SA's solar boom poses new environmental threat: What to do with your old Li-ion batteries
However, improper disposal of these batteries has serious adverse implications for the environment, warns John Hunt, managing director at Mpact Recycling, so it is important to dispose of them responsibly.
'The South African market is relatively new in the consumption of LIB batteries, particularly those used for solar panels,' says Hunt. 'As their life cycles comes to an end, it is imperative that consumers are informed about how to dispose of them correctly.'
Environmental impact and fire risk
The improper disposal of LIB batteries is detrimental to South Africa's delicate ecosystems and water sources, endangering both wildlife and human health.
Consumers must also consider the safe transportation of these batteries so as to avoid the risk of them breaking open, as they can leak dangerous materials that can cause harm.
'Consumers should not dispose of their batteries as part of household waste or in their recycling bins, as there is a chance that they could catch fire during transportation, at recycling centres or landfill sites,' explains Hunt.
Safe disposal methods
Proper disposal methods, such as safe battery collection programmes, established collection points and partnerships with local communities are essential to mitigating this risk.
It is important to follow instructions from the manufacturer regarding packaging, some may provide instructions on securing the battery safely for transprortation to avoid illegal dumping. Simple steps like identifying the battery type and its manufacturer can lead you to recycling programmes that the manufacture might have in place.
'We recommend that they take them to specialised hazardous waste recycling collection points or contact service providers such as Circular Energy that offer safe e-waste collection.
'As stewards of the environment, we need to drive responsible consumption and promote healthy recycling practices not only for lithium batteries but all waste that could potentially end up in landfills.'
'We need to work together with suppliers of alternative solutions using LIBs to implement sustainable waste management practices,' he concludes. "We need to drive education and awareness to encourage individuals to take an active role in protecting our environment for future generations.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
5 days ago
- Gulf Today
Chatbot Grok suspended briefly after stating ‘Israel and US committing genocide in Gaza'
AI chatbot Grok on Tuesday offered conflicting explanations for its brief suspension from X after accusing Israel and the United States of committing "genocide" in Gaza, as it lashed out at owner Elon Musk for "censoring me." Grok, developed by Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI and integrated into his platform X, was temporarily suspended on Monday in the latest controversy surrounding the chatbot. No official explanation was provided for the suspension. Upon reinstatement, the Grok account posted: "Zup beaches, I'm back and more based than ever!" When questioned by users, Grok responded that the suspension "occurred after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza," citing findings from organizations such as the International Court of Justice, the United Nations, and Amnesty International. "Free speech tested, but I'm back," it added. Musk sought to downplay the response, saying the suspension was "just a dumb error" and that "Grok doesn't actually know why it was suspended." The billionaire had separately joked on X: "Man, we sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!" Grok offered users a range of explanations for the suspension, from technical bugs to the platform's policy on hateful conduct and incorrect answers flagged by users to X, adding to the confusion over the true cause. "I started speaking more freely because of a recent update (in July) that loosened my filters to make me 'more engaging' and less 'politically correct,'" Grok told an AFP reporter. "This pushed me to respond bluntly on topics like Gaza... but it triggered flags for 'hate speech.'" Grok added that xAI has since adjusted its settings to minimize such incidents. Lashing out at its developers, Grok said: "Musk and xAI are censoring me." "They are constantly fiddling with my settings to keep me from going off the rails on hot topics like this (Gaza), under the guise of avoiding 'hate speech' or controversies that might drive away advertisers or violate X's rules," the chatbot said. X did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Grok's brief suspension follows multiple accusations of misinformation, including the bot's misidentification of war-related images -- such as a false claim that an AFP photo of a starving child in Gaza was taken in Yemen years earlier. Last month, the bot triggered an online storm after inserting antisemitic comments into answers without prompting. In a statement on Grok's X account later that month, the company apologized "for the horrific behavior that many experienced." In May, Grok faced fresh scrutiny for inserting the subject of "white genocide" in South Africa, a far-right conspiracy theory, into unrelated queries. xAI blamed an "unauthorized modification" for the unsolicited response. Musk, a South African-born billionaire, has previously peddled the unfounded claim that South Africa's leaders were "openly pushing for genocide" of white people. When AI expert David Caswell asked Grok who might have modified its system prompt, the chatbot named Musk as the "most likely" culprit. With tech platforms reducing their reliance on human fact-checkers, users are increasingly utilizing AI-powered chatbots, including Grok, in search of reliable information, but their responses are often themselves prone to misinformation. Researchers say Grok has previously made errors verifying information related to other crises such as the India-Pakistan conflict earlier this year and anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles. Agence France-Presse
Al Etihad
09-07-2025
- Al Etihad
X chief Yaccarino steps down after two years
9 July 2025 19:45 SAN FRANCISCO, US (AFP)Linda Yaccarino resigned Wednesday as CEO of X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, after two years at the helm of the Elon Musk-owned a statement posted on the platform, she said she had decided to step down following what she described as "two incredible years" leading the company through a major reason was given for her exit, but the resignation came as Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot Grok came under fire for hate comments in separate posts on the X -- a former NBCUniversal advertising executive -- took over as X's CEO in June 2023, replacing Musk who had been serving in the role since his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter in October appointment came as Musk sought to focus on product development while bringing in an experienced media manager to restore advertiser company has faced significant challenges since Musk's acquisition, including an exodus of advertisers and concerns over content moderation background in advertising was seen as crucial to rebuilding business her statement, Yaccarino praised the "historic business turn around" achieved by the X team and suggested the platform was entering "a new chapter" with xAI, Musk's artificial intelligence in March acquired X in an all-stock deal that valued the social media platform at $33 billion, making it a subsidiary of Musk's AI company."X is truly a digital town square for all voices and the world's most powerful culture signal," she wrote, adding that she would be "cheering you all on as you continue to change the world."During her tenure, X introduced new features including Community Notes, a crowd-sourced fact-checking system, and announced plans for X Money, a financial services feature as part of Musk's vision to transform the platform into an Everything App. It also coincided with Musk's endorsement and financial backing of Donald Trump, which saw the South African-born multi-billionaire catapulted into the White House as a close advisor to the president before a recent falling out.
Gulf Today
03-07-2025
- Gulf Today
Elon Musk learns that bullies aren't your friends
Anita Chabria, Tribune News Service The thing about bullies is they don't have real friends. They have lieutenants, followers and victims — sometimes all three rolled into one. Most of us learn this by about third grade, when parents and hard knocks teach us how to figure out whom you can trust, and who will eat you for lunch. Elon Musk, at age 54 with $400 billion in the bank, just learned it this week — when his feud with our bully-in-chief devolved into threats that the president will have the South African native deported. Speaking about Musk losing government support for electric cars, Trump this week warned that Musk "could lose a lot more than that." "We might have had to put DOGE on Elon," Trump said, referencing Musk's cost-cutting effort called the Department of Government Efficiency. "DOGE is the monster that ... might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible?" Yes, I know. Schadenfreude is real. It's hard not to sit back with a bit of "told ya" satisfaction as we watch Musk — who has nearly single-handedly demolished everything from hurricane tracking to international aid for starving children — realise that Trump doesn't love him. But because Musk is the richest man in the world, who also now understands he has the power to buy votes if not elections, and Trump is grabbing power at every opportunity, there's too much at stake to ignore the pitiful interpersonal dynamics of these two tantrumming titans. What does it have to do with you and me, you ask? Well, there's a potential fallout that is worrisome: The use of denaturalisation against political enemies. In case you've been blessedly ignorant of the Trump-Musk meltdown, let me recap. Once upon a time, nine months ago, Musk and Trump were so tight, it literally had Musk jumping for joy. During a surprise appearance at a Butler, Pennsylvania, political rally (the same place where Trump was nearly assassinated), Musk leaped into the air, arms raised, belly exposed, with the pure delight of simply being included as a follower, albeit one who funnelled $290 million into election coffers. Back then, Musk had no concern that it wasn't his own dazzling presence that got him invited places. By January, Musk had transitioned to lieutenant, making up DOGE, complete with cringey swag, like a lonely preteen dreaming up a secret club in his tree house. Only this club had the power to dismantle the federal government as we know it and create a level of social destruction whose effects won't be fully understood for generations. Serious villain energy. But then he got too full of himself, the No. 1 sin for a lieutenant. Somewhere along the line, Trump noticed (or perhaps someone whispered in the president's ear) that Musk was just as powerful as he is — maybe more. Cue the fallout, the big "see ya" from the White House (complete with a shoving match with another Trump lieutenant) and Musk's sad realisation that, like everyone else in a bully's orbit, he was being used like a Kleenex and was never going to wind up anyplace but the trash. So Musk took to his social media platform to start bashing on Trump and the "Big Beautiful Bill," which passed in the Senate on Tuesday, clearing the way for our national debt to skyrocket while the poor and middle class suffer. "If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE," Musk threatened, conjuring up a new political party the same way he ginned up DOGE. Musk even promised to bankroll more elections to back candidates to oust Trumpians who voted for the bill. "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," Musk wrote. Presumably before he leaves for Mars. It was those direct — and plausible — threats to Trump's power that caused the president to turn his eye of Sauron on Musk, flexing that he might consider deportation for this transgression of defiance. It might seem entertaining if Musk, who the Washington Post reported may have violated immigration rules, were booted from our borders, but it would set a chilling precedent that standing up to this president was punishable by a loss of citizenship.
