Blackpool Pleasure Beach reassures visitors after £2.7m losses
Blackpool's Pleasure Beach theme park is reassuring staff and visitors after accounts revealed it had closed some rides and jobs had been lost because of difficult financial conditions. Bosses at the attraction said a review was carried out and action taken to mitigate for the 2023-24 season when the park made a pre-tax loss of £2.7m. A report on its recently published accounts said trading had been difficult because of the cost of living crisis and that had led to a "head count review" and the closure of some smaller rides.Last month the park said it was closing five less popular rides to allow it to reinvest and later revealed plans for a new £8.72m pendulum ride.
The Eddie Stobart Convoy, Alpine Rallye, Thompson Carousel, Gallopers and Red Arrows Skyforce will all be closed during the 2025 season, the theme park has said.
'So tough'
It did not reveal how many jobs have gone in the "head count review" but the attraction, which has been open in some form since 1896, said none of the measures taken had been a "knee-jerk" reaction but rather part of a strategic review where all factors have been considered.The attraction also said it would be open for more days this year, no more rides would be closed and, as it stands, the same level of seasonal staff will be recruited.Part of the reinvestment includes the new spinning pendulum ride due to open next year that swings as 40 riders face outwards with their legs dangling.Claire Smith, of Stay Blackpool, a trade association for holiday accommodation in the area, also moved to reassure people."New rides - even refurbishing rides - cost millions and you are not going to have £20m in your petty cash tin, are you?," she said."So I would imagine that this loss is purely in the accounts."She said it was expected to be a challenging season "purely because the economy is so tough at the moment". Ms Smith said the theme park had, like many businesses, been hit with a "double whammy" of the national insurance and minimum wage increases.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
5 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court rules Mexico can't sue US gunmakers over cartel violence
"An action cannot be brought against a manufacturer if, like Mexico's, it is founded on a third-party's criminal use of the company's product," Justice Elena Kagan wrote. The decision landed against a backdrop of strained diplomatic relations between the United States and Mexico. President Donald Trump wants Mexico to do more to stop illegal drugs from flowing into the United States and Mexico wants to stop illegal arms from flowing south. Mexico has maintained tighter regulations on firearms than its neighbor to the north. The case was also the first time the Supreme Court ruled on a 2005 law that shields gunmakers from liability for crimes committed by third parties. An exception in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act allows suits if a gunmaker is accused of knowingly violating a state or federal law. Attorneys representing Mexico argued that gun companies are "aiding and abetting" the trafficking of hundreds of thousands of high-powered firearms into Mexico through deliberate design, marketing and distribution choices. That includes doing business with dealers who repeatedly sell large quantities of guns to cartel traffickers, Mexico's counsel alleged. Firearms makers, led by Smith & Wesson Brands, said the chain of events between the manufacture of a gun and the harm it causes after being sold, transported, and used to commit crime in Mexico involves too many steps to blame the industry. Guns made in the United States are sold to federally licensed distributors who sell them to federally licensed dealers - some of whom knowingly or negligently sell them to criminals who smuggle them into Mexico, where they end up in the hands of cartel members. Mexico's attorneys stressed that the suit was in its early stages and said Mexico should be allowed a chance to prove its allegations in court. A federal judge in Massachusetts dismissed the suit, ruling it was barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms. But the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the challenge met an exception in the law and could move forward. Mexico, it said, had adequately alleged the gunmakers "aided and abetted the knowingly unlawful downstream trafficking of their guns into Mexico." Mexico was seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages, estimated in the range of $10 billion, and a court order requiring gun companies to change their practices. Lawyers for gun rights groups told the Supreme Court that Mexico's suit is an attempt to bankrupt the American firearms industry and undermine the Second Amendment. Gun violence prevention groups worried the case could make it harder to bring domestic lawsuits against the gun industry. The case is Smith & Wesson Brands Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
Supreme Court blocks Mexico's lawsuit against US gunmakers
The United States Supreme Court has blocked a $10 billion lawsuit filed by the Mexican government claiming U.S. firearm manufacturers are responsible for the out-of-control cartel violence and bloodshed that has ravaged the country. The lawsuit was filed in 2021 against 11 companies with Smith & Wesson appealing a lower court decision that had allowed the case to proceed. The unanimous ruling tossed out the case under U.S. laws that largely protect gunmakers from liability when their firearms are used in crime. The court found that Mexico had not shown that the companies had knowingly allowed weapons to be trafficked across the US's southern border. 'It does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the court's opinion. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has yet to comment on the landmark decision about the case, which her government had wanted to proceed under an exception for situations in which the companies themselves are accused of violating the law. Mexico had said the case was still in its early stages and wanted the lawsuit to continue against some of the US's biggest gun companies, including Beretta USA, Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Colt's Manufacturing Co. and Glock Inc. Mexico has strict gun laws and just one store where people can legally buy firearms. But thousands of guns are smuggled in by the country's powerful drug cartels every year. The Mexican government says at least 70% of those weapons come from the United States and claims that companies knew weapons were being sold to traffickers who smuggled them into Mexico and decided to cash in on that market. It has alleged that more than 500,000 guns are smuggled annually from the United States into Mexico and that more than 68 percent are produced by the gun manufacturing companies it sued. Weapons manufactured by the 11 Massachusetts-based gun makers were allegedly used in at least 17,000 homicides in 2019. 'They know how criminals are getting their guns,' Jonathan Lowy, a lawyer for Mexico, argued during virtual hearing in April 2022. 'They could stop and they choose to be willfully blind to the facts. Mexican security forces confiscated a semi-automatic Barrett M82A1 .50 caliber rifle during a raid in July 2022 in Mexico City that led to the arrest of 14 alleged members of Los Chapitos, the Sinaloa Cartel faction that is operated by the sons of notorious drug lord Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán. The same rifle abandoned by Jalisco New Generation Cartel members in the failed assassination of Mexico City police chief Omar García Harfuch on June 26, 2020. The companies have rejected Mexico's allegations, arguing the country's lawsuit comes nowhere close to showing they're responsible for a relatively few people using their products to commit violence. A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices. That exception has come up in other cases, including in lawsuits stemming from mass shootings.
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Supreme Court slaps down foreign government's attempt to blame America for its out-of-control violence
The United States Supreme Court has blocked a $10 billion lawsuit filed by the Mexican government claiming U.S. firearm manufacturers are responsible for the out-of-control cartel violence and bloodshed that has ravaged the country. The lawsuit was filed in 2021 against 11 companies with Smith & Wesson appealing a lower court decision that had allowed the case to proceed. The unanimous ruling tossed out the case under U.S. laws that largely protect gunmakers from liability when their firearms are used in crime. The court found that Mexico had not shown that the companies had knowingly allowed weapons to be trafficked across the US's southern border. 'It does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the court's opinion. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has yet to comment on the landmark decision about the case, which her government had wanted to proceed under an exception for situations in which the companies themselves are accused of violating the law. Mexico had said the case was still in its early stages and wanted the lawsuit to continue against some of the US's biggest gun companies, including Beretta USA, Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Colt's Manufacturing Co. and Glock Inc. Mexico has strict gun laws and just one store where people can legally buy firearms. But thousands of guns are smuggled in by the country´s powerful drug cartels every year. The Mexican government says at least 70% of those weapons come from the United States and claims that companies knew weapons were being sold to traffickers who smuggled them into Mexico and decided to cash in on that market. It has alleged that more than 500,000 guns are smuggled annually from the United States into Mexico and that more than 68 percent are produced by the gun manufacturing companies it sued. Weapons manufactured by the 11 Massachusetts-based gun makers were allegedly used in at least 17,000 homicides in 2019. 'They know how criminals are getting their guns,' Jonathan Lowy, a lawyer for Mexico, argued during virtual hearing in April 2022. 'They could stop and they choose to be willfully blind to the facts. Mexican security forces confiscated a semi-automatic Barrett M82A1 .50 caliber rifle during a raid in July 2022 in Mexico City that led to the arrest of 14 alleged members of Los Chapitos, the Sinaloa Cartel faction that is operated by the sons of notorious drug lord Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán. The same rifle abandoned by Jalisco New Generation Cartel members in the failed assassination of Mexico City police chief Omar García Harfuch on June 26, 2020. The companies have rejected Mexico's allegations, arguing the country's lawsuit comes nowhere close to showing they're responsible for a relatively few people using their products to commit violence. A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices. That exception has come up in other cases, including in lawsuits stemming from mass shootings. Families of victims of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, for example, argued it applied to their lawsuit because the gunmaker had violated state law in the marketing of the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting, in which 20 first graders and six educators were killed. The families eventually secured a landmark $73 million settlement with Remington, the maker of the rifle.
