State to hold programmes on women's safety at workplaces
Deputy chief minister Pravati Parida urged all women employees to raise their voices against any kind of harassment at the workplace while addressing an orientation programme for employees of the state secretariat here on Wednesday.
"The state govt is firmly committed to creating safe and dignified workplaces for all," said Parida, addressing over 600 govt employees. She stressed the need to foster a culture of respect, equality, and zero tolerance towards sexual harassment in workplaces.
"Such orientation programmes should be conducted in all govt offices. Both men and women can be victims. Everyone must be aware of the POSH Act and speak up against any form of harassment. Mutual respect and understanding are essential to ensure not only safe workplaces but also a progressive society," Parida added.
She further informed that the govt has issued strict instructions for the formation of internal compalints committees in all institutions and colleges to ensure the effective implementation of the POSH Act.
"While genuine complaints will be addressed with due seriousness and appropriate punishment will be meted out after proper investigation, those filing false allegations will also be dealt with as per the law," she added.
Legal expert Manasi Padhi conducted two in-depth sessions during the programme, explaining the provisions, responsibilities, and redressal mechanisms under the POSH Act. She sensitised employees and informed them how to prevent and respond to workplace harassment.
Apart from women employees of the state secretariat, director of women and child development department Monisha Banerjee and other senior officials were present.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Karnataka high court stays legal action against minister
Bengaluru: The Karnataka high court has temporarily halted the legal proceedings initiated against state energy minister KJ George, in connection with the allegations surrounding the state's smart meter tender process. The Karnataka high court has temporarily halted the legal proceedings initiated against state energy minister KJ George in connection with the the state's smart meter tender process. (HT PHOTO) The interim stay was ordered by Justice MI Arun, who was hearing George's plea challenging the maintainability of a case filed in the Special Court designated to handle criminal matters involving lawmakers. The case stems from a private complaint filed by BJP leaders CN Ashwath Narayan, SR Vishwanath and Dheeraj Muniraj. Earlier, on July 23, the Special Court had ordered the registration of a private complaint against George, former BESCOM managing director Mahantesh Bilgi and engineer Ramesh HJ. The complaint alleges irregularities in the awarding of the smart meter contract, alleging that the minister colluded with BESCOM officials to favour a particular company— Rajashree Electricals—by diluting eligibility norms and undervaluing the contract. The complaint pertains to a tender floated by BESCOM on September 26, 2024, for smart meter services. The BJP leaders allege that the contract was awarded to Rajashree Electricals, a company described in the petition as a shell entity based in Davangere, in violation of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement (KTPP) Act, 2000, and the rules of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC). The petitioners claim that instead of issuing separate tenders for each power supply company across regions, the entire contract was routed through BESCOM, bypassing norms meant to ensure competition and transparency. Appearing for George, senior advocate Shathabish Shivanna contended that the prosecution lacked mandatory sanction. 'Our client is a sitting legislator. Under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, prior sanction from the competent authority is required to prosecute a public servant. In this case, no such sanction was obtained before initiating proceedings. This makes the entire process legally untenable,' he argued. The court took cognisance of the argument and stayed proceedings before the Special Court. George's legal team further asserted that the complaint lacked substance and was politically driven. 'A plain reading of the allegations shows that our client had no direct or indirect role. The complaint is vague, politically motivated, and part of a larger pattern of harassment by BJP legislators,' they said. Advocates Samruddh Sura Hegde and Leela P appeared for the BESCOM officers named in the case. The interim stay drew sharp reactions from politicians on both sides of the political spectrum. 'It is an open secret that minister KJ George through BESCOM looted public money on the pretext of smart meters,' said BJP state media convener K Karunakar. 'A smart meter costs ₹10,000 here while same meter cost is just ₹2,000 in neighbouring states. This is a clear case of corruption and the court will punish him,' he added. The Congress rejected the allegations, with KPCC general secretary Manjunath Bhandari saying, 'This is not a scam. The government is doing all tender proceedings transparently and all the suppliers of meters were allowed to participate in the process.' He added, 'KJ George will come out clean after the probe.'
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Top court directs states to notify free education in private schools for orphans
The Supreme Court has ordered the state governments to issue notifications to allow orphans, children from weaker sections and disadvantaged groups to receive free education in private schools under the 25 per cent quota.A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and KV Vishwanathan, while hearing the case of Paulomi Pavini Shukla vs Union of India, clarified that states like Meghalaya, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Gujarat and Delhi have already issued notifications in this it ordered other states to do the same within four weeks. The court ordered that Delhi, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Gujarat have already issued notifications to include orphans under the definition of Section 12(1)(c) of the Right to Education (RTE) Act. The court have directed all other states to issue the same notification within four weeks following which they will inform Supreme Court regarding the matter. The bench also directed the states to conduct a survey of orphan children who have been admitted to schools or those who have been rejected by court stressed that the reason for refusal of admission must be recorded in the survey and Along with it, efforts should also be made to ensure admission of such (orphan) children in bench gave instructions in which directions were sought for standardised education, reservation and survey for counting the orphan population in court also highlighted the lack of official data regarding orphan children and said that it reflects the country's indifference towards the weaker section of the appearing in the court, argued that the Government of India does not count orphan children in the country. The only reliable data the government has comes from NGOs and independent organizations like UNICEF, which estimate that there are 29.6 million (2.96 crore) orphan children in India. - EndsTune InMust Watch
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Punish incestuous assault severely: SC
Incestuous sexual violence by a parent tears through the foundational fabric of familial trust and must invite the severest condemnation in both language and sentence, the Supreme Court held on Wednesday, dismissing a petition filed by a man convicted of repeatedly raping his minor daughter Punish incestuous assault severely: SC 'The home, which should be a sanctuary, cannot be permitted to become a site of unspeakable trauma, and the courts must send a clear signal that such offences will be met with an equally unsparing judicial response,' said a bench of justices Aravind Kumar and Sandeep Mehta. To entertain a plea for leniency in a case of this nature, the court stressed, would not merely be misplaced, but constitute a betrayal of the court's own constitutional duty to protect the vulnerable. 'When a child is forced to suffer at the hands of her own father, the law must speak in a voice that is resolute and uncompromising. There can be no mitigation in sentencing for crimes that subvert the very notion of family as a space of security,' said the bench, affirming the life sentence for the convict. Rejecting outright, the plea to consider his bail in the 2013 crime, the court added that any leniency in such cases would amount to 'a judicial insult to the sanctity of womanhood' and 'a betrayal of the constitutional promise made to every child of this country.' 'When a father who is expected to be a shield, a guardian, a moral compass, becomes the source of the most severe violation of a child's bodily integrity and dignity, the betrayal is not only personal but institutional. The law does not, and cannot, condone such acts under the guise of rehabilitation or reform,' it said. Upholding the Himachal Pradesh High Court's July 2024 judgment that affirmed the man's life sentence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the court said the case reflected a horrifying abuse of trust, where the father became the 'source of the most severe violation of a child's bodily integrity and dignity.' The court noted that the victim was around 10 years old when the assaults began, which were not isolated but sustained violations inside the home – 'a place where every child expects protection.' Referring to the father's repeated acts of aggravated penetrative sexual assault, the bench said the crime 'assumes a demonic character' when committed by a parent, and warrants the 'severest condemnation in both language and sentence.' 'No daughter, however aggrieved, would fabricate charges of this magnitude against her own father merely to escape household discipline,' observed the bench, rejecting the convict's claim that he was falsely implicated due to strained domestic relationships. It acknowledged that 'incestuous sexual violence constitutes a distinct category of offence that tears through the foundational fabric of familial trust', holding that such offences deserve nothing but the severest condemnation and deterrent punishment. 'To pardon such depravity under any guise would be a travesty of justice and a betrayal of the child protection mandate embedded in our constitutional and statutory framework,' maintained the bench, underlining the court's zero-tolerance approach. Reiterating that justice must not be limited to conviction, the court also emphasised the importance of restitution and rehabilitation, especially for child survivors. Invoking Article 142 of the Constitution, the bench directed the state of Himachal Pradesh to pay a compensation of ₹10.5 lakh to the now-major survivor, exceeding the maximum prescribed under the NALSA Compensation Scheme by 50% due to the gravity of the offence and age of the victim. Of this amount, ₹7 lakh is to be fixed in a nationalised bank for five years in the survivor's name, with quarterly interest accessible to her. The remaining ₹3.5 lakh is to be transferred directly to her account. The process will be monitored by the Himachal Pradesh State Legal Services Authority. 'In awarding this compensation, we reaffirm the constitutional commitment to protect the rights and dignity of child survivors, and to ensure that the justice delivered is substantive, compassionate and complete,' held the court.
