
Mark Carney, Canada's cosmopolitan man of steel, has given liberals a new playbook
We all knew
Donald Trump
can win elections, we just didn't know he'd be winning them outside the USA. Last Monday,
Trump won the Canadian election for Mark Carney
. There is no other way of interpreting the resurrection of the Liberal Party and the reincarnation of the uber-technocrat, Jesuit-educated Carney. In January, Carney was an out-of-work, itinerant central banker for hire, intellectually and temperamentally very much out of step in the new Maga world of ethno-nationalist populists. Today, he is the liberal world's man of steel who will square up to Trump, the very man who enabled his election win.
Carney turned the Canadian election into a referendum on Trump.
Canadians responded enthusiastically. Before Trump began dismissing Canada as an American state in waiting, the Liberal Party's support plummeted to a low of 16 per cent. This week it won 43 per cent of the vote. Trump has managed to create something the world has never seen: virulent Canadian nationalism.
Ironically for a committed cosmopolitan - he got an Irish passport years ago but has recently relinquished his Irish and British citizenship - a walking, talking Davos-man, Carney wrapped himself in the Maple Leaf and rode the nationalist wave. Bigging up his ice hockey credentials – Canada's real game – he deployed resolute rhetoric against the US to sell ordinary Canadians a firm but fair vision of themselves and their country. And they bought it.
Liberals all over the world are taking Carney's victory as evidence that
the juggernaut of ethno-nationalism can be beaten by facts, reason and an appeal to the better side of the electorate's nature
. Canadian nationalism is the acceptable face of nationalism in the liberal world because it is ... well, Canadian and decent. It presents itself as a middle-of-the-road, rule-of-law, Molson-lite nationalism. Defined not by what it is, but what it is against, this new Centrist Dad jingoism knows who the enemy is: Donald Trump.
READ MORE
Canadians have given liberals a new playbook. Stand up to Trump and your people stand behind you. All around the world, conservatives are realising that Trump and proximity to Trumpism is a massive liability. This fact alone changes the global background noise.
The new Canadian Confederation was proof that the antagonism between the 1 million Canadians of French origin and the two and a quarter million Canadians of British origin could dwindle as they found common ground
So it turns out those nice Canadians are harder than most imagined. But now that the campaign is over, how does Carney, a brilliant economic mind, negotiate from here? He must find a way to deal with America, not just because the US and Canada are neighbours, united by history and geography, but because they are, for all intents and purposes, two nations with one economy. Around
76 per cent of exports
(representing around
one-fifth of Canadian GDP
) flow southward – making Canada particularly vulnerable to
US tariff policies
.
According to ScotiaBank, Canada imports roughly 34 per cent of its inputs (ie intermediate goods) from the US, and exports roughly 75 per cent of total goods it produces to the US. Energy is
Canada's single largest export to the US by value
, with crude oil and natural gas making up roughly one-third of Canada's total exports flowing south. Around one in six jobs in Canada are linked to exports, with some estimates suggesting incomes are 15 to 40 per cent higher thanks to freer trade.
Mark Carney needs a deal. The one thing in his favour is the growing realisation that,
when faced with stern opposition, Trump always caves in
. Carney just has to hang tight, fly the flag, follow the puck and wait for the phone call.
Whatever happens, it is clear that Carney's ascension to power within the Liberal Party represents not merely a change in leadership but a recalibration of Canada's economic and political identity. That identity was officially created at midnight on July 1st, 1867, when church bells rang out from Nova Scotia to Ontario, signalling that nearly four million people would wake up as citizens of the new Dominion of Canada. The official population of 3.8 million was only 10 per cent of the bustling nation to the south.
At that stage, many Canadians doubted whether their garrison country would survive, wondering just how long Canada could remain without the Americans, driven by their 'manifest destiny', ruling the entire continent. After all, the Americans had just slaughtered each other in the civil war, so Canadians were under no illusions about what the recently victorious Union army could do if it turned around and switched its attentions from the warm south to the freezing north.
[
A win 'for democrats all around the world'. Canada's Mark Carney prepares to take on Trump
Opens in new window
]
But the new Canadian Confederation was proof that the antagonism between the one million Canadians of French origin and the two and a quarter million Canadians of British origin could dwindle as they found common ground. The rest – the indigenous peoples, the original inhabitants – didn't get a look in. The hope was that the differences, be they regional, racial or religious, could be gradually ameliorated by prosperity.
Can 'technocratic daddy' Mark Carney solve Canada's deep-rooted problems?
Listen |
40:48
Apart from the linguistic and cultural clash between French and English speakers, the major fault line in the new Canadian Confederation was sectarian. In the first Canadian census, 8 per cent of the population were neither French nor British. Of this group, 200,000 were German and the census turned up only 125 Jews, 11 Hindus and three Chinese.
The Irish were the largest group with the 'British' cohort, and we brought to Canada our sectarian 'green and orange' hatred that would play out in regular riots from Montreal to Toronto and Halifax. Ulster Protestant emigrants joined forces with Scottish farmers to form an Orange phalanx against the surge of Irish Catholic migration from the 1830s onwards. Today there are more Orange Lodges in Canada than anywhere else in the world outside Northern Ireland. (In fact, I witnessed my first and last Orange 12th of July march in Toronto back in 1986!)
More than 600,000 Irish emigrants arrived in Canada in the 20-year period between 1830 and 1851, making the Irish the second-largest ethnic group after the Quebecois. We kept coming to the new Confederation and, by 1931, more than a quarter of all Canadians were Irish-Canadians, one third Catholic and two-thirds Protestant. Today, there is scarcely a family in Antrim that doesn't have people in Canada, particularly Ontario.
Maybe a reason that I am interested in the country is that, but for last-minute cold feet, I would have been a French-speaking Canadian. In the late 1950s, my just-married parents got Canadian visas. My mother had secured a teaching job in Montreal, but a week before they were due to sail from Cobh they got the heebie-jeebies and stayed put. Between 1830 and 1970, 1.3 million Irish people moved to Canada. As a result, Irish-Canadians are about 14 per cent of the Canadian population today, Mark Carney included.
[
The Canadian election: Trump effect a major factor
Opens in new window
]
Today's Canada is no longer divided between French and English speakers. It is one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world. Many Canadians, including lots of the 41 per cent who still voted Conservative last week, believe immigration must be reduced, citing runaway house prices as evidence that the country can't cope. Similar arguments could be plausibly made here.
Canada is in essence two economies and cultures: the resource-based 'cowboy' commodity economy in the culture of western Canada and the service, 'social democrat' society of eastern Canada. Imagine a fusion of Texas and Belgium and you get the picture.
This is the country Mark Carney must unite. And nothing unites better than a common enemy. For Canadians, that man is Donald Trump, who this week proved he can win elections anywhere in the world.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Former senior Trump official says special relationship with Ireland won't stop president's trade war
Mairead Maguire IRELAND WILL LIKELY become collateral damage in Donald Trump's efforts to put America first – but it's nothing personal. That's according to Mick Mulvaney, a former Republican congressman who was Trump's acting chief of staff in his first term and who has a unique insight into how the president operates. He spoke to The Journal at the Global Economic Summit in Killarney, where tariffs and trade were headline issues. Trump, Mulvaney says, wants to make deals where everyone wins. But if that's not possible, he'll make sure America wins, even at the cost of special relationships. 'His first interest is to take care of Americans. It's not to say, 'You know what, I hate Ireland. Let's just stick it to them'. That's not how this works. 'Why are American businesses doing business in Ireland when they could be doing it in the United States? That's the perspective.' Mulvaney said, however, that there is a real connection with Ireland. 'It's familial, it's cultural. 'The Irish are so naturally good at diplomacy. It is one of your competitive advantages in the world marketplace. I don't understand why it's been struggling the last two years.' Mulvaney says 'dramatic missteps' made by the Irish government – particularly in relation to Palestine – have caused a 'blip' in the strong relationship. He said he understands the parallels between Ireland and Palestine, and the government's decision to join Spain and Norway in recognising it as a state, but he claims Washington was blindsided by it. 'What I don't understand is why nobody called us beforehand. Friends don't do that to each other. 'I found out about it in the press. I understand that my government found out about it in the press.' Then-Tánaiste Micheál Martin announced his intention for Ireland to recognise the state of Palestine weeks in advance, after months of discussions. The government is set to green light the Occupied Territories Bill – another move expected to ruffle Republican feathers. Officials at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade have been revising the bill, making substantial amendments to the original text in order to bring it in line with the constitution and reduce the risk of a clash with EU law. As a result, the bill is expected to only cover goods and not services, such as products from online tech companies. Advertisement Even in its revised, stripped-back version, Mulvaney says the bill is unlikely to be well received in Washington. 'If you're pro-Palestinian, to half of my country you have to explain why that's not antisemitic.' On the trade war with Europe, Mulvaney's reading of the situation is that Republicans don't see the bloc as a viable ally in the long run. This, he says, is partly because the priorities for many younger European voters, such as climate change, conflict with Washington's priorities. Trump this week paused his threatened 50% tariffs on the European Union until 9 July, postponing them from the original 1 June deadline he had initially given. 'A weird time' Mulvaney quit his role in the White House after the Capitol riots of 6 January 2021. He was a Republican congressman in the House of Representatives before becoming director of the Office of Management and Budget and then acting chief of staff for Trump. He also sought out the role of Special Envoy to Northern Ireland, as he's 'been coming here for 20 years'. His ancestors are from Mayo. Mulvaney now regularly appears in American and international media as a commentator on politics and economics. He says it's a 'weird time' for his country, as significant figures in both the Republican and Democratic parties are aging. Joe Biden, who dropped out of the presidential race last year, recently announced a cancer diagnosis. As for Trump, the constitution prevents him for running for a third term. Mulvaney believes the 2028 presidential race will be of particular importance. 'It will represent generational change in both parties, and that will be fascinating to see.' Both parties, he says, have a good lineup of potential candidates. His ones to watch? Within the Democratic Party: Senator Cory Booker, Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer, and congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Among Republicans, he tips current vice president JD Vance to run. Florida governor Ron DeSantis and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are also ones to watch. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
What Trump is doing to US universities is not as bad as the McCarthyite witch trials – it's worse
Some have said the current assault on American universities is the worst since the McCarthyite purges of the 1940s and 1950s. It's actually much worse. McCarthyism targeted individuals with 'Communistic' beliefs, which could include anything left of centre. Donald Trump similarly seeks to stamp out dissent. But his attack is McCarthyism on steroids, attempting to destroy universities as institutions. Trump began by threatening to withhold federal funding from universities that refused his demands. The US spends roughly $60 billion a year on university-based research and development, about half the size of the total Irish governmental budget. Because these funds have already been appropriated by the US Congress, withholding them is illegal. Yet Trump is doing it anyway and daring the courts to stop him. In March, Columbia University, fearful of losing $400 million in federal funding, caved to Trump's demands including surrendering control over its Middle Eastern studies programme. In April, Harvard fought back and has had nearly $2 billion pulled. These funds support all manner of research, and their suspension will have devastating effects on scientific progress, the benefits of which would have been felt far beyond the American borders. Just to take one example, say you or a relative develop Alzheimer's disease: these cuts will delay the search for treatments. More recently, Trump escalated his attack on another key source of university revenue: international students, who make up more than 20 per cent of the student body at most American research universities. Across the country, immigration officers have disappeared international students involved in anti-Israel protests. A haunting video showed one woman, Rumeysa Ozturk, walking near campus, pulled into an unmarked car in broad daylight by masked, plainclothes officers. In some cases, the government has provided no information as to the whereabouts of these students or information as to why they were detained. READ MORE [ CCTV footage shows US immigration detaining college student Rumeysa Ozturk Opens in new window ] International students seeking to re-enter the US have been detained at the border; like undocumented migrants, these students with the legal right to study in the country fear going home in case they are not allowed to travel back. Now, Trump has revoked Harvard's certification for enrolling international students , leaving nearly 7,000 in limbo. And last week, the State Department paused appointments for international student visas , which affects any non-citizen wishing to study at any US university. These actions will permanently damage American higher education – not simply Harvard or Columbia, which are just the most prominent examples. All American universities are potentially in the firing line. The New York Times reported last week that a Trump administration taskforce had identified 10 universities for particular attention. They include George Washington University; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Northwestern; the University of California, Berkeley; the University of California, Los Angeles; the University of Minnesota; and the University of Southern California. Many measures may be blocked in the courts; indeed, a judge has already prevented him from blocking Harvard's enrolment of international students. Regardless, the measures have created so much uncertainty that no international student can feel good about studying in the US. Who would want to bet their future education on the chance that American courts will restrain Trump? And even if a Democrat wins the White House in 2028, any student considering a multiyear degree in the US will have to factor in the possibility of a future republican victory. [ Judge blocks Trump administration's ban on international student enrolments at Harvard Opens in new window ] To be sure, universities made themselves vulnerable to attack. By cracking down on pro-Palestinian protests in 2024, many gave Trump an entering wedge. Now 'fighting anti-Semitism' is the flimsy pretext of his current assault. Private universities, in particular, are elitist institutions. The annual cost of a Harvard bachelor's degree is just over $90,000 for next year, though many students – including international students – benefit from need-based financial aid. Because most US universities, including public ones, depend on private gifts to balance their books, they focus on pleasing big donors. They kowtow not just to the rich, but to the ultra-rich. [ Donald Trump's chilling assault on universities mirrors that of the Nazis in 1930s Germany Opens in new window ] Trump retains a lot of political support for anti-elitist attacks on academia among voters without third-level education who have trended republican. The Maga movement loves hierarchies based on wealth, nationality, race, and gender. But it hates the kind of hierarchies that US universities supply: ones based on merit and thereby more open to women and people of colour. Trump's arch nemesis, Barack Obama, demonstrates how a black man could rise to the presidency through academic institutions: Columbia, Harvard Law, and a professorship at the University of Chicago. As imperfect as US universities are, they remain vital institutions of free speech, which is precisely why Trump is attacking them. His attacks have had a chilling effect on college campuses. Some, such as Columbia, have been internally riven over how to respond. Academics and students are demoralised. Many are fighting back, but they are forced to redirect their energy away from studying, teaching, and researching. Three leading scholars of fascism – Marci Shore, Jason Stanley and Timothy Snyder – made headlines by leaving Yale for the University of Toronto. Needless to say, it is a disturbing sign for American democracy when those who know the most about fascism's rise start to flee. Destroying higher education is a strange way of making America great again. US universities have been not just engines of economic growth, they have been tremendous sources of soft power. According to one count, more than 50 current world leaders were educated in the US. Like other aspects of Trump's radical agenda such as his imposition of tariffs, his attack on universities in the name of America First is rapidly accelerating the decline of his country's geopolitical power. But Trump's attack on academia presents Ireland with a unique opportunity . Just think how desirable it is for researchers and students to come here to an English-speaking country that is a functioning democracy. Minister for Education James Lawless recently announced a scheme for attracting disaffected American academics. Yet it is unclear whether it will be of the necessary scale and ambition to truly benefit from the US brain drain. Such a scheme, if successful, would enable Ireland not only to be a refuge for academic freedom and democracy, it would generate long-term economic growth through science and innovation. But the scheme shouldn't be too narrowly focused on the hard sciences. After all, we need artists, humanists, and social scientists – and perhaps some scholars of fascism – to help us understand the madness that is Trump's America. Dr Daniel Geary is Mark Pigott Professor in US History at Trinity College Dublin

The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Three-quarters of Irish universities fall in global rankings - but TCD still best in the country
THREE-QUARTERS OF Irish universities have fallen in global rankings, but Trinity College Dublin is still rated the best in the country. The rankings are based on quality of education, employability, quality of faculty, and research. Ireland's overall slip in the Global 2000, which is released today, is mainly due to research performance amid intensified global competition from well-funded institutions, the Centre for World University Rankings said. University College Dublin (UCD) is the only Irish university that ranked higher on the list than it did last year. Here's how they're all faring: Trinity College Dublin – 259th (250th in 2024) University College Dublin – 299th (301st last year) University College Cork – 545th (542nd) University of Galway – 707th (668th) University of Limerick – 926th (925th) Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland – 1013rd (no change) Dublin City University – 1151st (1134th) Maynooth University – 1323rd (1287th) Advertisement Harvard is the top university in the world for the fourteenth year in a row. However, other US institutions have declined in some areas amid slashed government funding and disputes over academic freedom and free speech. In the top ten, Harvard is followed by two other private US institutions, MIT and Stanford. The UK's Cambridge and Oxford are the world's highest-rated public universities, coming fourth and fifth. The rest of the global top ten are also private American universities: Princeton, Pennsylvania, Columbia, Yale, and Chicago. For the first time, China has surpassed the US as the country with the most universities in the Global 2000. While Oxford and Cambridge maintain their high rankings, the overall outlook for Britain is unfavourable, as 75% of universities have fallen down the list. The top ten universities in Europe this year are: Cambridge (UK, 4th), Oxford (UK, 5th), PSL (France, 19th), UCL (UK, 20th), Imperial College London (UK, 28th), Paris City University (France, 29th), ETH Zurich (Switzerland, 32nd), Paris Saclay (France, 34th), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (France, 35th), and Copenhagen (Denmark, 38th). Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal