logo
British sanctions against Israel would be self-harming and morally wrong

British sanctions against Israel would be self-harming and morally wrong

Telegraph13-05-2025

When earlier this year I was asked by the Government to become trade envoy to Israel, it was an invitation I gladly took up. It was a way to serve the interests of the British people.
You may not realise it, but countless jobs and even lives in this country are dependent upon the exchange of ideas, innovation and business with Israel.
The Government is negotiating a new trade deal but Labour donor Dale Vince says ministers should 'pull the trade deal and impose sanctions'. A few backbenchers are campaigning against the trade relationship with Israel too. As the Government is negotiating a new trade deal, they're instead calling for sanctions.
Meanwhile, in the Tory party, a small group of MPs and peers want the UK to defy the Israeli government and recognise a state of Palestine now.
Imagine how much this country would lose if the call for sanctions was heeded.
Take the health system. Every day millions of people in Britain rely on vital medicines developed and manufactured in Israel. A staggering one in seven drugs dispensed by the NHS comes from the country. It may be a relatively small nation of ten million people, but Israel is a global powerhouse when it comes to pioneering new technology and pharmaceuticals.
And let's not forget that during the pandemic, Britain was able to reap the benefits of Israel's world-leading public health strategies, thanks to close cooperation between our two countries. Britain can expect to reap the benefits of this innovation in biotech for decades to come. University partnerships between Israel and the UK are already developing life-saving technologies and treatments to tackle some of the world's biggest health challenges, including dementia and cancer.
An astonishing level of engineering and intellectual firepower in Israel has made it a Silicon Valley of the Middle East. Israeli tech is found in the mobile phones we all use every day, computers and much more. Scientists there are working on the development of new agriculture technologies to eliminate world hunger.
Then there is the boost to our economy. More than 1.7 million people work for UK firms exporting goods to Israel. We sell clothes, cars, generators, aircraft engines, medical equipment, scientific instruments and pharmaceuticals there. British engineers are working on Israeli infrastructure contracts worth millions of pounds.
We benefit substantially from this ongoing relationship. The UK exported £3.2bn worth of products to Israel last year. In return, Israel sold £2.5bn worth of goods and services to the UK.
But it's not just about money. The UK also benefits much more than Israel from defence and security cooperation too. Without Israeli technology, the RAF could not get planes in the air. Israeli intelligence has foiled multiple terror attacks in the UK. When British troops at war in Afghanistan and Iraq needed certain weapons and equipment urgently, they were supplied immediately, in some cases straight from Israel's own defence supplies. There's no doubt that British lives were saved.
It's abundantly clear that Israel is a vital trading partner and ally for the UK.
Of course, the stance of a few parliamentarians – both Labour and Conservative – against Israel is a response to the war in Gaza. But to me it seems their views stand against not only British interests but also what's best for Israelis and the Palestinians.
When, on October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists crossed the border to slaughter 1,200 Israelis and take 250 hostages, the worst loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust should have been an occasion for worldwide sympathy and support.
Instead, in a sickening moral inversion, Israel has been the target for the worst victim blaming imaginable. Marches in London by supporters of Palestine began before Israel had so much as struck a blow in return. One Labour backbencher, Andy McDonald, accuses Israel of 'war crimes, apartheid and even genocide'.
But in truth it is Hamas who have committed countless crimes and stand in the way of peace. Their cowardly gunmen cynically hide among the civilian population in school and hospitals, and have siphoned off billions from international humanitarian aid to build a rabbit warren of tunnels beneath Gaza.
Behind Hamas stands Iran, also the puppeteer pulling the strings of Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. The arrests last week over an alleged terror plot on British soil remind us that Tehran is a direct threat to the UK too.
Israel is the world's only Jewish state, the Middle East's only true democracy and one of our closest allies. We share values and interests and economic benefits. We share enemies too, who would only rejoice if we put that relationship at risk.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump sends Bessent and Lutnick to haggle with Chinese on tariff war after Xi chat
Trump sends Bessent and Lutnick to haggle with Chinese on tariff war after Xi chat

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump sends Bessent and Lutnick to haggle with Chinese on tariff war after Xi chat

Three members of Donald Trump's cabinet will meet with Chinese officials in London on Monday in an effort to deescalate or resolve the unprovoked trade war which Trump started with Beijing two months ago. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was 'pleased to announce' that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Lutnick would travel to London along with U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer for a sit-down with 'Representatives of China, with reference to the Trade Deal.' He added: 'The meeting should go very well. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'

Is Sir Keir Starmer a Right-wing extremist?
Is Sir Keir Starmer a Right-wing extremist?

Telegraph

time30 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Is Sir Keir Starmer a Right-wing extremist?

Is Sir Keir Starmer KC – Left-wing human rights lawyer, former director of public prosecutions, and Labour Prime Minister of the United Kingdom – a dangerous Right-wing extremist? Common sense, evidence and reality say emphatically not. Government materials issued as part of Prevent training programmes give a less clear answer. The Prime Minister's warning that uncontrolled migration risks turning Britain into an ' island of strangers ' would appear to risk falling foul of the definitions used in a Prevent course taken by thousands of public sector professionals with a duty to make referrals to the scheme. This defines 'cultural nationalism' as a type of extreme Right-wing terrorist ideology, including the belief that 'Western culture is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups'. Sir Keir is no more an extremist than any other writer who has expressed concern over the unprecedented scale and pace of migration and cultural change in recent years. Why, then, has the Government risked labelling him as such? The short answer is that, riddled with political anxieties over the composition of terrorism in Britain – 80 per cent of the Counter Terrorism Police network's live investigations involved Islamism in 2023, compared with 10 per cent for the extreme Right – Prevent has given the appearance of loosening the definition of the latter in order to provide an artificial 'balance' to its work. As the Shawcross Review found in 2023, the programme has adopted a 'double standard' when dealing with Islamists and the extreme Right. The results have been farcical, with an 'expansive' definition of Right-wing extremism capturing 'mildly controversial or provocative forms of mainstream, Right-wing leaning commentary that have no meaningful connection to terrorism or radicalisation' even while Prevent funded organisations whose leaders have publicly made statements 'sympathetic to the Taliban' and referred to militant Islamists as 'so-called 'terrorists' of the legitimate resistance groups'. Such absurdities might be overlooked if Prevent had also proved ruthlessly effective at preventing atrocities. It has not. Prevent has failed to identify dangerous and violent suspects on multiple occasions, including Southport killer Axel Rudakubana, who was referred and dismissed on three occasions before carrying out his attack. A deradicalisation programme that seems to show less interest in deradicalising potential terrorists than in policing Right-wing thought is unfit for purpose. It beggars belief that two years after the Shawcross Review we are once again having the same conversations. Prevent must be reformed – or if incapable of change, dismantled entirely.

Labour spends £35k on pub beer mats to boast about minimum wage rise
Labour spends £35k on pub beer mats to boast about minimum wage rise

Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Labour spends £35k on pub beer mats to boast about minimum wage rise

Labour spent more than £35,000 of taxpayer cash on beer mats in pubs advertising the increase to the national minimum wage, a minister has admitted. The Government sent out promotional material to pubs across the country to tell workers that the minimum wage and national living wage were going up. Justin Madders, the employment minister, rationalised the £35,580 expense as he said the beer mats offered a 'unique opportunity to engage audiences in a social, high-dwell environment where financial conversations naturally occur'. The red and pale blue beer mats were government-branded and said: 'Millions got a pay rise.' 'National minimum and living wages went up on 1st April', it added, and displayed a barcode for customers to scan for details on how to 'make sure you're getting paid correctly'. The employment minister responded to a written question by Richard Holden, the shadow paymaster general, about the cost of the drink mats. He said: 'The cost to advertise in pubs using beer mats was £35,580, which was approved at official level.' He confirmed that the advertising push was approved by the Cabinet Office, and came out of the 2025 National Minimum Wage and National Living Wage campaign budget of £650,000. He added: 'The 2024 campaign saw an increase in reach to eligible workers. However, recognition remained low, reinforcing the need for bolder, more engaging formats for the 2025 campaign, which expected to deliver an estimated 3.2 million impressions. 'It offered a unique opportunity to engage audiences in a social, high-dwell environment where financial conversations naturally occur. 'This setting encourages discussion and word-of-mouth sharing about rate changes and offers an effective nudge for audiences to 'check their pay'.' 'We will be ruthless' Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have both pledged a war on waste in Whitehall, with the Government having taken such moves as freezing government credit cards and abolishing NHS England. The Prime Minister said in October: 'We will also be ruthless in clamping down on government waste, just as we will be ruthless on clamping down on tax avoidance ', emphasising the intention to show so the British people that 'every penny counts'. He added: 'Every single person in this country had to do that during the cost-of-living crisis and government must be no different.' The national living wage for those aged 21 and over rose from £11.44 per hour to £12.21 per hour, an increase of 6.7 per cent. The national minimum wage for those between 18 and 20 went up from £8.60 to £10 per hour, a 16.3 per cent boost. The Government has also begun to name and shame firms that do not pay their workers the appropriate wages, demanding they pay back what they owe and in some instances a further financial penalty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store