logo
Mark Carney, Canada's cosmopolitan man of steel, has given liberals a new playbook

Mark Carney, Canada's cosmopolitan man of steel, has given liberals a new playbook

Irish Times03-05-2025
We all knew
Donald Trump
can win elections, we just didn't know he'd be winning them outside the USA. Last Monday,
Trump won the Canadian election for Mark Carney
. There is no other way of interpreting the resurrection of the Liberal Party and the reincarnation of the uber-technocrat, Jesuit-educated Carney. In January, Carney was an out-of-work, itinerant central banker for hire, intellectually and temperamentally very much out of step in the new Maga world of ethno-nationalist populists. Today, he is the liberal world's man of steel who will square up to Trump, the very man who enabled his election win.
Carney turned the Canadian election into a referendum on Trump.
Canadians responded enthusiastically. Before Trump began dismissing Canada as an American state in waiting, the Liberal Party's support plummeted to a low of 16 per cent. This week it won 43 per cent of the vote. Trump has managed to create something the world has never seen: virulent Canadian nationalism.
Ironically for a committed cosmopolitan - he got an Irish passport years ago but has recently relinquished his Irish and British citizenship - a walking, talking Davos-man, Carney wrapped himself in the Maple Leaf and rode the nationalist wave. Bigging up his ice hockey credentials – Canada's real game – he deployed resolute rhetoric against the US to sell ordinary Canadians a firm but fair vision of themselves and their country. And they bought it.
Liberals all over the world are taking Carney's victory as evidence that
the juggernaut of ethno-nationalism can be beaten by facts, reason and an appeal to the better side of the electorate's nature
. Canadian nationalism is the acceptable face of nationalism in the liberal world because it is ... well, Canadian and decent. It presents itself as a middle-of-the-road, rule-of-law, Molson-lite nationalism. Defined not by what it is, but what it is against, this new Centrist Dad jingoism knows who the enemy is: Donald Trump.
READ MORE
Canadians have given liberals a new playbook. Stand up to Trump and your people stand behind you. All around the world, conservatives are realising that Trump and proximity to Trumpism is a massive liability. This fact alone changes the global background noise.
The new Canadian Confederation was proof that the antagonism between the 1 million Canadians of French origin and the two and a quarter million Canadians of British origin could dwindle as they found common ground
So it turns out those nice Canadians are harder than most imagined. But now that the campaign is over, how does Carney, a brilliant economic mind, negotiate from here? He must find a way to deal with America, not just because the US and Canada are neighbours, united by history and geography, but because they are, for all intents and purposes, two nations with one economy. Around
76 per cent of exports
(representing around
one-fifth of Canadian GDP
) flow southward – making Canada particularly vulnerable to
US tariff policies
.
According to ScotiaBank, Canada imports roughly 34 per cent of its inputs (ie intermediate goods) from the US, and exports roughly 75 per cent of total goods it produces to the US. Energy is
Canada's single largest export to the US by value
, with crude oil and natural gas making up roughly one-third of Canada's total exports flowing south. Around one in six jobs in Canada are linked to exports, with some estimates suggesting incomes are 15 to 40 per cent higher thanks to freer trade.
Mark Carney needs a deal. The one thing in his favour is the growing realisation that,
when faced with stern opposition, Trump always caves in
. Carney just has to hang tight, fly the flag, follow the puck and wait for the phone call.
Whatever happens, it is clear that Carney's ascension to power within the Liberal Party represents not merely a change in leadership but a recalibration of Canada's economic and political identity. That identity was officially created at midnight on July 1st, 1867, when church bells rang out from Nova Scotia to Ontario, signalling that nearly four million people would wake up as citizens of the new Dominion of Canada. The official population of 3.8 million was only 10 per cent of the bustling nation to the south.
At that stage, many Canadians doubted whether their garrison country would survive, wondering just how long Canada could remain without the Americans, driven by their 'manifest destiny', ruling the entire continent. After all, the Americans had just slaughtered each other in the civil war, so Canadians were under no illusions about what the recently victorious Union army could do if it turned around and switched its attentions from the warm south to the freezing north.
[
A win 'for democrats all around the world'. Canada's Mark Carney prepares to take on Trump
Opens in new window
]
But the new Canadian Confederation was proof that the antagonism between the one million Canadians of French origin and the two and a quarter million Canadians of British origin could dwindle as they found common ground. The rest – the indigenous peoples, the original inhabitants – didn't get a look in. The hope was that the differences, be they regional, racial or religious, could be gradually ameliorated by prosperity.
Can 'technocratic daddy' Mark Carney solve Canada's deep-rooted problems?
Listen |
40:48
Apart from the linguistic and cultural clash between French and English speakers, the major fault line in the new Canadian Confederation was sectarian. In the first Canadian census, 8 per cent of the population were neither French nor British. Of this group, 200,000 were German and the census turned up only 125 Jews, 11 Hindus and three Chinese.
The Irish were the largest group with the 'British' cohort, and we brought to Canada our sectarian 'green and orange' hatred that would play out in regular riots from Montreal to Toronto and Halifax. Ulster Protestant emigrants joined forces with Scottish farmers to form an Orange phalanx against the surge of Irish Catholic migration from the 1830s onwards. Today there are more Orange Lodges in Canada than anywhere else in the world outside Northern Ireland. (In fact, I witnessed my first and last Orange 12th of July march in Toronto back in 1986!)
More than 600,000 Irish emigrants arrived in Canada in the 20-year period between 1830 and 1851, making the Irish the second-largest ethnic group after the Quebecois. We kept coming to the new Confederation and, by 1931, more than a quarter of all Canadians were Irish-Canadians, one third Catholic and two-thirds Protestant. Today, there is scarcely a family in Antrim that doesn't have people in Canada, particularly Ontario.
Maybe a reason that I am interested in the country is that, but for last-minute cold feet, I would have been a French-speaking Canadian. In the late 1950s, my just-married parents got Canadian visas. My mother had secured a teaching job in Montreal, but a week before they were due to sail from Cobh they got the heebie-jeebies and stayed put. Between 1830 and 1970, 1.3 million Irish people moved to Canada. As a result, Irish-Canadians are about 14 per cent of the Canadian population today, Mark Carney included.
[
The Canadian election: Trump effect a major factor
Opens in new window
]
Today's Canada is no longer divided between French and English speakers. It is one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world. Many Canadians, including lots of the 41 per cent who still voted Conservative last week, believe immigration must be reduced, citing runaway house prices as evidence that the country can't cope. Similar arguments could be plausibly made here.
Canada is in essence two economies and cultures: the resource-based 'cowboy' commodity economy in the culture of western Canada and the service, 'social democrat' society of eastern Canada. Imagine a fusion of Texas and Belgium and you get the picture.
This is the country Mark Carney must unite. And nothing unites better than a common enemy. For Canadians, that man is Donald Trump, who this week proved he can win elections anywhere in the world.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

John Downing: Millionaire mogul Sheridan must overcome his controversies before he can be a credible presidential candidate
John Downing: Millionaire mogul Sheridan must overcome his controversies before he can be a credible presidential candidate

Irish Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • Irish Independent

John Downing: Millionaire mogul Sheridan must overcome his controversies before he can be a credible presidential candidate

Past presidents have included lawyers, teachers, academics and journalists, but businesspeople have never been successful The business route to Áras an Uachtaráin is the one less-travelled. This makes us ponder why a heavy-hitter in international commerce like Gareth Sheridan wants to switch to being a ribbon-cutter at civic occasions. In its near 90-year existence, the office of Irish president has never had a business titan win the Áras. That simple fact is further highlighted by the number of controversies that have descended upon the millionaire pharma mogul in the days after he confirmed his presidential ambitions, as first unveiled in the Sunday Independent, at Tullamore Show last Sunday.

European leaders to join Volodymyr Zelensky for crunch war talks with Donald Trump in Washington
European leaders to join Volodymyr Zelensky for crunch war talks with Donald Trump in Washington

Irish Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • Irish Independent

European leaders to join Volodymyr Zelensky for crunch war talks with Donald Trump in Washington

Mr Trump is leaning on Mr Zelensky to strike an agreement after the US president met Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin in Alaska and emerged more aligned with Moscow on seeking a peace deal instead of a ceasefire first. Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky will meet today. 'If peace is not going to be possible here and this is just going to continue on as a war, people will continue to die by the thousands ... we may unfortunately wind up there, but we don't want to wind up there,' US secretary of state Marco Rubio said in an interview with CBS's Face the Nation. Mr Trump yesterday promised 'big progress on Russia' in a social ­media post, without specifying what this might be. Sources briefed on Moscow's thinking told Reuters the US and Russian leaders have discussed proposals for Russia to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for Kyiv ceding a swathe of fortified land in the east and freezing the front lines elsewhere. Top Trump officials ­hinted that the fate of Ukraine's eastern Donbas region – which incorporates Donetsk and Luhansk and which is already mostly under Russian control – was on the line, while some sort of defensive pact was also on the table. 'We were able to win the following concession, that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection,' Trump envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN yesterday, suggesting this would be in lieu of Ukraine seeking Nato membership. 'The United States could offer Article 5 protection, which was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that.' Article 5 of Nato's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defence – the notion that an attack on a single member is considered an attack on them all. That pledge may not be enough to sway leaders in Kyiv to sign over Donbas. Ukraine's borders were already meant to have been guaranteed when Ukraine surrendered a Soviet-era nuclear ­arsenal in 1994, and it proved to be little deterrent when Russia absorbed Crimea in 2014 and then launched its full-scale invasion in 2022. The war has now dragged on for more than three years and killed or wounded more than one million people. It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory German chancellor Friedrich Merz, French president Emmanuel Macron and UK prime minister Keir Starmer hosted a meeting of allies yesterday to bolster Mr Zelensky's hand, hoping in particular to lock down robust ­security guarantees for Ukraine that would include a US role. The Europeans are keen to help Mr Zelensky avoid a repeat of his last Oval Office meeting in February. That went disastrously, with Mr Trump and vice-president JD Vance giving the Ukrainian leader a public dressing-down, accusing him of being ungrateful and disrespectful. Taoiseach Micheál Martin attended the virtual leaders' meeting of the so-called 'coalition of the willing'. Mr Martin, who will not be in Washington, said he had assured Mr Zelensky that Ireland will 'continue to steadfastly support Ukraine'. 'It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force,' he said. 'I fully agree that Ukraine needs strong, credible, long-term security guarantees. This will mean sustained support from Europe, the United States and other partners.' A joint communique released by the UK, France and Germany after the meeting said their leaders were ready 'to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased, and to help secure Ukraine's skies and seas and regenerate Ukraine's armed forces'. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen will also travel to Washington, as will Finland's president Alexander Stubb, whose access to Mr Trump included rounds of golf in Florida earlier this year, and Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni, who is an admirer of many of Mr Trump's policies. As I've often said, Ukraine must become a steel porcupine, indigestible for potential invaders 'It's important that Washington is with us,' Mr Zelensky said alongside Ms von der Leyen on a visit to Brussels, saying the current front lines in the war should be the basis for peace talks. 'Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it.' Setting out red lines, Ms von der Leyen said Ukraine's allies wanted robust security guarantees for Ukraine, no limits to Ukraine's armed forces, and a seat at the table with Mr Trump and Putin for Ukraine to discuss its territory. 'As I've often said, Ukraine must become a steel porcupine, indigestible for potential invaders,' she said. For his part, Putin briefed his close ally, Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko, about the Alaska talks, and also spoke with Kazakhstan's president Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. Mr Trump said on Friday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war because 'Russia is a very big power, and they're not.'

The Irish Independent's View: As Trump appears to give in to Putin, Europe must prepare for the worst
The Irish Independent's View: As Trump appears to give in to Putin, Europe must prepare for the worst

Irish Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • Irish Independent

The Irish Independent's View: As Trump appears to give in to Putin, Europe must prepare for the worst

Today's meeting with the US leader presents similar dangers, but the Ukrainian president, and Europe, cannot be caught on the hop. The pressure may be more subtle and exerted by stealth, but it may feel equally overwhelming. As predicted, US president Donald Trump appears to have bowed completely to Vladimir Putin's maximalist demands. For Kyiv, this would mean handing over huge chunks of eastern lands which Moscow has been unable to capture. Under what was mooted by the Russian president when the two leaders met in Alaska on Friday, it effectively means Ukraine surrendering its sovereign status, and becoming a client state. How this fits in with any framework of democracy, or the integrity of international borders as we understand them, is a question with which Europe must now grapple. Neither Mr Trump nor Putin can decide the fates of independent states. The summit was unsettling for many reasons. For someone who is wanted by the International Criminal Court – to answer for war crimes – to be treated with full honours was troubling, not only for Ukrainians, but for all who decry its invasion. Mr Trump seems to have succumbed to the persuasive skills of his expertly KGB-trained interlocutor in dropping all demands for a ceasefire and an all-out agreement to end the war. Ireland's participation in a phone call with the Coalition of the Willing – involving European leaders planning to police a future peace deal – speaks to the new risks. Mr Trump's impatience with the process, and his intention to accelerate dialogue to move to a full peace deal, sounds well-meant. What alarms Ukraine and Europe is that Moscow will again be let dictate terms, endorsed by Mr Trump, while Mr Zelensky will find himself with his back to the wall. That is why the Coalition of the Willing must stand firm and use all its combined weight to hold Mr Trump to his word to underwrite security guarantees. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen will also be meeting Mr Trump today. French president Emmanuel Macron, German chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish president Alexander Stubb and Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni are also reportedly travelling to Washington for the meeting. The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any time soon But the view expressed by the EU's top diplomat Kaja Kallas, who accused Putin of seeking to 'drag out negotiations' with no commitment to end the bloodshed, suggests talks are now aimed more at damage limitation, rather than securing agreement, based on what's on the table. 'The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any time soon,' Ms Kallas said. If last February's disgraceful humiliation of Mr Zelensky was a boon to Moscow, the Alaska summit was an unexpectedly extravagant bonus. So Europe no longer has any excuse for not preparing for the worst, even if it maintains a fragile facade of hoping for the best.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store