Himanta Sarma On Why NIA Should Probe Case Linked To Congress Leader's Wife
A day after Himanta Biswa Sarma hinted at transferring an ongoing state inquiry - into 'links' between Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi's wife and a Pakistan-based non-governmental organisation - to the anti-terror body National Investigation Agency, the Assam chief minister explained on Thursday why he feels a need for this.
Stating that the Assam Police special investigation team (SIT) has been informed that its term will not be extended and it has to wrap up its probe into the case by September 10, Mr Sarma said, "The Assam SIT has a limited scope. We cannot access telephonic interactions beyond two years. But the National Investigation Agency (NIA) can trace conversations till 2010. The Assam SIT has done a good job, but ultimately, the case is related to citizenship. It is the Centre which has to finally take over the investigation."
The chief minister had, earlier this year, ordered the registration of a case against a Pakistani national, who is believed to have links with Mr Gogoi's wife Elizabeth Colburn, for "trying to interfere in domestic matters" of the state and the country.
Mr Sarma had also said that Ms Colburn will be probed over her alleged links with Pakistan and its intelligence agency ISI. Besides, he has said, she will also be investigated over her alleged participation in the Lok Sabha election campaigns despite being a "British citizen".
The Assam SIT had taken over the case and questioned several people. "We will refer the case to the Centre, but not now. We have given a deadline of September 10 to the SIT to wrap up its probe. It will submit a report and I will table that report before the cabinet, which can recommend the case's transfer to NIA," he added.
Mr Gogoi has denied the allegations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Himanta: Non-tribals on forest land will be evicted — period
1 2 Guwahati: Amid Assam's most aggressive land reclamation drive to date, chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said he has ordered a sweeping crackdown on forest encroachments across all districts of the state. He said here on Friday that all district commissioners have been tasked with conducting immediate surveys and initiating evictions, sparing only those protected under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 (Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006). The directive is clear—enforce the law and reclaim the land. "Tribal communities who lived in forests before 2005 are protected under law. Everyone else will be evicted, period," Sarma said here on Friday, adding that the scale of encroachment is staggering. "Even at one eviction per month, it will take a decade to reclaim the land," he added. Since May 2021, when Sarma's government came to power, over 1.19 lakh bighas (approximately 160 sq km) of land has been cleared, evicting nearly 50,000 people. This includes 84,743 bighas (113 sq km) of forest land and 26,713 bighas (35.6 sq km) of general government ('khas') land. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Despite this, an alarming 63 lakh bighas (8400 sq km) — including 29 lakh bighas (3866 sq km) of forest land — remain under illegal occupation. On Thursday, the government carried out its largest single eviction yet, clearing 3,305.78 acres in Uriamghat, Golaghat district, along the Assam-Nagaland border. The ongoing operation targets the Rengma Reserve Forest, aiming to clear 1,500 hectares currently occupied by nearly 1,500 families, primarily Bengali-speaking Muslims. Many of them claim displacement from riverine 'char' areas due to erosion by the Brahmaputra. The eviction entered its fourth straight day on Friday across six villages, with no reports of violence. But the message from Dispur is clear, unauthorised settlement—regardless of community—is not negotiable. Sarma has reiterated that the drive will also extend to village grazing reserves (VGR), professional grazing reserves (PGR), satras, namghars, and other public lands. "This is about reclaiming Assam's land, restoring ecological balance, and enforcing the rule of law," he said.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cops nab 48 in nationwide crackdown on online fraud
1 2 Hyderabad: In July, cybercrime sleuths conducted operations across India and arrested 48 people for their alleged involvement in a range of cybercrimes. Among those arrested were 21 people linked to investment fraud schemes. Additional commissioner of police (crimes), Viswa Prasad, said the accused were involved in 78 cybercrime cases registered in Telangana. Over the past month alone, refunds amounting to 2.2 crore were issued to several victims. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Detailing key cases cracked during the operations, Prasad described one incident in which a complainant fell victim to a fraudulent financial advisor named "Neha", who claimed to be an employee of a well-known multinational IT services company. Police said: "Over time, she befriended the complainant and gained his trust. Neha advised him to invest in trading via a website that promised high returns. The complainant invested 1.7 lakh, and the platform displayed an apparent profit of $20,100 (approx. 17 lakh). However, when he attempted to withdraw the funds, he was asked to pay 4.8 lakh as tax." The victim then paid 1.4 lakh and another 75,000 after being misled into believing these were necessary charges for withdrawal. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Are Houses In Dubai So Cheap? Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Undo When he was later asked to pay an additional $3,326 (2.9 lakh), he realised it was a scam. Based on his complaint after losing 8 lakh, the police arrested C Santosh Kumar, a resident of Warsiguda. In another case, a victim lost 1 crore, believing he was investing in a Hong Kong-based company. He was contacted by Lakshya Verma, who claimed to be from Delhi. "The victim realised he was defrauded when it became clear the company did not exist," ACP Prasad said. Probe revealed that Para Singla, also from Delhi, played a key role. He was arrested and found to be using 30 mobile phones to orchestrate the fraud. In a separate IPO fraud case, police arrested three persons from Maharashtra, who duped a victim by promising 890% return within three to six months. The accused persuaded the victim to register on an app, allowing initial withdrawals to build trust. They then convinced him to invest up to 79 lakh.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Second US appeals court open to blocking Trump's birthright citizenship order
By Nate Raymond Second US appeals court open to blocking Trump's birthright citizenship order -U.S. President Donald Trump's order restricting birthright citizenship appeared on Friday to be headed toward being declared unconstitutional by a second federal appeals court, as judges expressed deep skepticism about a key piece of his hardline immigration agenda. A three-judge panel of the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sharply questioned a lawyer with the U.S. Department of Justice as to why they should overturn two lower-court judges who blocked the order from taking effect. Those lower-court judges include one in Boston who last week reaffirmed his prior decision to block the order's enforcement nationally, even after the U.S. Supreme Court in June curbed the power of judges to broadly enjoin that and other policies. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week became the first federal appeals court to hold Trump's order is unconstitutional. Its ultimate fate will likely be determined by the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice Department attorney Eric McArthur said on Friday that the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 after the U.S. Civil War, rightly extended citizenship to the children of newly-freed enslaved Black people. "It did not extend birthright citizenship as a matter of constitutional right to the children of aliens who are present in the country temporarily or unlawfully," he said. But the judges questioned how that argument was consistent with the Supreme Court's 1898 ruling interpreting the clause in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, long understood as guaranteeing American citizenship to children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. "We have an opinion by the Supreme Court that we aren't free to disregard," said Chief U.S. Circuit Judge David Barron, who like his two colleagues was appointed by a Democratic president. Trump's executive order, issued on his first day back in office on January 20, directs agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder. Every court to consider the order's merits has declared it unconstitutional, including the three judges who halted the order's enforcement nationally. Those judges included U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston, who ruled in favor of 18 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia, who had swiftly challenged Trump's policy in court. "The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized children born to individuals who are here unlawfully or who are here on a temporary basis are nonetheless birthright citizens," Shankar Duraiswamy, a lawyer for New Jersey, argued on Friday. The 6-3 conservative majority U.S. Supreme Court on June 27 sided with the administration in the litigation by restricting the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directing lower courts that had blocked Trump's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. But the ruling contained exceptions, allowing federal judges in Massachusetts and New Hampshire and the 9th Circuit to issue new decisions stopping Trump's order from taking effect nationally. The rulings on appeal to the 1st Circuit were issued by Sorokin and the New Hampshire judge, who originally issued a narrow injunction but more recently issued a new decision in a recently-filed class action blocking Trump's order nationwide. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
