Israel says it killed Al Jazeera journalist, claiming he was a Hamas leader
In its coverage, Al Jazeera termed the killings of al-Sharif and four other staffers murder.
The network said that al-Sharif; another journalist, Mohammed Qreiqeh; and camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa were killed.
The network reported that they died 'in a targeted Israeli strike on a tent housing journalists in Gaza City.'
The Israel Defense Forces claimed that al-Sharif was "the head of a terrorist cell in the Hamas terrorist organization and was responsible for advancing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF troops."
The IDF said in a statement about the killing that it had "previously disclosed intelligence information and many documents found in the Gaza Strip" that it said confirm that al-Sharif was a member of Hamas.
Al Jazeera reported that al-Sharif was a well-known Al Jazeera Arabic correspondent who reported extensively from northern Gaza.
The network said that 10 of its staff have been killed by Israel since Israel launched the war in Gaza in 2023.
Israel launched the offensive in Gaza, targeting Hamas, after the Hamas-led terror attacks against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, in which 251 people were taken hostage. Many of the targets of those Hamas-led attacks were civilians, including a music festival, and
Over 61,000 people have been killed in Gaza since the offensive began, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health in the enclave.
Al Jazeera is a network funded by Qatar's government. Israel's government has accused it of biased coverage of conflicts and violence involving itself and the Palestinian territories.
In May 2024, Israel's government under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu voted to shut down the channel's local offices. Netanyahu at the time called it an incitement channel.
A Jazeera has repeatedly denied the allegations of incitement made by Israel.
Israel last week said that it will take control of Gaza City, an escalation of the war. The move was criticized, and Germany announced that it is suspending the export to Israel of military equipment that could be used in Gaza.
The Committee to Protect Journalists said that Israel has a longstanding practice of accusing journalists of being terrorists without providing credible evidence.
It called al-Sharif one of Al Jazeera's best-known journalists, who has recently been reporting on starvation in Gaza to a lack of aid allowed in the territory.
'Israel's pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,' CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah said in a statement. 'Journalists are civilians and must never be targeted. Those responsible for these killings must be held accountable.'
After an IDF spokesperson accused al-Sharif of being affiliated with Hamas' military wing in July, al-Sharif told the CPJ that he was being retaliated against for news coverage that made Israel look bad.
"All of this is happening because my coverage of the crimes of the Israeli occupation in the Gaza Strip harms them and damages their image in the world. They accuse me of being a terrorist because the occupation wants to assassinate me morally," al-Sharif told the CPJ then.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
‘We are outraged': Reporters Without Borders director reacts to killing of journalists in Gaza
Reporters Without Borders Project Director Louise Allen Bichet joins 'Early Start' to discuss reaction to the IDF strike that killed five Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Tuesday briefing: Trump's D.C. police takeover; Anas al-Sharif; CDC shooting; new Taylor Swift album; and more
President Donald Trump ordered a federal takeover of D.C. police. The Pentagon has drafted plans to create a military 'reaction force.' Trump's higher tariffs on goods from China were delayed again for 90 days. Palestinians mourned five Al Jazeera journalists killed by Israel in Gaza. We learned more about the shooting at CDC headquarters in Atlanta.
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Daniel DePetris: By winging it in Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu is taking a big risk
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving premier, is no stranger to making tough decisions. But the decision he made last week to expand Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza, to the vocal opposition of some of the Israeli military's most senior officers, was perhaps his most controversial one to date. After intense debate in the security cabinet, Netanyahu ordered the Israel Defense Forces to accelerate ground operations in the roughly 25% of Gaza outside of Israel's control. According to the plan, the IDF will move into Gaza City and the camps in central Gaza, push the roughly 1 million Palestinians who reside there farther south and root out the remaining Hamas units operating in the area. The operation seems straightforward from a military standpoint: get the civilians out, isolate the hardened fighters and kill them. But for many in the IDF, including chief of staff Gen. Eyal Zamir, Netanyahu's plan runs the risk of plunging Israeli troops into an occupation of the Palestinian enclave that Netanyahu's predecessors came to regret. Netanyahu remains defiant. 'Given Hamas' refusal to lay down its arms, Israel has no choice but to finish the job and complete the defeat of Hamas,' he told foreign journalists over the weekend. He has gone to great pains to stress that Israel won't keep Gaza indefinitely; the goal is simply to free Gaza of Hamas. The problem is that Netanyahu often seems like he's winging it, is often unsure of the next steps and arrogantly refuses to acknowledge the consequences of his own actions. This latest decision is no different. First, Netanyahu continues to assume that tightening the squeeze on Hamas will eventually pressure the organization to wave the white flag, demobilize and agree to exile itself into irrelevance. Whether he actually believes in these assumptions or is doing so to keep his far-right coalition afloat is not important because the end product is the same: a longer war. And the result is the same too: Hamas continues to fight and enlist additional members into its ranks, using Israel's bombardment of Gaza as the perfect recruiting tool. Israel has killed thousands of Hamas militants in the nearly two-year-long war, yet according to U.S. intelligence assessments, the group has offset a significant chunk of those losses with another 15,000 or so recruits. When all is said and done, Netanyahu is plunging Israel into a war of attrition with an insurgency that has shown no signs of submitting to Israel's maximalist objectives. Second, the renewed Israeli offensive will add more strain on the IDF, which despite being the Middle East's most capable force is also experiencing readiness issues. The Israeli reservists who form the backbone of the army have already been fighting in Gaza nonstop for close to two years, all the while continuing the military campaign in Lebanon and conducting occasional operations in Syria. A growing number of Israeli reservists aren't reporting for duty, either, because they want to spend time with their families, hope to get back to their jobs or are increasingly disillusioned about what Israel is doing in Gaza. Indeed, the IDF's top brass has cited the strain on the army as a reason why freeing the hostages through negotiations should be a bigger priority than defeating Hamas militarily. The most glaring omission in Netanyahu's plan is what happens over the long term. If by some miraculous act Israel does manage to kill every single Hamas fighter on earth, what happens next? The Israelis have insisted they have clear goals and a sophisticated strategy to achieve them. Israel, Netanyahu says, will retain security control over Gaza. The moderate Arab states will step into the void to administer the enclave on a temporary basis until a viable Palestinian administration is established. And the international community will organize reconstruction while deradicalizing the territory. If that all sounds too good to be true, that's because it is. In effect, Israel is trying to have its cake and eat it too: keep Gaza under its de facto control but hand over the time-consuming and frustrating governance portfolio to the Arab states. But let's be perfectly blunt: This isn't going to happen. The Arab states have no intention of fixing a mess Israel helped create, and it's virtually inconceivable to envision regional leaders like Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman or Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi deploying their own troops to Gaza, which their publics would grossly oppose considering how much damage Israel has inflicted there. The Saudis, Egyptians, Jordanians and Emiratis have no intention of being portrayed as helping Israel in any way, shape or form, particularly when there's no prospects for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations over a two-state solution. If Netanyahu allowed such a process to take place, perhaps minds would change. However, back on the planet Earth, the Israeli government's firm opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state makes the odds of this occurring beyond steep. Finally, doubling down in Gaza will further torpedo Israel's international reputation, which is already in the cellar. Perhaps Netanyahu doesn't care about this or views international public opinion as secondary to Israel's war goals. Either way, there's no disputing that Israel's is alienating many of its closest partners for the sake of a phantom military victory in Gaza. Outside of the United States, most of the West is on record rejecting Israel's latest war plans. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Netanyahu's course of action 'will only bring more bloodshed' and do nothing to rescue the hostages. The foreign ministers of Britain, Australia, Germany, Italy and France (among others) released a joint statement saying much the same thing. Germany, the most pro-Israel state in Europe, is even cutting off offensive arms to the IDF. If Netanyahu is worried about any of this, he isn't showing it.
