logo
ATS arrest in May: Engineer held for ‘passing on sensitive documents to Pak operatives' seeks bail

ATS arrest in May: Engineer held for ‘passing on sensitive documents to Pak operatives' seeks bail

Indian Express25-06-2025
A 27-year-old engineer, arrested in May by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) for allegedly passing on sensitive documents related to the Indian Naval dockyard to a Pakistani Intelligence Operatives (PIOs) through social media, has sought bail stating that his prolonged detention will prejudice his personal and professional life.
The engineer, Ravi Varma, who was working with a private defence technology company, was arrested by the ATS on May 28, which alleged that he had shared sensitive and confidential information through WhatsApp between November 2024 and March 2025.
'It is respectfully submitted that the investigation in the present case appears to be substantially complete. The primary evidence including the applicant (Varma)'s mobile phone, containing the alleged WhatsApp chats, audio files, images and documents, has been seized, thoroughly examined and extracted by the investigating agency… The continued incarceration of the applicant is no longer necessitated for any further custodial interrogation or recovery of evidence,' the bail plea filed by Varma states.
It adds that he has extended full cooperation with the investigators through the interrogation and there is no likelihood of him absconding or fleeing or tampering with the evidence, given that key electronic evidence is already secured.
'That the allegations, while serious, are subject to proof beyond reasonable doubt during the trial. The applicant maintains his innocence and reserves the right to present his defence at the appropriate stage… that the applicant is a young professional employed as a junior service engineer, and his prolonged detention would severely prejudice his personal and professional life without serving any larger investigative purpose,' the plea filed through lawyer Rajhans Girase said. The lawyer said that the case will be heard next on July 1.
The ATS after arresting Varma had claimed that the PIOs had posed as women to lure him and they communicated for months, following which he sent documents of restricted areas in the Indian Navy dockyard that he had access to through the company where he was working.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delhi Court Acquits Swati Maliwal In Case Of Revealing Rape Victim's Name
Delhi Court Acquits Swati Maliwal In Case Of Revealing Rape Victim's Name

NDTV

time16 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Delhi Court Acquits Swati Maliwal In Case Of Revealing Rape Victim's Name

New Delhi: A Delhi court on Wednesday acquitted MP and former chairperson of Delhi Commission for Women (DCW), Swati Maliwal, accused of allegedly disclosing the identity of a 14-year-old rape victim who succumbed to injuries. Additional chief judicial magistrate Neha Mittal also acquitted Bhupender Singh, then public relations officer of DCW. The prosecution alleged Singh disclosed the minor rape victim's name to electronic media at Maliwal's behest. According to the FIR, the notice sent by Maliwal as the chairperson of DCW, in which she sought to know about the investigation in the rape case, was "intentionally circulated" on a WhatsApp group and shown by a TV channel. "Prosecution has failed to prove the commission of offence under Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, read with Rule 86 of the Juvenile Justice rules by the accused persons beyond a reasonable doubt," the order said. The court said neither the notice revealing the identity of the minor victim on WhatsApp nor Singh sharing a copy of the notice with a news channel was proved. While Section 74 of the law prohibits any such disclosure to the media, Rule 86 deals with the classification of offences as cognisable or non-cognisable and designated courts. "Accused persons, namely Swati Maliwal Jaihind and Bhupender Singh, are hereby acquitted of the offence under Section 74, read with rule 86 of the Juvenile Justice Act," the court said. The order referred to the testimony of witnesses and underlined "complete failure" on the part of prosecution or complainant to prove the charges. On the allegations that the notice revealing the minor's name was displayed by a news channel on July 25, 2016, the court noted when the footage of the news item was viewed neither such a notice was seen, nor did the anchor disclose her name. "Thus, the allegations of the prosecution to this extent appear to be baseless and unfounded," the court held. It also rejected the prosecution's argument that Maliwal could be convicted based on the notice she sent to the SHO, revealing the minor's name. "It does not appeal to common sense to hold accused 1 (Maliwal) criminally liable for disclosing the name of the minor victim to SHO of Burari police station, who otherwise is in knowledge of all her details, being the one responsible for filing the chargesheet in the FIR," the court said. The court in the meantime referred to the legislative intent behind the enactment of Section 74 JJ of the act, saying the aim was "to avoid scrutiny of the proceedings in which a juvenile is tried to insulate and protect the juvenile from stigma and emotional trauma". "Some measures like restricted access to records of trials, sealing and destruction of records of prosecution of juvenile delinquents are finding acceptance among legislatures across the world. The courts have been anonymising trials of children in conflict with the law to protect their identities," it said. Delhi Police booked Maliwal in 2016 and said there was a blatant violation of provisions of Juvenile Justice Act, which protect the identity of a minor victim of sexual offence. The minor girl succumbed to her injuries on July 23, 2016, at a hospital after being sexually assaulted by her neighbour who allegedly forced a corrosive substance down her throat and damaged her internal organs. On account of the presence of the consent of the victim's parents to disclose her name, Section 228A (Prohibition on disclosure of identity of the victim) of the IPC was dropped, and Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act was added in the case. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Delhi Court Allows 26/11 Accused Tahawwur Rana 3 Phone Calls With Family
Delhi Court Allows 26/11 Accused Tahawwur Rana 3 Phone Calls With Family

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Delhi Court Allows 26/11 Accused Tahawwur Rana 3 Phone Calls With Family

New Delhi: A Delhi court on Wednesday allowed 26/11 Mumbai attack accused Tahawwur Hussain Rana to have three phone calls this month with his brother to discuss engaging a private counsel, court sources said. Special judge Chander Jit Singh also extended the judicial custody of Rana till September 8 after the accused appeared virtually, they added. According to the sources, the judge during the in-chamber proceeding said the phone calls by Rana will be recorded and the conversations will have to be in English or Hindi in the presence of prison authorities. Legal aid counsel Piyush Sachdeva was stated to have sought time from the court to scrutinise certain documents in the chargesheet and supplementary chargesheet. Rana is allegedly a close associate of 26/11 main conspirator David Coleman Headley, alias Daood Gilani, a US citizen. He was brought to India after the US Supreme Court on April 4 dismissed his review plea against his extradition to India. On November 26, 2008, a group of 10 Pakistani terrorists went on a rampage, carrying out attacks on a railway station, two luxury hotels, and a Jewish centre, sneaking into India's financial capital through the sea route. A total of 166 people were killed in the assault that lasted for nearly 60 hours.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store