US threatens to quit Russia-Ukraine effort unless ‘concrete proposals'
Bruce said it would ultimately be up to Trump to decide whether to move ahead on diplomacy. – AFP photo
WASHINGTON (April 30): Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned on Tuesday that the United States would give up on mediation unless Russia and Ukraine put forward 'concrete proposals,' as US patience wanes on an early priority for Donald Trump.
The US president had vowed to end the war in his first 24 hours back in the White House but, as Trump celebrates 100 days in office, Rubio has suggested the administration could soon turn attention to other issues.
'We are now at a time where concrete proposals need to be delivered by the two parties on how to end this conflict,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters, in what she said was a message from Rubio.
'If there is not progress, we will step back as mediators in this process.'
She said it would ultimately be up to Trump to decide whether to move ahead on diplomacy.
The president suggested on Tuesday that his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin still wants to negotiate a peace agreement with Ukraine.
Asked in an interview with ABC television if Putin wants peace, Trump said: 'I think he does.'
Putin recently proposed a three-day ceasefire around Moscow's commemorations next week for the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II.
But he has rebuffed a Ukrainian-backed US call for a 30-day ceasefire.
The United States wants 'not a three-day moment so you can celebrate something else — a complete, durable ceasefire and an end to the conflict,' Bruce said.
Means of pressure
It remains unclear if Rubio is actually ready to turn the page or is seeking to pressure the two countries.
The United States already put together a framework proposal which Ukrainians feel bows to Russian demands.
Trump has suggested an official recognition of Russia's takeover in 2014 of Crimea, an annexation rejected by nearly all the world, in addition to land swaps.
'We all want this war to end in a fair way — with no rewards for Putin, especially no land,' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told an event in Poland by videoconference on Tuesday.
Russia has also not moved on the proposal with many experts believing Moscow now sees an upper hand — on the battlefield and diplomatically, with Trump eager to reconcile.
Russia's ambassador to the United Nations, Vassily Nebenzia, sought to blame Zelensky and said that Russia would keep speaking with the United States.
Zelensky 'is bent on escalating the conflict. He's recklessly rejecting the United States' balanced peace proposals,' Nebenzia told a UN Security Council meeting.
US diplomat John Kelley told the session that both sides would benefit from working off the US framework and condemned Russian strikes into Ukraine.
'Right now, Russia has a great opportunity to achieve a durable peace,' Kelley said.
Trump, criticising his predecessor Joe Biden for shunning Putin over the February 2022 invasion, reached out by telephone to the Russian leader and has sent his business friend turned globe-trotting ambassador Steve Witkoff to see him.
Trump in turn berated Zelensky in a February 28 White House meeting. He and Vice President JD Vance accused the wartime leader of ingratitude for US weapons sent under Biden.
Ukraine quickly tried to make amends by backing US diplomatic efforts and pursuing a deal in which the United States would control much of the country's mineral wealth.
'Fatally mismanaged' talks
US Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Tuesday that recognising 'Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea would invite additional aggression from Moscow and Beijing.'
'I have endeavored to give President Trump the space to negotiate a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, which is a goal we both share,' she said.
'However, President Trump and his team have fatally mismanaged these negotiations — offering concession after concession to Russia, throwing away our leverage and fracturing the united front with our allies that is critical to ending this war,' she said.
Ukraine ordered on Tuesday the evacuation of seven villages in the eastern Dnipropetrovsk region which used to be remote from the frontlines but are now under threat as Russian forces close in.
Last week a ballistic missile ripped into a residential area of Kyiv in one of the deadliest attacks on the capital since the invasion.
Trump, who has claimed that Putin would not have attacked Ukraine if he were in power in 2022, wrote, 'Vladimir, STOP,' on social media after the attack. – AFP donald trump Russia Tammy Bruce Ukraine us
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
40 minutes ago
- The Sun
Russia says it received Ukraine's draft memorandum on peace
MOSCOW / ISTANBUL: A senior Russian official said on Sunday that Moscow has received Ukraine's draft memorandum outlining a possible peaceful resolution of the ongoing conflict, Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported. Putin's adviser, Vladimir Medinsky, who would head the Russian delegation during peace talks in Istanbul on Monday, told Russia Today that the document was submitted in both Ukrainian and English languages. 'The Russian delegation previously received a version of the memorandum concerning a peaceful resolution from Ukraine,' Medinsky said. He added that the language of the document was not an issue and noted that key points had already appeared in Western media. Medinsky also said Russia would announce its stance on the Ukraine issue on Monday. On Sunday, Ukraine's president said that his government will strive to achieve 'at least some progress on the path toward peace' during talks set to take place in Istanbul, despite not receiving any ceasefire memorandum from Russia.
The Sun
40 minutes ago
- The Sun
How Trump's trade war is upending the global economy
U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff decisions since he took office on January 20 have shocked financial markets and sent a wave of uncertainty through the global economy. Here is a timeline of the major developments: February 1 - Trump imposes 25% tariffs on Mexican and most Canadian imports and 10% on goods from China, demanding they curb the flow of fentanyl and illegal immigrants into the United States. February 3 - Trump suspends his threat of tariffs on Mexico and Canada, agreeing to a 30-day pause in return for concessions on border and crime enforcement. The U.S. does not reach such a deal with China. February 7 - Trump delays tariffs on de minimis, or low-cost, packages from China until the Commerce Department can confirm that procedures and systems are in place to process them and collect tariff revenue. February 10 - Trump raises tariffs on steel and aluminum to a flat 25% 'without exceptions or exemptions'. March 3 - Trump says 25% tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada will take effect from March 4 and doubles fentanyl-related tariffs on all Chinese imports to 20%. March 5 - The president agrees to delay tariffs for one month on some vehicles built in Canada and Mexico after a call with the CEOs of General Motors and Ford and the chair of Stellantis. March 6 - Trump exempts goods from Canada and Mexico under a North American trade pact for a month from the 25% tariffs. March 26 - Trump unveils a 25% tariff on imported cars and light trucks. April 2 - Trump announces global tariffs with a baseline of 10% across all imports and significantly higher duties on some of the U.S.' biggest trading partners. April 9 - Trump pauses for 90 days most of his country-specific tariffs that kicked in less than 24 hours earlier following an upheaval in financial markets that erased trillions of dollars from bourses around the world. The 10% blanket duty on almost all U.S. imports stays in place. Trump says he will raise the tariff on Chinese imports to 125% from the 104% level that took effect a day earlier. This pushes the extra duties on Chinese goods to 145%, including the fentanyl-related tariffs imposed earlier. April 13 - The U.S. administration grants exclusions from steep tariffs on smartphones, computers and some other electronics imported largely from China. April 22 - The Trump administration launches national security probes under Section 232 of the Trade Act of 1962 into imports of both pharmaceuticals and semiconductors as part of a bid to impose tariffs on both sectors. May 4 - Trump imposes a 100% tariff on all movies produced outside the U.S. May 9 - Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announce a limited bilateral trade agreement that leaves in place 10% tariffs on British exports, modestly expands agricultural access for both countries and lowers prohibitive U.S. duties on British car exports. May 12 - The U.S. and China agree to temporarily slash reciprocal tariffs. Under the 90-day truce, the U.S. will cut the extra tariffs it imposed on Chinese imports to 30% from 145%, while China's duties on U.S. imports will be slashed to 10% from 125%. May 13 - The U.S. cuts the low value 'de minimis' tariff on China shipments, reducing duties for items valued at up to $800 to 54% from 120%. May 23 - Trump says he is recommending a straight 50% tariff on goods from the European Union starting on June 1. He also warned Apple it would face 25% tariff if phones it sold in the U.S. were manufactured outside of the country. May 25 - Trump backpedals on his threat to slap 50% tariffs on imports from the EU, agreeing to extend the deadline for talks between the U.S. and the block until July 9. May 28 - A U.S. trade court blocked Trump's tariffs from going into effect in a sweeping ruling that the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from U.S. trade partners. The Trump administration said it would appeal the ruling. May 29 - A federal appeals court temporarily reinstates the most sweeping of Trump's tariffs, saying it was pausing the lower court's ruling to consider the government's appeal, and ordered the plaintiffs in the cases to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9. May 30 - At a rally in Pennsylvania, Trump says he plans to increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%.
The Sun
44 minutes ago
- The Sun
Great hex-pectations: Shamans divided on South Korea's political destiny
INCHEON: The outcome of this week's presidential elections in South Korea may still be unknown, but shaman Yang Su-bong tells AFP the winner came to her in visions years ago. South Koreans go to the polls on Tuesday to choose their next president, a snap vote triggered by ex-leader Yoon Suk Yeol's disastrous declaration of martial law in December. And for Yang, a traditional Korean 'mudang', it's clear that liberal frontrunner Lee Jae-myung will emerge victorious -- a prediction that chimes with all major opinion polls that put Lee well ahead in the presidential race. The latest Gallup survey show 49 percent of respondents viewing Lee as the best candidate, while Kim Moon-soo, from the conservative People Power Party (PPP) was trailing on 35 percent. 'From the beginning, I've seen Lee Jae-myung becoming president,' Yang told AFP at her office in the western port city of Incheon. 'I saw a presidential aura,' she explained, adding that she faced 'criticism and even threats' for her prediction. 'But I can't lie about what I see.' Shamanism has shaped culture and belief on the Korean peninsula for centuries. South Koreans still regularly turn to them for advice on everything from their love lives to important business decisions and cities, and the registrar of the country's largest shamanic organisation lists 300,000 practising in the country. But the folk religion has also come under the spotlight for all the wrong reasons -- two presidential impeachments have been linked to undue influence allegedly wielded by shamans. Former President Park Geun-hye was removed from office in 2017 in an influence-peddling scandal involving claims of, among other things, participation in shamanistic rituals. Ousted ex-leader Yoon and his first lady Kim Keon Hee have also been accused of turning to sketchy shamans when making decisions -- including, it is alleged, the fateful martial declaration. - 'Intense emotions' - Claims like that provoke an 'intense emotional reaction' in South Korean society -- in part because the country's history is full of leaders led astray by unscrupulous spiritual advisors, Lee Won-jae, a sociologist at South Korea's KAIST university, told AFP. 'When it comes to dramatising politics, there's nothing quite as effective as invoking shamanistic themes,' he said. 'Mudang' or shaman act as intermediaries between the world of spirits and everyday life. Their elaborate 'gut' ceremonies can be hours-long affairs, with cacophonic music, singing and prayers used to ward off evil spirits or hope for a good harvest. Hit thrillers like last year's 'Exhuma' -- which features a group of shamans fighting an ancient evil spirit -- have piqued public interest. And some shamans now even turn to social media to ply their craft, livestreaming on YouTube and offering advice over video calls. Shaman Lee Dong-hyeon, who goes by Ohbangdoryeong -- 'guardian of the five directions' -- says he was approached by local politicians after predicting Yoon's untimely fall three years ago. 'To become a truly great person, you must learn to carry burdens,' he told AFP. Yoon 'lacks that destiny', he said. And 'despite his age, he lacks judgement', he said. - 'Truth can be uncomfortable' - Ohbangdoryeong engages in 'sword rituals' -- licking the sharp blade of a knife in a bid to receive messages from deities. He isn't so sure that frontrunner Lee will help end South Korea's political turmoil. 'Things will stabilise for two years, but then there will be bloodshed -- political purges,' he darkly predicted. Fellow shaman Hong Myeong-hui agreed that turbulent times could be ahead. She said conservative contender Kim Moon-soo has a 'quiet fire' in him. But liberal Lee's 'energy is fast and consuming, like a wildfire in spring', she said. 'His term will be stormy,' Hong said. 'Prophecy isn't for pleasing people -- it's for truth. And truth can be uncomfortable.' No matter if the predictions ring true, what is clear that the new president will have to helm South Korea through a period of economic turbulence, as the trade-dependent nation will be facing steep tariffs from the United States while struggling with sluggish demand at home.
