Diddy's wild confession to sketch artist who drew him during sex trafficking trial
The 55-year-old music mogul was depicted in court sketches visibly panicking when jurors announced earlier this week that they had reached a verdict on four of the five charges against him.
Diddy was later seen collapsing in his chair when jurors declared that he was not guilty of racketeering conspiracy - the top charge against him - and sex trafficking. He was, however, found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution.
The images - some of which were commissioned by Jane Rosenberg - provided rare glimpses into the rapper's mood and demeanor during the high-profile proceedings.
But Combs was not always satisfied with the way Rosenberg was portraying him, even criticizing her work during a break in proceedings last month.
She recounted to PEOPLE how the I'll Be Missing You singer returned to the Manhattan federal courtroom and mouthed something at her.
At first, Rosenberg said she could not make out what Combs was trying to tell her. But when he repeated himself, she could hear that he wanted her to make him look 'softer' as he pointed to his mouth.
'And he said, "You made me look like a koala bear,"' the artist said.
She apparently took the criticism in stride, noting that later that same day, she found herself in the elevator with Combs' mother, Janice Combs, along with his sons.
'In the elevator, they were saying "Thank you for being such an unbiased artist,"' Rosenberg said. 'And I told them, "Today, Diddy said I made him look like a koala bear." And they all started chuckling.'
In her remarks to PEOPLE, Rosenberg admitted it took her some time to figure out how to properly draw the hip hop artist.
'He was not a simple likeness to do,' she said, adding that she had to learn how to draw his jaw.
'He's got an unusual look. And he doesn't look anything like he used to.'
Drawing celebrities at their high-profile criminal trials is a difficult task in general, Rosenberg said, as they are widely known and people have a perception of how they are supposed to look.
At times, even the celebrity has comments, like Diddy did.
'[Rudy] Giuliani told me I made him look like a dog, [Harvey] Weinstein told me to give him more hair, John Gotti asked me to trim down his chin,' said Rosenberg, who has been working as a professional sketch artist for 45 years and wrote a memoir entitled. ' Drawn Testimony: My Four Decades as a Courtroom Sketch Artist.'
'And [President Donald] Trump once stood over one of my sketches and said, "I need to lose some weight,"' she recounted.
The worst criticism Rosenberg ever faced came in 2015, she said, when she drew former Patriots Quarterback Tom Brady during an NFL hearing on the 'Deflategate' scandal - which claimed the team illegally deflated footballs in their 2014 AFC Championship victory over the Indianapolis Colts.
She said she did not know who the star quarterback was when she sketched him. But when she returned home from work, she said she found she had received hundreds of emails.
Fans of Brady panned her for making the handsome quarterback look like he was 'put in one of those machines that crushes cars,' while those who disliked him celebrated her depiction of him.
'I didn't know what memes were,' Rosenberg said. 'But I certainly learned the what memes were' as netizens put the sketch in place of ET on the poster for the classic movie, or the face in The Scream, by Norwegian artist Edvard Munch.
In the end, Rosenberg was forced to apologize as she had 'nightmares' about her viral fame.
'I didn't make Tom Brady look as handsome as he is,' she told WBZ Boston. 'I apologize to Tom Brady. And all the NFL fans.'
She added: 'He's a very handsome guy. It's very hard in a very short time to get somebody so good- looking to look as good as they look [in person].'
Fortunately, her second effort at drawing the star football player passed without so much attention.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
I'm raging after catching my neighbour STEALING electricity & this was after they caused our water to be cut off too
A WOMAN was left shocked after discovering that her neighbour has been stealing her electricity. The 29-year-old revealed that she recently moved to a new city with her husband and one-year-old child - and problems started to arise with her neighbour. 3 She explained that they live in a semi-detached building, and share a wall with their neighbour, who is in their late 40s or early 50s. The first issue they had with the neighbour is that she didn't pay her half of the water bill, and as they share one water metre, it was cut off. The US-based woman wrote on Reddit: 'We didn't make it a big deal about the water because it was resolved and turned back on the same day. 'We've given a lot of grace considering she smokes weed and it seeps through that wall so you can smell it through our restroom and child's room.' Things reached a head when they spotted she had been stealing electricity from them by plugging in a lead to go to her house. They immediately texted her asking what was going on, and her replies were rather emotional. She replied saying: 'I'll unplug asap, and I'll come right over to tell [sic] to you. 'It's been the worst week and I don't know how much more I can take.' She added in a later text: 'I'm at my wits end. 'Everything is falling apart and my daughter won't help me. Your kids are breaking law if they kick their ball over neighbour's fence, High Court rules after couple sued next door 'My electric bill is 2000 dollars because I went the whole year without paying everything myself. 'I'm paralyzed and I'll be sitting in the dark again in about 2 hours. 'NOONE can help me. And I'm so tired, I can't ask anyone for anything else. I'll be homeless.' The woman whose electricity was being stolen said they were also going through a hardship. She texted back: 'I feel like we've been respectful neighbors to you and would appreciate to be treated the same way. 'If you could have simply asked us out of respect we would have worked some type of agreement with you. 'I understand you're going through hardship but we are too. 3 'And we feel like you plugging into our electricity without asking is taking advantage of us thinking we're just a dumb young couple who won't notice. 'I understand you have a child you're taking care of but we have a baby we're trying to better provide for.' They explained that they would be now letting the property management handle the situation. 3 PAY BACK In response to this, the neighbour said she had been "embarrassed" to ask for help, and offered them $100 to pay them back for the electricity. Many people were shocked at the encounter, with one saying: 'She shamelessly plugged it in but too scared to admit fault. Instead of just owning up to her mistake, she's whining about how awful things have been for her. Coward.' Another added: 'There was no mistake here. What she did was very deliberate and had her sob story ready to go to guilt the neighbor into letting her continue to leech.' I had a two-year bin war with my next door neighbour Gemma Smith and Sophie Wood were engaged in a weekly feud for a year over their wheelie bins. When Gemma moved next door to Sophie, 34, who is unemployed, in November 2020 they were civil to one another. Gemma, who is single and doesn't work due to stress, says: 'Sophie seemed nice and we'd stop and exchange pleasantries. 'But it all changed at the beginning of 2022, when Sophie's bin was full and she put her rubbish bag in mine. 'I took it out and put it on top of her bin. 'It fell off, gulls pecked at it and there was rubbish everywhere.' Both women refused to clear up the mess, claiming it was the other one's fault. Gemma says: 'I felt so angry. 'There was cat litter spread all over my drive — it was absolutely disgusting and we ended up shouting at each other. 'We were both as bad as each other — we'd walk past each other and I'd tell her she was a lazy cow and to clean up after herself. 'We'd scream insults at each other." Within six months Sophie had set up a CCTV camera and threatened to report Gemma to the council. In retaliation, Gemma set up the baby monitor — which can record video — to try to pin more wrongdoing on Sophie. Then last July Sophie spotted Gemma in tears on her doorstep following a burglary at her home. Gemma says: 'Sophie came straight round and asked if there was anything she could do. 'We are now the best of friends and help each other out all the time."
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
'He was a violent socialist': How Superman started out as a radical rebel
Returning to cinemas next week, the superhero may be known as the ultimate all-American Mr Nice Guy – but, back in the 1930s, he didn't begin that way. James Gunn's new Superman film will be flying into cinemas next week, but ever since the first trailers were released, superhero fans have been having online debates about whether the Man of Steel played by David Corenswet is true to the one in the comics. Is he too gloomy? Is he too woke? Should he still be wearing red swimming trunks over his blue tights? Underlying these debates is an agreement that a few details are non-negotiable: Superman should be faster than a speeding bullet and more powerful than a locomotive. He should come from the planet Krypton and live in a city called Metropolis. And he should be in love with Lois Lane. Beyond that, he should also be noble and wholesome – and perhaps a bit of a bore. While the likes of Batman and Wolverine are popular because they break the rules, Superman has to be a law-abiding, upstanding all-American Mr Nice Guy. But that hasn't always been the case. The first Superman strips were written by Jerry Siegel, drawn by Joe Shuster, and published in Action Comics magazine in 1938 by DC (or National Allied, as the company was then called). And in those, he was a far more unruly, and in some ways far more modern character. He was "a head-bashing Superman who took no prisoners, who made his own law and enforced it with his fists, who gleefully intimidated his foes with a wicked grin and a baleful glare", says Mark Waid, a comics writer and historian, in his introduction to a volume of classic Action Comics reprints. "He was no super-cop. He was a super-anarchist." If this rowdy and rebellious Superman were introduced today, he'd be hailed as one of the most subversive superheroes around. "I had no idea the character was like that until I started writing my book," says Paul S Hirsch, author of Pulp Empire: A Secret History of Comic Book Imperialism. "But it blew my mind when I saw it. He's essentially a violent socialist." The earliest issues of Action Comics bear out this assessment. When there are wrongs to be righted, Superman knocks down doors and dangles suspects from fifth-storey windows, and he makes hearty jokes while he's doing so: "See how easily I crush your watch in my palm? I'll give your neck the same treatment!" Some of the people who are roughed up by this boisterous outlaw are pistol-packing racketeers, but usually they are a less glamorous brand of villain – a domestic abuser, an orphanage superintendent who is cruel to children – and the majority are so wealthy that they don't need to rob banks: there is the mine owner who skimps on safety measures, the construction magnate who sabotages a competitor's buildings, the politician who buys a newspaper in order to turn it into a propaganda sheet. Rather than being a typical costumed crime-fighter, then, the Superman of 1938 was a left-wing revolutionary. How Superman grew from his creators' experiences "I absolutely love those old issues," Matthew K Manning, the writer of Superman: The Ultimate Guide and John Carpenter's Tales of Science Fiction, tells the BBC. "They're clearly the work of young people frustrated with the injustices of the world, and rightfully so. Keep in mind, these were two Jewish men reaching adulthood just before the start of World War Two. There was plenty to be angry about. And suddenly they had this character who could give a voice to their concerns and hold the corrupt accountable." Siegel and Shuster were schoolmates from Cleveland, Ohio. Having grown up during the Great Depression, they defined Superman in the first issue of Action Comics as a "champion of the oppressed… sworn to devote his existence to helping those in need". "We were young kids and if we wanted to see a movie we had to sell milk bottles, so we had the feeling that we were right there at the bottom and we could empathise with people," Siegel is quoted as saying in Superman: The Complete History by Les Daniels. "Superman grew out of our feelings about life. And that's why, when we saw so many similar strips coming out, we felt that they were perhaps imitating the format of Superman, but something wasn't there, which was this tremendous feeling of compassion that Joe and I had for the downtrodden." Not that Siegel and Shuster were the only comics professionals with such liberal views. "The comic-book industry was founded largely by people barred from work in more legitimate fields," Hirsch explains to the BBC, "because they were Jewish, they were immigrants, they were people of colour, they were women. It was a creative ghetto where a lot of very talented people ended up because they weren't able to get a Madison Avenue advertising job, and they couldn't write for Life Magazine. A lot of those people were radical – or at least not mainstream – and DC was founded by men who very much fit that mould: men who were recent immigrants, men who had leftist sympathies from growing up in New York City at that time." All the same, few comic characters were as militant as Superman. In one early issue, he demolishes a row of slum homes in order to force the authorities to build better housing (a risky strategy, that one). In another, he takes on the city's gambling industry because it is bankrupting addicts. And in another, he declares war on everyone he sees as being responsible for traffic-related deaths. He terrifies reckless drivers, he abducts the mayor who hasn't enforced traffic laws, he smashes up the stock of a second-hand car dealer, and he wrecks a factory where faulty cars are assembled. "It's because you use inferior metals and parts so as to make higher profits at the cost of human lives," he informs the owner. Were Superman's direct-action protest campaigns strictly legal? No, but they were riotous, boldly political fun – and almost 90 years on, they stand as a fascinating street-level account of US urban life in the 1930s. All too soon, however, Superman turned his attention to mad scientists and giant monsters, and away from Metropolis's under-privileged masses. After a handful of issues, his "opponents were all larger than life, and while that made for exciting comics, his days of social crusading were becoming a thing of the past", writes Waid. Why he became a changed superhero What was the Kryptonite that sapped Superman's social conscience? Hirsch argues that it was a compound of two elements. One was the "blandification" that occurs when the sales of any commercial property go up, up and away. "Superman is unbelievably popular from the moment they get the sales numbers for the first issue," he says. "So they suddenly realise what they have on their hands, and they don't want to jeopardise it. Jack Liebowitz, the president of DC, sees that they can sell Superman pillowcases and pyjamas – but if Superman's running around throwing people out of windows and threatening to wrap iron bars around their necks, it isn't going to work." More like this:• 10 of the best films to watch this July• Why original kids' films are flopping• The inside story of the wildest shoot ever Alongside that familiar story of a big star selling out, "the ultimate thing that ends Superman's radical streak is the beginning of the war", says Hirsch. "All of the immigrant and non-white people who were working in this industry, they wanted to be seen as patriotic. And it makes sense. That's what you had to do to fit in. And even more nuts-and-bolts, that's what you had to do to get your paper ration [for printing magazines]. If you were doing things that bothered the government in 1941, maybe you wouldn't get your wood pulp." Another, more personal factor was that Siegel and Shuster lost control of their creation. Shuster's deteriorating eyesight forced him to let other artists take over the drawing, and Siegel's conscription into the army in 1943 cut down the time he had to work on scripts. But there was worse to come. Having sold the rights to Superman for $130 in 1938, both men were treated by DC as hired hands, rather than revered innovators, and in 1947 they tried and failed to win back those rights in court. In retrospect, there is a grim irony to those rollicking early yarns about exploitative fat cats getting their comeuppance. Siegel and Shuster could have done with having a champion of the oppressed by their side. Still, after World War Two, Superman wasn't the type of superhero who would take on a conniving publisher. "Superman constantly evolves with the times, and that hasn't always been for the better," says Manning. "During the McCarthy era of the 1950s, when parents were actively burning comic books and Congress was blaming comics for juvenile delinquency, publishers were forced to self-regulate their content under the label of the Comics Code Authority. This seal would appear on the cover of every approved comic, marking it "safe" for children. While he'd already mellowed a bit, Superman became more of a father figure during this period, no longer interested in real-world villains. Instead, he mostly set his sights on aliens, other-dimensional beings, and foiling Lois Lane's latest attempt at discovering his secret identity." Superman's evolution didn't stop there, though. In some eras he is a politely conservative pillar of virtue, mocked by his fellow DC superheroes as "the big blue Boy Scout", while in others, notes Manning, he has "some of his original edge back… as a vigilante with an eye for social justice". And in the new film? We don't know yet which Superman we'll be getting, so corrupt politicians and construction magnates should keep their eyes on the sky. It's a bird! It's a plane! It's Super-Anarchist! Superman is released in UK and US cinemas on 11 July. -- If you liked this story sign up for The Essential List newsletter, a handpicked selection of features, videos and can't-miss news, delivered to your inbox twice a week. For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X, and Instagram.
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
White House to host UFC fight, US President Donald Trump says
The White House will host a UFC bout next year as part of events to mark 250 years of American independence, US President Donald Trump has event will be a "championship fight" with an audience of 20,000-25,000, Trump told a crowd in Iowa on Thursday. The president, who is a friend of UFC president Dana White, said: "We are going to have some incredible events, some professional events, some amateur events."Trump has attended several UFC events, including UFC 316 in Newark, New Jersey, last month, where he was pictured watching a fight with White. Addressing the crowd during an appearance at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines, Trump said: "Does anybody watch UFC? The great Dana White? We're going to have a UFC fight. We're going to have a UFC fight - think of this - on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there."UFC boss to promote Trump's 'fighter' image at RNC finaleListen: Donald Trump, UFC and WWE: The love affairFollowing Trump's announcement, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the plans on X, writing: "It's going to be EPIC!"Trump's links to UFC date back more than 20 years. In 2001, he hosted a UFC fight at Trump Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City when White was struggling to find a venue. White has backed the president's political career from the beginning, endorsing his presidential bid in 2016, calling Trump a "fighter". Following a failed assassination attempt on Trump last year, White described Trump as a "tough guy" and "the legitimate, ultimate, American badass of all time".Trump suggested the UFC event would be one of many to mark the 250th anniversary of American independence on 4 July next year. He said: "Every one of our national parks, battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honour of America250."
