I promised my American wife Canada was safe for queer couples. I'll vote to keep it that way
This First Person article is the experience of Kiva-Marie Belt, a non-binary farmer who lives in Seafoam, N.S. For more information about CBC's First Person stories, please see the FAQ.
When I first invited my then-girlfriend (now wife) Julia to come visit me in Nova Scotia in 2019 from her home in the United States, I never once questioned whether Canada would be a safe place for 2SLGBTQ+ people like us.
I knew things weren't perfect for transgender folks here, but as a dual Canadian-U.S. citizen who keeps on the pulse on U.S. news, I knew it would definitely be better here than it was there.
That's still the case, but my confidence in Canada remaining welcoming and safe has eroded. I've seen and felt an anti-transgender movement rising here, leading me to watch the forthcoming federal election with equal measures of hope and dread.
I first met Julia online through social media and visited her at her home in the midwest U.S. in 2017.
It felt like coming home. We realized how much we enjoyed each other's company — or, as we like to say, "doing life together". We survived seven years of a long-distance, cross-border relationship, including almost two years apart during pandemic travel restrictions, and we eloped in 2021 so that no government could keep us apart again.
A couple of years after we married, I started to see much more hateful comments and disinformation about people like my wife and me on social media feeds. It had begun to spill over into real life in my community. School protests and destruction of Pride flags were happening all over Nova Scotia. But because we have sparse local news coverage in my area, I was worried that people here might think that anti-trans bigotry was just an overseas problem.
I submitted a letter to my local volunteer-run newspaper to draw attention to the upcoming Pride season.
I was very anxious to send it, and I honestly didn't expect it to be published. When you spend your whole life feeling invisible, you don't expect anyone to want to read your words.
So, in June 2023, when rifling through my freshly-delivered summer edition of the newspaper, I was overjoyed to find the letter I'd written printed in full.
Then, suddenly, it felt like the floor had evaporated from under me.
Right next to my letter was one from another community member, filled with the same trans-exclusionary talking points I'd been seeing all over social media. Catchy buzzwords like "social contagion" and "sex based rights" were mixed in with unsubstantiated fear-mongering about sexual predators getting "access to our private spaces under gender-identity ideology."
GLAAD, an American organization that advocates for 2SLGBTQ+ people in the media, says gender ideology is an inaccurate term deployed by opponents to undermine and dehumanize transgender and nonbinary people. By claiming gender identity is an "ideology," it says opponents attempt to diminish the very real need for legal protections and for social acceptance essential for trans and nonbinary people's safety.
So, on the one hand, the other writer illustrated perfectly why my letter to the paper had been necessary in the first place.
But I was revolted and heartbroken. I was in the middle of filling out the application to sponsor my wife for Canadian permanent residency, and I started to question whether I was doing the right thing. Was I bringing her to a good place to live? It made me feel unsafe and unwelcome.
But we proceeded with our application, and she was granted permanent residency. I'm glad we did because we love our life together on our lavender farm.
But if one letter hurt me so deeply, and made me question my wife's and my future in Canada, you can imagine how it feels when political leaders use trans issues as a wedge to whip up the electorate, or pretend we don't exist and ignore our needs completely.
In the U.S., the anti-trans movement has grown and state oppression of transgender folks has escalated quickly. Access to public washrooms, healthcare and identity documents with the correct gender marker are being stripped away. President Donald Trump has declared by executive order that transgender and nonbinary peoples' existence will not be recognized by the federal government. America has rapidly become a living hell for trans Americans, and my wife and I have survivors' guilt for being here when so many of our trans friends in the U.S. do not have any means of escape.
If you think it can't happen here, I think you're wrong. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has denied having any knowledge of nonbinary and two-spirit identities, and the Conservative party platform already includes a key anti-trans policy position opposing inclusion of trans women in sport.
I am afraid that under a Conservative government, many people will simply look the other way while our rights and freedoms are clawed back — as has already happened just across the border.
I implore all candidates not to ignore the rising tide of hate against transgender people and to do more to uphold our human rights. As for the other federal parties, I want to see bold leadership. Whoever forms the next Canadian government should withdraw from Safe Third Country agreement with the U.S., as its president has demonstrated it is a profoundly unsafe country for transgender people.
I want there to be clear and accessible pathways for trans folks to immigrate to Canada to seek a better life. But I also want those of us who are already here to feel welcome and accepted in the place in which we live and work.
I love my wife deeply. Just like so many other couples, we enjoy the simple pleasures of playing board games and reading comic books together. We have our own secret code words and inside jokes, and have found joy in visiting beautiful spots in the Maritimes together.
There are politicians who try to make 2SLGBTQ+ rights a partisan issue, but I have rural-living, Christian family and friends who have always voted Conservative — and they still support and love me and Julia.
When I cast my ballot, it will be for a party that affirms the existence of people like me and my wife, that sees our value and that supports our inclusion in all aspects of public life. I want the leadership of this country to keep Canada as open and welcoming a place I promised my wife that it has been and that I hope it will continue to be.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
27 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Letters: Lowering the volume makes sense, and not just to appease the neighbours
Neighbours of loud establishments are justifiably unhappy about the noise emanating from these venues. But what about the customers and employees inside? Prolonged exposure to excess noise levels is a well-known cause of hearing damage. Reducing sound to a safe level would benefit them, too. And there's no reason why they wouldn't enjoy the environment just as much. Tim Skene, Montreal Lift language barriers, too Quebec has introduced Bill 112, designed to ease some interprovincial trade barriers. However, I don't find it terribly encouraging to know that a tradesperson from another province can come to Quebec and start working immediately — yet much-needed family physicians from other provinces generally have to pass a French-language proficiency test before being permitted to start the practice of saving lives. This seems like another case of misplaced logic on the part of the CAQ. Let's encourage everyone to come to work in Quebec by eliminating language barriers. Allen Rubin, Westmount $61-billion dome helps us how? Re: ' Golden Dome? No, thanks; we don't want it ' (Opinion, June 10) So here's the deal on Donald Trump's Golden Dome as I see it: First scenario: North America gets attacked by nuclear weapons from whomever. The Americans, to save their cities, try to destroy the missiles over Canada before they reach the U.S. border. Result: All the fallout falls on Canadian cities. Second scenario: We have the Golden Dome covering the U.S. and Canada. The missiles start flying and, once again, the Americans try to destroy them over Canada before they obliterate some U.S. cities. Result: All the fallout lands on us again, with no assurance that any U.S. anti-missiles are targeting hostile missiles heading for Canadian cities. Third scenario: We invest $61 billion into our own defence and learn to take care of ourselves. Jerry Trudeau, N.D.G. What qualifies as rebellion in the U.S. In dispatching the National Guard to Los Angeles to quell federal immigration policy protests, President Donald Trump relied upon a legal provision allowing him to do so when there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the U.S. government. I assume then that the infamous Jan. 6 rioting at the Capitol in Washington did not qualify. Ian Copnick, Côte-St-Luc Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.
Toronto Star
35 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
AP PHOTOS: Mexican flags at LA protests spark debate over symbolism
This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors. ——— Over the last week, a sea of green, white and red Mexican flags have become a fixture of the Los Angeles protests against immigration raids. The use of Mexican and other Latin American flags during the protests are a form of symbolism many conservatives are calling anti-American — while others argue they're an expression of pride in one's homeland that could not be more American. Whether it be U.S., Mexican or Palestinian flags, the banners reflect a nation of immigrants whose stories have become intertwined with the story of America, experts say. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Kris Hernández, an associate professor of history at Connecticut College, said the flying of foreign flags in the U.S. has always brought awareness to the plight of marginalized groups. Their appearance in the latest protests might symbolize solidarity with their native land or social movements that support Americans of Mexican descent, she said. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that those flying Mexican flags at immigration protests were left-wing radicals that attacked law enforcement agents 'removing violent, criminal illegal aliens from the city.' And even fierce Trump critic Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a Democrat, expressed his displeasure with the display of non-American flags at immigration protests that have spread to other states. 'Peaceful protests are fine. Violence is not and will only destroy your message,' Kinzinger wrote on X. 'American flags or nothing.' Amid the backlash, many Americans who support the right to protest are encouraging demonstrators to protest against immigration policies with the American flag instead of a foreign one, as way of reclaiming the U.S. flag for all who call the U.S. home. This underscores just how influential the American flag can be, Hernández said. 'What we are seeing ... is that people don't like to see some flags over others,' she said. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Some Latino activists say the Mexican flag is being used by people who were in this land before it was part of the United States. California was part of Mexico until the 1800's. Many Mexican Americans are descendants of people who never crossed a border — instead the border crossed them. Still, their display of the Mexican flag at protests is being twisted into something it's not, said Juan Proaño, CEO of the League of United Latin American Citizens. Hector E. Sanchez, president and CEO of 'Mi Familia Vota,' a non-profit focused on mobilizing Latino voters, said Mexicans have been at the forefront of attacks when it comes to immigration — attacks heightened during both of Trump's campaigns. Sanchez said he wonders why it's not called anti-American when some Americans fly Confederate flags next to the U.S. flag. 'We see a lot of flags celebrating cultural history and heritage,' he said. 'Why is it that the Mexican community is constantly under attack?'
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Alberta seeks private investor to help build oil pipeline to coast
The Alberta government is working to entice a private-sector player to build a major crude pipeline to coastal waters, Premier Danielle Smith said Wednesday. "We're talking to all of the pipeline proponents; anyone who has had success in building a pipeline in Canada and has an interest in perhaps coming together as a consortium. Or, if one emerges as being a principal proponent, then we'll be interested in talking to them, too," Smith told reporters following a speech to the Global Energy Show. "But we know that it's a chicken and egg problem, that no one's going to come forward with a project without some guarantee that it is going to be approved." Alberta could help the project along by committing barrels of physical bitumen received in lieu of cash royalties from oilsands producers, Smith said. She has been enthusiastic about reviving a plan to ship oilsands crude to the northern B.C. coast for export to Asia, and the end point she sees making the most sense is Prince Rupert, B.C. Enbridge Inc. had once planned to ship crude to another northern B.C. port, Kitimat, via its proposed Northern Gateway pipeline. That project was nixed in 2016 when the federal government banned tankers off the northern B.C. coast. Enbridge CEO Greg Ebel has said it would take a major overhaul in federal regulations for his company to revisit such a proposal. The Alberta government is working to entice a private-sector player to build a major crude pipeline to coastal waters, Premier Danielle Smith said Wednesday. Smith said Prince Rupert might be a more viable choice than Kitimat, as it has a less treacherous route out to the open Pacific and many other commodities already move out of there. Smith said no company will agree to build a pipeline to the northern B.C. coast as long as there is a tanker ban, and oilsands companies aren't going to expand their production as long as there's a federal emissions cap. The premier urged conference attendees to keep up the pressure on Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to do what needs to be done to get "nation-building" projects built. "Anything less than success means failing to act for Canada. It means failing to stand up for democracy and peaceful global development," she said. "And most importantly, it means a loss of economic prosperity that future Canadian youth and families cannot count on to enhance their standard of living locally and to eliminate energy poverty globally." With U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs throwing the Canada-U.S. trade relationship into disarray, there have been growing calls for Canada to tap into other markets for its resources. The only way meaningful amounts of Canadian oil can currently flow to customers outside the United States is via the federally owned Trans Mountain pipeline to the B.C. Lower Mainland, whose expansion started up about a year ago. Trans Mountain CEO Mark Maki told reporters on the sidelines of the conference that his is among the companies Smith has talked to about spearheading a new pipeline. "But as far as us ... optimize the existing kit is the first priority," he said. The Trans Mountain pipeline has been running at about 85 per cent of its capacity of 890,000 barrels a day. That could be taken further to 1.14 million barrels a day with the help of drag-reducing chemical additives and additional pumping horsepower. Maki said Carney, a former central banker, strikes him as a decisive and detail-oriented leader who "gets it." "The business sort of wiring to him, I think is where a lot of my optimism comes from," he said. Carney recently met with provincial and territorial premiers to hear about what projects they'd like to see fast-tracked under new legislation, but has not said which have made the cut. Smith said she'll give the Liberals until the fall legislative session — or four to six months — to determine whether Carney is serious about his pledge to make Canada an "energy superpower." Smith is also keen on accessing global markets via the East Coast or a pipeline to the Port of Churchill in northern Manitoba, which would give tanker access to Hudson Bay. Smith heaped praise on Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew — a New Democrat of a much different political stripe than her United Conservative Party — for being open to that idea. "He has been very vocal in saying that he wants Churchill to be a major export hub, including oil and gas, and he's been unequivocal about that," Smith said. B.C. NDP Premier David Eby, on the other hand, has been skeptical about pursuing a Northern Gateway-like proposal while Trans Mountain, already in operation, is running under full capacity and has expansion potential.
