One third of Queensland public servants have witnessed corruption and over half didn't report it, watchdog finds
However, the state's Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) investigated fewer than 1% of complaints referred to it, and has only charged a single person with a corruption offence in a year, it revealed in parliament this week.
The survey, which included 5,957 state government public servants, 928 employees of local councils and 114 employees of the police service, was conducted between March and May.
About 55% of public sector employees reported they had either witnessed or potentially witnessed corruption in the past five years. Of 31% who believed they had witnessed corruption, '55% did not report it', the survey found.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
The primary reasons those who said they would not report corruption gave were: fear of retribution, reprisals and concerns about confidentiality, safety, and privacy.
'I don't have faith that the complaint would be investigated confidentially, fairly or thoroughly,' one anonymous survey respondent said.
The report quotes another saying: 'Because I will be identified to the parties that you are complaining about and the repercussions are I will lose my job. Seen it time and time again.'
According to documents tabled in parliament this week, the CCC assessed 5,567 corruption matters in the 2024-25 financial year and retained 33. Of the matters, 3,700 were referred back to the 'unit of public administration' they were made about, and 1,834 were dropped.
One person was charged with one corruption offence during that period, it reported.
The continued practice of referring complaints back to the departments they were made against comes years after a landmark inquiry recommended it be ended entirely for police.
The landmark November 2022 Call for Change inquiry into the Queensland police's response to domestic and family violence heard evidence of repeated failure by the integrity oversight system.
It recommended creating a police integrity unit within the CCC 'within 18 months'. The body would be responsible for investigating all complaints about the police.
The deadline was missed last year, under Labor. In July 2024 the CCC chair, Bruce Barbour, told parliament there had not been any progress on the 'urgent' recommendation 'in any meaningful way'.
The new LNP government has not committed to implementing the reform and has repeatedly refused to answer questions about progress.
Of public servants surveyed by the CCC, 41% reported they had not witnessed corruption in the past five years. Others weren't sure if witnessed behaviour constituted corruption.
Of public sector employees, 90% agreed corruption happened in Queensland, with 65% agreeing that it was a problem in Queensland.
'Only two in five employees (40%) agree they would feel comfortable if their complaint was investigated by their workplace,' the CCC report stated.
The survey was tabled in Queensland parliament in July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
I know the Home Office is hiding the real costs of asylum
Our immigration system sometimes feels like an organised conspiracy against the British people. For decades, the public have voted for drastic reductions in immigration, only to see the numbers go up and up. For years, they have demanded an end to the Channel crossings and the asylum crisis, only to see politicians refuse to do what is necessary. When governments do move in the right direction, they are undermined by weak enforcement, litigious and often publicly-funded NGOs, activist judges who are often former claimant lawyers in the immigration tribunals, and human rights laws that make securing the border an impossible job. Not that governments should be let off the hook: ultimately our constitution allows Parliament to change the law. The last Conservative government had the right idea to stop the Channel crossings. Deporting every migrant coming to Britain without permission – to their home country or a third country like Rwanda – is ultimately the only way to end this wave of illegal immigration. But the plan was never going to work unless we left the European Convention on Human Rights, and that government – with exceptions like Robert Jenrick, who resigned for this reason as immigration minister – was unwilling to go that far. Immigration is the biggest single reason my party is in the predicament it is in, and we must be brutally honest about our record and radical in our solutions if we are ever to win back the trust of the British people. Labour's approach, however, is even worse. They abandoned the policy of deporting migrants who cross the Channel and are now rushing illegal immigrants through the asylum system. Approvals are up, and once asylum is granted, the migrants are hidden in the social housing and welfare systems, where it is impossible to track their costs. The Office for Budget Responsibility calculates that the average 'low-wage migrant worker' arriving aged 25 will cost the British taxpayer over £400,000 by the time they reach 81. Ministers muddy the waters by claiming they are deporting record numbers of people. But this is dishonest. First, the numbers they use include migrants who leave voluntarily. And second, only about three per cent of Channel crossers are ever removed. It's no surprise that Channel crossings are up – by almost 50 per cent – under Labour. And the court injunction won by the Conservative council in Epping, which stops a local hotel being used to house migrants, throws the Government's policy into further chaos. But while the injunction is undoubtedly a clear victory for the local residents – vilified as 'far Right' by those who should know better – it may yet mean more trouble for communities affected by 'asylum dispersal'. Those hoping for a policy of detention and deportation will soon be disappointed. Human rights laws can prevent deportation, and Labour reject automatic deportation for those who cross the Channel. So the migrants will still end up housed in towns and cities across the country. There are already more than twice as many migrants in private housing, including houses of multiple occupancy, than in hotels. And accommodation like this may suit a government as cynical as this one better than hotels. Individual houses provide less of a focal point for protest than hotels, and the Home Office, working with Serco, has been building up its property portfolio for some time. With 1.33 million people on local waiting lists for social housing, this is a serious breach of the fundamental deal offered by citizenship. Foreign nationals – who broke into our country knowing it was illegal – are being offered housing that is not available to British families in need. And the unfortunate residents who live nearby are very deliberately kept in the dark. As an MP elected last year, I have been horrified by the secrecy with which ministers handle housing migrants. When I asked why MPs are not informed about migrants being moved into their constituencies, the immigration minister said we would only be told when it is 'lawful, proportional and necessary.' In other words: never. After the disorder last year, we learnt from press leaks that an internal government paper had said asylum hotels had 'stoked community tensions' and were a 'critical factor behind the summer riots.' Yet when I used the Freedom of Information Act to request a copy of the paper, the Government said while the information was held, it would not be released because ministers needed a 'safe space' to think about policy. The truth is that Labour's immigration policy means surrender and secrecy. The illegal immigrants crossing the Channel will keep on coming, Labour will keep granting them asylum, and ministers will do everything to keep the consequences – for housing, for crime, for the cost to the taxpayer – a secret from you.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
ABC issues gag order on 'activist' staff pushing their own agendas on social media after Antoinette Lattouf debacle
Australia's public broadcaster has hit employees with new speech rules and social media restrictions following the Antoinette Lattouf case. The guidelines were announced by ABC editorial director Gavin Fang in an all-staff email on Wednesday. They will replace the previous rules, which were in place when the Federal Court ruled ABC unlawfully terminated Lattouf's employment after she shared a social media post relating to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Company workers have been told to avoid posting material on social media, as well as other public platforms including online petitions and WhatsApp groups, that could arguably compromise ABC's editorial independence. ABC managing director Hugh Marks previously admitted the Lattouf incident had highlighted the 'confusion' about the company's guidelines for employees' personal social media use. ABC's new policies apply not just to employees on social media, but also while in attendance at public events. The standards apply to 'any context where comments may reasonably be expected to reach a public audience'. In the document, ABC employees are told they must not make public comments that 'undermines your perceived or actual ability to perform your role; undermines the independence or integrity of the ABC or any ABC editorial content; implies ABC endorsement of your personal views; is on behalf of the ABC, or in a way that could be seen as representing the ABC, without prior authorisation'. The new guidelines state a worker's contract may include 'specific restrictions' regarding public comment. 'Public comments that do not meet the standards set out in these guidelines will be managed by line management, in consultation with People & Culture and Editorial Policies where required and may constitute a breach of the ABC's Code of Conduct,' the rules read. 'A breach of the Code of Conduct will be dealt with in accordance with the relevant ABC employment contract and/or enterprise agreement and may lead to disciplinary action, including possible termination of employment,' reported Lattouf was hired for ABC Radio on a five-day presenting role in Sydney in December 2023 before being fired. She was let go after just three shifts after sharing a Human Rights Watch post that said Israel was using starvation as a 'weapon of war' in Gaza. Justice Darryl Rangiah, who delivered his judgment in Sydney's Federal Court in June, found the ABC contravened the Fair Work Act by terminating Lattouf's employment. He ruled the broadcaster had breached the act by firing the presenter 'for reasons including that she held a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza'. Justice Rangiah found pro-Israel lobbyists formed an 'orchestrated campaign' to pressure then-ABC chair Ita Buttrose to take Lattouf off air. The ABC claimed that they had given Lattouf a 'direction' not to 'post anything on social media that would suggest she was not impartial in relation to the Israel/Gaza war'. But Justice Rangiah found that an email campaign from pro-Israel supporters alleged Lattouf 'expressed anti-Semitic views, lacked impartiality and was unsuitable to present any program for the ABC'. 'The complaints caused great consternation amongst the senior management of the ABC,' he said. Justice Rangiah found that instead of being given a 'direction' from senior ABC management, Lattouf was 'merely provided with advice that it would be best not to post anything controversial about the war'. 'That advice was also qualified by an indication that posting fact-based material from a verified source would be fine.' The ABC was ordered to pay Lattouf compensation of $70,000.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Grieving colleague of tragic Finnish MP gives heartbreaking insight into lead up to his suicide after body was found in parliament building's stairway
A Finnish MP has given heartbreaking insight into the lead up to the suicide of her colleague after his body was found in a stairway in the country's parliament. SDP MP Eemeli Peltonen, 30, died in the parliament building yesterday at around 11am. The first-term representative was elected to parliament in 2023, and was a member of its Administrative Committee and Legal Committee, as well as a city councillor of Järvenpää and the chairman of the city board. He took his own life just weeks after revealing serious health struggles. Now, the chairwoman of the SDP parliamentary group, Tytti Tuppurainen, said his suicide was related to his illness. She told Finnish broadcaster YTE: 'The fact that he decided to leave us specifically in Parliament was, however, more related to his illness and the suffering that came with it, from which he saw no other way out than to enter eternal rest.' Mika Hari, another SDP MP who worked with Peltonen, said: 'I immediately noticed his enthusiasm for social issues. It was great to later work with him in Parliament.' In June, Peltonen revealed on social media that he was receiving treatment for kidney problems and had taken a few weeks off his parliamentary duties to recover at home. But he later revealed that he had contracted a bacterial infection while being treated. He said prior to his death: 'To control the bacteria, I was started on an intravenous antibiotic course in [hospital], which will take time. At the same time, treatment for my kidney problems will continue.' Police investigating the incident reportedly do not suspect foul play, while paramedics were also at the scene. Emergency services are said to have received a call at 11.06am on Tuesday. Finnish broadcaster Yle reported that at least one ambulance, a firetruck and two police vehicles were present at the Parliament Building. One person who works nearby told the outlet: 'Ambulances drove behind the Parliament Building with their whistles blaring. Then a full-size fire truck, a police car and, with a slight delay, an armored police Mercedes also drove there.' Security Director Aaro Toivonen neither confirmed nor denied the initial reports, instead telling local media: 'There is a mission underway, with rescue authorities, police and emergency services on site. I cannot say more than that at this stage. 'I can't say what the emergency response from the emergency center has been. Parliament is a bit of an exceptional site, so one could imagine that such things have been considered when the situation has been unclear.' Peltonen was elected to parliament in 2023 with nearly 6,000 votes. He began his political career at just 18 after being elected to his local city council with 153 votes. At just 22 he became the chairman of his city's council, the youngest person to hold the position. He graduated from the University of Helsinki in 2020 with a Master's degree in Political Science. Sofia Nevalainen, a fellow city council member, wrote in a post to her Instagram: 'You were my everything. I will always love you.' She and Peltonen were pictured several times on each others social media accounts. Finland's PM Petteri Orpo said the ministerial group of the Coalition Party, the ruling party, would 'stop talking about politics' for a time in response to the tragedy. He added: 'We received some really shocking news some time ago from Parliament, our shared workplace, that one of our colleagues has passed away on Parliament premises. Really sad news.' Jussi Halla-aho, the speaker of Finland's parliament, said of Peltonen's passing: 'On behalf of the Parliament, I express my condolences to the family and loved ones of Representative Peltonen. 'Peltonen was a well-liked and respected colleague across party lines.' Finland's parliament is currently in recess, with the autumn session set to begin on September 2. For confidential support call the Samaritans on 116123 or visit a local Samaritans branch, see for details.
