
Check out this great movie before it leaves Amazon Prime Video next week (May 2025)
Few directors went on a more impressive run through the late 1990s and early 2000s than Steven Soderbergh. In addition to winning the Oscar for Best Director and helming Ocean's Eleven, Soderbergh made several smaller movies that have stood the test of time.
The greatest example is 1998's Out of Sight, a charming thriller starring George Clooney as a bank robber who finds himself in a hugely flirtatious relationship with Jennifer Lopez's Karen Sisco, a federal marshal looking to arrest him. Here are three reasons Out of Sight still hits more than 25 years later.
Recommended Videos
Lopez and Clooney have remarkable chemistry
Although Out of Sight has elements of a great action movie, it is first and foremost a love story that heavily relies on the chemistry between Clooney and Lopez. Thankfully, both actors are more than up to the task. Clooney is playing exactly the kind of character you'd expect — a charming, slightly sleazy guy who is smarter than he lets on.
Meanwhile, Lopez plays Sisco tough, but she's charmed by Clooney's thief long before she's willing to admit that to herself. Every scene they share is electric, the kind of onscreen chemistry that almost leaves the viewer tingling as they watch it.
The supporting cast is excellent
Although Clooney and Lopez deserve a lot of credit for the work they do here, Soderbergh assembled an incredible supporting cast to surround them. We've got Ving Rhames in his prime, a frazzled Steve Zahn, as well as Dennis Farina, Albert Brooks, and, maybe most importantly, Don Cheadle.
On top of feeling like a cast filled with people who you might see on the street, the chemistry between every member of the cast is exceptional. Out of Sight was not the kind of movie that was destined to top the box office, but it's filled with recognizable faces anyway.
Soderbergh knows exactly what he's doing
In the past decade, Soderbergh has spent most of his time experimenting with different kinds of storytelling, and more power to him. In the 1990s and 2000s, though, there was no one more capable of combining action, comedy, and romance to deliver something utterly satisfying.
That's exactly what he does with Out of Sight, a movie that is not about anything particularly complicated or emotional. Nevertheless, it's such an utterly satisfying movie and one that knows exactly how to achieve a perfect tonal balance. After watching, you feel like it's a masterpiece.
You can watch Out of Sight on Amazon Prime Video.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
42 minutes ago
- CNN
Suge Knight urges longtime rival Sean ‘Diddy' Combs to take the stand to ‘humanize' himself
People in entertainment Sean 'Diddy' Combs MusicFacebookTweetLink Follow Imprisoned former rap mogul Marion 'Suge' Knight, who for decades shared an acrimonious relationship with Sean 'Diddy' Combs, urged his longtime archrival to take the stand in his ongoing trial. Speaking to CNN's Laura Coates in a brief phone interview from prison, where he's serving a 28-year-sentence for a deadly hit-and-run in 2015, Knight said he believed Combs should 'humanize' himself. 'I feel if he do tell his truth, he really would walk,' Knight said. 'If Puffy goes up there and says, 'Hey … I did all the drugs, I wasn't in control of my life at the time, or myself' – he can humanize his old self and the jury might give him a shot.' 'But if they keep him sitting down, it's like he's scared to face the music,' Knight added. 'He should just have his faith in God, put up his pants and go up there and tell his truth.' Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges that include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted on all counts, he could face up to life in prison. It's not clear whether Combs will testify at his trial. Taking the stand can be seen as a risky move for defendants because it can open them up to a bruising cross-examination, experts say. Benjamin Chew, the co-lead counsel for actor Johnny Depp in his defamation trial, told CNN earlier this week that the standard wisdom is for defendants not to testify – but added it may benefit Combs to defend himself and express remorse over the allegations that have been brought up during the prosecution's case. Knight, the co-founder of Death Row Records, was best known in the 1990s for helping promote West Coast rap in a field that had long been dominated by East Coast artists. It was during this time that his rivalry with Combs ratcheted up – with their respective labels fighting for dominance, and the two groups trading public insults and diss tracks. The feud reached its peak when Tupac Shakur and Christopher Wallace, known by his rap alias the Notorious B.I.G., were shot and killed within months of each other. Knight was driving the car in which Shakur was killed in Las Vegas in 1996. Knight has resurfaced in headlines in recent weeks during Combs' trial, as several former staffers employed by Combs mentioned the men's rivalry. One of Combs' former personal assistants, Capricorn Clark, said Combs once brought her to Central Park at night and brought up her former employment with Death Row Records. 'He told me that he didn't know that I had anything to do with Suge Knight, and if anything happened, he would have to kill me,' Clark said. David James, another former assistant, recalled an instance when he and Combs' security guard ran into Knight at a diner. When Combs heard about it, he ordered James to drive them back to the diner, bringing three handguns with him – but Knight had left by the time they arrived, James testified. Knight was sentenced to prison in 2018 after pleading no contest to manslaughter in the death of a man he was accused of hitting with his truck on the set of the movie 'Straight Outta Compton.'


New York Times
44 minutes ago
- New York Times
Pacers' Tyrese Haliburton owns Game 5 clunker in New York: ‘I'll be better in Game 6'
NEW YORK — Tyrese Haliburton and Andrew Nembhard share a former coach who was concerned about Game 5 for the Indiana Pacers. Haliburton played the last two summers for USA Basketball, which had the all-star coaching staff of Steve Kerr, Erik Spoelstra, Tyronn Lue and Mark Few — who was Nembhard's coach in college at Gonzaga. Advertisement Few is from a small town on the western coast of Oregon, population today of about 5,000, and he is both famous and kidded by his players for the colloquial language he uses to make a point. So Thursday, ahead of Indiana's potential closeout game in the Eastern Conference finals at Madison Square Garden, Few texted Haliburton and Nembhard to say: 'Don't tiptoe into a bar fight.' Which, as it turns out, is basically what the Pacers ended up doing in a 111-94 loss to the New York Knicks in Game 5. 'It was a rough showing for us tonight,' Haliburton acknowledged. Look, losses after playoff games are too often explained by clichés that have to do with: A. Boxing; B. Getting punched in the face, chest or stomach (which can happen in MMA, taekwondo or outside of Jimmy's Corner Bar on Sixth and 46th); C. Being less aggressive than the team that won (not as sexy, but 'aggressive' is as time-worn as all the punching metaphors in the NBA playoffs). The Knicks didn't hit anyone Thursday night, but they played desperate. They noticeably turned up the pressure defensively, they jumped passing lanes, they refused to be denied on drives to the hoop. They had to be that way, one more false step by the New Yorkers, and their playoffs are over. That's what Few knew was coming for his two former players, both from the Knicks' side and also from a raucous, borderline frothy MSG crowd that was, by the end of things, chanting 'Knicks in seven, Knicks in seven.' The, ahem, sober, clinical diagnosis of what happened in Game 5 is that the Pacers, generally, didn't play well (which will be dissected elsewhere at The Athletic), and specifically Haliburton turned in a stinker — which happens from time to time with him. In 32 minutes of game action on Thursday, Haliburton scored eight points on seven shots. If you just know him generally as a pretty good player, maybe as an All-Star, perhaps as a third-team All-NBA selection, you might raise an eyebrow over a player of his caliber producing so little with a trip to the NBA Finals on the line. Advertisement If you have been following the conference finals, and you know all about Haliburton's heroics in Game 1, with the 31 points, the score-tying shot at the buzzer and the Reggie Miller flex, as well as the historic, never-been-equaled, 32-point, 12-rebound, 15-assist, zero-turnover performance he dropped in Game 4, then maybe Game 5 is a real head-scratcher, to the point where you might ask, why the tiptoeing, bruh? 'A rough day for me,' Haliburton said. 'I got to be better, set the tone, get downhill. I feel like I can do a great job of that, but I'll watch the film. There's some different things they did defensively. But for the most part, I think their base stuff was the same. They picked up the pressure a little bit more, tried to apply more as the game went on. But yeah, I gotta be better, and I'll be better in Game 6.' I covered the Pacers' series against the Cleveland Cavaliers, and I recall him making huge plays in the first two games to win both of them and then score 4 points in a 22-point loss in Game 3 of that series. What I was less aware of, because I only saw the Pacers from time to time during the regular season, is these occasional disappearances happen. For instance, in Game 2 of the entire season, all the way back in October, Haliburton went scoreless against the Knicks. In 26 minutes. He was held under 10 points 11 times this season (by lofty comparison, LeBron James hasn't scored fewer than 10 points in a regular-season game since Jan. 5, 2007), and shut out twice. Haliburton now has two clunkers to his name in these playoffs. The reason to go to such great lengths pointing this out is, if the Pacers win Game 6, he would almost certainly be the series MVP because he had been so consistent and so clutch in the closing moments of the close games. 'As a team, we have to be aggressive and have a level of balance,' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. 'I mean, I'll look at it. There's more things I'm gonna have to do to help him. I'll take responsibility for that, and we'll see what we can improve.' Advertisement The Knicks borrowed a page from the Pacers by pressuring the ball earlier in the Pacers' possessions, preventing Haliburton from throwing skip passes and otherwise slowing him down from getting Indiana into its offense. That is the precise formula the Pacers had used defensively to eradicate the Milwaukee Bucks and Cavs and push the Knicks to the brink of elimination. Haliburton said 'when you get here at this point, there's no such thing as surprises,' which, if we are to take him at his word, means the Pacers knew the Knicks were going to crank up the pressure and simply failed to handle it. The Pacers remain on the brink of their first NBA Finals since 2000, and the first ever for many of their players — including Haliburton. They haven't lost two straight since March. Haliburton said as much; he knows he needs to, and vowed to be, better in Game 6. If you're stepping into a swimming pool full of sharks (why would you do that, ever?) or perhaps walking into a rough-and-tumble bar in Hell's Kitchen, with every patron over 6-1 and 220 pounds (again, why, but I digress), perhaps you would tread lightly. It seemed to be the case for Haliburton and the Pacers, despite Few's warning to the contrary. But downtown Indianapolis has good bars, too. And the Pacers will have the benefit of standing behind the saloon doors, with empty bottles and sawed-off stools in hand, waiting for the visitors to approach. 'We felt like our preparation was right, as a group I felt like we approached the day the right way, but I feel like I could have been a lot better,' Haliburton said. 'You know, put it on me, and I'll be better in Game 6.' (Top photo of Tyrese Haliburton and Jalen Brunson: Al Bello / Getty Images)


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
The Quiz #421
Who wrote the novel 'The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe'? Find out with The Quiz. Play. Share. Listen with FOX News Headlines 24/7 Anchor, Chris Foster. Blue MAGA