Map Shows States With Highest Levels of Tiny, Toxic Air Pollution
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
California and Oregon are among the U.S. hotspots for dangerous submicron (PM1) air pollution—those with particles less than a micron, or a millionth of a meter wide—according to new research.
Researchers at Washington University of St. Louis have been quantifying the amount of submicron particles in the air across the country over the last 25 years.
The data, which calculated submicron estimates based on known rations of what makes up PM 2.5 particles (those less than 2.5 microns wide), suggest that many areas in the east of the contiguous U.S. contain hotspots.
Because PM1 pollution is much smaller than PM2.5 (and at least six times smaller than human blood cells), it has the potential to lead to even worse health effects, as it is small enough to slip past the body's defenses.
Parts of Arizona, California, Idaho, New Mexico, Oregon and Texas all appear to have higher concentrations of submicron particulate matter, shown by darker red areas on the researchers' map, as below.
A map of the U.S. showing the concentration of submicron particulate matter, with higher concentrations shown by darker red areas.
A map of the U.S. showing the concentration of submicron particulate matter, with higher concentrations shown by darker red areas.
Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group
Conversely, parts of Colorado, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming appear to have far fewer dark patches on the map, suggesting much lower levels of submicron particulate matter.
Parts of Arizona and New Mexico showed high concentration levels in some areas, and much lower levels among other regions of their respective state.
Higher concentrations of PM1 were found in major urban and industrial areas and areas affected by wildfires, highlighting the role of combustion sources in producing harmful particles. This contrasts with lower concentrations being prevalent across the arid west.
The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that 99 percent of the global population breathes in air containing high levels of pollutants and exceeds the WHO guidelines. The combined effects of ambient air pollution with household air pollution are associated with 7 million premature deaths every year.
Both outdoor and indoor air pollution can cause respiratory diseases, as the small particles are able to get deep into the lungs or potentially even into the bloodstream.
Exposure to particle pollution can cause heart attacks, irregular heartbeat, aggravated asthma, decreased lung function, and difficulty breathing, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
According to Chi Li, assistant research professor and first author of the study, the small particles identified tend to come from direct air emissions, such as black carbon particles from diesel engines, or the smoke from wildfires.
PM1 can also form through secondary processes however, when sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides are spit out through fuel combustion and burning coal, Li noted.
The significance of pollution regulation should not be overlooked, as the dataset reveals that PM1 levels dropped sharply from 1998 to 2022, as a result of regulations such as the Clean Air Act of 1970.
Newsweek has contacted Li via email for comment.
Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about air pollution? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.
Reference
Li, C., Martin, R. V., Donkelaar, A. van, Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Turner, J. R., Liu, X., Rowe, M., Meng, J., Yu, W., & Thurston, G. D. (2025). Estimates of submicron particulate matter (PM1) concentrations for 1998–2022 across the contiguous USA: Leveraging measurements of PM1 with nationwide PM2·5 component data. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00094-4
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
3 hours ago
- Time Business News
The Dangers of EMDR Therapy: What You Should Know
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is often promoted as a breakthrough in trauma therapy. Recognized by the WHO and APA, it's widely used to treat PTSD, anxiety, and other stress-related conditions. But while many patients report positive outcomes, others experience intense emotional or physical side effects, sometimes severe enough to interrupt treatment entirely. Before starting EMDR, it's important to understand not only how it works, but also who may be at risk. For example, if you've recently experienced a head injury or unexplained symptoms like dizziness, nausea, or brain fog, it's crucial to rule out a neurological cause first. A quick concussion test online can help identify whether these symptoms stem from a physical issue rather than emotional trauma — a distinction that can change your entire treatment approach. In this article, we'll explore what EMDR therapy is, why it's controversial, and the potential dangers patients should be aware of before committing to it. EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing) is a form of psychotherapy used to treat trauma, PTSD, anxiety, and related conditions. It involves bilateral stimulation — like eye movements or tapping — to help the brain reprocess painful memories. Unlike traditional talk therapy, EMDR doesn't require patients to recount trauma in detail. Instead, it focuses on how the body and mind respond to those memories, aiming to reduce emotional reactivity. While many experience relief after just a few sessions, EMDR can also be intense — and may not be suitable for everyone. While EMDR is widely considered safe, it's not without risks — especially for individuals with certain mental health conditions, physical sensitivities, or unresolved neurological issues. Understanding the dangers of EMDR therapy is essential before beginning treatment. EMDR can trigger intense emotional responses. Patients may experience a temporary worsening of anxiety, panic, or depression as traumatic material surfaces during sessions. Some report feeling overwhelmed, detached, or emotionally raw for days afterward. If the brain is not ready to reprocess a memory, the therapy may open more than it can resolve. Because EMDR targets subconscious memory systems, it's common for patients to experience vivid or disturbing dreams after sessions. This isn't inherently dangerous — in fact, it may indicate that reprocessing is underway — but for some, especially those prone to nightmares or insomnia, it can become a source of emotional exhaustion. The neurological activation involved in EMDR can lead to mild physical side effects such as tension headaches, fatigue, nausea, or lightheadedness — especially during early sessions. These symptoms are usually short-term, but in certain cases, they may indicate something more serious. For instance, if you're already experiencing dizziness, fogginess, or balance issues before starting EMDR, it's critical to rule out a neurological condition first. A simple concussion test online can help determine whether these symptoms are related to trauma or possibly an undiagnosed head injury — something that could be worsened by high-stimulation therapies like EMDR. EMDR may reactivate traumatic memories that were previously repressed or inaccessible. For some individuals, this can be retraumatizing if they don't have the psychological tools or support system in place to process these revelations safely. Patients with a history of dissociation or complex PTSD may be especially vulnerable to losing touch with present reality during EMDR. In rare cases, this can lead to panic attacks or full-blown flashbacks, which might require crisis intervention if the session isn't managed properly. Like any powerful therapy, EMDR has real benefits — but they come with real risks. Knowing them in advance allows patients and clinicians to build safeguards into the process. Despite endorsements from major institutions like the World Health Organization and the American Psychiatric Association, EMDR remains one of the most controversial trauma therapies in mental health care today. So, why is EMDR so controversial? One of the biggest points of contention is that researchers still don't fully understand how EMDR works. While bilateral stimulation is a core component of the process, some studies suggest that it may not be essential — raising questions about whether the eye movements themselves add value beyond standard exposure therapy. EMDR is sometimes marketed as a quick fix for trauma — a few sessions and you're 'cured.' In reality, its effectiveness depends on the patient, the therapist's skill, and the complexity of the trauma. This gap between public perception and clinical reality has created skepticism in the medical community. Not all EMDR therapists are created equal. Some complete only a weekend workshop, while others undergo months of supervised training. This wide range of preparation means that patient outcomes can vary dramatically, leading some to question the reliability of the method across practitioners. The emotional risks of EMDR — including retraumatization, dissociation, and destabilization — are rarely discussed in promotional materials. Critics argue that patients are not always properly screened or prepared for the intensity of the sessions, especially when underlying conditions (like TBI or psychosis risk) are overlooked. In short, EMDR is effective for many, but controversial because of its inconsistent outcomes, unresolved scientific questions, and lack of safeguards in some therapeutic settings. Although EMDR therapy has helped many people recover from trauma, it's not suitable for everyone. For individuals with certain medical or psychological conditions, the risks may outweigh the benefits — especially if no screening or support is in place. People with certain conditions should proceed carefully or consult a specialist first: Psychosis or dissociative disorders: EMDR may trigger disorientation or flashbacks without proper support. EMDR may trigger disorientation or flashbacks without proper support. Neurological symptoms: If you're experiencing dizziness, fatigue, or fogginess, rule out head injury with a quickconcussion test online. If you're experiencing dizziness, fatigue, or fogginess, rule out head injury with a quickconcussion test online. Certain medications: Drugs affecting memory, sleep, or emotional regulation may interfere with EMDR's effects. Drugs affecting memory, sleep, or emotional regulation may interfere with EMDR's effects. Chronic migraines or epilepsy: Sensory triggers like light or sound may worsen symptoms. Sensory triggers like light or sound may worsen symptoms. No support system: EMDR can surface intense emotions. Having emotional backup is essential. Being cautious means being smart — not avoiding healing, but preparing for it safely. To reduce risks, EMDR should always be guided by a certified, experienced therapist. Before starting, patients should: Undergo a full mental and physical health screening Discuss any history of neurological symptoms or dissociation Create a coping plan for intense emotions between sessions Ensure they have post-session support (friend, therapist, or helpline) Consider a concussion test online if dizziness, fogginess, or memory issues are present When done correctly, EMDR can be powerful — but safety should always come first. EMDR therapy offers real hope for people struggling with trauma, anxiety, and emotional pain. But like any intense treatment, it comes with risks that deserve serious consideration — especially for individuals with underlying neurological or psychological conditions. If you're considering EMDR, take the time to learn how it works, understand its limitations, and screen for any red flags beforehand. That includes addressing physical symptoms that may not be emotional in origin. Tools like a quickconcussion test online can help rule out hidden issues before you begin. In the right hands and with the right preparation, EMDR can be transformative. Just make sure you're fully informed — and fully supported — before you begin. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
'Star Trek' Icon Teases Possible 'Spaceballs 2' Return
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors While he didn't play one of the lead characters, "Star Trek: Voyager" alum Tim Russ had one of the most memorable lines in 1987's "Spaceballs," and he might just be coming back for the sequel. After Amazon MGM's announcement about "Spaceballs 2", Russ took to X and reposted the announcement teaser. Along with the link, he wrote, "I may be ..... combing the desert again..!!!" I may be ….. combing the desert again..!!! — tim russ (@timruss2) June 13, 2025 Read More: Glenn Close Joins 'The Hunger Games' A scene in 1987's "Spaceballs" has Lord Dark Helmet's troops literally "combing" the desert in search of the heroes; i.e., using giant combs to rake the desert sands. Different troops are asked if they've found anything. Russ, who is using a giant hair pick instead of a comb, yells back, "We ain't found sh-t!" The eponymous vessel of "Star Trek: Voyager". The eponymous vessel of "Star Trek: Voyager". Paramount Russ has often joked about the fact that, in spite of his body of work, that one line remains the one thing many fans remember him for. Indeed, on IMDb, "Spaceballs" is listed as one of the top four projects Russ is known for, in spite of how short a time he's on screen. As much as "Spaceballs" fans know him best for his one line in the film, "Star Trek" fans know Russ better as Security Chief Tuvok from "Star Trek: Voyager", a Vulcan and close friend/confidant to Captain Kathryn Janeway (Kate Mulgrew). Russ played Tuvok for all seven seasons of "Star Trek: Voyager" along with a cameo as an alternate version of the character on "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine". Decades later, he reprised the role in Season 3 of "Star Trek: Picard". Russ actually made a number of appearances across the franchise before finally being cast as Tuvok. He appeared as minor characters in "Star Trek: The Next Generation", "Deep Space Nine", and in the 1994 feature "Star Trek: Generations". He even auditioned for the part of Geordi La Forge on "The Next Generation", though the role eventually went to LeVar Burton. If Russ does return for "Spaceballs 2", he'll join a cast that includes Bill Pullman, Lewis Pullman, Mel Brooks, Daphne Zuniga, Rick Moranis, Josh Gad, and Keke Palmer. Josh Greenbaum is directing the sequel, with a script from Benji Samit, Dan Hernandez, and Josh Gad. There's no word on exactly when "Spaceballs 2" is expected to bow, but it is scheduled to release in 2027. More Movies: 'Naked Gun' Reboot Trailer Shares First Look at Liam Neeson, Pamela Anderson Team Up 'Spaceballs 2' Recruiting 'Thunderbolts' Star
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States With Highest Levels of Tiny, Toxic Air Pollution
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California and Oregon are among the U.S. hotspots for dangerous submicron (PM1) air pollution—those with particles less than a micron, or a millionth of a meter wide—according to new research. Researchers at Washington University of St. Louis have been quantifying the amount of submicron particles in the air across the country over the last 25 years. The data, which calculated submicron estimates based on known rations of what makes up PM 2.5 particles (those less than 2.5 microns wide), suggest that many areas in the east of the contiguous U.S. contain hotspots. Because PM1 pollution is much smaller than PM2.5 (and at least six times smaller than human blood cells), it has the potential to lead to even worse health effects, as it is small enough to slip past the body's defenses. Parts of Arizona, California, Idaho, New Mexico, Oregon and Texas all appear to have higher concentrations of submicron particulate matter, shown by darker red areas on the researchers' map, as below. A map of the U.S. showing the concentration of submicron particulate matter, with higher concentrations shown by darker red areas. A map of the U.S. showing the concentration of submicron particulate matter, with higher concentrations shown by darker red areas. Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group Conversely, parts of Colorado, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming appear to have far fewer dark patches on the map, suggesting much lower levels of submicron particulate matter. Parts of Arizona and New Mexico showed high concentration levels in some areas, and much lower levels among other regions of their respective state. Higher concentrations of PM1 were found in major urban and industrial areas and areas affected by wildfires, highlighting the role of combustion sources in producing harmful particles. This contrasts with lower concentrations being prevalent across the arid west. The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that 99 percent of the global population breathes in air containing high levels of pollutants and exceeds the WHO guidelines. The combined effects of ambient air pollution with household air pollution are associated with 7 million premature deaths every year. Both outdoor and indoor air pollution can cause respiratory diseases, as the small particles are able to get deep into the lungs or potentially even into the bloodstream. Exposure to particle pollution can cause heart attacks, irregular heartbeat, aggravated asthma, decreased lung function, and difficulty breathing, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. According to Chi Li, assistant research professor and first author of the study, the small particles identified tend to come from direct air emissions, such as black carbon particles from diesel engines, or the smoke from wildfires. PM1 can also form through secondary processes however, when sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides are spit out through fuel combustion and burning coal, Li noted. The significance of pollution regulation should not be overlooked, as the dataset reveals that PM1 levels dropped sharply from 1998 to 2022, as a result of regulations such as the Clean Air Act of 1970. Newsweek has contacted Li via email for comment. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about air pollution? Let us know via science@ Reference Li, C., Martin, R. V., Donkelaar, A. van, Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Turner, J. R., Liu, X., Rowe, M., Meng, J., Yu, W., & Thurston, G. D. (2025). Estimates of submicron particulate matter (PM1) concentrations for 1998–2022 across the contiguous USA: Leveraging measurements of PM1 with nationwide PM2·5 component data. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(6).
