logo
'Must never happen again': Call for inquiry into culling of hundreds of koalas

'Must never happen again': Call for inquiry into culling of hundreds of koalas

9 News06-05-2025

Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here PICTURES All the incredible looks on the Met Gala red carpet Wildlife experts are calling for an inquiry hundreds of koalas were shot from helicopters to "reduce suffering" after a bushfire. The Victorian government says the animals were "individually assessed" after the fire swept through Budj Bim National Park, 270km west of Melbourne in March. But some experts are questioning how this was possible. Victoria's Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action (DEECA) confirmed around 860 animals were shot from the air in the remote area, saying it was "accurate and humane". Wildlife experts are calling for an inquiry into the shooting of hundreds of koalas from helicopters a state government claims aimed to "reduce suffering" after a bushfire. (Getty) "This was the humane action to take to prevent further suffering," a statement said. "This decision to employ this method was not taken lightly." However, Claire Smith, who runs Wildlife Rescue Sunshine Coast, claims as many as 1100 koalas were killed. "Let's just take the shooting part, when they send out shooters in helicopters to shoot brumbies they can't even shoot them dead," she told 9News. "How does anyone believe that these koalas have been shot with a one shot kill. "There will be a thousand bodies laying around - not all of those koalas would have died straight away when they are shot. "How many had joeys? How many joeys are dead because of this? "They'll be digging pits to bury these koalas. "Secondly how is anybody assessing these koalas from a helicopter?" The fire started on March 10 after a lightning strike. (Facebook/Vic Emergency) She wants an independent inquiry into what happened. Smith, who has launched a petition dismissed DEECA claims the terrain was too difficult to access from the ground as "nonsense". "There needs to be open and transparent documentation about the decision that was taken to shoot koalas from the air and we want to see an independent report. "This sets a precedent now, and it must never, ever happen again." Bosses at the Humane World for Animals charity also want an inquiry. "While we're relieved that the koala shooting operation has ceased, the need to learn from this incident and ensure positive welfare outcomes for surviving koalas remains urgent," Evan Quartermain, Australian Head of Programs, said in a statement. While Victorian government says the animals were "individually assessed" after the fire swept through Budj Bim National Park, 270km west of Melbourne in March, experts are questioning how this was possible. (Facebook/Vic Emergency) "Humane World for Animals is communicating with and supporting concerned locals and koala advocates on the ground around Budj Bim as we continue to scrutinise information." Victoria's Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action (DEECA) told 9News it worked with "experienced vets, wildlife carers, and animal welfare experts" to '"individually assess" the creatures. "However, due to direct impacts of the fire, the poor health and low likelihood of survival of many animals due to the ongoing drought conditions and lack of food post-fire, many of the animals did require euthanising," it said in a statement. Victoria's Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action (DEECA) said it worked with experienced vets, wildlife carers, and animal welfare experts to '"individually assess" the creatures after the fire. (Facebook/Vic Emergency) "The options were to just leave them to deteriorate or take proactive steps to reduce suffering by using aerial assessments. "A ground-based veterinary assessment conducted by a wildlife vet during an aerial trial showed that all koalas assessed and euthanised by the aerial team during the trial were in very poor health and would have continued to suffer in a deteriorating state of welfare if they had remained alive." The fire started after a lightning strike. It burned around 22sq km of the 54sq km park according to VicEmergency. Koalas on the east coast of Australia could be extinct by 2050, the WWF says. Koala
wildlife
bushfires
Australia
national
Victoria CONTACT US

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Foot in the mouth elder statesman has done the Liberals no favour
Foot in the mouth elder statesman has done the Liberals no favour

Sydney Morning Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Foot in the mouth elder statesman has done the Liberals no favour

Just when the Liberal Party is struggling to rebuild and move into the 21st century following a series of self-inflicted wounds and May 3's near-death electoral defeat, a blundering tribal elder has glanced backwards and shown that political parties are quite capable of rotting from the top. Alan Stockdale, a former Liberal Party federal president and ex-Victorian treasurer, brought in to save the NSW Liberal branch from self harm, has managed to shoot himself and the party in the feet, telling a Zoom meeting of the NSW Liberal Women's Council this week, 'women are sufficiently assertive now… we should be giving some thought to whether we need to protect men's involvement'. As bewildered outrage raced along the Liberals' bush telegraph and federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley all but sneered, Stockdale apologised. 'Following a discussion of quotas, I made a light-hearted but poorly chosen remark. I certainly intended no disrespect to anyone, and I regret that people felt disrespected,' he said. Not good enough, sir. A current perspective on Stockdale could explain such shellback obstinacy: as a state treasurer he played Elon Musk to Jeff Kennett's Donald Trump when the Liberals swept a floundering Labor government aside and imposed radical financial reforms and massive public service cuts. Post politics, board chairmanships and a six-year stint as federal president followed. Former leader Peter Dutton last year appointed Stockdale, 80, another outsider, former Victorian senator Richard Alston, 84, and former NSW MP Peta Seaton, 65, as administrators to run the NSW division after its failure to nominate 144 candidates for local government elections. However, there is deep division over whether their planned term should end on June 30. The federal executive of the party will consider an extension of the trio's term at a meeting on June 17. The Liberals' plight has forced modernisation. But Stockdale's antediluvian comments on Liberal women are absurd, especially when commonsense demands the party abandon the entrenched opposition to affirmative action and quotas for women. His words also display political ineptitude unworthy of an elder statesman charged with rebuilding his party to recapture its lost heartland. As the Herald 's state political editor Alexandra Smith noted, Stockdale's pitch to Liberal women should be enough to send the clear message that he and Alston were not the right pick, let alone demographic, to turn around a troubled party which has been reduced to a rump of just six federal seats in NSW. Their term should not be extended, and consideration to appointing talented women of the Liberal Party should take the reins. This does not mean the end of federal intervention. The Liberals remain a mess that must be cleaned up and a new beginning found. Democracy needs the party to be fighting fit and move beyond internecine brawling, factionalism and living in the past. The cause has not been helped by Stockdale's foot in mouth. He is a case study of the people put in charge of the Liberals who have brought the party to its current parlous state.

New poll shows more than 70 per cent of public support Australian flag as Mornington Peninsula council responds to backlash
New poll shows more than 70 per cent of public support Australian flag as Mornington Peninsula council responds to backlash

Sky News AU

time3 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

New poll shows more than 70 per cent of public support Australian flag as Mornington Peninsula council responds to backlash

The Australian flag is viewed as a symbol of unity by an overwhelming majority of the public, despite local council bureaucrats erasing it from flyers. Mornington Peninsula Shire Council was sent into damage control this week after it emerged that council materials were being put out with the Aboriginal flag, Torres Strait Islander flag and the woke 'progress pride' flag – but not the Australian flag. The council flyers are wildly out of step with community attitudes, with a new poll released on Thursday showing that just 10 per cent of people want to get rid of the Australian flag. The survey of 1000 people, commissioned by the Institute of Public Affairs and carried out by Dynata – an independent marketing research firm – found that 71 per cent of Australians believe our national flag helped unite all Australians. While Australia currently has three officially recognised national flags, the IPA poll found that 61 per cent of Australians believe we should have just one flag – the Australian flag – while 29 per cent of respondents support the Australian flag being displayed alongside the Aboriginal flag and the Torres Strait Islander flag. Institute of Public Affairs Deputy Executive Director Daniel Wild said the Australian flag was the nation's 'most inclusive flag'. 'The Australian flag is our most inclusive flag as it represents our entire nation and every Australian, regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, or gender,' Mr Wild said. 'The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags have an important place in our society, but Australia has only one national flag. The Mornington Peninsula Council materials that had the Australian Flag removed include a flyer encouraging parents to sign their kids up to Kindergarten, a Child and Family news flyer, and a Health and Development Assessment flyer. According to the Herald Sun, at least one council office in Mornington also displays only the three minority flags on its entry doors. The Mayor of Mornington Peninsula and the council's chief executive have both denied knowing about the flyers before they appeared in the news. And on Tuesday evening Councillors voted to amend the council's flag policy to ensure the incident was not repeated. Mayor Anthony Marsh has told that "going forward" the council will ensure the Australian flag is included on all publications and materials it puts out. According to Mr Wild, the public backlash against the council reflects the fact Australians have 'had a gutful' of divisive identity politics. 'At a time when social cohesion is disintegrating across the nation, mainstream Australians understand that our symbols are unifying, and should be cherished and celebrated at all times. After all, there is far more that unites Australians than divides us,' he said.

Please slurp your noodles: Dos and don'ts of eating out in Asia
Please slurp your noodles: Dos and don'ts of eating out in Asia

The Age

time15 hours ago

  • The Age

Please slurp your noodles: Dos and don'ts of eating out in Asia

If you ever dine with locals in China, Japan or South Korea for business or pleasure, you'll have the chance to connect in a relaxed setting. A few rules of etiquette, however, will make for a better experience and impress your hosts. You wouldn't want to appear greedy or hungry, would you? Both may be taken as a sign of poverty or lack of refinement. If invited to someone's house, politely decline food the first time it's offered. Not to worry, you'll be given a second (and third) chance to eat. In restaurants, especially in China, consideration and respect is shown by plucking fine morsels from communal dishes and placing them in your companions' bowls. Again, you might make a polite protest. So will your fellow diners, but don't take them at their word. Try again. It's also polite to refill other diners' teacups, glasses and soy-sauce dishes before your own. This is especially true in Japan, where nobody ever pours their own drink. When someone offers to pour your drink, lift your glass up with one hand supporting it from below, then take a small sip before setting it down. In Japan toasts are proposed at the start of meals; in China they'll be ongoing. Whoever hosts should be first to offer a toast, and will probably order the food without consultation. Meals can be convivial except in South Korea, where too much chatter shows lack of respect for the food and occasion. Anywhere, polite Australian conversational fillers about the weather or traffic will cause bemusement. Talk about the food, however, will be welcomed. Brace yourself: few topics are off limits. The Chinese might quiz you about your age, religion, marital status, salary, rent or the cost of the clothes on your back. Awkward, but take it as a great opportunity to turn the tables and find out more about your hosts. And so to the food. While chomping is universally considered uncouth, slurping soup or noodles can be a sign of appreciation in Asia. Such dishes are also 'inhaled' to cool them as you eat. Only hungry peasants fill up on rice, so don't ask for it if hosted. You'll get a small bowl of rice towards the end of the meal in China. In Japan, rice is eaten between courses and never mixed with food.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store