Vice Presidential election: Opposition to field consensus candidate, vows not to repeat past mistakes
Sources indicate that the bloc would announce its nominee only after the ruling NDA led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) confirms its candidate. A meeting of the Opposition bloc leaders is expected soon to pick a 'consensus candidate' as it wants to give a 'spirited fight'.
In the last VP election in 2022, the Trinamool Congress (TMC) refused to support senior Congress leader Margaret Alva, who was pitted against the NDA's Jagdeep Dhankhar, as the Opposition candidate. Alva's nomination was approved after a meeting of 17 political parties. However, the TMC didn't attend the meeting and it had also abstained from voting in the election. The announcement of Alva's name had even come as a surprise for many Congress leaders.
'The matter will be discussed with all INDIA bloc members. We don't want a repeat of the last election's situation when the TMC decided to abstain. We will put up a united front. All parties are on board… In both the House, the Opposition has a good presence; 40-60 ratio. We should fight. The party will actively be engaging with its allies to build consensus around a common nominee,' said a senior Congress functionary.
"Let the government announce its candidate, we will come up with our nominee subsequently," the Congress leader added.
TMC sources also indicated that the party would go with the candidate decided by the INDIA bloc collectively in the election. 'This time we are clear; we are onboard with all alliance partners,' said TMC leaders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India test fires tactical missile Pralay
India has successfully test-fired the newly-developed tactical missile Pralay, which is capable of carrying conventional warheads. The missile was test-fired from the APJ Abdul Kalam island off the coast of Odisha on Monday and Tuesday, the defence ministry said. Pralay is a short-range surface-to-surface missile with a payload capacity of 500-1,000 kg. The missile, capable of carrying conventional warheads, has a range of 150 to 500 km. It has been developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). The missile, equipped with modern technologies, will give further technological boost to the armed forces against threats, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said lauding the DRDO, the armed forces and the concerned industry partners involved in the project for the successful flight-tests. The flight tests were carried out as a part of user evaluation trials to validate the maximum and minimum range capability of the missile system, the defence ministry said. The missiles precisely followed the intended trajectory and reached the target point with pin-point accuracy meeting all the test objectives, it said. 'All subsystems performed as per expectations, which were verified using test data captured by various tracking sensors deployed by the integrated test range, including instruments deployed on ship positioned near the designated impact point,' it added in a statement. 'Pralay is an indigenously-developed solid propellant quasi-ballistic missile employing state-of-the-art guidance and navigation to ensure high precision,' the ministry said. Its system has been developed by Research Centre Imarat in collaboration with other DRDO laboratories- such as Advanced Systems Laboratory, Armament Research and Development Establishment, High Energy Materials Research Laboratory, Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory, Research and Development Establishment (Engineers). The industry partners in the project included the Bharat Dynamics Limited and the Bharat Electronics Limited and many other MSMEs
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Demand for American degrees is sinking
SOME OF AMERICA'S most valuable companies were built by people who came to America as students. Elon Musk was born in South Africa and lived in Canada before studying physics at the University of Pennsylvania. Patrick and John Collison moved from Ireland to attend MIT and Harvard, respectively, before founding Stripe, a digital payments company. All told, more than half of America's billion-dollar start-ups were founded by at least one immigrant; a quarter have a founder who arrived as a student. That pipeline of talent is now under heavy pressure. On May 22nd the Trump administration abruptly stripped Harvard University of its ability to enroll foreign students. A judge blocked the move the following day. But the administration only tightened its squeeze: on May 27th it suspended all new visa interviews for foreign students hoping to study in America. Officials say the pause is temporary. The damage might not be. Attracting global talent has long been one of American academia's greatest strengths. The country draws more international students than any other; over the past two decades the share of foreign students has nearly doubled, reaching almost 6% in 2023 (see chart 1). Most pursue degrees in fields such as science, engineering and maths. Nearly a third come from India; a quarter from China. America's top private universities attract the lion's share of foreign talent (see chart 2). International students make up 14% of the intake at the country's 158 most selective research institutions—more than double the national average. At the dozen 'Ivy-plus" universities—including the Ivy League and peers such as Stanford and MIT—the share reaches 28%. Columbia and Harvard, two institutions that President Donald Trump has recently targeted in his broader assault on elite universities, rely heavily on international enrolment, at 40% and 28% respectively. Public universities, although less exposed in terms of headcount, face other risks. They tend to depend more on foreign tuition, which is often several times higher than the rates charged to local students, and lack the endowments that cushion private institutions. Prospective students are already looking elsewhere. Studyportals, an online directory for degree programmes around the world, says clicks on American courses are now at their lowest level since the covid-19 pandemic (see chart 3). Weekly page views halved between January 5th and the end of April. First-quarter traffic to American undergraduate and master's degrees was down by more than 20% year on year; traffic to PhD courses fell by a third. The biggest drop was from India, where interest fell by 40%. The data suggest that British universities would be the most likely beneficiaries. The financial stakes are high. In the 2023-24 academic year foreign students added $43.8bn to America's economy, according to the National Association of International Educators, a non-profit—mostly in Democratic-leaning areas (see map). They also supported jobs at universities and in other sectors, such as food services and health care. But the heaviest cost to America will be in talent. Around three-quarters of international PhD students say they intend to stay in America after graduating. Blocking the next generation of students may punish the Ivies. Over time, though, it is America's edge in science, business and innovation that will suffer.
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Govt dreaming of building concrete cities and urban jungles over fertile land: KMM
Farmers and labourers under the banner of the Kisan Mazdoor Morcha (KMM) submitted memorandums at the deputy commissioner (DC) offices across the state, demanding the Punjab government 'repeal its ambitious land pooling policy'. Addressing the media, KMM coordinator Sarwan Singh Pandher said, 'Following the central government's model, the state government is trying to benefit corporate interests by dreaming of building concrete cities and urban jungles over Punjab's fertile land, a move that will be firmly resisted.' Questioning the government's 'intention,' Pandher said, 'There is no data on demand for housing colonies, yet Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann-led state government, under pressure from Delhi-based lobbies, is aggressively pursuing a policy that threatens to displace entire villages.' 'Government representatives cite examples from Dubai and other countries, but those nations built structures on barren land, and not on fertile lands that produce three to four crops a year,' Pandher said. Pandher emphasised that the policy 'isn't just harmful to farmers, but it would also affect farm labourers, small shopkeepers, commission agents (arhtiyas), and middle-class traders'. Terming the government's claim that 'land won't be forcibly acquired false, Pandher read out a clause in the policy, purportedly reading 'if landowners on both sides of a plot agree to pooling, the landowner in between could lose his land even without consent under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act'. Criticising the 'cost-sharing clause' in the land pooling policy, Pandher said, 'The policy mandates landowners to bear 60 per cent of the development cost, while the development authority pays 40 per cent.' Referring to Cabinet Minister for Revenue, Rehabilitation and Disaster Management, Water Supply & Sanitation and Housing and Urban Development Hardeep Mundian's remarks that 'land with bank loans will have the debt transferred to the allotted plots,' Pandher questioned, 'If the farmer no longer owns cultivable land, how will they repay those loans?' The KMM coordinator accused the government of 'trying to grab land under the guise of generous offers like Rs 1 lakh annual lease payments', calling it 'unrealistic'. 'How will a government struggling financially afford Rs 650 crore annually for 65,000 acres?' he asked. Referring to the statements of the Punjab CM and other Cabinet ministers that the Opposition was 'misleading farmers,' Pandher said, 'We are not illiterates…the time has changed now and everyone can read the policy and understand its pros and cons… farmers know what is good or bad for them. Rather, the government is misleading the public.' Pandher also questioned the August 4 deadline provided to landowners to file objections, and warned, 'There is no clear recourse whether the farmers' objections will be rejected during the hearings.' Calling upon the farmer and labourer organisations in Punjab to set aside differences and fight the land pooling policy unitedly, Pandher announced full support for the Samyukta Kisan Morcha's (SKM) tractor march on July 30, and appealed to the public to actively support all such united efforts. BKU (Krantikari) president Surjit Singh Phool said, 'The promise of 'affordable housing' is hollow. At the current government rate, a five marla plot will cost Rs 45 to Rs 50 lakh, making it unaffordable even for the middle class. So, who will buy plots in these government-developed colonies? The real motive behind the policy is to seize land and lease it to corporate houses for large-scale corporate farming on the pretext of urban development. That's why the policy targets highly fertile land close to highways.' BKU (Azad) president Jaswinder Singh Longowal said, 'Thousands of colonies already exist around New Chandigarh, Ludhiana, Jalandhar, Amritsar, Mohali and Phagwara. Why don't the government regularise those colonies first instead of setting up new colonies?' Leaders who submitted the memorandums at various locations are Sukhwinder Singh Sabhra (Kisan Mazdoor Sangharsh Committee), Omkar Singh Bhangala (Kisan Mazdoor Hitkari Sabha), Malkeet Singh Gulamiwala (Kisan Mazdoor Morcha, Punjab), Dilbag Singh Gill (Bhartiya Kisan Mazdoor Union), Manjeet Singh Rai (BKU, Doaba), Jang Singh Bhateri (BKU, Bhateri), Balwant Singh Behramke and Guramneet Singh Mangat (BKU, Behramke), and several others. The major demands in the memorandums included, among others, compensation for property and items lost during the forced dismantling of protest sites at the Shambhu and Khanauri borders; complete waiver of farmers' and labourers' loans; the passage of a Minimum Support Price (MSP) Guarantee Act in the Punjab Assembly and pressing the central government to implement it and few other demands.
