logo
North Carolina lawmakers finalize bill that would scrap 2030 carbon reduction goal

North Carolina lawmakers finalize bill that would scrap 2030 carbon reduction goal

Yahoo19-06-2025
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina legislators finalized a bill Thursday that would eliminate an interim greenhouse gas reduction mandate set in a landmark 2021 law, while still directing regulators to aim to cancel out power plant carbon emissions in the state within the next 25 years.
With some bipartisan support, the state Senate voted to accept the House version that would repeal the 2021 law's requirement that electric regulators take 'all reasonable steps to achieve' reducing carbon dioxide output 70% from 2005 levels by 2030. The law's directive to take similar steps to meet a carbon neutrality standard by 2050 would remain in place.
The bill's Republican supporters pushing the new measure say getting rid of the interim goal benefits ratepayers asked to pay for future electric-production construction and is more efficient for Duke Energy, the state's dominant electric utility.
The bill now goes to Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, who can veto the measure, sign it or let it become law without his signature. Stein previously expressed concerns about the Senate version of the measure, worried that it could hurt electricity users and threaten the state's clean-energy economy. His office didn't immediately provide comment after Thursday's vote.
With over a dozen House and Senate Democrats voting for the final version, the chances that any Stein veto could be overridden are higher. Republicans in charge of the General Assembly are only one House seat shy of a veto-proof majority.
The bill also contains language that would help Duke Energy seek higher electric rates to cover financing costs to build nuclear or gas-powered plants incrementally, rather than wait until the project's end.
The 2021 greenhouse gas law marked a rare agreement on environmental issues by then-Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper and Republican lawmakers.
At least 17 other states — most controlled by Democrats — have laws setting similar net-zero power plant emissions or 100% renewable energy targets, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council. North Carolina and Virginia are the only ones from the Southeast.
The legislation came about as President Donald Trump's administration has proposed rolling back federal environmental and climate change policies, which critics say could boost pollution and threaten human health. Republicans are promoting them as ways to reduce the cost of living and boost the economy.
The state Utilities Commission, which regulates rates and services for public utilities, already has pushed back the 2030 deadline — as the 2021 law allows — by at least four years. The panel acknowledged last year it was 'no longer reasonable or executable' for Duke Energy to meet the reduction standard by 2030.
Bill supporters say to meet the goal would require expensive types of alternate energy immediately. If the interim standard can be bypassed, GOP bill authors say, Duke Energy can assemble less expensive power sources now and moderate electricity rate increases necessary to reach the 2050 standard.
Citing an analysis performed by a state agency that represents consumers before the commission, GOP lawmakers say removing the interim goal would reduce by at least $13 billion what Duke Energy would have to spend — and pass on to customers — in the next 25 years.
Bill opponents question the savings figure given uncertainty in plant fuel prices, energy demand and construction costs, and say the interim goal still holds an aspirational purpose to while Duke Energy agreed in 2021 to meet.
Provisions in the measure related to recouping plant construction expenses over time would reduce accumulated borrowing interest.
Environmental groups argue the financing option would benefit Duke Energy financially on expensive projects even if they're never completed, and the bill broadly would prevent cleaner energy sources from coming online sooner.
'This bill is bad for all North Carolinians, whether they're Duke Energy customers or simply people who want to breathe clean air,' North Carolina Sierra Club director Chris Herndon said after the vote while urging Stein to veto the measure.
Bill support came from the North Carolina Chamber and a manufacturers' group, in addition to Duke Energy.
'We appreciate bipartisan efforts by policymakers to keep costs as low as possible for customers and enable the always-on energy resources our communities need,' the company said this week.
Gary D. Robertson, The Associated Press
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Dream Act supporters sue to restore in-state tuition for undocumented students
Texas Dream Act supporters sue to restore in-state tuition for undocumented students

CBS News

time20 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Texas Dream Act supporters sue to restore in-state tuition for undocumented students

There is a growing legal fight to reinstate the Texas Dream Act, which gave college students without legal residency access to reduced in-state tuition. Several law firms and nonprofit organizations have filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas, arguing the law is essential for educational equity. Student shares personal impact Among those on the front lines is Oscar Silva, who came to Texas at the age of 1 and has called Garland home ever since. "My senior year, I remember being terrified because I couldn't land any scholarships," Silva said. "A lot of the scholarships I tried to apply for were only for U.S. citizens, and so that was a significant barrier for me. For the longest, I thought I was just not going to be able to afford college." With the help of the Texas Dream Act, Silva was able to attend the University of North Texas for his undergraduate degree. He said it also motivated him to pursue a master's degree. Sense of belonging in college "Throughout undergrad, I just remember feeling very, very happy that I could attend college, that I could sit in classes with my peers and pretend like everything was normal—that I belonged there just as much as they did," Silva said. ACLU joins legal effort The ACLU of Texas is among the groups working to restore the law. "I feel like we have a very strong argument moving forward," said Valeria Alvarado with the ACLU of Texas. "And what I can confidently also say is that the Texas Dream Act is not going to go away without a fight." Judge rules law unconstitutional In June, a federal judge blocked the Texas Dream Act, calling it "unconstitutional and invalid." Domingo Garcia, who was a state representative in 2001, helped write the bill, which passed with bipartisan support. Supporters call repeal cruel "It's been the law of the land, and attempts to repeal it over the years have all failed," Garcia said. "It's just really cruel, manipulative and mean-spirited what is being done by the attorney general and the DOJ." Student balances school and advocacy As the issue heads to court, Silva is balancing his final year in a master's program while also joining the group intervening in the lawsuit. "I want to continue higher ed. I want to finish my master's. I want to see my degrees to the end," Silva said. "I've got to do whatever I can in my power to make sure that my education is not tampered with." Tuition costs could double Silva said without the Texas Dream Act, his tuition will nearly double. According to the University of North Texas' online tuition calculator, a master's degree in accounting costs about $7,600 per year for in-state students. For out-of-state students—now including Silva—it's more than $12,600.

Trump's Brazen New Lie Leads To Instant Fact-Check On Social Media
Trump's Brazen New Lie Leads To Instant Fact-Check On Social Media

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Brazen New Lie Leads To Instant Fact-Check On Social Media

President Donald Trump on Friday made a wild new claim about wind power as he renewed his attacks on renewable energy. Trump complained that many of the components used in wind turbines are made in China, then suggested that China itself doesn't actually use wind turbines. 'I have never seen a wind farm in China,' Trump declared. 'Why is that? Somebody check that out.' In reality, China is far and away the world's leading producer of wind energy, with more than triple the current U.S. wind capacity. Trump, however, has long had issues with renewable energy ― especially wind, which he has called 'bullshit' and 'a hoax,' a grudge he has held since a dispute over an offshore wind farm near one of his resorts. Now, Trump might finally get his way as his 'big beautiful bill' will wipe out tax credits for wind and solar power, potentially decimating the industry. The Rhodium Group, a research firm, estimates the bill will put a stop to between 57% and 72% of new solar and wind projects. North America's Building Trades Unions slammed the move as 'the biggest job-killing bill in the history of this country' as those projects are cancelled. 'Critical infrastructure projects essential to that future are being sacrificed at the altar of ideology,' the organization said in a statement. New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman said China is 'laughing' at the United States as a result, writing: 'The Chinese simply can't believe their luck: that at the dawn of the electricity-guzzling era of artificial intelligence, the U.S. president and his party have decided to engage in one of the greatest acts of strategic self-harm imaginable. They have passed a giant bill that, among other craziness, deliberately undermines America's ability to generate electricity through renewables — solar, battery and wind power in particular.' Since Trump said 'somebody check that out' when railing against wind power, many people did exactly that ― and gave the president a fact-check:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store