logo
5 takeaways from the Trump-Zelensky White House meeting

5 takeaways from the Trump-Zelensky White House meeting

Yahooa day ago
President Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on Monday as the search for an end to the three-and-a-half-year war intensifies.
Major European leaders also jetted in for the meeting. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni were all in attendance. So too were European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.
In a relief for all concerned, the meeting was vastly different from the late February contretemps in the Oval Office, in which Trump and Vice President Vance berated Zelensky at length.
Here are the other main takeaways.
A positive tone but few specifics
The mood music was positive Monday, but huge hurdles remain on the road to peace.
Trump was civil and solicitous toward Zelensky throughout the day, and he was also conspicuously affable to the European leaders, with whom he has had volatile relations.
Trump argued that 'while difficult, peace is within reach.' He also held out the promise of an imminent trilateral meeting between Zelensky, Russian President Vladimir Putin and himself at which the knottiest issues of the conflict could be unpicked.
Zelensky, for his part, enthused about his 'really good' conversation with Trump — a far cry from February's debacle.
Rutte said he was 'really excited' about the prospects for peace, while Starmer asserted there was a chance of 'real progress toward a just and lasting outcome.'
Reaching that goal will be enormously difficult, however. Nothing that was said Monday changed the underlying contours of the conflict.
The Europeans lauded Trump for committing to provide security guarantees to Ukraine in the event of a settlement — but the pledge came with no specifics.
Starmer, Meloni and von der Leyen all talked about guarantees akin to NATO's Article 5, which holds that member nations will come to the defense of any ally that is attacked.
But what exactly is an 'Article 5-like security guarantee,' as termed by von der Leyen? And how would Putin accept such a thing, given its practical resemblance to NATO membership for Ukraine, to which he is implacably opposed?
Conversely, Zelensky said he would be willing to discuss territorial changes at a trilateral meeting — but said nothing more on the topic, making it impossible to gauge how much pain he would be willing to take in that regard for peace.
The overall lack of concrete detail makes it hard to argue a settlement is any closer.
Europeans succeeded in shoring up Zelensky
The fact the European leaders trooped to Washington as reinforcements for Zelensky was one of the most notable elements of the day.
By and large, they succeeded in their two intertwined aims: making sure there was no repeat of the earlier Oval Office humiliation of the Ukrainian president and defending Kyiv's interests more broadly.
In their remarks to the media, the Europeans talked about the degree to which they believe the war has enormous ramifications for other nations across the continent.
'We are on the side of Ukraine,' was the straightforward message delivered by Meloni, who is usually seen as more simpatico with Trump than counterparts such as Macron and Merz.
There is still plenty of European unease as to whether Trump will be too accommodating of Putin's imperatives — but Monday quelled some of their worst fears.
Interim ceasefire is rare point of contention
A topic central to Trump's meeting with Putin last week in Alaska reared its head again.
Prior to that Alaska meeting, Trump wanted Russia and Ukraine to quickly agree to a ceasefire, which would then set the stage for more comprehensive peace talks.
After Anchorage, he appeared to have shifted significantly in Putin's direction, suggesting it would be better to move to a full settlement without any halfway measures.
Putin's fondness for that framework is based on the widely accepted reality that Russia has the upper hand on the battlefield. The Kremlin fears an interim ceasefire would disrupt its momentum and allow Ukraine to regroup.
On Monday, Merz was the most assertive about the need for a ceasefire right away.
The German chancellor said he found it impossible to imagine a next step on the path to peace without a ceasefire.
'Let's try to put pressure on Russia,' Merz said.
Trump seemed ambivalent about the idea, at best.
That's an important divide — and one Putin might try to exploit.
Trump vouches for Putin's desire to make peace
The Europeans view Putin with the deepest suspicion, not only because of the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine but because they fear his expansionist instincts in general. They also regard him as fundamentally untrustworthy.
By contrast, Trump on Monday vouched more than once for the Russian leader's interest in making peace.
To a skeptical Zelensky, the president insisted that 'I think you'll see that President Putin really would like to do something else. … I think you're going to see some really positive moves.'
Toward the end of the public remarks with the European leaders, he again argued that 'I think President Putin wants to find an answer, too.'
Time will tell whether those assertions are true.
Even Trump admitted, in apparent reference to his campaign trail pledge to end the war on day one of his second term, 'I thought this was going to be one of the easier ones [to solve]. It's actually one of the most difficult — very complex.'
Huge stakes if a trilateral meeting happens
Monday's events did at least create some momentum in the search for peace.
Trump wants to capitalize on that with a trilateral meeting soon.
Such a meeting could truly be a make-or-break moment.
If Putin, Zelensky and Trump get together in one room, there will be no way to avoid the most difficult issues that underpin the war.
The stakes would also be enormous for each participant — including Trump, who could either emerge as the consummate dealmaker or end up looking naive in his belief that he could get a peace agreement.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vance's trip for burgers crashes into Trump's D.C. takeover
Vance's trip for burgers crashes into Trump's D.C. takeover

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Vance's trip for burgers crashes into Trump's D.C. takeover

A vice president, defense secretary and top White House aide walk into a burger joint. Let the chaos ensue. Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller on Wednesday paid an unannounced visit to the National Guard troops stationed at Union Station, the major regional train station in the nation's capital. From a second-floor Shake Shack, Vance thanked the soldiers for 'actually keeping this place safe.' 'You guys bust your ass all day. We give you hamburgers. Not a fair trade, but we're grateful for everything you guys do,' the vice president said. His staffers presented them with boxes of burgers. The remarks were hard to hear, however, because of what was happening down below. As three of the most powerful men in the world attempted to seize yet another media moment broadcasting the White House's crackdown on crime in Washington, protesters in the station drowned them out. Shouts of 'Free D.C.,' echoed throughout the historic train hall. The extraordinary scene was evocative of the greater tensions between Washington and the White House, as President Donald Trump exerts unprecedented control over the deep-blue city. Since the president launched a takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department, deployed federal law enforcement from agencies like ICE and the FBI and sent in National Guard troops nine days ago, the District has had little choice but to comply with a crackdown — based predominantly on the president's whims — while tackling the uncomfortable political realities of crime here. 'You hear these people out here screaming 'Free D.C.,' Vance said. 'Let's free D.C. from lawlessness. Let's free Washington, D.C., from one of the highest murder rates in the entire world. Let's free Washington, D.C., so that young families can walk around and feel safe and secure. That's what we're trying to free D.C. from.' Vance and Miller — who have both been publicly critical of diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and the broader racial justice movement — cast the protesters in racial terms, calling them out for being white and not having a true understanding of crime in the city. 'It's kind of bizarre that we have a bunch of old, primarily white people who are out there protesting the policies that keep people safe when they've never felt danger in their entire lives,' Vance said. Although troops and law enforcement have been highly visible in the city's tourist hotspots — which are generally high-traffic, low-crime areas — the White House says enforcement crackdowns are concentrated in Wards 7 and 8, which are majority-Black and have the highest crime rate in the city. POLITICO could not independently confirm the White House's analysis. 'We're going to ignore these stupid white hippies,' Miller said. 'They all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old, and we're going to get back to business protecting the American people.' Miller called the protesters 'crazy communists' who 'have no connection to this city.' He promised to add 'thousands more resources to this city to get criminals and the gang members out of here.' Trump nine days ago invoked a provision of the Home Rule Act, the 1970s law that grants limited self-governance to the District, to demand the services of the Metropolitan Police Department to assist the federal government during 'special conditions of an emergency nature.' But Trump and his administration have cast his move in much more dire terms, suggesting it was a full-fledged federal takeover of the city's police. An attempt by the administration to name the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration the city's 'emergency police commissioner' prompted fury from city officials, a move the administration walked back last week in an agreement with D.C. at the urging of a federal judge. Trump only has the authority to take federal control of the MPD for 30 days without congressional approval, but has suggested he wants to circumvent that. Asked if the White House would try to extend the takeover beyond that timeline, Vance said: 'If the president of the United States thinks that he has to extend this order to ensure that people have access to public safety, then that's exactly what he'll do.' A supermajority of the city's residents oppose Trump controlling law enforcement in the city, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll released Wednesday. But Vance said he was 'highly skeptical' of that poll. 'I don't know what poll you're talking about, maybe the same poll that said Kamala Harris would win the popular vote by 10 points,' he quipped. That response, too, is indicative of the broader White House playbook behind the crime crackdown: Lean on what people see and how they feel, and when the numbers don't align with the vibes, call the numbers into question. District police data, for example, has violent crime in Washington at a 30-year low. But the White House claims the MPD 'cooked the books' and the Justice Department is now probing whether those statistics were manipulated, multiple outlets reported Tuesday. Vance on Wednesday said 'crime statistics all over our country were massively underreported.' Asked what evidence he had that the MPD statistics had been manipulated, Vance said 'you just have to look around,' adding that statistics from the Justice Department and FBI 'back it up.' It was not clear what statistics he was referring to. Solve the daily Crossword

National Guard vehicle, car collide in DC
National Guard vehicle, car collide in DC

The Hill

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hill

National Guard vehicle, car collide in DC

A National Guard vehicle collided with a civilian car early Wednesday morning approximately a mile away from the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. The D.C. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department said in a statement that the crash occurred at the intersection of 8th Street SE and North Carolina Avenue SE. The civilian driver was trapped in the car, rescued and transported to a local hospital with minor injuries, the statement said. The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) said officers responded to reports of the crash at 6:18 a.m. EDT and 'upon arrival officers discovered a two-car accident involving a government vehicle.' The driver was 'conscious and breathing' when taken to the hospital for 'non-life-threatening injuries,' MPD said. The military vehicle was a D.C. National Guard Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected All-Terrain Vehicle and was part of a five-vehicle convoy and an MPD cruiser, the National Guard said in a statement reported by local news outlets. The National Guard is investigating the incident, the statement said. Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) was asked about the incident at a press conference later Wednesday and said, 'I actually haven't gotten a readout on that collision yet, other than I know we had a person, I believe one person transported for medical attention. So I can't really say more,' NewsNation reported. The incident comes after President Trump ordered hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., in an effort to crack down on crime in the nation's capital. Several Republican governors have joined his effort, bringing the total number of troops in the city to nearly 2,000.

Trump official slams 'elderly white hippies' as Vance mocks pushback to DC takeover
Trump official slams 'elderly white hippies' as Vance mocks pushback to DC takeover

USA Today

time4 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump official slams 'elderly white hippies' as Vance mocks pushback to DC takeover

Top Trump official Stephen Miller derided protesters as "elderly white hippies" in a city that has more Black residents than white residents. WASHINGTON ― Top Trump administration officials including Vice President JD Vance fired back at noisy protesters targeting the recent federal takeover of Washington D.C. during a scene at Union Station, the city's transit hub. Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Stephen Miller, a senior White House official, dropped by Union Station unannounced on Aug. 20 for a photo-op to tout President Donald Trump's recent deployment of National Guard troops to the nation's capital to crack down on crime. But as the trio spoke from a Shake Shack to claim credit for bringing down crime, a small group of protesters could be heard from the main hall chanting "Free D.C.!" and producing a drumbeat of noise that visibly irritated the three Trump officials. More: Voters split on Trump's DC police takeover, National Guard deployment, new poll Miller, the White House's deputy chief of staff, called the protesters "crazy communists" who have no connections to Washington D.C., accusing them of advocating for "the criminals, the killers, the rapists, the drug deals." "I'm glad they're here today," Miller said in brief remarks, "because me, Pete and the vice president are going to leave here, and inspired by them, we're going to add thousands more resources to this city to get the criminals and the gang members out of here." More: How DC's unique status let Trump take control of police, deploy National Guard Miller went on to label the protesters "elderly white hippies" in a city that has more Black residents than white residents. "Most citizens in Washington D.C. are Black. This is not a city that has had any safety for its Black citizens for generations, and President Trump is the one who is fixing that," Miller said. "So we're going to ignore these stupid white hippies. They all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old." Vance, who claimed violent crime in D.C. has dropped 35% in nine days, also took note of the loud demonstrators. "Of course, these are a bunch of crazy protesters. But I'll tell you: A couple of years ago, when I brought my kids here, they were being screamed at by violent vagrants, and it scared the hell out of my kids," the vice president said. Vance said Union Sation is now a place where parents can safely bring their children again. "I know we've traded now some violent crazy people who are screaming at kids with a few crazy liberals who are screaming at the vice president, but I think that's a very worthwhile trade to make," Vance said. More: Trump orders National Guard into Washington and takes over DC police Declaring a local crime emergency in D.C., Trump on Aug. 11 deployed 800 National Guard troops to the streets of Washington and took action to seize control of the city's police force. Trump said the extraordinary steps were necessary to combat crime in the city, even though Washington's violent crime rate was down 26% in 2025 compared with last year. The National Guard has maintained a major presence at Union Station, a frequent stop for visitors of Washington but not a destination in one of the city's most dangerous neighborhoods. "We talked to a first-responder before we came up here," Hegseth said. "They said this is their No. 1 call location ‒ Union Station ‒ for first responders. So it's not as if this is insignificant. In many ways, this is part of the epicenter." During their visit to Union Station, Vance, Hegseth and Miller thanked the guard members for their service. After speaking for 12 minutes to reporters, Vance stuck around at Shake Shack to have lunch with the troops. 'You guys bust your ass all day and we give you hamburgers ‒ not a fair trade but we're grateful for everything you do," Vance said. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store