Border checks on fruit and vegetable imports from EU scrapped
The Government has said Sir Keir Starmer's Brexit reset deal will stop the proposed controls coming into force on July 1.
The produce sector has suggested that halting the plans will save businesses around £200 million of additional supply chain costs.
Bosses had warned that this could add to inflation, put pressure on food supply chains and threaten the future of businesses.
The new SPS (sanitary and phytosanitary) deal with the EU will eliminate routine border checks for food exports and imports on certain products.
The Government said impending checks on 'medium-risk' fruit and vegetables, such as tomatoes, grapes, plums, cherries, peaches and peppers, will now not be introduced.
The latest relaxation in trade rules will take place until January 31 2027 as a 'contingency measure', according to officials.
Biosecurity minister Baroness Hayman said: 'This Government's EU deal will make food cheaper, slash bureaucracy and remove cumbersome border controls for businesses.
'A strengthened, forward-looking partnership with the European Union will deliver for working people as part of our plan for change.'
It is the fourth time the border check plans have been pushed back, with the proposals previously set to come into force in January.
The checks on fruit and vegetables were the latest phase of the Government's Border Target Operating Model which introduced checks on animal and plant products last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Why doesn't Musk like Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'?
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 It's day 135 of Donald Trump's second term, and our US correspondents Mark Stone and Martha Kelner discuss Elon Musk's exit from his Department of Government Efficiency role last week, and his harsh criticism of Trump's 'big beautiful' spending bill in a furious X post on Tuesday. Plus, Hamas and Israel have reacted to Mark's Monday interview with former State Department spokesman Matt Miller, who said that 'without a doubt' war crimes had been committed in Gaza by Israel, which is in stark contrast to what he said in office. If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Superannuation tax breakthrough as Albo signals changes: PETER VAN ONSELEN on how the rules could be drastically different
News that Anthony Albanese is willing to negotiate precisely how the new superannuation tax is designed should be seen as a welcome development. All that remains is whether or not it's a media stunt designed to appear open-minded, rather than a genuine attempt at compromise.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Seamus Logan: Nigel Farage's visit shows what he knows about Scotland
The wisdom of that observation was brought into sharp relief for Scots on Tuesday, as Nigel Farage opted to take time out of his busy schedule of being anywhere but in his Clacton constituency to jet northwards for a day trip. The public-facing part of his day seemed to be mercifully short for all concerned. It began with him feigning concern for the welfare of energy workers in Aberdeen, before flying off to Glasgow Airport – en route to Hamilton – to get his picture taken to show him 'campaigning' in the by-election. READ MORE: Nigel Farage's Scottish conspiracy theories fit Reform's agenda. Don't fall for it When not attacking journalists for their cheek in wanting to ask him some questions, he seemed to spend the rest of his time finding ways to hide from them. Meanwhile, his press team were busy asserting that his party somehow represents a 'fresh, positive voice' between what they tried to describe as the Labour and SNP 'see-saw' in Scotland. If nothing else, his flying visit certainly showed up how much he knows and cares about Scotland. On both counts, about the nicest thing you could say is that it at least rhymes with 'see-saw'. Sometimes, as I wrote last week, politicians are lucky in their opponents. Farage has certainly been lucky on that score, but he's even luckier still in that after decades of his schtick, he still keeps getting away with it. His complaints about the 'institutionally biased' BBC and its licence fee show a particular lack of self-awareness. For without the institutional willingness of the BBC to platform him over the years with a frequency and prominence out of all proportion to the public support for whatever political vehicle he happened to be riding at the time, he'd be just another crank languishing on the fringes of politics, forever dependent on the patronage of wealthy idiots to keep him sporadically in the public eye. He's particularly lucky in that despite having won his long-term political prize of Brexit, it still manages to sustain him. Not through being able to bask in its successes, but instead, through the ability to feast off the political corpse of it being a disaster that somehow still has nothing to do with him. In this world, Brexit has been a failure – even in the fishing sector which potentially had the most to gain – not because the trade-offs involved in losing freedom of movement for goods and people simply weren't worth it. Rather, it's been a failure because 'politicians' have somehow 'betrayed' the noble vision of being able to 'take back control' free of there being any negative consequences to follow. In Farage-land, the economy doesn't struggle because of a failure to invest in people and infrastructure – it falters because taxes on the rich are too high. Public services aren't struggling from the consequences of ideologically driven austerity over many years from successive UK governments, but because of the pressures supposedly created by immigrants coming to the UK to consume those services. Every complex problem has a simple solution. He is held responsible for nothing, and nothing is ever his fault. Incredibly, both Labour and the Tories still seem to think that the best way to tackle his particular brand of grievance farming is not to do so head-on, but to lurch even further to the right themselves. And the more it fails to work for them, the louder the internal voices seem to become for them to keep doing it. READ MORE: Scottish Labour by-election candidate flounders after dodging question 11 times It's been obvious for a while that since the General Election, support for the Tories in Scotland has disappeared down the plughole. While there's no evidence that there are any significant numbers of SNP voters switching to Farage, there's ample evidence that a significant number of former Labour voters are happy enough for now to throw their lot in behind him. Maybe that shouldn't be a surprise. There's also always been a hardcore of anti-home rule of any kind Scots, who will vote in Westminster elections but who have tended to stay at home when it comes to Holyrood. Having spent the past two decades guided by nothing more principled than a steadfast and resolute #SNPBad-ism, it's hardly surprising that Labour and the Tories are now being outflanked by a party which seems well set up to cater to that sentiment far better than they can themselves. Farage's unpopularity with most Scottish voters is apparent, and was reflected in polling over the weekend which showed that were he to become prime minister, support for independence would rise by a further four points. If this time we are to turn that sentiment into pro-independence votes, then our arguments have to change. People are rightly concerned still about the cost of living, public services and the quality of life that they and their closest friends and relatives are able to have. So as well as delivering tangible results in those areas, we also have to be posing the fundamental question which affects all of those things for Scots. And that is the question of 'who decides?' If you are a Unionist who is happy for Westminster to continue setting budgets and clipping the wings of Holyrood, then you already know your answer to that question. If, on the other hand, you can be persuaded that decisions about Scotland should be taken in Scotland, for Scotland, by the people we elect in Scotland, then ultimately the answer to that question should also be clear. The reform that Scots need most is independence. And it's the job of everyone in our movement to do their bit in continuing to persuade the persuadable on that front.
