Op-Ed: Bigoted MAGA Republican Wants To Deport NYC Mayoral Nominee Zohran Mamdani, Calling Him ‘Little Muhamaad'
Source: Pool / Getty
White conservatives have often claimed they're fine with immigrants so long as they come to the U.S. 'the right way,' meaning legally. This has always been a lie, and now they're revealing that truth to anyone who didn't already know it. If the notion that conservatives only objected to immigrants residing in the U.S. when their paperwork wasn't in order wasn't a big, fat lie, Republican voters would be far more outraged that their leaders are now calling on President Donald Trump to denaturalize and deport Zohran Mamdani.
As we previously reported, MAGA supporters across the MAGA-net , including GOP leaders, had gone into full meltdown mode over news that Mamdani had clinched the Democratic nomination in New York City's mayoral race, defeating former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, and, apparently, pissing in the Cheerios of Islamaphobic bigots across America. Well, the frantic attacks on Mamdani have increased exponentially since — *checks notes* — Tuesday, and now even lawmakers, who should know there's no precedent, cause or logic behind it, are calling for Mamdani, who was 7 years old when he and his parents migrated to the U.S., to be stripped of his citizenship.
On Thursday, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) posted on X: 'Zohran 'little muhammad' Mamdani is an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York. He needs to be DEPORTED. Which is why I am calling for him to be subject to denaturalization proceedings.' Attached to his post was a screenshot of a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, urging her to open an investigation into Mamdani.
Before we get to how far and wide Ogles is reaching in suggesting a legal reason to deport Mamdani, let's take a look at the way the congressman began his tweet with explicit racism, right before accusing the presumptive Democratic nominee of being antisemitic.
Who the hell is 'little Muhammad?'
Mamdani is Muslim, and, as mentioned earlier, white conservatives have not been shy about making his faith and ethnicity the central focus of their objection to him. 'Little Muhammad' isn't some cute nickname he came up with for himself, and he's never been referred to as such in the media or by anyone else publicly. So, it appears that Ogles is quoting himself in a reference to the Muslim Prophet Muhammad, which would make 'little Muhammad' an ethnic slur, not that it would matter to xenophobic hypocrites who are only pretending to care about antisemitism to mask their own bigotry.
Another thing to note is that, like many MAGA Republicans, including Trump himself, Ogles has blindly accused Mamdani of being a communist, an allegation that is substantiated by absolutely nothing, but bolstered by the fact that your average MAGA conservative has no damn clue what communism actually is.
From Al Jazeera:
Mamdani's platform calls for making transportation, housing and groceries more affordable, but experts say he hasn't espoused key tenets of communism, such as government takeover of industry and private property.
'Mamdani is NOT a communist,' wrote Anna Grzymala-Busse, Stanford University professor of international studies, in an email to PolitiFact. 'Communism involves a centrally planned economy, with no market forces. Prices and quantities are set by a central government authority. There is no democratic political competition, and instead a single party rules the country. He is not calling for any of this.'
Unsurprisingly, Ogles believes Bondi can legally denaturalize and deport Mamdani, not because he has committed a crime — because he hasn't — but because, eight years ago, he expressed views that anti-Palestine conservatives might find offensive. Ogles cited a chapter from the U.S. Code that outlines the revocation of citizenship for individuals who willfully misrepresent or conceal material support for terrorism.
From The Hill:
'According to public reports, including a June 21, 2025 New York Post article, Mr. Mamdani expressed open solidarity with individuals convicted of terrorism-related offenses prior to becoming a U.S. citizen. Specifically, he rapped: 'Free the Holy Land Five / My guys,'' Ogles wrote in the letter.
The Holy Land Foundation is a U.S.-based Muslim charity. Five of its leaders were convicted of funneling money to Hamas in support of Palestine in 2008.
'Publicly praising the Foundation's convicted leadership as 'my guys' raises serious concerns about whether Mr. Mamdani held affiliations or sympathies he failed to disclose during the naturalization process,' Ogles wrote.
The Trump administration cited similar obscure legislation to justify the detention and deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist who also had not committed a crime. Khalil still faces a formal trial, but a federal judge ruled that he can't be deported without due process just because the White House doesn't agree with his views.
Even Ogles seems to be aware that what he's trying to do violates the First Amendment, but as Trump supporters across the nation have shown, the Constitution ends where their unbridled xenophobia begins.
'While I understand that some may raise First Amendment concerns about taking legal action based on expressive conduct, such as rap lyrics, speech alone does not preclude accountability where it reasonably suggests underlying conduct relevant to eligibility for naturalization,' Ogles wrote.
Again, this man is going to pull every muscle in his body with that reach.
It would be nice if Ogles and all the other Republican leaders and groups who are calling for Mamdani's deportation would just admit they're doing it for the same reason every conservative justice on the U.S. Supreme Court voted Friday to aid Trump in his war against birthright citizenship.
It was never about the legality of Black and brown migrants living here. It was always about reinforcing white nationalism; they prove it every day!
SEE ALSO:
MAGA Racists Predictably Melt Down Over Muslim NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani's Win
After Winning NYC's Democratic Mayoral Primary, Zohran Mamdani Reaffirms Support For Reparations
SEE ALSO
Op-Ed: Bigoted MAGA Republican Wants To Deport NYC Mayoral Nominee Zohran Mamdani, Calling Him 'Little Muhamaad' was originally published on newsone.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
37 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
‘Nepo baby' Zohran Mamdani is still a breath of fresh air
If Zohran Mamdani's 'luxury beliefs' turn out to be even half as effective as those of fellow 'nepo baby' Franklin Delano Roosevelt's — social security, minimum wage, and that pie-in-the-sky idea of a 40-hour workweek — he will be a great mayor. Sandy Huckleberry Jamaica Plain Globe Opinion writer Carine Hajjar's analysis of Zohran Mamdani's victory in the New York mayoral primary fails on several counts. First of all, her accounts of being harassed on the New York City subway presumably happened under current or prior administrations. None of them are socialist. How Mamdani will handle subway crime is unknown at this point. Bernie Sanders, a strong supporter of Mamdani, is hardly a self-soothing progressive. He is a genuine populist, and presumably so is Mamdani, who cites Boston's Mayor Michelle Wu as a role model. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up As for calling him a nepo baby, where does that come from? His father is a professor and his mother is a film director. So what? Is no one with a college degree allowed to be a populist? Advertisement Michael Keating Cambridge In her recent column, columnist Carine Hajjar turns her sights on Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor. She paints a picture of a city beset by dangerous, mentally ill, unhoused people, and insinuates that 'nepo baby' Mamdani doesn't have the best interests of New York's most vulnerable, particularly women, at heart. She cynically pits various groups against each other to advocate for more policing. Advertisement Ironically, she fails to acknowledge that the aforesaid crimes and misdemeanors are happening on the watch of 'tough on crime' Mayor Eric Adams. Similarly, while bemoaning the experiences of harassment faced by women, she makes no mention of Andrew Cuomo's well-known history of harassing his female staffers and employees. Cuomo, a former New York governor, conceded New York City's Democratic mayoral primary to Mamdani on Wednesday. Hajjar suggests that Mamdani's ideas for advances in mental health care and community violence prevention are pointless — dangerous, even. Yet we know from our experience here in Boston that these types of innovative community violence prevention efforts do, in fact, work. It is just such initiatives, put in place by Mayor Michelle Wu, that have helped crime rates in our city Katie Sutton Hingham New Yorkers rejected the Democratic status quo While no one can predict how successful Zohran Mamdani will eventually be, there is little doubt that his victory was due to an overwhelming desire on the part of New Yorkers to believe in, to quote from his victory speech, 'the power of the politics of the future: one of partnership and sincerity.' Bruce Goldberg Newburyport Mamdani only promises more chaos Carine Hajjar states that the current NYC policies — such as neglect of the mentally ill and the homeless, and the deliberate nonenforcement of misdemeanor crimes, have made everyday life more miserable and dysfunctional in the city. Mamdani promises more of the same, only less law enforcement in the interest of public safety and even more neglect. How would that lead to better personal security, cleaner neighborhoods, and an improved quality of life? Advertisement J Q Public
an hour ago
Debate is underway in the Senate on Trump's big bill, but overnight voting is delayed
WASHINGTON -- Debate has been underway in the Senate late into the night, with Republicans wrestling President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts over mounting Democratic opposition — and even some brake-pumping over the budget slashing by the president himself. The outcome from the weekend of work in the Senate remains uncertain and highly volatile, and overnight voting has been pushed off until Monday. GOP leaders are rushing to meet Trump's Fourth of July deadline to pass the package, but they barely secured enough support to muscle it past a procedural Saturday night hurdle in a tense scene. A handful of Republican holdouts revolted, and it took phone calls from Trump and a visit from Vice President JD Vance to keep it on track. GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina announced Sunday he would not seek reelection after Trump badgered him for saying he could not vote for the bill with its steep Medicaid cuts. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. It also said the package would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the decade. But other Senate Republicans, along with conservatives in the House, are pushing for steeper cuts, particularly to health care, drawing their own unexpected warning from Trump. 'Don't go too crazy!' the president posted on social media. 'REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected.' All told, the Senate bill includes some $4 trillion in tax cuts, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions in green energy tax credits that Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide, and impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements and making sign-up eligibility more stringent. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. If the Senate can pass the bill, it would need to return to the House. Speaker Mike Johnson has told lawmakers to be on call for a return to Washington this week. Unable to stop the march toward passage of the 940-page bill, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress is using the tools at its disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took some 16 hours. Then senators took over the debate, filling the chamber with speeches, while Republicans largely stood aside. 'Reckless and irresponsible," said Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan. "A gift to the billionaire class,' said Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Sen. Patty Murray, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. 'In my 33 years here in the United States Senate, things have never — never — worked this way,' said Murray, the longest-serving Democrat on the Budget Committee. She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books. "Go back home and try that game with your constituents," she said. 'We still need to kick people off their health care — that's too expensive. We still need to close those hospitals — we have to cut costs. And we still have to kick people off SNAP — because the debt is out of control.' Sanders said Tillis' decision not to seek reelection shows the hold that Trump's cult of personality has over the GOP. 'We are literally taking food out of the mouths of hungry kids,' Sanders said, while giving tax breaks to Jeff Bezos and other wealthy billionaires. Republicans are using their majorities to push aside Democratic opposition, and appeared undeterred, even as they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. "We're going to pass the 'Big, beautiful bill," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Budget Committee chairman. The holdout Republicans remain reluctant to give their votes, and their leaders have almost no room to spare, given their narrow majorities. Essentially, they can afford three dissenters in the Senate, with its 53-47 GOP edge, and about as many in the House, if all members are present and voting. Trump, who has at times allowed wiggle room on his deadline, kept the pressure on lawmakers to finish. He threatened to campaign against Tillis, who was worried that Medicaid cuts would leave many without health care in his state. Trump badgered Tillis again on Sunday morning, saying the senator 'has hurt the great people of North Carolina.' Later Sunday, Tillis issued a lengthy statement announcing he would not seek reelection in 2026. In an impassioned evening speech, Tillis shared his views arguing the Senate approach is a betrayal of Trump's promise not to kick people off health care. 'We could take the time to get this right,' he thundered. But until then, he said he would remain opposed. Using a congressional process called budget reconciliation, the Republicans can rely on a simple majority vote in the Senate, rather than the typical 60-vote threshold needed to overcome objections. Without the filibuster, Democrats have latched on to other tools to mount their objections. One is the full reading of the bill text, which has been done in past situations. Democrats also intended to use their full 10 hours of available debate time, which was underway. And then Democrats are prepared to propose dozens of amendments to the package, a process called vote-a-rama. But Republicans late Sunday postponed that expected overnight session to early Monday. As Saturday's vote tally teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.' Several provisions in the package are designed for her state in Alaska, but some were out of compliance of the strict rules by the Senate parliamentarian. A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vance joined in. Later, Scott said, 'We all want to get to yes.'
Black America Web
2 hours ago
- Black America Web
Federal Judge's Ruling Could Halt Mississippi's DEI Ban In Schools
Source: kickstand / Getty Across the country, several states have enacted bans on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in K-12 schools and higher education. Unsurprisingly, Mississippi is one such state, but a lawsuit filed by attorneys with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) could temporarily prevent it from being enforced. The Clarion Ledger reports that the ACLU's lawyers have requested that Federal Judge Henry Wingate put a restraining order on several state boards designed to enforce Mississippi's DEI ban at K-12 schools and public universities. The ACLU has argued that enforcement of the ban should be halted due to the law having vague language, leaving open different interpretations of how it should be enforced. They also argue that the ban infringes on educators' and students' First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by restricting their speech. The attorneys from the ACLU are representing several students and education advocacy groups. The ACLU has requested a 14-day temporary restraining order (TRO) on the ban and intends to file a motion requesting a second 14-day TRO as the issue is litigated. The state's Assistant Attorney General Rex Shannon is representing the state boards targeted in the lawsuit and has argued the TRO shouldn't be granted as it would infringe on the state's sovereignty. Wingate repeatedly asked Shannon what harms the state would experience should he grant the restraining order, but Shannon said he didn't have enough time before the case to provide specific harms. Wingate will make a decision on granting the restraining order in the next week. Mississippi's DEI ban did not pass without a fight. House Bill 1193 prevents Mississippi schools from having DEI programs and teaching 'divisive concepts.' Sounds vague? Apparently, that was the point, which is concerning, as Mississippi's DEI ban allows students, parents, and educators to sue schools if they feel the ban was violated. Should a school receive two violations, the state would withhold funds until the violations are corrected. Source: Dennis Macdonald / Getty From Mississippi Today: People could only sue after they go through an internal campus review process and a 25-day period when schools could fix the alleged violation. Republican Rep. Joey Hood, one of the House negotiators, said that was a compromise between the chambers. The House wanted to make it possible for almost anyone to file lawsuits over the DEI ban, while Senate negotiators initially bristled at the idea of fast-tracking internal campus disputes to the legal system. The House ultimately held firm in its position to create a private cause of action, or the right to sue, but it agreed to give schools the ability to conduct an investigative process and potentially resolve the alleged violation before letting people sue in chancery courts. 'You have to go through the administrative process,' said Republican Sen. Nicole Boyd, one of the bill's lead authors. 'Because the whole idea is that, if there is a violation, the school needs to cure the violation. That's what the purpose is. It's not to create litigation, it's to cure violations.' So much of American and global history consists of 'divisive concepts.' So if a teacher says 'Slavery was bad,' or 'Mississippi has a shameful history of lynching,' and a child's parents disagree, the vagueness of the law seems as though it would allow them to file a suit claiming that Mississippi's DEI ban was violated. So that then begs the question: are we just going to stop teaching about historical horrors because it offends the people who think they were a good thing? Democratic Rep. Bryant Clark, son of Robert Clark, the first Black Mississippian elected to the state Legislature since the 1800s, argued Mississippi's DEI ban was unnecessary and particularly offensive given the state's dark history in its treatment of Black people. 'We are better than this, and all of you know that we don't need this with Mississippi's history,' Clark said during the debate period. 'We should be the ones that say, 'listen, we may be from Mississippi, we may have a dark past, but you know what, we're going to be the first to stand up this time and say there is nothing wrong with DEI.'' Mississippi's DEI ban is just one of many being enacted around the country. States such as Texas and West Virginia have passed similar laws banning DEI in K-12 and postsecondary education. Several colleges have already begun phasing out their DEI initiatives as a result of a 'Dear Colleague' letter sent by the Department of Education threatening to withhold federal funding from schools believed to have DEI initiatives and programs. SEE ALSO: Survey: High-Level Business Execs Say DEI Is Necessary UNC Asheville Dean Of Students Fired For Pro-DEI Comments SEE ALSO Federal Judge's Ruling Could Halt Mississippi's DEI Ban In Schools was originally published on
