioral health background. She said the department is in negotiations with a medical doctor and a nurse practitioner.
Shell said the program likely would not be fully staffed until September 2025.
She attributed the delay to an overall shortage in healthcare specialists following the pandemic and said the organization of Pierce County's street medicine team is different than in other places with similar programs.
Shell said in other places teams are organized and operated directly by healthcare providers, such as hospitals or clinics. Pierce County's is being facilitated by the health department, which typically does not administer health care.
'I don't know the exact reasons as to why not, but that puts us at a disadvantage. Because you have a health department who is trying to stand up this team when the health department historically has not done this kind of work,' Shell told members of the coalition. 'So that also accounts for some of the delay.'
By late June, Shell said she anticipates being able to deploy large vans in the community to distribute supplies and offer medical exams in some capacity. She said the program will have to form partnerships to be able to host the vans in parking lots and other areas with encampments.
To date, the program has distributed hygiene kits and opioid overdose-reversing medicine around the community. She estimated the program has helped distribute supplies to more than 500 people.
Sally Perkins is a local homeless advocate who does volunteer street outreach in Tacoma's Hilltop Neighborhood. During the May 2 meeting, Perkins expressed some of her frustrations with the rollout of the program.
'This is the first truthful presentation we have had on street medicine yet,' Perkins said following Shell's presentation. 'We've been gaslighted for months.'
Perkins said the timeline and progress of the program has been 'obfuscated' by both the City of Tacoma and TPCHD.
'Fast forward to May 2025. Still not up and running,' Perkins wrote to The News Tribune in an email. 'Handing out supplies is something that random volunteers like ME can do … for free.'
Perkins told The News Tribune she is concerned the street medicine team would not be what was promised — a program that brings health care 'directly' to those who need it.
She said she did not like the plan to park a street medicine van in one location and require those living unhoused to find it, which she said could be difficult for sick and mobility-impared individuals.
During the 2024 survey of those living unhoused in Pierce County, volunteers counted 2,661 people living unhoused in a single night. Of those surveyed, 25% reported having a chronic health condition, and 22% reported having a physical disability.
'This is not true street medicine and was not the intent of the original Legislative proviso, as I understand that proviso,' Perkins wrote to The News Tribune. 'And as far as I can see, there is no way for me, who is out talking to unsheltered people fairly regularly, to call this team directly and get them to show up when they are needed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scientific American
20 hours ago
- Scientific American
Second U.S. Malaria Case Not Tied to Travel Raises Fears of Local Transmission
Health officials are investigating a case of possibly locally acquired malaria in New Jersey, just weeks after a health department in Washington State launched a similar investigation. The cases are sparking alarm over rising risks of mosquito-borne illnesses as climates warm. According to the New Jersey Department of Health and the state's Department of Environmental Protection, a resident of Morris County with no recent history of travel possibly came down with the mosquito-borne disease, which is marked by fever, headaches, chills and gastrointestinal symptoms. While the state sees about 100 cases of malaria that are contracted abroad each year, if confirmed, the Morris County case will be New Jersey's first case of locally acquired malaria since 1991. Washington State has reported a similar case. A patient in Pierce County with no recent travel history was diagnosed with possible malaria on August 2, prompting the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department to begin trapping and testing mosquitoes for the disease-causing Plasmodium parasite, which the insects transmit with their bites. If it is determined to be locally acquired, the case will be the first non-travel-related malaria infection known in Washington State. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Malaria was once common in North America but was eliminated from the U.S. by 1951 by a national campaign that pushed for pesticide use and drainage of mosquito breeding sites. Most of the country still hosts species of Anopheles mosquitoes that can transmit the Plasmodium parasite, however. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there have been around 150 cases of malaria caught within the U.S. in the past 50 years. The reason that these infections haven't triggered a wider epidemic is malaria's tricky transmission. The malaria-causing parasite can only be transmitted from a human host to a mosquito in a certain phase of its life cycle. The infected insect, carrying Plasmodium, then has to bite another person 10 to 15 days later, when the parasite has sufficiently developed, in order to transmit it back into a human. Mosquito lifespans in the wild aren't well known, says Photini Sinnis, who studies malaria transmission at the Malara Research Institute at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. But in the lab, the insects start to die of old age at around 20 days, meaning many may not live to make that malaria-transmitting bite. The Anopheles mosquitoes found in sub-Saharan Africa, where malaria is endemic, almost exclusively bite humans, so their chances of spreading the parasite are pretty high. Fortunately, the Anopheles species in the U.S. feed on multiple species, only biting humans if one happens to be nearby when they're looking for a blood meal. That means they're even less likely to bite two people, much less anyone in the tiny percentage of the population with infectious malaria. U.S.-acquired cases may be increasing—along with other mosquito-borne illness—however, as winters warm and summers lengthen, Sinnis says. Warmer weather means more mosquitoes, which means more opportunities for unlucky, disease-transmitting bites. While this likely still won't be enough to re-establish malaria as a common threat, one-off locally acquired cases could become more regular. 'It's all probabilities,' Sinnis says, 'and warmer winters just will increase those probabilities.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Change to state's suicide and crisis line has driven large increases in contacts
During Dianna Caber's 15-year tenure at South Sound 911 – the public safety answering center for a majority of fire and law enforcement agencies in Pierce County – dispatchers have rarely transferred anyone to a regional crisis and suicide hotline. Practically every call that reached their Tacoma communication center was handled by first responders. 'The only caller we were transferring to a crisis line before was someone who called and said 'can I talk to crisis?'' Caber, manager of the center, said. 'Outside of that, it was getting entered for a law enforcement or fire department response.' Practices fundamentally changed two years ago, after trained mental health counselors from the 988 Suicide & Crisis Life Line embeded themselves inside Sound Sound's call center under a state pilot program. Large numbers of calls are now diverted, at least partially, away from emergency responders like law enforcement. The shift is one component of broader and ambitious effort to overhaul Washington's behavioral health response system following the lauch of 988, which debuted across the country in July 2022 as a replacement for the National Suicide Prevention Hotline. Changing from the former suicide hotline number, 1-800-273-8255, to an easy-to-rember three-digit replacement drove a significant increase in volume. Record numbers have connected with trained counselors via phone, text and chat since 988 launched. In Washington, calls are up 52% from launch, according to a state report published last December. Text messages rose 923%. And call volumes have continued to grow monthly, said Courtney Colwell, director of 988 Services for Volunteers of America of Western Washington. Calls were up 37% since last year, and 8% between June in July. Volunteers of America, based in Everett, is one of three providers handling 988 calls in Washington. VOA handles calls from a vast majority of the state, excluding those in King and six counties near Spokane. Only about 10% of those calls require any sort of dispatch, Colwell said. About 10% of calls end with a mobile crisis outreach team being deployed, while about 2% might need a response from law enforcement or firefighters. 'A lot of people just need someone to talk to,' she said. Much of the work being done around 988 is still in its infancy, but has shown promising results, Caber says. Their partnership with Volunteers of America has been a 'huge benefit.' One of the biggest innovations has been conference calls, where a 911 call receiver and 988 counselor are on the line at the same time with a caller – able to give them advice as they wait for first responders. About 16% of calls are now being handled in this format, Colwell said, while the rest are flat transfers. Being together opens up many opportunities to support callers and maintain a 'no wrong door approach,' Caber said. "No matter who you call and where you go, we're going to get you to the right people." Someone to respond and somewhere to go From the beginning, Washington officials envisioned 988 as an entry point to a more comprehensive system, adopting legislation to enhance the state's behavioral health infrastructure to provide help beyond the initial call. The concept, based on the ideal crisis continuum outlined by the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, was that in addition to a crisis line to call, there would be local dispatch services and facilities for people to go for follow-up care. 'At launch, the promise for the future of Washington's lifeline was threefold: someone to call, someone to respond, and a place to go,' then-Gov. Jay Inslee wrote in a 2024 blog post. Three years later, much of those initial promises are still a work in progress, said Jolene Kron, executive director of the Salish Behavioral Health Administrative Services Organization. Several state workgroups continue to discuss the future of 988 and its role in the state's crisis system. A spokesperson for the Washington state Health Care Authority, the agency tasked with overseeing much of this work, did not make a representative available for an interview by press time. One of the questions is how 988 fits in with the existing local crisis lines. Salish, one of 10 state-funded regional behavioral health providers, runs its own behavioral health hotline – distinct from and created prior to the launch of 988 – for residents of Kitsap, Jefferson and Clallam Counties. The Salish Regional Crisis Line and 988 services coordinate with each other. Volunteers of America runs both, but they are separate entities. Kron said this requires some call transferring between the two lines, in an effort to maintain a no-wrong-door approach. In an emergency, an individual can call either line, she says. There are few transfers from 988 to the Salish Line, Kron said. Part of that is 988 has historically been used for suicide prevention, meaning most callers are only looking for someone to talk to and their issues are resolved on the phone. If a call needs an in-person response, it has to be transferred to Salish, Kron said. They are the only ones who can dispatch the mobile crisis outreach team run by the nonprofit Kitsap Mental Health Services. Kron said that is something that could be changed down the road. Challenges around georouting also exist for 988, to some degree, Kron said. Previously, when some dialed 988, their calls were routed to a call center based on their phone's area-code – not their actual location. That changed for major wireless carriers like T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T last year, but smaller providers still have this issue. 'Many of the folks we would be serving are probably not on those larger plans, so we continue to support folks using the Salish regional crisis line for most expedient direct access,' Kron said. 'There's not a barrier to using 988, it would just mean an additional call transfer.' This article originally appeared on Kitsap Sun: WA 988 suicide and crisis line seeing large number of calls
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Yellowknife pet owners fear emergencies after vet clinic temporarily closes
Yellowknife pet owners say they are fearful for their animals after the temporary closure of a veterinary clinic leaves the city with almost no emergency pet care. The Yellowknife Veterinary Clinic, run by Dr. Michael Hughes, will be closed for at least the remainder of August due to a family emergency, leaving only the newly established Aurora Veterinary Hospital in service. Hughes's clinic had a sign on the door last week advising clients of the closure and did not say when it will re-open. The Aurora Veterinary Hospital, which has one veterinarian, posted earlier this month that it's doing its best to be accessible after hours, and is offering a virtual triage service that charges $50 U.S. per case. "To be honest, it's scary," said Shelleen Branch, a Yellowknife dog owner who is one of Hughes's clients. Yellowknife, like the rest of the country, is dealing with a veterinary shortage. Along with Dr. Katie Denroche at the Aurora clinic, Dr. Michelle Tuma provides some services but does not have a clinic or provide emergency services. Outside of Yellowknife, there are no other permanent veterinary services in the N.W.T.; the nearest clinic outside the capital city is about a 10-hour drive away in Alberta. "Do I now have to drive, you know, to Grand Prairie or to Edmonton or something like that to get [my dog] like medical attention?" Branch said. Branch is taking her dog to Edmonton in the next week for surgery and she worries about bringing the animal back. "I have to fly now back to Yellowknife with my dog, now I have no vet for them," she said. Branch said she and her dogs appreciate Hughes, and she feels for what the vets are dealing with, having to service the entire territory. "When you only have two vets in town that not only have to service all the animals here in Yellowknife, but basically all of the animals like in the North essentially, like that's a lot on their plate," she said. Danika Williams spoke with CBC News on Saturday from Calgary where her dog was getting knee surgery. She's also worried about her dog's recovery when she returns to Yellowknife. Williams doesn't drive and said it would be difficult to get to Alberta in an emergency scenario. "It's like really unsettling knowing that if something happens with her knees with like the healing and I need an emergency visit, I'm not going to get an emergency visit," she said. Williams, who is a client of the Aurora Veterinary Hospital, said she worries the closure of the other clinic will further stretch her own veterinarian's limited resources. She said the Aurora clinic — which opened earlier this year — is still getting fully established. "They're trying their hardest to accommodate everyone and give the best advice and stuff as they can, but it's still scary," she said. Katie Lessard owns two senior pets and one "rambunctious young dog." She said the temporary closure has taken her anxiety "next level." "The fact that the next emergency vet is 1,000 kilometres away is absolutely terrifying," she wrote in a Facebook message. Lessard said the triage services offered by Aurora Veterinary Hospital aren't ideal in a true emergency, but she also gets why it's the best option they have. "I'm super grateful for Aurora vet," she wrote. "It's not realistic for one vet to take care of an entire territory 24/7."
