Escudero files bill penalizing misuse of AI to replicate physical identity
Under the proposed measure, anyone who creates, generates, reproduces, simulates, distributes, or publishes content using another person's likeness without consent—regardless of platform—will face criminal liability.
Escudero said the bill aims to address the risks posed by generative AI technologies, which, despite their potential in various fields, can be exploited to harm individuals or erode public trust.
Penalties include imprisonment of one to two years or a fine of up to ₱200,000, or both, for unauthorized use of a person's image.
If the act is committed for profit, the penalty increases to two to four years imprisonment or a fine ranging from ₱200,000 to ₱400,000.
For content used to facilitate a crime or fraud, the penalty will be four to six years imprisonment or a fine of ₱400,000 to ₱600,000.
If done both for profit and to commit a crime or fraud, the offender may face up to 12 years in prison or a fine of ₱600,000 to ₱1 million.
Public officials found guilty will also face absolute perpetual disqualification from holding public office, on top of the maximum penalties.
Escudero emphasized that the bill promotes accountability in AI use while safeguarding legitimate activities such as journalism, academic research, and documentary work.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
21 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Senate Votes to Archive Impeachment Articles Against VP Sara Duterte
The Senate voted on Monday to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment filed against Vice President Sara Duterte. This decision came after the Supreme Court ruled the impeachment unconstitutional, citing violations of the one-year rule and due process. The vote passed with 19 senators in favor, 4 against, and 1 abstention. The decision followed a motion initially filed by Senator Rodante Marcoleta to dismiss the articles outright. However, Senate Majority Leader Joel Villanueva proposed an amendment to simply archive the documents instead of dismissing them entirely, which Marcoleta accepted. Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero emphasized that this action upholds the Constitution and the rule of law, choosing to respect the Supreme Court's authority. Those who voted against archiving, including Senators Risa Hontiveros, Bam Aquino, Kiko Pangilinan, and Minority Leader Tito Sotto, argued that the Senate was abandoning its constitutional duty to try impeachment cases. Sotto questioned the validity of archiving documents that are technically part of an impeachment court's jurisdiction, while Hontiveros called it a departure from the Senate's mandate under the 1987 Constitution. Despite the archiving, Senate President Migz Zubiri noted that the case may be revived if the pending motions for reconsideration before the Supreme Court are granted. Meanwhile, the Vice President's camp said they are now focused on submitting the required response to the High Court's order. The Supreme Court maintained that while Duterte is not absolved of the accusations, any new impeachment complaint can only be filed starting February 6, 2026.
Filipino Times
a day ago
- Filipino Times
Marcoleta Moves to Dismiss VP Sara Impeachment Complaint in Senate
During a Senate plenary session on Wednesday, Senator Rodante Marcoleta formally moved to dismiss the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte, citing the Supreme Court's ruling declaring it unconstitutional and void from the start. In his privilege speech, Marcoleta emphasized that the High Court's decision is final and immediately executory. He argued that the Senate never had jurisdiction over the case. However, Senate Minority Leader Vicente 'Tito' Sotto III opposed the motion, urging colleagues to wait for the Supreme Court's action on the House of Representatives' motion for reconsideration. Sotto instead moved to table Marcoleta's motion, stressing the importance of allowing the SC to correct what he described as 'blatant errors' in its earlier decision. The SC had earlier ruled 13-0-2 that the impeachment complaint violated the one-year bar rule under the Constitution and infringed on Duterte's right to due process.
Filipino Times
2 days ago
- Filipino Times
Dela Rosa Sees No Need for Senate Debate on Supreme Court's Sara Duterte Ruling
Senator Ronald 'Bato' Dela Rosa expressed his belief that there is no longer a need for the Senate to debate the Supreme Court's decision to dismiss the impeachment case filed against Vice President Sara Duterte. The Senate is scheduled to vote on the High Court's ruling, but Dela Rosa said the matter has already been resolved by the judiciary. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous ruling, declared the impeachment case against the Vice President unconstitutional. The decision was based on the violation of the one-year ban on filing successive impeachment complaints. According to the Constitution, no impeachment proceeding shall be initiated against the same official more than once within a year. Although Dela Rosa is not a lawyer, he emphasized that he recognizes the Supreme Court's authority as the final interpreter of legal and constitutional issues. He said that while the three branches of government are equal, it is only the judiciary that is empowered to make final decisions on such matters. He added that no one is above the Supreme Court except God. Despite his personal stance, Dela Rosa said he will respect Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero's call to allow debate on the floor. Escudero earlier asked senators to listen to arguments from both sides before making a final vote on whether to abide by the High Court's ruling. Dela Rosa, however, maintained that for him, the issue has already been settled by the country's highest court.
