logo
Is Dr. Bronner's Castile Soap Really the Only Household Soap You Need?

Is Dr. Bronner's Castile Soap Really the Only Household Soap You Need?

New York Times10-06-2025
Both soap and modern-day detergents clean by mixing with water to lower the surface tension and lift dirt away. When the solution rubs against a surface, such as dirty dishes, the dirt temporarily bonds to the solution, allowing you to rinse or wipe it away.
Andrea compared the cleaning power of Dr. Bronner's liquid Castile soap with that of two dish detergents, Seventh Generation Dish Soap and Dawn Platinum Dishwashing Liquid, which contain multiple surfactants to pull dirt from dishes and hands, as well as other ingredients such as viscosity adjusters, pH adjusters, and stabilizers to hold the formula together. (Though 'soap' and 'detergent' are often used interchangeably by both consumers and manufacturers, the Seventh Generation and Dawn liquids are both technically detergents, while Dr. Bronner's is a true soap.)
I also used Dr. Bronner's Castile soap as dish soap in my kitchen, scrubbing plastic storage containers with greasy film, an enamelware sheet pan with baked-on cheese, and stainless steel utensils with peanut butter and cream sauce residue. During my day-to-day testing, I applied a few drops of Castile soap to a sponge and cleaned dishes in my sink just as I would with dish detergent. Caroline Mullen/NYT Wirecutter Castile soap produces suds like dish detergent, but it left my hands feeling quite dry, and I had to rinse dishes more thoroughly than I would with dish detergent. Caroline Mullen/NYT Wirecutter During my day-to-day testing, I applied a few drops of Castile soap to a sponge and cleaned dishes in my sink just as I would with dish detergent. Caroline Mullen/NYT Wirecutter
The Dr. Bronner's soap did an adequate job of cleaning dishes, sudsing up similarly to the dish detergents. But it was less effective than the Seventh Generation and Dawn liquids, which did a better job of tackling grease and stuck-on food and required less rinsing for items to get clean.
The verdict: 2 out of 5 (somewhat effective with some shortcomings). Dr. Bronner's Castile soap will clean your dishes, but we found that the dish detergents were better at lifting grease and stuck-on food, and with their neutral pH, they're less likely to irritate your hands.
They are also less likely to leave a film of soap scum in the sink or on your dishes if you're not careful about thoroughly rinsing it off. That is especially true if you have hard water, since soap scum develops when saponified oils (like those in Castile soap) react with minerals in water.
In addition to surfactants, most laundry detergents also include other cleaning ingredients, such as enzymes, which target and break down proteins, fats, and carbohydrates that are otherwise difficult to remove with soap or surfactants alone.
Depending on the type of detergent and how you use it (such as in a machine versus hand-washing), a laundry detergent may also include other additives, such as polymers to suspend dirt before being washed away, optical brighteners and oxidizing agents to improve the appearance of fabrics, solvents to stabilize formulas, and disinfectants like bleach or other antibacterial agents.
We tested Dr. Bronner's liquid Castile soap as a hand-washing laundry detergent against Soak Laundry Rinse and Dirty Labs Hand Wash & Delicates Detergent, two picks from our hand-washing laundry detergents guide. Andrea tested how the cleaners removed stains by washing industrial stain monitors, professionally stained jersey-cotton swatches that allow us to directly compare cleaning power on substances such as red wine, pig blood, sebum, peat, and engine oil. We also washed three swatches of sebum-stained silk with each detergent and Castile soap and compared the results. We hand-washed jersey-cotton swatches that were pretreated with common stains. While neither cleaner eliminated the stains, Dr. Bronner's Castile soap (left) made little difference, while Dirty Labs Hand Wash & Delicates Detergent (right) significantly improved some stains. Andrea Barnes/NYT Wirecutter We washed sebum-stained silk with the three cleaners. From top to bottom: Dirty Labs Hand Wash & Delicates Detergent, Soak, and Dr. Bronner's. The detergents almost returned the sebum-stained silk back to its original luster, while Dr. Bronner's soap made almost no difference. Andrea Barnes/NYT Wirecutter We hand-washed jersey-cotton swatches that were pretreated with common stains. While neither cleaner eliminated the stains, Dr. Bronner's Castile soap (left) made little difference, while Dirty Labs Hand Wash & Delicates Detergent (right) significantly improved some stains. Andrea Barnes/NYT Wirecutter
Dr. Bronner's Castile soap performed worse than either of our picks. It lifted significantly fewer stains on the stain monitor than the Dirty Labs detergent, our pick for washing stained delicates. The Dr. Bronner's soap also left the sebum-stained silk looking rather gray compared with the samples we washed with the Soak and Dirty Labs detergents.
The verdict: 1 out of 5 (ineffective with disqualifying shortcomings). Dr. Bronner's Castile soap was far worse at lifting stains than the hand-wash laundry detergents we tested. Vigorous scrubbing or very hot water might improve its performance, but we don't recommend trying, since they may damage delicate fabrics you would typically wash by hand, such as silk, lace, cashmere, and wool. Hand-wash laundry detergents like Dirty Labs Hand Wash & Delicates Detergent and Soak are gentle on fabrics and have proven stain removal abilities.
Like dish and laundry detergent, all-purpose spray cleaners work by lowering the surface tension between the dirt or liquid you're removing and the liquid of the cleaning solution. Dirt, grease, and crud become suspended in the solution and can then be wiped away with a cloth.
I tested Dr. Bronner's liquid Castile soap as an all-purpose cleaner by diluting it according to package instructions and comparing its effectiveness with that of the top pick in our all-purpose cleaner guide, Clorox Free & Clear Multi-Surface Spray Cleaner. I used it on sriracha and toothpaste that I had left to dry on glass, as well as on smeared butter and ricotta on stainless steel. I cleaned the messes with both sprays using a microfiber cloth, paper towels, and a cotton rag. We tested a diluted Castile soap solution on (clockwise from top left) dried sriracha and toothpaste on a glass table and ricotta cheese and butter on a stainless steel fridge. Caroline Mullen/NYT Wirecutter
The Dr. Bronner's soap and the Clorox all-purpose cleaner both cleaned those surfaces, although Dr. Bronner's left behind more streaking and residue and required an extra buffing-dry step to get the surfaces fully spotless. Both cleaners were effective and required the same level of soaking (spraying and leaving the solution to sit) and scrubbing action to remove the dried substances. One major drawback to using diluted Castile soap as an all-purpose spray: Overspray not immediately wiped up leaves behind residue. Caroline Mullen/NYT Wirecutter
The verdict: 2 out of 5 (somewhat effective with some shortcomings). As an all-purpose cleaner, diluted Castile soap worked about as well as our top pick when applied in small amounts. But you may need to worry about residue and streaking.
A few things can help to prevent those issues: Use the smallest amount possible, which is easier to fully wipe off than a heavy spray. Wipe up overspray immediately, or it may leave behind specks of soap scum, which I noticed were particularly visible on stainless steel. Use a microfiber cloth, rather than a paper towel or a cotton cloth, as the tiny fibers of a microfiber cloth are more effective at buffing away residue.
I found these extra steps to be enough of a deterrent that I wouldn't opt for diluted Castile soap as an alternative to Clorox Free & Clear Multi-Surface Spray Cleaner. When I reach for an all-purpose cleaner, I'm usually quickly wiping something down, such as kitchen appliances or countertops, and worrying about residue eliminates Castile soap as a replacement.
Neither Castile soap nor Clorox Free & Clear Multi-Surface Spray Cleaner is a disinfectant, though with scrubbing and wiping or rinsing, either cleaner can remove pathogens. For disinfecting, we recommend using Clorox Clean-Up Cleaner + Bleach for killing pathogens such as bacteria or viruses.
There's a misconception that cleaning products made from synthetic ingredients may be more irritating than those made from natural ones. Depending on their formulations, detergents and Castile soap alike may be harsh for your skin, particularly if you have underlying skin conditions.
In fact, due to their alkaline pH, Castile soaps may be more drying than some detergents, said Marisa Garshick, a dermatologist and assistant clinical professor of dermatology at Cornell University, since Castile soap is even more alkaline than most detergents. This is especially true if you use Castile soap straight from the bottle without diluting it, for instance, as a dish soap, though some formulations, like Dr. Bronner's Unscented Pure-Castile Magic Soap, may include unsaponified fatty acids to help minimize irritation.
Whether you're using a detergent or Castile soap, Garshick recommends wearing gloves when cleaning by hand or washing off residue, and applying moisturizer afterward.
People with eczema or sensitive skin should be especially cautious when trying any new product. And keep in mind that any scented cleaner could be potentially irritating to people with allergies, respiratory conditions, or fragrance sensitivities.
If you are considering health and safety when looking for a cleaning product, note that 'natural,' 'non-toxic,' 'eco-friendly,' or 'clean' claims on labels are unregulated and may mean different things to different manufacturers. Voluntary third-party certifications, such as the EPA Safer Choice certification, UL Ecologo, or Green Seal, may give more peace of mind, since they set criteria for product ingredients regarding human and environmental safety. Dr. Bronner's Castile soap contains ingredients that are certified organic, which means they adhere to the standards outlined by the USDA's National Organic Program.
After weighing performance and safety considerations, I don't plan to switch to Castile soap over my preferred dish soap, laundry detergent, or all-purpose cleaner. Its universal-cleaner promises are enticing, and it does perform adequately or well at some tasks, but for other purposes it can't compare to the best dedicated cleaners. I'll use the rest of the bottle I have on hand for quick wipe-downs in the kitchen and otherwise, but after that's gone, I'll repurchase my old standbys.
This article was edited by Katie Okamoto and Megan Beauchamp. Andrea Barnes contributed reporting. If you're sensitive or allergic to fragrances in cleaning, personal-care, or other products, there's a distinct difference you should keep in mind.
After 65 hours of research, testing 28 detergents, and 7 years of long-term testing, we found Seventh Generation Dish Liquid to be the best dish soap for most people.
We hand-washed vintage linens, cashmere sweaters, and delicates in a variety of detergents and soaps, and Soak came out on top.
Clorox Free & Clear Multi-Surface Spray Cleaner rids surfaces of grime and comes with the EPA's Safer Choice certification.
Tide's newest laundry detergent comes in a sponge-like tile that looks strange but is surprisingly powerful, even in cold water.
What I Cover
Caroline Mullen is a staff writer reporting on cleaning and organizing at Wirecutter. Though she's waging a constant battle against the dog hair and dust bunnies in her apartment, she's not willing to scale back on tchotchkes to make it easier. It also takes her two to three business days to complete a load of laundry—but she's made peace with that.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 buildings damaged after massive fire in Lawrence, Massachusetts
5 buildings damaged after massive fire in Lawrence, Massachusetts

CBS News

time23 minutes ago

  • CBS News

5 buildings damaged after massive fire in Lawrence, Massachusetts

Five buildings were damaged in a massive fire on Lowell Street in Lawrence, Massachusetts Tuesday night. Approximately 20 people have been displaced, according to the Lawrence fire chief. Firefighters responded to 324 Lowell Street shortly after 6 p.m. after receiving multiple 911 calls. A layer of smoke covered the Lawrence neighborhood. When crews arrived, there was heavy fire coming from two multi-family homes and propane tanks were exploding. Fire Chief Patrick Delaney said crews kept the fire from spreading to several other occupied buildings. "Our crews worked very hard, they were able to keep it out of 85 Oxford which was an occupied three-family dwelling," Chief Delaney said. "We had several propane tanks going off at one time." In the hot weather, crews struggled to contain the fast-moving flames. Two firefighters were treated heat exhaustion. "It's a hot night in the city of Lawrence," Delaney said. "Our gear traps our heat. The men and women here worked very hard to save a lot of property." Delaney said at least two of the buildings are a total loss. Crews will assess damage to the other buildings that were damaged in the morning. In the sea of red lights and haze, some families looked for their loved ones to make sure they were safe. "It's scary, it's scary, it really is," said resident Lisbeth Fernandes. "I don't know what's going on like I'm trying to get home to my kids." The smoky conditions were challenging for firefighters from several communities who responded. "It's tough, it's deep-seated, rooted fire, so it's developing a lot of smoke," Delaney said. "In tonight's humidity, it really just keeps that smoke to the ground. So a lot of our members, if you were out front, they're taking a lot of smoke in there." Representatives from MEMA and the American Red Cross will be helping the residents impacted by the fire. The Lawrence Senior Center was being opened for residents who needed a place to stay. The cause of the fire is under investigation.

Proposed Texas reservoir continues to hang over landowners' heads after 50 years
Proposed Texas reservoir continues to hang over landowners' heads after 50 years

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Proposed Texas reservoir continues to hang over landowners' heads after 50 years

For cattle rancher Eddie Belcher, his family's 900-acre plot of land in Northeast Texas is everything. The land has been owned by Belcher's family for seven generations. Although Belcher has lived in and visited cities across the country, he said nothing compares to his home in Bogata, Texas. "I can't put into words what it's like to be raised the way we were raised," Belcher said. "This land grows on you." Belcher built a log cabin on his land, complete with a bar named after his late father. He built it even though he knows that at some point in the next few decades, the entire area could be underwater. The proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir has been hanging over the heads of residents in Red River and Titus Counties for more than half a century. First introduced in the state's water plan in 1968, the reservoir would flood 66,000 acres of the Sulphur River Basin. Building it would require private landowners, like Belcher, to sell their land. "I decided this is where I was going to build my house regardless," Belcher said. "I took the chance that we would beat this." Even though the project was first proposed 57 years ago, construction hasn't started on the Marvin Nichols Reservoir. It's a fact that landowners, including Belcher, said has left the region in a sort of limbo. "We see that with the threat of the lake over the land for decades now, many of the regional ranches have fallen into disrepair," Belcher's neighbor and cattle rancher, Dr. Jim Marshall, said. "People sort of lost hope." But Dan Buhman, general manager of the Tarrant Regional Water District, said the fact that the reservoir hasn't been built is a sign of the progress that's been made in water conservation. "We conserve, and that pushes the need out, and so that is a win," Buhman said. "Obviously, they don't want us to come and build the lake tomorrow. And our customers, the rate payers, the people who pay their water bill, don't want us to go build an expensive supply before it's needed." But Buhman, who also chairs the Region C Water Planning Area, said there will be a day when it will have to be built. The $7 billion project is an integral part of the region's water planning strategy in the future. "We have looked at it every way to Sunday and said, can we conserve our way out of this growth?" Buhman said. "It's just not possible. The math says you need the water supplies." Although critics call reservoirs outdated and inefficient, Buhman said they continue to be an important part of Region C's water supply in the future. "Reservoirs are not an outdated strategy," Buhman said. "Absolutely, we see evaporation, that is part of the equation for a reservoir, there's no question about it. But when you compare it to all the other possibilities, they capture the water in the spring and they supply it in August when there isn't any. And that is exactly what we need." Eighty percent of the proposed reservoir's water would go to Region C, which includes the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Twenty percent would remain in Region D. Today, Texas is home to about 31 million people. By 2070, that's expected to grow to more than 50 million. The state's rapid growth has helped create a water shortage crisis. "The Texas Water Development Board... their data shows, not to be alarming, but towns and cities could face a severe water shortage by 2030, if we continue with severe, prolonged drought and if there are no water solutions implemented throughout the state," said Alejandra Martinez, the Texas Tribune's environmental reporter. A water shortage isn't just a public health risk. Without action toward increasing the state's water supply, a severe drought could cause $153 billion in economic damages annually, according to an estimate in the Texas Water Development Board's 2022 water plan. "This session, Gov. Greg Abbott put out really early on that he wanted a Texas-size investment for water supply projects," Martinez said. "So this session, there was a big investment made towards water, $20 billion worth of investment, one of the biggest investments made by the Texas Legislature for water supply for the whole state. How that money will be distributed throughout the state is yet to be seen." While $20 billion is a sizable investment, some experts say it isn't enough. The nonprofit Texas 2036 estimates the state needs to spend about $154 billion to secure its water supply in the coming decades. "Water experts I talked to say this was a significant step forward," Martinez said. "But they also said, in that same vein, this is just a down payment." Those opposed to the Marvin Nichols Reservoir are holding out hope Region C finds alternative water solutions, even as efforts to kill the project have so far failed. "It's not that the people of Northeast Texas want to harm the people of Dallas-Fort Worth," said state Rep. Gary VanDeaver of New Boston. "They want to see the entire state thrive and continue to grow, and certainly a big piece of that is having adequate water. But what the people of Northeast Texas do want to make sure that people understand is we deserve our livelihood as well." VanDeaver introduced a bill that would have killed the reservoir project. It ultimately failed. In June, the Texas Water Development Board found that an interregional conflict exists between Regions C and D regarding the reservoir. The two groups met for mediation and came to an agreement that requires Region C to study another water supply strategy alongside Marvin Nichols. A new study comparing the projects would have to begin by March 2026. The agreement also requires that no application for permitting would occur for Marvin Nichols before 2030. Region D Water Planning Group will discuss and consider ratification of the agreement Wednesday. Region C will do the same on Oct. 6. All of this leaves families like the Belchers and Marshalls wondering if and when they will be forced to sell their land. "The land would lose everything," Marshall said. "The community would be gone forever, and all of this wonder we see out here in nature would literally be drowned." Belcher said he'll continue to do what he can to oppose the project and honor his mother's wish that the land not be sold. "There's not a price for this land," Belcher said. "You can't put a price on seven generations.

Mega Millions winning numbers for Aug. 12: $182 million jackpot
Mega Millions winning numbers for Aug. 12: $182 million jackpot

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Mega Millions winning numbers for Aug. 12: $182 million jackpot

The Mega Millions jackpot rose to $182 million for the drawing on Tuesday, Aug. 12, after no one matched all the winning numbers in the drawing on Friday, Aug. 8. If someone matches all six numbers on Tuesday, they will have the option of a one-time cash payment of $82.1 million. There have been four Mega Millions winners this year, with the most recent being the June 27 win in Virginia of a jackpot of $348 million. Before then, on April 18, an Ohio player took home a $112 million jackpot, a lucky lottery ticket holder in Illinois took home a $344 million jackpot on March 25 and another lucky person hit the Mega Millions jackpot on Jan. 17 for $113 million. Here are the winning numbers from the Mega Millions drawing on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025. Mega Millions winning numbers for 8/12/25 The winning numbers for Tuesday, Aug. 12, will be posted here once drawn. Winning lottery numbers are sponsored by Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. Did anyone win the Mega Millions? Any Mega Millions winners will be posted here once announced by lottery officials. To view the list of past winners, visit the Mega Millions website. How to play the Mega Millions To play the Mega Millions, you have to buy a ticket. You can do this at a variety of locations, including your local convenience store, gas station or even grocery store. In some states, Mega Millions tickets can be bought online. Once you have your ticket, you need to pick six numbers. Five of them will be white balls with numbers from 1 to 70. The gold Mega Ball ranges from 1 to 24. If you're feeling especially unlucky or don't want to go through the hassle of picking, you can ask for a 'Quick Pick' or an 'Easy Pick.' These options let the computer randomly generate numbers for you. Mega Millions tickets now include a built-in multiplier, which increases non-jackpot prizes by two, three, four, five, or 10 times. Before, players had to pay an extra dollar to add the 'Megaplier.' Where can you buy lottery tickets? Tickets can be purchased in person at gas stations, convenience stores and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets. You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network, in these U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington, D.C., and West Virginia. The Jackpocket app allows you to select your lottery game and numbers, place your order, view your ticket and collect your winnings — all using your phone or home computer. Jackpocket is the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue for audience referrals to Jackpocket services. Must be 18+, 21+ in AZ and 19+ in NE. Not affiliated with any State Lottery. Gambling Problem? Call 1-877-8-HOPE-NY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY); 1-800-327-5050 (MA); 1-877-MYLIMIT (OR); 1-800-981-0023 (PR); 1-800-GAMBLER (all others). Visit for full terms. Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Mega Millions winning numbers for 8/12/25: Jackpot at $182 million

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store