Newton nonprofit holds fundraiser to install safe haven baby box
NEWTON, Iowa — A nonprofit in Newton is halfway to its fundraising goal for a safe haven baby box to be installed at the community's hospital.
The plan was first presented in 2024 when Jasper County Attorney General Scott Nicholson brought the idea to the Open Arms Foundation of Jasper County, a nonprofit that provides support for children facing crisis or are in the foster care system.
Open Arms was founded last year and provides backpacks with necessary supplies and comfort items to children who were removed from their biological families. So far, the nonprofit has helped 200 children and families, according to founder and director Nick Pietrack.
At the beginning of 2025, Open Arms started fundraising for a baby box in Newton. Their goal is $30,000.
Pietrack says the box is estimated to cost $20,000, plus $500 in annual fees for maintenance, training, certification, and other expenses. His goal is to raise enough that the cost is covered for many years.
Sen. Joni Ernst responds to backlash from her sarcastic comments on Medicaid
Around $15,000 has been raised so far, but the organization plans on fundraising for the rest of the year.
Pietrack said the baby box will be installed in Newton even if the fundraising goal isn't met, but he commends the community's ability to come together in support of this cause.
'I've seen a tremendous ability in Jasper County for us to gather our community for positive things. So, it's very heartwarming and wonderful to see the support and we're excited about it,' he said.
The baby box will be located at the MercyOne Newton Medical Center. Pietrack said the current plan is to have the box located outside the emergency room and near the ambulance bays, however the hospital will be remodeling soon, so the exact location in the hospital is subject to change.
'We want to be proactive, not reactive. So, the reason for some of the baby boxes being installed in other communities are reactive towards horrible incidences that have happened, tragic deaths of infant children,' he said.
Newton is now the fourth Iowa community to start the process of installing a baby box.
The Iowa Safe Haven Act went into effect in 2002, and it provides parents in crisis an option to safely surrender an infant up to 90-days-old. The law was expanded in 2023, allowing communities to implement their own safe haven baby boxes.
Since then, baby boxes were installed at the Fort Dodge Fire Department and the MercyOne Medical Center in Des Moines. The Norwalk Fire Department announced last year that they are in the process of installing a baby box as a result of a baby's death in 2023.
The Iowa Department of Health and Human Services announced on Monday that a baby girl was recently surrendered safely through the Safe Haven Law. She is the third infant to be surrendered this year and the 77th since the law was put into effect, according to the department's press release.
Iowa News:
Iowa veteran passes halfway point on Appalachian Trail
Newton nonprofit holds fundraiser to install safe haven baby box
Storms move in, along with cooler air
Miguel Angel Jimenez wins playoff in Iowa for 3rd PGA Tour Champions victory of the year
Forecast: Smoke exits, storms move in
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Haaland criticizes Trump cuts to VA in Santa Fe campaign stop
Ask Democratic gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland whether she's been getting eight hours of sleep since she hit the campaign trail, and she doesn't hesitate in her response. "No, absolutely not," she said Wednesday. Haaland, the first person to announce her candidacy for governor, said the campaign is a full-time affair. "It's pretty busy," she said. "It's fine, though. I mean, this is what I do best. I feel very comfortable on the road and campaigning, so it's fine. It's [also] fun. I love being with my team and love seeing people in New Mexico." Haaland, a former congresswoman and U.S. Interior secretary, is campaigning in earnest this week in Santa Fe. On Wednesday, she held a news conference to sound the alarm on U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs cuts under the Trump administration and her plans to address them, from expanding a rural veterans transportation program to all 33 New Mexico counties to investing in state-funded mental health and suicide prevention programs. "Let's be honest about this moment," she said. "We're facing coordinated attacks on our rights, our freedoms and our future. The Trump administration is back, and they're coming directly for our veterans. ... Right now, Trump and Elon Musk are planning to cut 83,000 jobs at the VA. That's nearly double the population of Roswell." Haaland said veterans make up 30% of the federal workforce and nearly 500,000 veterans could lose their jobs if Republicans pass Trump's budget. "That's not to mention the 1.6 million veterans who rely on Medicaid and the 1.2 million veterans who have families that receive food assistance through SNAP, the same program I relied on as a young mother to feed my child," she said. "These are the safety nets that Trump and his cronies are shredding to pay for tax giveaways for billionaires." At the event, Haaland received an early endorsement from Common Defense, which describes itself as the largest grassroots membership organization of progressive veterans. The news conference was followed by a roundtable discussion on veterans' priorities ahead of her summer policy plan rollouts, though the discussion was closed to the news media. On Thursday, Haaland is scheduled to deliver the keynote address at the 2025 Next Generation Water Summit, which is being held at the state Capitol. Fundraisers are also on her itinerary. "Campaigns don't run on their own," said Haaland, who is dwarfing every other gubernatorial candidate in fundraising with $3.7 million in campaign contributions so far. "It costs money to travel around New Mexico, and I'm so grateful for everyone who has pitched in and helped us achieve our goals." While Haaland was first out of the gate, she faces stiff competition in the June 2026 primary from Bernalillo County District Attorney Sam Bregman, who raised more than $1 million in the first five weeks of his campaign. Former longtime Las Cruces Mayor Ken Miyagishima formerly launched his campaign for governor late last month. Other Democrats are considering a gubernatorial run, too, including Lt. Gov. Howie Morales, who is expected to make a decision this week. On the Republican side, Rio Rancho Mayor Gregg Hull is seeking his party's nomination, though his campaign showed signs of trouble when it delayed a formal announcement that had been scheduled for June 2, saying it was choosing to extend a statewide listening tour "to ensure that our platform reflects the real concerns, hopes, and priorities of New Mexicans in every region." "The campaign remains in a strategic growth phase, focused on building the infrastructure, fundraising base, and grassroots team necessary to win both the primary and general election," Hull's campaign wrote in a message to supporters. Haaland, considered the front-runner in the Democratic primary, said she's been "super busy." "We did one tour around New Mexico, and we're slowly but surely getting around to everywhere and getting meetings with our Indian tribes, meeting with tribal leaders and just doing whatever we can to reach out to voters," she said. "For me, it's meeting voters where they are, so we want to make sure that we are getting everywhere because everybody deserves to have a face-to-face conversation with us about our campaign."
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Steve Bannon on Elon Musk's Big Breakup: ‘Told You'
Steve Bannon saw it coming. So forgive him for saying I told you so. In a call with me Thursday afternoon — as President Donald Trump and erstwhile ally Elon Musk were trading escalating attacks online — the godfather of the MAGA movement slammed the billionaire for betraying the president and being 'destructive' to the Trump agenda in trying to tank the president's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'MAGA's done with him,' Bannon declared, months after he first predicted that Trump and Musk would eventually fall out of favor — and warned Trump to be wary of the tech baron and his motives. He's also suggesting, as The New York Times first reported, that Trump suspend Musk's security clearance, cancel his contracts, investigate his alleged drug use, and even consider deporting the naturalized U.S. citizen as an 'illegal alien.' Bannon has long considered Musk a suspect character, someone who in his view is a particularly untrustworthy representative of a self-interested class of tech billionaires who had sidled up to Trump for all the wrong reasons and never truly was part of his America First movement. 'I took a lot of criticism,' he noted, for calling Musk out at a time when the party was high on his promises to slice $2 trillion in government spending through his Department of Government Efficiency. 'I think MAGA is now seeing exactly what he was' all along, he added. 'I'm just saying, 'Hey, told you — knew this was gonna happen, folks. Not a hard one.' Bannon pointed to two proximate reasons for the sudden unraveling of the relationship this week. To start, there was Musk's decision to target what is shaping up to be Trump's greatest, and maybe only, second-term legislative accomplishment. It's one thing, he said, to want changes to the 'big, beautiful bill' — like how Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) has pushed for more spending cuts or Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has worked to protect Medicaid. It's quite another to tell 220 million followers to call up their representatives and 'KILL the BILL.' 'He's not being constructive — he's being destructive,' Bannon said. 'He's made this a personal vendetta against the president of the United States because the president dismissed him.' (Though, I'll note, they seemed to be on fine terms when Musk left the White House last month.) The other reason for the breakup, he said, was broader: Musk's essential miscalculation that his $250 million investment in the 2024 elections could have bought him enduring influence with Trump. 'Trump is the least donor-responsive political figure in history — he doesn't give two fucks,' Bannon said. 'Elon was under some impression that you write Trump a big check and eventually there's going to be some sort of payoff. Trump doesn't work like that.' Musk leaned into the notion that he feels wronged by Trump Thursday, writing on X of Trump's 'ingratitude' and claiming that Trump would have lost the election without his intervention. Trump — ever sensitive to those questioning his political acumen — hit back hard. After staying silent for days as Musk fanned the flames against the megabill, he weighed in after Musk's attacks turned personal. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget…. is to terminate Elon's Government Subsidies and Contracts,' he said, adding in a Bannon-esque flourish that Musk had been out only for himself: 'I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' The MAGA mega divorce has not only sucked up all the attention and headlines in Washington, it's put so many Republicans in a suddenly awkward position — essentially forced to pick sides. 'Will be interesting to see what Republican lawmakers do now,' MAGA influence Laura Loomer wrote on X. 'I've been on the hill all day and it's all anyone is talking about.' One especially fawning Musk fan, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, posted, 'But … I really like both of them.' But don't expect a whole lot of hand-wringing otherwise: Musk might be the richest man in the world, but Trump commands loyalty in a way the Tesla founder never has. Musk has the money, but Trump has the movement. 'MAGA is going to back the president 100 percent,' Bannon agreed, dismissing Musk's following as a smattering of 'crypto bros … who have the mentality of 11-year-olds' and worship his every move. He's not wrong. Inside GOP political circles, Musk was seen as something of a joke until Trump adopted him into his inner circle. Republicans loved his deep pockets, but many privately mocked his efforts to elect Trump, noting that many of his own volunteers left because his get-out-the-vote effort was such a mess. Indeed, the Trump divorce is risky for Musk — not only because he's alienating the most powerful man in the world, but because he's exposing how little political capital he has to go with his overwhelming financial capital. Conservatives on Capitol Hill didn't jump at his command to sink the bill; instead they mostly expressed frustration that he didn't help them fight for more cuts last month when it might have made a difference. Other Republicans predicted his decision to launch a personal campaign against Trump — to the point of associating him with the late sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein — will only alienate his allies in the GOP. 'If his goal here is to move legislation, this shows he really doesn't have the juice,' said one Trump associate granted anonymity to speak frankly about Musk. 'At the end of the day, is Marjorie [Taylor Greene] going to go with Elon or Trump? She's going with Trump.' Bannon suggested that Musk would continue his broadsides against the president to try and worm his way back into the good graces of Democrats as he tries to bolster faltering Tesla sales. All of a sudden, prominent members of the opposition party, including top Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, are taking his own words and quoting them back to voters. Rep. Ro Khanna of California is openly arguing Democrats should welcome him back in the fold. 'First thing, he's a business guy,' Bannon said. 'He's got to sell some cars — and he's not going to sell any cars to MAGA.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cuts at what cost? Childhood care and education leaders weigh in on spending bill's impacts
( — As the Senate continues to debate the passage of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill', California leaders in early childhood care and education are anticipating the impacts of looming federal cuts. Bianca Ventura sat down with First 5 California and Child Care Resource Center representatives on Wednesday. The two organizations have been advocating for California children and families on Capitol Hill. Though they've seen bipartisan support in preserving children's resources like Head Start, they say potential cuts to Medi-Cal and nutritional programs like SNAP could impact children's overall health. 'There are huge cuts proposed in the House reconciliation package to the Medicaid program,' said Vice President of the Child Care Resource Center, Donna Sneeringer. 'Many of those recipients are young children. I think one of the things that we have been trying to speak with lawmakers about, as well as with the public, is that this will not just impact those who are receiving those services through Covered California. They are going to impact our overall health care system. Particularly our rural health care system, our hospitals. It will impact our emergency room services. Everyone's care will become harder to come by and more expensive.' If federal investments are rolled back on health services, food support, and child care, the experts we spoke with anticipate that some of the costs will be shifted. Possibly putting the burden on employers to provide access to health care. 'A lot of businesses, because they are also struggling themselves with the affordability crisis and materials. They can't necessarily afford the robust health care that their employees deserve,' said First 5 California Executive Director, Jackie Wong. 'However, a lot of their employees are likely on Medicaid.' Wong adds that many of those employees work entry-level positions that the state relies on to support the economy. As for education, when we last checked in with leaders in early childhood development and care. President Trump's executive order to dismantle the Department of Education was still in effect. Since then, a federal judge blocked the administration's efforts to eliminate the department while ordering the rehiring of employees who were fired in mass layoffs. Yet, Wong tells us cuts within the department have made it difficult to carry out administrative tasks, like completing payments to Head Start providers. She even learned of cuts to certain programs the last time she traveled to Washington D.C. to speak with Congressional leaders. 'While we were there, actually, we had gotten wind that grants to steward mental health got cut,' said Wong. 'They are actually, in real time, pulling back and clawing back their investments that actually have supported young learners, as well as our students and our student community.' As for what's next? Representatives with First 5 California and the CCRC are going to continue their advocacy in Washington D.C. CCRC is currently collecting stories in hopes of sharing them with congressional lawmakers who want to hear the impacts of federal funding cuts firsthand. Families and caregivers are encouraged to share their testimonies of how they are making ends meet while navigating food costs, health and child care, along with living expenses. You can find more details and pass along your story to state representatives by visiting Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
