This $300 pair of headphones proves you don't need to spend Sony or Bose money to get epic cans
Why do we keep spending upwards of $400 when there are some of the best headphones cost a whole lot less? As the world reaches a financial boiling point and life becomes more expensive than ever, I am glad that Cambridge Audio and other manufacturers stick to lower price points for their flagship audio products.
Cambridge Audio's upgraded cans show that you don't have to go for one of the more premium options to get some of the best ANC headphones. They sound excellent, offer some of the best battery life around, and sport a smart design to round out the package.
Bose and Sony's headphones both sound good. The Sony options tend to be slightly more sonically refined than Bose's warmer sound, but you won't find anyone complaining when they put either model on their head.
But, as the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 show us, they don't quite sound as good as their premium price point might suggest.
An extra case in point are the headphones we've got on hand here. The Melomania P100 SE sound undeniably more refined and well-considered than both the Sony XM5 and the QC Ultra — despite those two coming from more established headphone brands. In a single generation of headphones, Cambridge Audio has shown Sony and Bose how it should be done.
The bass is impactful and precise, with none of the fuzziness you'll sometimes find with Bose. The highs are clear and bright, more so than the Sony. The mids are wide and all encompassing, bringing together an excellent sound profile that lets you slide into your favorite wingback and enjoy the ride.
Where the Melomania manage to really stand out is their excellent soundstage. They sound very wide, and the instruments and their players are very easy to pick out amongst the din.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
That's no mean feat, and it makes sure that the Cambridge Audio headphones really stand out when you compare them against the far more expensive competition.
They're a dab hand at every genre I threw at them, from R&B to Metal and Classical. They send a message to Sony and Bose. You can't rest on your laurels in the audio space anymore when cheaper options sound this good.
You might expect that the further down the headphone hierarchy you go, the lower the build quality becomes. In some options this is certainly the case, but Cambridge Audio bucks the trend with headphones that feel a darn sight better built than options that cost a whole lot more.
As much as I love my QuietComfort Ultra Headphones, they've always been a little rattly and shaky. They don't quite feel like a pair of $450 headphones, and I've always been disapointed by their build quality. While they're slightly heavier, the P100 SE feel a whole lot better built.
There's no unwanted rattling if you shake them or bang your head. The materials feel incredibly premium, and there are subtle metal accents that remind you $300 is actually still quite a lot of money.
Even when compared to Sony's plastic heroes the P100 SE feel like the more premium headset. All thanks to more substantial plastics and a more premium feel to the earcups.
But don't take my word for it. I'm a headphone reviewer — I've used hundreds of pairs of headphones and evaluated their build quality, so perhaps I'm jaded.
No, trust the word of my mother, who's used perhaps one pair of headphones in her entire life. I laid out the three pairs in front of her, and asked her to pick out the one she thought cost the most.
Here's how it went down:
"Hey mom, of these three headphones, which do you think cost the most?"
She stroked her chin, looking up from her work.
"Why?"
"It's for my work, which do you think are more expensive?"
She spent a good ten minutes weighing each pair of headphones in her hands, turning them over to see the facets and details at hand. Eventually, she placed the P100 SE down.
"These ones"
"Why?"
"Well, they seem to be made of metal, and they weight more. Can I go back to my work now?
"Sure, mom, thanks for helping out."
So there you go — if you don't want to believe me about the build quality of the Melomania P100 SE, then you should believe my poor, long suffering mother. At least make sure that she didn't put up with my nonsense for nothing.
But it's just another point for the P100 SE in the long run that shows you don't have to spend hundreds more dollars for excellent headphones.
The $400+ price point seems to have landed on a battery figure: 30 hours. In my mind that's still plenty of battery life, but there is still part of me that can see the allure of something that you don't have to charge as often.
If nothing else, it's something we'd have thought could be an easy stat to pad in the quest to make headphones more buyable than their competitors.
But that 30 hour figure stats to feel quite stagnant when you take into consideration the staying power of the likes of the P100 SE. They'll last you 60 hours on a charge with ANC turned on, and then 100 hours with the ANC turned off. That's three times the battery life of almost every single flagship pair of headphones.
Again, it goes to show that a lot of the real innovation in headphones happens further down the price bracket, where it's more difficult to stand out amongst a busier space. The result is headphones like the P100 SE, which do a standout job of laughing in the boys faces.
There are a couple of things that show that there's a $100 price gulf between the Sony and Bose options and the P100 SE. The first is the size of the case.
While the more expensive options fold smaller and feature slimmer cases, the P100 SE have a gargantuan carrying case that takes up more space in a bag. It still feels expensive—the magnetic door on the cable compartment is inspired—but it is very, very large.
There are also a couple of features missing. Spatial audio fans might be saddened to see no form of Atmos or even a custom variant, but I never found myself worrying. ANC is very good, but still bettered by the Sony and Bose headphones.
But in the long run, considering the $100 price difference, the P100 SE prove that you don't have to spend loads and loads of money to get spectacular headphones.
Perhaps, instead of moving prices continuously up and up, we might see those prices drop to counter upstarts like Cambridge Audio. Sadly I have my doubts, given how much money the likes of the XM6 and QC Ultra Headphones must make their manufacturers.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
10 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I test headphones for a living — and these are my favorite wireless earbuds for true audiophiles
Look, I know that buying a pair of wired earbuds for $100 is going to sound better than the likes of the WF-1000XM5 and the rest of the best wireless earbuds. Wired options are capable of carrying a higher-quality signal, and the space once taken up by batteries and Bluetooth modules can be better used for drivers and other assorted audio bits and bobs. I thought you'd never be able to get audiophile sound out of wireless buds — until I was lucky enough to try out some very premium earbuds from US manufacturer Noble. My world was turned upside down — amazing sound, epic features, all packed into some very slick-looking earbuds. Wireless convenience with the sound I crave from earbuds, so that I can listen critically when I'm out and about. Turns out the problem was about spending lots of money — although there is a cheaper pair that gets very close. If you're looking for "good sound", you're going to be fine with the likes of the Bose QuietComfort Ultra earbuds and the Sony WF-1000XM5. They feature a warm and welcoming sound signature that forgoes control and fidelity for comfort and listenability. Bass heads will prefer the Bose's low-end grunt, while most people will be served well by the more restrained Sony buds. What we're looking for is something wholly different. We want a more open soundstage, more detailed highs, rounder mids, and a more controlled low-end. Generally, that's something you'll only find in a pair of wired earbuds. It's a sound profile that audiophiles prefer for critical listening, the idea being to get as close to the artist's intent as possible. I haven't had much luck finding a sound like that in wireless buds. They're generally aimed at more casual listening, which would make sense. I've gotten close with buds from Sennheiser, but there's still been something missing — until I get to earbuds from Noble. With their jewel-like shells and green aluminum charging case, the Noble Fokus Rex5 look like they're worth every part of their $449 price tag. They're a stunning pair of buds, and they feel like they could be run over by a tank and still work for my critical listening sessions. They've got loads of battery life, a comfortable fit, and blah de blah... we're here for the sound. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. And what sound it is. There are five drivers inside, each dealing with a different part of your music. The bass, while not as loud as other, more established options, is extremely well controlled and deliciously deep. That means you can spend more time hearing all the little low-end details, like bass guitar strings being plucked and wobbly synth parts. Classical music timpani are impactful and clear as well — you can feel the drummer hitting his drum. The mids are wide, with loads of definition for guitars and other instruments. Heavy chugging riffs out of my favorite music have just the right amount of edge to be crunchy without being uncomfortable on the ear — epic stuff. The highs are detailed, making for perfect cymbal crashes and soaring electric guitar solos. Wind instruments in classical arrangements sound sublime as a result. I can't think of a better way to illustrate their audiophile credentials than to show you how easy it is to pick out the finer details of a track with them. We'll use Bobby Caldwell's Love Won't Wait because I like it. The chirping cymbals stand out as the song begins, the smooth drum beat bringing the first semblances of funk. The bass introduces itself, and you can hear the guitarist's fingers dance across the fretboard. The orchestra joins the fray, and each instrument in the horn section is easy to pick out. Bobby starts to croon, and the earbuds reveal the crest of each breath as he sings. The saxophone around 2:11 is smooth, living firmly in the left of the mix. The soundstage (which is how 'wide' your music sounds) places instruments well between the ears, and makes the ensemble sound as big as you'd hope. $449 well spent in my eyes. Note: as a revealing set of buds, these are designed with out-and-out bass performance in mind, so bass heads need not apply. You'll want what comes next... The Rex5 are a very expensive pair of earbuds, make no mistake — but they sound incredible. If you're looking for the best-sounding pair of wireless earbuds without compromise, these are they. If the mega-expense of the Rex5 is too much for you, then you'll want to look at the less-expensive Fokus Amadeus. That doesn't mean they're cheap, however. They'll set you back $320, with solid battery life, a comfortable fit, and some pretty good ANC... again, we're all about the sound today. Where the Rex5 are all about control and high-end detail, the Amadeus uses a single driver setup to show you all the little things that are happening down low in your music. They go all the way down, with some epic sub-bass for some of the most impactful bass out of a pair of earbuds that I've ever tested. That doesn't mean the rest of the frequency range is in any way ignored or pushed aside. They're still very detailed, and the mid-range is very well represented for those all-important instruments. They don't sound better than the Rex5, but they sound different, catering to audiophiles who want to critically listen for all the bits of bass you might otherwise miss. Again, let me take you through a listening session to give you a clearer picture. We'll go with something bassy — Becky Hill and Chase & Status' Disconnected. The depth of Becky's voice in the introduction is something to be envied — the low bits rumble with some impressive presence. Then the synths start to build, and the drums start to ramp up, before the massive bassy crescendo that shakes your skull. The dancing synths that make themselves known later, dancing from left to right. Becky's voice remains completely clear despite the heavy bass, with no signs that she's being overpowered by the low-end. The drums keep time throughout the track, smooth in delivery and controlled in impact. It's a stellar performance, and allows you to see how much variance and detail there can be in drum & bass. The Noble Fokus Amadeus earbuds bring some extra low-end to the table while keeping things easy to digest and easy to decipher. They've also got more battery than the Rex5, although they lose out in sonic detail. If you don't have hundreds of dollars to spend on some earbuds, then you're going to do well with the Cambridge Audio A100. They're not 'traditionally audiophile' and there's a bunch of true anoraks that have just turned their noses up at me and demanded I return my Audiophile Club membership card. But I'll stand by them — they're a great way to wirelessly critically listen without the need for something with a wire. They've got some excellent, controlled bass, while retaining that all-important high-end detail that we're looking for with audiophile earbuds. They're not going to hold a candle to similarly priced wired options, but for something wireless, they're better for hobby listening than just about anything else below the $250 price point. I've had loads of fun listening to them on the train and picking apart my favorite tunes – and the fact I'm less worried about them tumbling down the side of my seat just makes them all the more sweet. Let's see how they fare with a quick listen-through of Depth Of Satan's Eyes from mad occult rockers Ghost. The bass guitar hits hard and fast, not overstaying its welcome or overpowering the distorted guitars as the track kicks off. The drums are very well defined, although there's perhaps a little missing out of the very top end of the cymbals. Papa begins his unholy singing, and the buds are more than happy to reveal some extra detail, like his breathing. The synth kicks in, things become more foreboding, and they perhaps slide in behind the guitars a little too much compared to the more expensive options. As the track reaches its peak, the A100 show some dynamism as the volume changes around. The loud parts are loud enough, while the quiet parts are peaceful and calm. There's a lot for audiophiles to like about these little buds. The Cambridge Audio Melomania nab you the convenience of wireless connectivity, while retaining a solid, audiophile-friendly sound signature. They're very comfortable, too. I could write until I'm blue in the fingers about how much fun critical listening can be, but also how you don't need to go out and buy some new buds to do it. Sure, they'll reveal more detail and let you really get in deep with your music, but sometimes all it takes is a little attention. Critical listening is all about listening to music as an activity rather than a background silence filler. You'll find details you never knew were there if you take the time to appreciate your music — although I can't guarantee you won't come away wishing for more. 'Tis a slippery slope, and one without a bottom. Or a financial ceiling. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Tom's Guide
12 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Forget the XM6 — these Sony headphones just crashed to their lowest price ever
Sony's headphones are some of the most popular on the market, but they can be seriously expensive. Just as an example, Sony's latest flagship model, the WH-1000XM6, cost a hefty $449. However, you can still get excellent Sony sound quality for less than half the price. Right now the Sony WH-1000XM4 are on sale for $198 at Amazon. At $150 off, they've hit their lowest price ever and they're the Sony headphones I'd buy right now. These might not be the newest headphones on the block, but they've got it where it counts. They earned a 4.5 star rating in our Sony WH-1000XM4 review, thanks to the game-changing ANC and very good sound quality. Their case is better than both the newer options in the family, and they're potentially more comfortable as well. In the U.K.? Right now you can get the Sony WH-1000XM4 on sale for £199 at Amazon UK. Just note that this isn't the lowest ever price, and these cans have sold for as low as £174 in the past. While Sony's newer headphones ultimately won out in our Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Sony WH-1000XM4 face-off, it was an extremely close match. And right now, the XM4 headphones less than half the price of the XM6. For starters, the Sony WH-1000XM4 headphones still sound great to this day. Our reviewer loved their wide soundstage and improved bass response, which some people will prefer over the XM6's clarity-focused approach to audio. The XM4s also deliver excellent active noise canceling, which is great if you want to use them on trips or during your commute. And you get an impressive 30 hours of battery life with ANC enabled, or up to 38 hours with ANC off. On the downside, the WH-1000XM4 headphones aren't the best for voice and video calls — they do an average job, which is fine for everyday conversations. But if you prioritize crystal-clear communication, you'll want to spend up and get the Sony WH-1000XM6. This is a super saving that you don't want to miss out on! Make sure to grab it before it's gone. For more savings, see our Amazon promo codes and the Asics deals I'd shop from $19.
Android Authority
13 hours ago
- Android Authority
I wanted to love Sony's Xperia 1 VII, but its outdated priorities made that impossible
Sony Xperia 1 VII The Sony Xperia 1 VII packs some of the most powerful photo and video features on the market into a robust build that finally sees a long-term update pledge to match. Sadly, the camera quality doesn't always live up to the promise, and it struggles to stand out on any other merits. It'll delight a niche audience, but it's far too average for such a high asking price for everyone else. It's been a little while since a Sony phone passed my desk, so I was chomping at the bit to get my hands on the brand's 2025 flagship, the Xperia 1 VII. As has been the way with almost all Xperia handsets in recent generations, it is undeniably familiar — Sony is seemingly wedded to this hardware formula, for better or worse. Still, the phone boasts some interesting upgrades on paper that aim to keep it battling out with the best Android rivals. AI — that most heinous buzzword — has made its way into Sony's camera array, imbuing it with supposedly superior face and eye tracking, steadier videography, and auto-subject framing. There's even a 2.1x larger ultrawide camera onboard for a minor hardware improvement, too. The Xperia 1 VII has a few other tweaks, too, but you buy a Sony phone first and foremost for that Alpha camera goodness — and perhaps the headphone jack, if you still care about such things. But before we get into that, the biggest news is that Sony promises four years of OS and six years of security updates. Finally! While not the absolute best update policy in the business, this does at least address our biggest gripe about its predecessors. So, is this finally an Xperia that everyone should consider buying? Bluntly, no. The Xperia 1 VII has a very niche appeal for a few reasons, and it starts with those cameras… Is the Xperia the best camera experience money can buy? Robert Triggs / Android Authority Priced at an eyewatering £1,399/€1,499 (that's ~$1,900, but Sony seemingly isn't launching this in the US), you'd really hope the Xperia 1 VII would go toe to toe with the best camera phones on the market. The hardware, at least, remains competitive on paper. The triple rear camera array comprises a 52MP 1/1.35-inch main lens (48MP effective), 50MP 1/1.56-inch ultrawide (48MP effective), and Sony's novel 12MP 1/3.5-inch variable periscope camera, with a focal length and aperture that extends from f/2.3 at 85mm to f/3.5 at 170mm for an effective optical zoom of 3.5x to 7.1x. Still, these are hardly the biggest sensors found in a phone at this price. The mightily impressive Xiaomi 15 Ultra, my favorite camera phone to date, packs a whopping 1-inch primary sensor and a 200MP, 1/1.4-inch 4.3x periscope zoom. Even the Pixel 9 Pro XL and Galaxy S25 Ultra have larger 1/2.52-inch zoom cameras, though their ultrawides aren't quite as big. With that in mind, the Xperia 1 VII takes good-looking pictures (you can see a bunch of uncompressed samples in this Google Drive folder), but there are a few compromises to be aware of. Color, white balance, and exposure are generally spot on, though some might find the contrast a little dark at times. Details are naturally soft; however, there is quite a lot of noise present, especially on the smaller ultrawide and zoom sensors, even in bright outdoor lighting. You probably won't be blowing many of these pictures up to put on your wall. I don't have much to say about the selfie camera, other than it's pretty poor in low light, and the field of view is far too wide for my taste. While normally I wouldn't say that bigger is always better when it comes to mobile photography sensors, that usually comes with the caveat that clever processing and computational photography can make up the gap. To be fair to Sony, it has slowly fixed many of the Xperia's problems. HDR is now solid, and selfie colors aren't so far behind the rest of the setup. However, bokeh edge detection remains highly questionable, and night shooting is still pretty pointless next to the long-exposure shot the phone takes anyway — it's just a smidgen brighter. At least the results aren't artificially exposed, I suppose, and we know how Sony likes to keep image processing as traditional as possible. Night Mode Motion Blur Bad Bokeh Annoyingly, I also encountered some overly long shutter times outdoors. So, despite having phenomenal tracking capabilities, pictures can still come out blurry. A soft breeze was all it took to make the camera struggle with the picture above. The periscope zoom camera epitomizes my love/hate relationship with the Xperia's camera array. It's my favourite lens to shoot with, but it's still not living up to its promise, mainly because the sensor is too small. You'd think that an 85mm to 170mm focal length with an f/2.3-3.5 aperture would produce natural, silky bokeh for portraits, but that's not the case. The 1/3.5-inch sensor fails to create much background separation, leaving you reliant on subpar software bokeh for added depth. The setup doesn't capture much detail at greater distances either. Color and exposure are great, but other mobile photography staples are disappointing. Check out this 10x and 20x zoom comparison below. While the full-res photos look passable, the 100% crop reveals far less detail than the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and even the Pixel 9 Pro XL. It's not a disaster, but it's not good enough when you're billing yourself as a top dog. Xperia 1 VII - 10x, 100% crop Pixel 9 Pro XL - 10x, 100% crop Xiaomi 15 Ultra - 10x, 100% crop Xperia 1 VII - 20x, 100% crop Pixel 9 Pro XL - 20x, 100% crop Xiaomi 15 Ultra - 20x, 100% crop While Xiaomi's long-range pictures might look a little too AI-enhanced, Sony's blurry details at a pretty common shooting distance in bright light are undoubtedly worse. It's almost like there's not even a proper interpolation pass going on here, which is bizarrely bad. OK, so is there anything I like about Sony's camera setup? Well, the color profiles are good fun. The Natural setting looks great to my eye, and the Film option has a lovely nostalgic feel. Again, though, Sony isn't the only one offering these capabilities, and some might find the five options a little limited. Still, they let you grab interesting shots without resorting to editing post-shot. Robert Triggs / Android Authority Equally, Sony's camera app is finally really good. The standard and pro-tier features are all in one place and just a quick swipe away. You can quickly access those Instagram-ready filters or manually fiddle with shutter speed options, giving you the best of point-and-shoot and advanced tools within easy reach. It's definitely one of the better camera apps I've used this year. As for video, there's an equally potent split between everyday and pro-tier features, offering control over focus, HDR, stabilization level, focus peaking, microphoto priority, frame rates, and more. Speaking of tracking, the new AI Camerawork stabilization feature works pretty well, helping to keep fast-moving subjects in frame with clever sensor cropping and AI algorithms to keep track of your subject. I'm a pretty poor videographer, but it helped me keep some rather nippy toddlers in frame. It's less good with non-human subjects, however. Video capture is where the Xperia really shines. There are some annoying lingering issues, though. Why can't I switch lenses when shooting in Pro Video, for instance, and why is AI Camerawork separate from the regular stabilization options, meaning you can't use it with the pro-tier features? Probably because it only works at FHD 30fps, so it might be equally confusing if it were stuffed in the pro-tier stabilization options, but this all goes to highlight that Sony's bolt-it-on approach can still feel messy at times. All of this is to say that the Xperia 1 VII's camera setup is good, but far from flawless. Many of the pictures I took look great, impressive tracking makes it effortless to stay focused and on-subject, and the videography suite is kitted out far better than most. But the faults are still there, and I feel I'm experiencing very similar problems to the Xperia 1 V, which is the last flagship Xperia I got my hands on. That's a pretty big problem when so much of the phone's reputation is staked on the cameras. What about the rest of the phone? Robert Triggs / Android Authority At least the core Xperia software experience remains as dependable as ever. The UI is fast and slick, with minor custom theming but just enough neat tricks of its own, like the Side Sense dashboard, to stop it from being too basic. If you're big into multimedia, which you'd better be if you're buying an Xperia, you might get something out of Sony's Game Enhancer, Music Pro, and Video Creator tools. I'd argue they're a bit too niche for most, but to each their own. However, I have a few reservations about the phone's handling of some day-to-day tasks. Charging, powering through apps, and getting you through to the end of the day are all rather unimpressive for a phone of this calibre. Functional but far from groundbreaking. Peak charging power of just 27.6W and an average of 18W make for painfully slow charging times, taking 77 minutes to hit 100%. There are no quick top-ups on offer here either; the phone only managed 21% charge after 10 minutes on the plug — the OnePlus 13 hits 44% in the same time. If you often need to get back on your feet in a hurry, you'll find the Xperia seriously lacking. Thankfully, Sony boasts two days' worth of battery life, and while I could certainly make it into a second day of very light use, the phone doesn't stand out in our battery benchmarks. The good-sized 5,000mAh cell is competitive with rivals that offer similar capacity, and Sony's performance profile is frugal enough, but it could be considered slightly behind rivals regarding all-important content capture, web browsing, and video playback times. Speaking of performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite powers through daily tasks without a hitch or hiccup, as you would expect. But the Xperia 1 VII can't summon Sony's PlayStation prowess when it comes to gaming. The phone runs hotter than its rivals during stress tests, meaning that throttling and performance drops occur more quickly. This isn't a problem for lighter games, but it suggests that prolonged sessions in warmer climates could see frame rates drop, especially on more demanding titles and emulators. It plays the latest games well enough, but this isn't quite the dedicated gaming phone some would want, despite the inclusion of streaming, FPS optimization, and analytical overlay tools. Bare essential AI smarts, slow to charge, and hot under stress. The Xperia struggles to score any wins. Putting it all together, it's slower to charge than the Pixel, worse in stress tests than the Galaxy, and has good but pretty typical battery life for a phone of this size. The Xperia 1 VII really struggles to stand out as a must-buy over its competitors in those absolutely key smartphone metrics. I'm not a huge fan of mobile AI use cases, but the Xperia 1 VII doesn't offer any of those fancy picture editing or document summary extras either. You get cloud-based Gemini, Magic Eraser in Photos, and that's about your lot. Sony Xperia 1 VII review verdict: A niche phone, even among fans Robert Triggs / Android Authority The perennial problem with the Xperia series is that it's still living in the previous decade. Yes, Sony has invested in streaming and video creation tools to appeal to new audiences, but any number of third-party options can easily replicate these. Clinging to fan favorite features like the headphone jack, a stripped-back take on Android, and a belief that computational photography doesn't matter caters to an increasingly niche crowd. Ultimately, very few will want to buy a phone at this price when they can obtain the same or better specs and features for less elsewhere. Especially given the motherboard issues that affected some launch models. That's not to say this is a bad phone by any means. The Xperia 1 VII is a gorgeous, well-built piece of kit. The IP65/IP68 rating is robust, the display is sumptuous even if no longer 4K, and the audio package remains as compelling as ever. I don't mind the side-mounted fingerprint scanner, the dedicated shutter button remains a fun touch, and fans will stand by the headphone jack and microSD slot. It's been a familiar pleasure to use for a couple of weeks, but would I go out and buy one? The Xperia 1 VII is a mostly unremarkable phone with a very remarkable asking price. Well, no, not for almost £1,400 here in the UK, and I don't know who else would or should want to spend their money here either. Even the most serious mobile photographers don't have to spend this kind of money to take arguably even better pictures, and it's not like other phones don't have you well covered for Hi-Res music or HDR video playback. Really, I'm just disappointed. I've longed to love the Xperia series for years, but the dates just keep ending in disaster. If Sony were charging £999, I'd cut it some slack, but at £1,399, it's just far too average. At least the update policy is better this year, and the series isn't dead. Maybe Sony will have something more exciting for me next time. Sony Xperia 1 VII High-res audio capture • Top-tier specs • AI camera assist MSRP: €1,499.00 Now with Walkman DNA and AI camera tools The Sony Xperia 1 VII focuses media capture, including Walkman DNA with integrated high-quality audio components, and powerful AI tools to help capture the best possible images and video. A 5,000mAh battery promises two-day battery life running the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, 12GB of RAM, 256GB of storage, a 6.5-inch FHD+ display, and a 52MP camera. See price at Amazon Positives Excellent video options Excellent video options Great audio support Great audio support Six years of updates Six years of updates Still has 3.5mm jack and microSD support Still has 3.5mm jack and microSD support Gorgeous display Cons Very expensive Very expensive Average cameras Average cameras Slow to charge Slow to charge Hot under stress Follow
