
Q&A: Bladder Cancer Treatment Challenges
Bladder cancer is a prevalent malignancy affecting the urinary system, with symptoms including gross or microscopic hematuria, urinary frequency, and pelvic pain. Medscape spoke with Kyle A. Richards, MD, an associate professor in the Department of Urology at University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, about the current challenges in bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment.
What are the challenges with managing early stage bladder cancer?
Most patients are diagnosed with early stage bladder cancer, or non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Once the initial cancer is removed via transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), lifelong surveillance is needed to detect recurrence, which may occur at any time in a high rate of patients.
For high-risk NMIBC, monitoring using office cystoscopy is recommended every 3 months for the first 2 years after diagnosis. Noninvasive urine biomarkers aim to reduce this significant burden. One such biomarker, CxMonitor, has shown promise in early phase clinical studies, but additional trials are needed.
Another challenge is the difficulty of detecting all the cancer burden in the bladder following TURBT using the typical 'white light' source. Narrow band imaging and blue light cystoscopy aim to address this. Though the data are mixed, these technologies appear to improve detection rates and possibly the completeness of TURBT. However, a randomized trial comparing blue-light-guided and standard white-light-guided TURBT showed no difference in recurrence rates.
How do you determine the staging of bladder cancer?
Bladder cancer staging is based on the pathology report from TURBT plus axial imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis to evaluate for metastatic disease. FDG PET scan may help assess for distant metastasis, and CT urogram often helps evaluate for upper tract urothelial tumors.
For localized NMIBC, we typically assess the need for adjuvant therapy following TURBT to reduce the risk for recurrence or progression. Standard-of-care treatment for high-risk NMIBC is bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Because of the BCG shortage worldwide and lack of responsiveness to BCG in some patients, additional treatments have been explored, with sequential chemotherapy — specifically gemcitabine + docetaxel (gem/doce) — gaining the most traction.
We have no reliable tools to predict which patients are less likely to respond to BCG or gem/doce. Computational histologic artificial intelligence has been used to develop assays to help predict response to BCG, preserve BCG for patients most likely to respond, and route others to different treatments. More investigation is needed to see how these tests perform prospectively.
How do you manage patients with bladder cancer?
Surgery is often needed to remove the primary bladder tumor. Adjuvant intravesical therapies following a complete TURBT are recommended for intermediate- or high-risk patients with NMIBC to help prevent recurrence and progression. For patients with suspected low-risk NMIBC, a single dose of gemcitabine immediately after TURBT reduced the risk for recurrence from 47% to 35%.
Complications following TURBT are typically minor. In a prospective study of 159 patients undergoing TURBT, 10% had an unplanned emergency room visit, 79% experienced hematuria, and one third had bladder spasms and incontinence. Patient education and preoperative counseling may help reduce the burden of complications and postoperative readmission.
Can you tell us about recently approved bladder cancer therapies?
Perioperative durvalumab was studied in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. This three-drug regimen was compared to the standard GC regimen in the NIAGARA trial. Overall survival at 2 years following cystectomy was improved by 8% in the durvalumab arm.
Nogapendekin alfa inbakicept was evaluated in patients with NMIBC unresponsive to BCG. This drug modulates the local immune microenvironment in the bladder as an IL-15 super-agonist and must be given with BCG. In the pivotal study, 71% of patients had an initial complete response with a median duration of 26 months.
Mitomycin intravesical solution has been investigated in patients with low-grade intermediate-risk NMIBC, who often must undergo frequent TURBTs that can negatively affect quality of life. This agent, given intravesically, delivers a slow release of chemotherapy that ablates the tumors. With this strategy, 80% of patients were tumor free without requiring surgery at 3 months, and 82% remained free of cancer 12 months later. It has similar efficacy to TURBT but involves six weekly instillations vs one trip to the operating room.
Can you tell us more about upcoming therapies and clinical trial results in the near future?
I will be excited to see the results from the BRIDGE trial (ECOG-ACRIN EA8212), which met its patient accrual in July 2025. This trial randomized over 700 newly diagnosed patients who were BCG naive with high-grade NMIBC to BCG vs gem/doce. The primary objective is to assess event-free survival. Patient-reported outcomes are also being collected.
TAR-200, which is under FDA review, involves a novel drug delivery system that is inserted in the bladder and slowly releases gemcitabine to treat early stages of bladder cancer. A July 2025 press release cited an 82% complete response rate against bladder cancer, with 52% remaining cancer free for at least 1 year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The sober-curious generation? This map shows where Gen Z is reshaping U.S. drinking habits.
Gen Z is the sober-curious generation. Between 2011 and 2023, the number of adults aged 18 to 24 who drank alcohol dropped by 8 percentage points, according to survey data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Consumption among 25- to 34-year-olds has also fallen 5 percentage points over the past decade, making young adults the driving force behind America's diminishing alcohol consumption. Gen Z is driving the shift away from drinking. Even young people who do drink do so less frequently than previous generations. Nearly two-thirds of 18- to 34-year-olds say one to two drinks a day is bad for their health, reflecting changing attitudes toward drinking. These days, drinking less doesn't mean sacrificing a social life, though. Bars and liquor stores are catering to a growing demand for mocktails and zero-proof alcohol. Data from Eventbrite shows a 92% rise in sober-curious events across the country over the past year. These include everything from morning dance parties (20% rise) to DJ'd events with coffee instead of alcohol (478% rise). Advertisement Yahoo used data from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to examine the evolving drinking culture among young adults in the U.S. The map data is based on surveys conducted between 2011-2012 and 2022-2023.
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CVS unit must pay $290 million in drug whistleblower lawsuit, judge rules
A federal judge ordered CVS Health's pharmacy benefit manager unit to pay $289.9 million in damages and penalties after it overcharged Medicare for prescription drugs. In a Tuesday decision, Chief Judge Mitchell Goldberg in Philadelphia federal court tripled to $285 million the damages he had ordered CVS Caremark to pay in June, citing the federal False Claims Act. He added a $4.87 million civil fine. Goldberg rejected CVS' request to pay less, saying that while CVS Caremark was liable for only two years of overbilling, evidence at trial "made clear that the fraud was financially motivated, not the result of some innocent or mistaken belief." CVS, based in Woonsocket, said on Wednesday it plans to appeal. Last month, a Manhattan federal judge ordered CVS' Omnicare unit to pay $948.8 million in a separate whistleblower lawsuit alleging fraudulent billing. CVS plans to appeal that judgment. Goldberg presided in March over a non-jury trial in the whistleblower case brought by Sarah Behnke, a former head actuary for Medicare Part D at Aetna. She accused CVS Caremark of having caused health insurers such as Aetna to submit inflated claims since 2010 to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), while pharmacies such as Rite Aid and Walgreens WBA.O were paid less. CVS argued that the original $95 million in damages was substantial, and punitive damages should be limited to $95 million. But the judge said CVS Caremark's fraud not only financially harmed the government, but diminished public confidence in it. "CMS relies on companies like Caremark to truthfully and accurately report Part D drug prices," he wrote. "Caremark's conduct broke CMS's trust, and as a result, the public's trust in CMS." Behnke sued in 2014. CVS bought Aetna four years later. The False Claims Act lets whistleblowers sue on behalf of the government and share in recoveries, typically 15% to 30%. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Judge: CVS Caremark overcharged Medicare for prescription drugs Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Verge
5 minutes ago
- The Verge
Google says a typical AI text prompt only uses 5 drops of water — experts say that's misleading
Amid a fierce debate about the environmental toll of artificial intelligence, Google released a new study that says its Gemini AI assistant only uses a minimal amount of water and energy for each text prompt. But experts say that the tech giant's claims are misleading. Google estimates that a median Gemini text prompt uses up about five drops of water, or 0.26 milliliters, and about as much electricity as watching TV for less than nine seconds, roughly 0.24 watt-hours (Wh), which produces around 0.03 grams of carbon dioxide emissions. Google's estimates are lower than previous research on water- and energy-intensive data centers that undergird generative AI models. That's due in part to improvements in efficiency that the company has made over the past year. But Google also left out key data points in its study, leading to an incomplete understanding of Gemini's environmental impact, experts tell The Verge. 'They're just hiding the critical information.' 'They're just hiding the critical information,' says Shaolei Ren, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside. 'This really spreads the wrong message to the world.' Ren has studied the water consumption and air pollution associated with AI, and is one of the authors of a paper Google mentions in its Gemini study. A big issue experts flagged is that Google omits indirect water use in its estimates. Its study included water that data centers use in cooling systems to keep servers from overheating. Those cooling systems have sparked concerns for years about how data centers might exacerbate water shortages in drought-prone regions. Now, attention is shifting to how much more electricity data centers might need to accommodate new AI models. Growing electricity demand has triggered a spate of new plans to build gas and nuclear power plants, which also consume water in their own cooling systems and to turn turbines using steam. In fact, a majority of the water a data center consumes stems from its electricity use — which Google overlooks in this study. As a result, with Google's water estimate, 'You only see the tip of the iceberg, basically,' says Alex de Vries-Gao, founder of the website Digiconomist and a PhD candidate at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Institute for Environmental Studies who has studied the energy demand of data centers used for cryptomining and AI. Google left out another important metric when it comes to power consumption and pollution. The paper shares only a 'market-based' measure of carbon emissions, which takes into account commitments a company makes to support renewable energy growth on power grids. A more holistic approach would be to also include a 'location-based' measure of carbon emissions, which considers the impact that a data center has wherever it operates by taking into account the current mix of clean and dirty energy of the local power grid. Location-based emissions are typically higher than market-based emissions, and offer more insight into a company's local environmental impact. 'This is the groundtruth,' Ren says. Both Ren and de Vries-Gao say that Google should have included the location-based metric, following internationally recognized standards set by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Google's paper cites previous research conducted by Ren and de Vries-Gao and argues that it can provide a more accurate representation of environmental impact than other studies based on modeling that lack first-party data. But Ren and de Vries-Gao say that Google is making an apples-to-oranges comparison. Previous work was based on averages rather than the median that Google uses, and Ren faults Google for not sharing numbers (word count or tokens for text prompts) for how it arrived at the median. The company writes that it bases its estimates on a median prompt to prevent outliers that use inordinately more energy from skewing outcomes. 'You only see the tip of the iceberg, basically.' When it comes to calculating water consumption, Google says its finding of .26ml of water per text prompt is 'orders of magnitude less than previous estimates' that reached as high as 50ml in Ren's research. That's a misleading comparison, Ren contends, again because the paper Ren co-authored takes into account a data center's total direct and indirect water consumption. Google has yet to submit its new paper for peer review, although spokesperson Mara Harris said in an email that it's open to doing so in the future. The company declined to respond on the record to a list of other questions from The Verge. But the study and accompanying blogs say that Google wants to be more transparent about the water consumption, energy use, and carbon emissions of its AI chatbot and offer more standardized parameters for how to measure environmental impact. The company claims that it goes further than previous studies by factoring in the energy used by idling machines and supporting infrastructure at a data center, like cooling systems. 'While we're proud of the innovation behind our efficiency gains so far, we're committed to continuing substantial improvements in the years ahead,' Amin Vahdat, VP/GM of AI & Infrastructure for Google Cloud, and Jeff Dean, chief scientist of Google DeepMind and Google Research, say in a blog. Google claims to have significantly improved the energy efficiency of a Gemini text prompt between May 2024 and May 2025, achieving a 33x reduction in electricity consumption per prompt. The company says that the carbon footprint of a median prompt fell by 44x over the same time period. Those gains also explain why Google's estimates are far lower now than studies from previous years. Zoom out, however, and the real picture is more grim. Efficiency gains can still lead to more pollution and more resources being used overall — an unfortunate phenomenon known as Jevons paradox. Google's so-called 'ambitions-based carbon emissions' grew 11 percent last year and 51 percent since 2019 as the company continues to aggressively pursue AI, according to its latest sustainability report. (The report also notes that Google started excluding certain categories of greenhouse gas emissions from its climate goals this year, which it says are 'peripheral' or out of the company's direct control.) 'If you look at the total numbers that Google is posting, it's actually really bad,' de Vries-Gao says. When it comes to the estimates it released today on Gemini, 'this is not telling the complete story.' Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Justine Calma Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Energy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Environment Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Report Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Science Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech