Newton nonprofit holds fundraiser to install safe haven baby box
The plan was first presented in 2024 when Jasper County Attorney General Scott Nicholson brought the idea to the Open Arms Foundation of Jasper County, a nonprofit that provides support for children facing crisis or are in the foster care system.
Open Arms was founded last year and provides backpacks with necessary supplies and comfort items to children who were removed from their biological families. So far, the nonprofit has helped 200 children and families, according to founder and director Nick Pietrack.
At the beginning of 2025, Open Arms started fundraising for a baby box in Newton. Their goal is $30,000.
Pietrack says the box is estimated to cost $20,000, plus $500 in annual fees for maintenance, training, certification, and other expenses. His goal is to raise enough that the cost is covered for many years.
Sen. Joni Ernst responds to backlash from her sarcastic comments on Medicaid
Around $15,000 has been raised so far, but the organization plans on fundraising for the rest of the year.
Pietrack said the baby box will be installed in Newton even if the fundraising goal isn't met, but he commends the community's ability to come together in support of this cause.
'I've seen a tremendous ability in Jasper County for us to gather our community for positive things. So, it's very heartwarming and wonderful to see the support and we're excited about it,' he said.
The baby box will be located at the MercyOne Newton Medical Center. Pietrack said the current plan is to have the box located outside the emergency room and near the ambulance bays, however the hospital will be remodeling soon, so the exact location in the hospital is subject to change.
'We want to be proactive, not reactive. So, the reason for some of the baby boxes being installed in other communities are reactive towards horrible incidences that have happened, tragic deaths of infant children,' he said.
Newton is now the fourth Iowa community to start the process of installing a baby box.
The Iowa Safe Haven Act went into effect in 2002, and it provides parents in crisis an option to safely surrender an infant up to 90-days-old. The law was expanded in 2023, allowing communities to implement their own safe haven baby boxes.
Since then, baby boxes were installed at the Fort Dodge Fire Department and the MercyOne Medical Center in Des Moines. The Norwalk Fire Department announced last year that they are in the process of installing a baby box as a result of a baby's death in 2023.
The Iowa Department of Health and Human Services announced on Monday that a baby girl was recently surrendered safely through the Safe Haven Law. She is the third infant to be surrendered this year and the 77th since the law was put into effect, according to the department's press release.
Iowa News:
Iowa veteran passes halfway point on Appalachian Trail
Newton nonprofit holds fundraiser to install safe haven baby box
Storms move in, along with cooler air
Miguel Angel Jimenez wins playoff in Iowa for 3rd PGA Tour Champions victory of the year
Forecast: Smoke exits, storms move in
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Mom abuses her kids, fakes their diagnoses to get Medicaid money, MN cops say
A mother accused of abusing her children for more than five years exploited them to get Medicaid money, Minnesota authorities say. The 34-year-old Crosslake woman, who in June was found guilty on 11 charges, was sentenced Aug. 7 to 468 months in prison, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said in a news release. Ellison said the mother 'physically, verbally and emotionally abused her three children,' who were 11, 9 and 8 when their mom was arrested in 2022. 'She abused her position of authority,' prosecuting attorney Dominika Kins said in court, according to the Brainerd Dispatch. 'And she stripped them of an actual childhood.' According to a criminal complaint, the mom received more than $35,000 from the state of Minnesota for medical care for her 9-year-old, who was being treated for dropping hemoglobin levels. But an investigation revealed the numbers had deteriorated because his mom was withdrawing blood from him using a syringe and picc line, according to the court documents. She would then make the other two kids dump the blood in a toilet. She also faked diagnoses for her other two children, including making her 11-year-old wear a cast for more than two years, authorities said. 'Another child stated that (their mom) would instruct the child to vomit at the doctor even though he didn't need to, and to cough as if he had asthma, at which time asthma medication was prescribed,' the attorney general said. The mother was accused of having violent outbursts against her children, according to investigators, who said she choked each of them when their rooms weren't clean. 'When Defendant would do this to (the 8-year-old), she could barely breathe and felt like she was about to pass out,' authorities said. '(The child) said her head would start hurting, starts to race, she wouldn't be able to walk right, her vision was blurry, her breathing was 'not so good' and she coughed a lot after.' The children said their mom would often beat them with a spoon, charging cord or a belt, sometimes making them bleed, according to the court documents. Investigators said she would withhold food from her children and made death threats. 'I was never safe,' the 11-year-old child told authorities, according to the court records. The mother was found guilty in June of attempted murder, three counts of child torture, three counts of stalking and four counts of theft by false representation, the attorney general said. He referred to her alleged actions as among the most 'heinous and agonizing' crimes he has seen as the attorney general. 'The facts we proved in court are nothing short of horrifying,' Ellison said in June. 'It strains the imagination and breaks my heart into pieces to think about the torture and anguish — physical, mental, and emotional — that (she) inflicted on her own children.' Crosslake is about a 145-mile drive northwest from Minneapolis.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Medical debt can still appear on credit reports, judge rules
A federal judge blocked a rule from the Biden-era Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that would have kept medical debt from appearing on credit reports. Mind Your Money host Julie Hyman reports on the latest. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Mind Your Money. A judge has blocked a Biden era ban on medical debt in credit reports. Now, technically, the rule from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau never took effect, but if it had, it would have stopped medical bills from appearing on credit reports and barred lenders from using that data to make lending decisions. The CFPB says removing medical bill information could have wiped $49 billion off credit reports of about 15 million Americans and increased their credit scores by an average of 20 points. But a judge ruled in favor of two trade associations that argued the CFPB overstepped its authority in issuing that rule. This comes at a precarious time in health care, with millions of Americans expected to lose health insurance by 2034 due to changes in Medicaid under President Trump's new tax bill. So how does medical debt and your credit report work without this rule? Say you get medical care. The provider will send your bill to insurance, and you're responsible for whatever your insurance does not cover. If you don't pay that balance, the provider will likely send you reminders. If you still don't pay, they may send that debt to a collection agency. Once it's with the agency, they own that debt. They'll start calling and sending you letters, and they may report it to credit bureaus. Once reported, it can appear on your credit report. Now, it may not hurt your credit score right away. Medical debt must be one year old before it shows up on your credit report. Debt under $500 is not reported. And 14 states have provisions in place to remove medical collection debt from credit reports. But still, consumers are left with the responsibility to stay on top of changes to their credit as they face mounting bills.
Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Even in states that fought Obamacare, Trump's new law poses health consequences
GOP lawmakers in the 10 states that refused the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion for over a decade have argued their conservative approach to growing government programs would pay off in the long run. Instead, the Republican-passed budget law that includes many of President Donald Trump's priorities will pose at least as big a burden on patients and hospitals in the expansion holdout states as in the 40 states that have extended Medicaid coverage to more low-income adults, hospital executives and other officials warn. For instance, Georgia, with a population of just over 11 million, will see as many people lose insurance coverage sold through ACA marketplaces as will California, with more than triple the population, according to estimates by KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. The new law imposes additional paperwork requirements on Obamacare enrollees, slashes the time they have each year to sign up, and cuts funding for navigators who help them shop for plans. Those changes, all of which will erode enrollment, are expected to have far more impact in states like Florida and Texas than in California because a higher proportion of residents in non-expansion states are enrolled in ACA plans. The budget law, which Republicans called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' will cause sweeping changes to health care across the country as it trims federal spending on Medicaid by more than $1 trillion over the next decade. The program covers more than 71 million people with low incomes and disabilities. Ten million people will lose coverage over the next decade due to the law, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Many of its provisions are focused on the 40 states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA, which added millions more low-income adults to the rolls. But the consequences are not confined to those states. A proposal from conservatives to cut more generous federal payments for people added to Medicaid by the ACA expansion didn't make it into the law. 'Politicians in non-expansion states should be furious about that,' said Michael Cannon, director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. The number of people losing coverage could accelerate in non-expansion states if enhanced federal subsidies for Obamacare plans expire at the end of the year, driving up premiums as early as January and adding to the rolls of uninsured. KFF estimates as many as 2.2 million people could become uninsured just in Florida, a state where lawmakers refused to expand Medicaid and, partly as a result, now leads the nation in ACA enrollment. For people like Francoise Cham of Miami, who has Obamacare coverage, the Republican policy changes could be life-altering. Before she had insurance, the 62-year-old single mom said she would donate blood just to get her cholesterol checked. Once a year, she'd splurge for a wellness exam at Planned Parenthood. She expects to make about $28,000 this year and currently pays about $100 a month for an ACA plan to cover herself and her daughter, and even that strains her budget. Cham choked up describing the 'safety net' that health insurance has afforded her — and at the prospect of being unable to afford coverage if premiums spike at the end of the year. 'Obamacare has been my lifesaver,' she said. If the enhanced ACA subsidies aren't extended, 'everyone will be hit hard,' said Cindy Mann, a health policy expert with Manatt Health, a consulting and legal firm, and a former deputy administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 'But a state that hasn't expanded Medicaid will have marketplace people enrolling at lower income levels,' she said. 'So, a greater share of residents are reliant on the marketplace.' Though GOP lawmakers may try to cut Medicaid even more this year, for now the states that expanded Medicaid largely appear to have made a smart decision, while states that haven't are facing similar financial pressures without any upside, said health policy experts and hospital industry observers. KFF Health News reached out to the governors of the 10 states that have not fully expanded Medicaid to see if the budget legislation made them regret that decision or made them more open to expansion. Spokespeople for Republican Gov. Henry McMaster of South Carolina and Republican Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia did not indicate whether their states are considering Medicaid expansion. Brandon Charochak, a spokesperson for McMaster's office, said South Carolina's Medicaid program focuses on 'low-income children and families and disabled individuals,' adding, 'The state's Medicaid program does not anticipate a large impact on the agency's Medicaid population.' Enrollment in ACA marketplace plans nationwide has more than doubled since 2020 to 24.3 million. If enhanced subsidies expire, premiums for Obamacare coverage would rise by more than 75% on average, according to an analysis by KFF. Some insurers are already signaling they plan to charge more. The CBO estimates that allowing enhanced subsidies to expire will increase the number of people without health insurance by 4.2 million by 2034, compared with a permanent extension. That would come on top of the coverage losses caused by Trump's budget law. 'That is problematic and scary for us,' said Eric Boley, president of the Wyoming Hospital Association. He said his state, which did not expand Medicaid, has a relatively small population and hasn't been the most attractive for insurance providers — few companies currently offer plans on the ACA exchange — and he worried any increase in the uninsured rate would 'collapse the insurance market.' As the uninsured rate rises in non-expansion states and the budget law's Medicaid cuts loom, lawmakers say state funds will not backfill the loss of federal dollars, including in states that have refused to expand Medicaid. Those states got slightly favorable treatment under the law, but it's not enough, said Grace Hoge, press secretary for Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat who favors Medicaid expansion but who has been rebuffed by GOP state legislators. 'Kansans' ability to access affordable healthcare will be harmed,' Hoge said in an email. 'Kansas, nor our rural hospitals, will not be able to make up for these cuts.' For hospital leaders in other states that have refused full Medicaid expansion, the budget law poses another test by limiting financing arrangements states leveraged to make higher Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals. Beginning in 2028, the law will reduce those payments by 10 percentage points each year until they are closer to what Medicare pays. Richard Roberson, president of the Mississippi Hospital Association, said the state's use of what's called directed payments in 2023 helped raise its Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals and other health institutions from $500 million a year to $1.5 billion a year. He said higher rates helped Mississippi's rural hospitals stay open. 'That payment program has just been a lifeline,' Roberson said. The budget law includes a $50 billion fund intended to insulate rural hospitals and clinics from its changes to Medicaid and the ACA. But a KFF analysis found it would offset only about one-third of the cuts to Medicaid in rural areas. Trump encouraged Florida, Tennessee, and Texas to continue refusing Medicaid expansion in his first term, when his administration gave them an unusual 10-year extension for financing programs known as uncompensated care pools, which generate billions of dollars to pay hospitals for treating the uninsured, said Allison Orris, director of Medicaid policy for the left-leaning think tank Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 'Those were very clearly a decision from the first Trump administration to say, 'You get a lot of money for an uncompensated care pool instead of expanding Medicaid,'' she said. Those funds are not affected by Trump's new tax-and-spending law. But they do not help patients the way insurance coverage would, Orris said. 'This is paying hospitals, but it's not giving people health care,' she said. 'It's not giving people prevention.' States such as Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi have not only turned down the additional federal funding that Medicaid expansion brings, but most of the remaining non-expansion states spend less than the national average per Medicaid enrollee, provide fewer or less generous benefits, and cover fewer categories of low-income Americans. Mary Mayhew, president of the Florida Hospital Association, said the state's Medicaid program does not adequately cover children, older people, and people with disabilities because reimbursement rates are too low. 'Children don't have timely access to dentists,' she said. 'Expectant moms don't have access nearby to an OB-GYN. We've had labor and delivery units close in Florida.' She said the law will cost states more in the long run. 'The health care outcomes for the individuals we serve will deteriorate,' Mayhew said. 'That's going to lead to higher cost, more spending, more dependency on the emergency department.' KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism.
