IHC forms special bench for overseas Pakistanis' property cases
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has constituted a special bench to hear property-related disputes of overseas Pakistanis under the Overseas Property Act 2024.
The bench is headed by Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro.
The decision, taken to expedite the resolution of such cases, was approved by Acting Chief Justice Sardar Sarfraz Dogar, who also directed the nomination of judges for special courts dedicated to overseas Pakistanis' property disputes.
A notification regarding Justice Soomro's appointment to hear related cases and appeals was issued by the deputy registrar of IHC with the approval of the acting chief justice.
In addition, Justice Dogar has empowered session judges to nominate judges for special courts handling overseas property cases.
According to an official letter, session judges of Islamabad's East and West districts will designate these special courts.
The IHC Registrar, in a letter to the Secretary of Law and Justice, advised that judges for these courts be nominated based on the volume of pending cases and judicial officers' expertise.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
'PTI's protest movement is ineffective' says Rana Sanaullah
Listen to article Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Public and Political Affairs Rana Sanaullah has said that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's protest call won't bear fruit as the party is not in a position to lead any such movement at the moment. Speaking to the media after offering Eid al-Adha prayers in Faislabad, the SAPM said Pakistan is now on the path to economic stability and development, but overcoming existing challenges requires national unity, political consensus, and alignment on an economic agenda, which he called the most urgent need of the time. He said Pakistan is transitioning from economic decline toward economic stability — a dream of the country's founding fathers. He added that thanks to national unity and courageous decisions by the political leadership, Pakistan is once again on a path of development. He revealed that India made an unjustified and arrogant attempt to attack Pakistan last month, but armed forces, with the backing of the people, delivered a strong response and shattered the enemy's arrogance. He said that the ongoing military operation, 'Bunyan-un-Marsoos', being carried out in the name of justice, has achieved historic success, and Pakistan has emerged before the world as a strong nuclear power. Read: FO slams Modi's 'unfounded' allegations on Pahalgam attack He extended congratulations to Field Marshal General Asim Munir and every soldier involved, saying they all deserve recognition for this success. Sanaullah said that under the leadership of PM Shehbaz Sharif, Pakistan has stepped onto the path of economic growth. He once again called on PTI and all political parties to come together for the country's betterment and agree on the Charter of Economy, just as the entire nation had shown unity and consensus between May 6 and May 10. He stressed that politics can wait — what's most important is fixing the economy, especially since 240 million Pakistanis are struggling with inflation and economic pressures. He appealed to opposition leaders to accept the Prime Minister's invitation and agree on the formation of a neutral Election Commission so that the next general elections are free and fair, leaving no room for objection. The adviser said that Pakistan has earned respect and recognition at the global level — countries that once distanced themselves are now compelled to listen. He warned that if political leaders continue to prioritise personal or group interests, it will go against national interest. He urged the public to put pressure on political parties to put the nation first. Commenting on PTI's protest movement, Rana Sanaullah said the movement is ineffective because the party lacks both preparation and public support. He further criticised Imran Khan, saying that if the former Prime Minister ties his release to the country's economic progress, it would be an injustice to the nation. Speaking on India's intentions, he responded to a question saying that the Modi government is following the RSS's extremist agenda and is hostile toward both Pakistan and Muslims. Read more: Pakistan launches diplomatic offensive against India He assured that India would not dare attack again, although efforts to destabilise Pakistan through terrorism would likely continue. He added that while the military has fulfilled its duties, it is now the responsibility of the political leadership to unite for national development. He claimed that the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) is taking the upcoming local government elections seriously and will participate actively under the new Local Government Act. He confirmed that these elections will be held on a party basis. Sanaullah also said that the Punjab government is working on welfare schemes such as the Kisan Card, Mazdoor Card, and Mazoor Card to improve the quality of life for ordinary citizens. He concluded by noting that major national projects, including Pakistan's nuclear tests, were completed during PML-N's tenure, and that Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz is now stepping forward with a new vision of public service.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Amendments to orders for accuracy: Commissioner IR has powers under Sec 221(1) of IT law: SC
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court ruled that the Commissioner Inland Revenue has jurisdiction under Section 221(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to amend the orders by rectifying any mistake apparent from the record. The 24-page judgment, authored by Justice Munib Akhtar, set aside the impugned judgments of the Lahore High Court (LHC) and the Islamabad High Court (IHC). It held; 'the tax references out of which these matters arise shall be deemed pending in the respective High Courts and the questions of law raised therein decided in accordance with law and consistently with this judgment.' Section 122 (5A) ITO: Power granted to IR commissioners is not without boundaries: ATIR 'CPLA 431-L/2023 involves questions of law other than the one decided by this judgment. This leave petition is returned to the office to be fixed in the ordinary course before an appropriate Bench,' it also said. A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Munib Akhtar, and comprising Justice Ayesha A Malik and Justice Shahid Waheed heard the department (FBR) petitions against the LHC and IHC decisions. Babar Bilal appeared in CPLA Nos.4583 to 4585/2023. The judgment noted that the matters relating to the deemed assessment order (and indeed, the deemed amended assessment order) fall only and always within the first part (of Mehreen Zaibun Nisa), with all ensuing 'inevitable corollaries' applying accordingly. One of these is that the deemed orders of both kinds must be regarded as orders 'passed' by the Commissioner within the meaning, and for the purposes of, Section 221(1). 'The Commissioner therefore has the jurisdiction to amend the orders by rectifying any mistake apparent from the record'. The judgment decided the question; 'Whether the Commissioner has jurisdiction under subsection (1) of Section 221 of the 2001 Ordinance to amend, in exercise of the power thereby conferred and, in the manner, and to the extent therein stated, what is known as a deemed assessment order under s. 120 to rectify a mistake apparent from the record?', in favour of the Commissioner and against the taxpayers. The High Courts had answered the question in the negative. The Department urged that both the courts erred materially in this regard. The taxpayers pray that the impugned judgments be upheld as having reached the correct conclusion in law. The judgment confirmed that the error made by the High Courts was to conflate the two deeming provisions into one. It was on account of this mistake that both judgments, whose reasoning run in parallel, concluded that there was no application of mind by the Commissioner and that the mistake always lay where, and by whom, in fact made, i.e., the taxpayer. However, once this unfortunate fusing is unpacked, and what the subsection actually does and require is realized, the mistake becomes apparent. Had the subsection only contained the deeming required by clause (b), then there could be merit to what the learned High Courts concluded. In such a situation, the only 'state of affairs' required to be imagined would be the deemed issuance of an assessment order. It could perhaps then be said that the deeming did not reach or touch any mistake to be found as a matter of fact in the return, and hence the deemed assessment order did not deal with any such thing. In this situation the attribution of the mistake, being outside the scope (or beyond the limit) of the legal fiction could be said to lie where, and by whom, actually made as a matter of fact. But that of course is not the case. There is also the (precedent) deeming required by clause (a). Once that is kept in mind then the inevitable conclusion is that there was, as a matter of law, a (deemed) application of mind by the Commissioner. Since it operated (as it could only) on the return, an inevitable corollary is that it is the whole of it, mistakes and all, that is the assessment (deemed) to have been made. And it is the (deemed) assessment so made that then results in the (deemed) issuance of the assessment order. In our view, it is only in terms of this bifurcation that subsection (1) can be properly understood and applied. A rolling up of the two clauses into one, with respect, led to the error into which both the learned High Courts fell. Thus, in the principal LHC judgment much emphasis was placed on s. 221(1) requiring that the order be 'passed' by the Commissioner. The matters before the Supreme Court arose under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 in relation to the jurisdiction, under subsection (1) of Section 221, of the Commissioner to rectify any mistake apparent on the face of the record and thereby amend what is known as a deemed assessment order under s. Most of these matters come from the Lahore High Court, where the principal judgment is dated 27.04.2022. That decision disposed of eight tax references that had been filed by the Commissioner and was followed in all the other matters in the said High Court by various orders of different dates. Islamabad High Court, where the principal judgment is dated 20.09.2023 which disposed of tax references filed by the Department. Both High Courts reached the same conclusion on the question now before the Court and therefore, all these matters were heard together and are being decided by this judgment. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Bilawal calls on US lawmakers to back Pakistan's peace efforts
PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, met with met with the representatives of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee headed by the chairman Brian Mast in Washington. Photo: PPP media cell Listen to article In a series of high-level meetings with members of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman and former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari cautioned against India's increasingly aggressive posture, warning it could destabilise the entire South Asian region. Leading a multi-party Pakistani delegation to Washington, Bilawal urged American lawmakers to back Pakistan's 'mission of peace' and facilitate meaningful dialogue to prevent the escalation of hostilities between the nuclear-armed neighbours. During discussions with several key US lawmakers, including Congressmen Jack Bergman, Tom Suozzi, Ryan Zinke, Maxine Waters, Al Green, Jonathan Jackson, Hank Johnson, Stacey Plaskett, Brian Mast, Brad Sherman, Greggory Meeks, Henry Cuellar and Senator Tom Cotton, he raised concerns over the current regional situation, the Kashmir dispute, and India's recent provocations. Had a frank and substantive exchange with Senator @TomCottonAR on peace and security in South Asia. Appreciated the U.S. role, especially, President @realDonaldTrump, in facilitating the ceasefire understanding as a stepping stone to durable peace. Highlighted India's escalatory… — BilawalBhuttoZardari (@BBhuttoZardari) June 5, 2025 A key point of concern was India's unilateral suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, which Bilawal termed a 'violation of international law.' 'India is setting a dangerous precedent of using water resources as a weapon,' he told the lawmakers. 'The suggestion of shutting off water for 240 million Pakistanis is an existential threat. If India takes this step, it will be tantamount to a declaration of war.' While acknowledging the 'positive role of the US in reducing tensions between Pakistan and India' following the recent military standoff, PPP chairman underscored that the ceasefire was only 'just a beginning.' 'South Asia, India and Pakistan, and indirectly the entire world, are more insecure today than when this crisis began,' he said. 'The threshold of full-scale war between Pakistan and India has never been so low in our history.' He warned of a dangerous precedent being set, where 'any incident of terrorism anywhere in India, whether proven or not, is considered to mean war.' Met with @RepBrianMast, Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee; @RepGregoryMeeks, Ranking Member; @RepHuizenga, Chair of the Subcommittee on South & Central Asia; and @BradSherman for a candid exchange on peace and stability in South Asia. Shared Pakistan's concerns over… — BilawalBhuttoZardari (@BBhuttoZardari) June 5, 2025 Underscoring the urgency of the matter, Bilawal informed the US lawmakers that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had mandated the delegation with a 'mission of peace.' 'This mission aims to find solutions to problems through dialogue and diplomacy with India,' he said. 'We urge American lawmakers to continue their efforts to establish peace and stability in South Asia and to support us in this peace mission.' 'If America puts its strength behind peace, it can convince India that solving our problems is the right thing to do,' he said, adding, 'A solution to the Kashmir issue is in the interest of all of us.' The former foreign minister called upon the US to 'facilitate meaningful and constructive dialogue between Pakistan and India' and to 'prevent India from pursuing policies that will destabilise the region and the world.' Also read: South Asia at brink over Kashmir and Indus Water Treaty, Bilawal warns US lawmakers Meanwhile, Senator Sherry Rehman addressed a press conference, describing the recent conflict with India as merely a "trailer" of Pakistan's coordinated response. She stated, "This war was part of India's strategy to keep the region in a Bollywood-style tension," highlighting how Indian media had promoted war sentiments while downplaying the peace narrative. She emphasised that Pakistan's military response was "legal and limited" but warned of the catastrophic consequences any misunderstanding between the two nuclear powers could trigger. "A nuclear conflict in a densely populated and sensitive region like South Asia would be uncontrollable," she cautioned. Sherry also expressed gratitude for the US's intervention, which helped broker the ceasefire, but warned, "If there is no purposeful and principled negotiation process, this trailer could soon turn into a global tragedy." She further stressed that a solution to the Kashmir issue requires a "serious and multilateral negotiation framework," noting India's reluctance to engage in such talks and its refusal of third-party mediation, which she deemed essential for any meaningful process. Read more: India laying ground for 'first nuclear water war', says Bilawal Last month, tensions between Pakistan and India and escalated following the deadly Pahalgam attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) in which 26 tourists were killed. On May 7, India launched airstrikes on Pakistani soil, prompting Pakistan to counter with Operation Bunyanum Marsoos. A ceasefire was reached on May 10, facilitated by the United States.
