
Jordan: JCD processes over 950,000 customs declarations in 2024 — Director-general
Speaking at a government communications forum titled "Achievements of the Jordan Customs Department", Akalik said that the department processed more than 950,000 customs declarations in 2024, figures he described as a "compelling reason" to adopt new working methods in line with the best global practices and digital transformation.
"These changes are not cosmetic. They reflect His Majesty King Abdullah's vision to modernise public services and empower the private sector," he said as reported by the Jordan News Agency, Petra.
Akalik revealed that 91 per cent of tariff lines are fully or partially exempted from customs duties, mainly raw materials that are essential for local production, noting that only 9 per cent of items are subject to tariffs ranging from 0 to 25 per cent, and national exports are completely exempted.
"These exemptions aim at reducing production costs, increasing competitiveness and creating a more attractive environment for local and foreign investment," he said, stressing that the remaining tariffs are structured to protect domestic industries.
He also highlighted that the JCD continues to regularly review its policies to align them with national development goals, highlighting that the reforms are part of a broader economic modernisation drive aimed at positioning Jordan as a 'productive, export-oriented' economy.
Addressing speculation about the reopening of the Ramtha customs centre, Akalik pointed out that any decision would have to be coordinated with Syrian authorities and that the issue was not currently under consideration.
He also noted that the old Amman Customs Centre has not been completely vacated, with some departments, such as foreign vehicle registration and customs licensing, still operating on site.
Highlighting the department's efforts to banking on infrastructure upgrades and technological innovation to cement Jordan's position as a regional logistics hub, he said that the new Amman Customs Centre in Madouneh, which covers 950 dunums, can accommodate inspections of up to 192 trucks at a time and features 'state-of-the-art' AI-driven systems.
Akalik added that the changes will also benefit Jordan's development and industrial zones, whose products will now be treated as national goods, simplifying market access and reducing logistical bottlenecks.
Among the most significant reforms are amendments to the Customs Law, which will shift from a pre-clearance inspection model to post-clearance audits, the director-general said.
This shift will allow compliant traders to obtain immediate release of goods while preserving the authority of the department to verify documentation at a later date, a move Akalik described as a "game changer" for trade facilitation.
The department is also using artificial intelligence to improve risk management, analyse data and replace manual inspections with remote monitoring systems, he said.
According to Akalik, this move is crucial to improving transparency and closing the door to fraud and manipulation.
Noting that the JCD has already received international recognition for its efforts, he said that the department won the King Abdullah II Excellence Award for e-services, and the World Customs Organisation has adopted its model as a global reference.
Despite the progress, Akalik acknowledged that one of the biggest challenges is changing the culture around customs operations within the department and among stakeholders.
He noted that to address this, the department plans to launch public awareness campaigns to explain the benefits of the new systems.
Supporting the department's vision, Secretary-General of the Ministry of Government Communications Zaid Nawaisah said that the JCD has emerged as a national leader in streamlining trade, stimulating the economy and promoting a fair business environment.
"The ministry has a critical role to play in highlighting these successes and building public confidence in government institutions," Nawaisah added.
© Copyright The Jordan Times. All rights reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
13 hours ago
- The National
Making good on the deal between the SDF and Damascus is critical to Syria's future
Some cities become synonymous with a moment in time. Kobani, in northern Syria near the Turkish border, is one such place. The Kurdish-majority city became the focal point of the Syrian civil war in late 2014, when it was besieged by the terrorist group ISIS. Over six months, a coalition of Kurdish militias known as the YPG/YPJ – with help from other Syrian opposition groups, Iraqi Kurdish forces, the US military and others – staged a successful resistance campaign. Hundreds of lives were lost, and much of Kobani was left in ruins. But the campaign to defend it was a turning point in the Syrian war because it set the stage for ISIS's eventual military defeat. It was also a seminal moment for Syria's Kurds, whose fighters gained a fearsome reputation as defenders of that community's interests. The upshot, however, was a revival of aspirations for Kurdish self-rule in Syria – an ambition that has persisted, implicitly or explicitly, even as the YPG/YPJ banded together with several Arab militias to form the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). When the fall of the Assad regime at the end of last year saw the rise of a transitional government in its place, many feared a new conflict would erupt between the new administration and the SDF. The country – and many of its neighbours – breathed a sigh of relief in March, when the SDF and government forces signed a deal to integrate the former into the latter. But five months later, despite ongoing talks shepherded by the US, such integration remains on ice. This poses a significant threat to an already-fragile post-war Syrian peace. As The National reported on Saturday, the Syrian military has plans to take two SDF-held provinces – Raqqa and Deir Ezzor – by force within the next two months if the militia does not make good on its promises to integrate and hand governing powers to Damascus. Unity is the right objective, and allowing one community or another to assert autonomy with force undermines that The SDF's reluctance is easily explained; it wants a secular, federalised Syria. The new government in Damascus has kept mum about the extent to which a future Syrian constitution will be secular, though it has been clear in its desire for a centralised system. The latter position is also understandable. Syria's new President, Ahmad Al Shara, is trying to reunite a country with kaleidoscopic ethnic and religious diversity fractured by years of civil war and decades of authoritarian rule. Unity is the right objective, and allowing one community or another to assert autonomy with force undermines that. A war to recapture Kurdish areas, however, would be a dire tragedy, and would threaten to return Syria to death and destruction. The SDF's obstinance in fulfilling the terms of its deal may be frustrating – even alarming – for Damascus, but it would have been truly remarkable if its integration into the army had happened as quickly as it at first had appeared. The talks to make it happen should be given more time, and the US – upon whose 'green light' the campaign will be dependent, according to a Syrian security source – should work to prevent things from getting out of control. The SDF's reputation was earned not just for what the militia and its predecessors did for their own communities, but for the country as a whole. Indeed, the legacy of the SDF's Arab and Kurdish fighters' bravery is a Syria that remains united today – from Kobani in the north to Daraa in the south. Now, their leaders must show by example that maintaining that unity requires dialogue, compromise and an ability to adhere to the country's unitary rules.


The National
17 hours ago
- The National
Last push to pause Gaza war, and Al Shara meets Syrian Christian leader
Mediators are making one last push to pause the fighting in Gaza. Syrian President Ahmad Al Shara has met one of the country's senior Christian leaders. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is set to travel to Washington today. On today's episode of Trending Middle East: Mediators revive plans for 60-day Gaza truce in final effort to stop Israeli ground assault Zelenskyy heads to Washington after Trump-Putin summit ends without Ukraine ceasefire agreement This episode features Hamza Hendawi, Cairo correspondent; and Khaled Yacoub Oweis, Jordan correspondent. Editor's note: We want to hear from you! Help us improve our podcasts by taking our 2-minute listener survey. Click here.


Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
Syrian president says country should not be unified 'with blood'
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa said he rejected attempts at creating autonomy in Syria and warned that the country's unification "should not be with blood" following a month of sectarian violence. Speaking on state TV on Sunday, Sharaa pushed back against demands by hundreds of Druze protesters in Syria's southern Sweida province calling for self-determination for the religious minority. "We still have another battle ahead of us to unify Syria, and it should not be with blood and military force... it should be through some kind of understanding because Syria is tired of war," Sharaa said. Since the overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad in December, Sharaa has struggled to stymie violence across the country, while a number of religious and political minorities have called for the decentralisation of power. "I do not see Syria as at risk of division. Some people desire a process of dividing Syria and trying to establish cantons... This matter is impossible," said Sharaa. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Some parties seek to gain power through regional power, Israel or others. This is also extremely difficult and cannot be implemented." Violence between members of the Druze minority, Bedouin tribesmen and state forces has seen more than 1,600 people killed in Sweida since the beginning of July. It also followed further violence in the coastal province of Latakia, where attacks by alleged Assad loyalists provoked a violent sectarian backlash against the minority Alawi population, of which the former president and his family were members. At least 1,500 Alawi were killed in the subsequent violence, with a Reuters investigation tracing much of it back to officials in Damascus. In his comments on Sunday, Sharaa conceded that they had "witnessed many violations from all sides... some members of the security forces and army in Syria also carried out some violations". He said the state was required "to hold all perpetrators of violations to account". Saturday's demonstrations in Sweida included calls for Sharaa's overthrow as well as displays of the Israeli flag. Israel bombed government forces last month, claiming it was acting to defend the Druze population. Sharaa's government has also been in talks with the semi-autonomous Kurdish-led administration that controls much of the north and northeast. Implementation of a 10 March deal on integrating its civil and military institutions into the state has been held up by arguments over issues such as decentralisation, which Damascus has rejected. Joseph Daher, a Swiss Syrian professor at the University of Lausanne, told Middle East Eye earlier this month that he was concerned by Sharaa's approach to Syria's post-Assad reconciliation. "Sharaa does not want to deal with political and social actors that are organised," he said. He told MEE that he saw the new government pursuing the creation of a new "ruling regime" with centralised power, but it still lacked the capacity to effectively assert its authority. "I think the lack and the failure to control Sweida, not only because of Israeli attacks, but also local resistance, is also an indication that this is one of the contradictions of this government," Daher said. "That it wants to seek monopolisation, centralisation of power, but at the same time is quite weak - whether militarily, human capacities, financially, politically."