logo
Hugh Hewitt Hired by Fox News as a Contributor

Hugh Hewitt Hired by Fox News as a Contributor

Yahoo11-04-2025
The conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt is joining Fox News Media.
Fox says that Hewitt is joining the company as a contributor, and will provide analysis across all platforms. He will make his Fox News debut in his new role this afternoon on Bret Baier's Special Report.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
Fox News Wins Dismissal of Lawsuit From Producer Alleging Ed Henry Rape
Lachlan Murdoch Says Fox's Streaming Strategy Is Modest in Scope
Media Executives Gather In D.C. As News Industry Faces Existential Questions
Hewitt, a former columnist for The Washington Post, currently hosts The Hugh Hewitt Show for Salem Media Networks. He is no stranger to Fox, having frequently appeared as a guest. In fact, he has been a staple of conservative and mainstream outlets for decades, as co-host of the weeknight television news and public affairs show Life & Times on PBS Los Angeles affiliate KCET-TV, and in the pages of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the Los Angeles Times, among other outlets.
Hewitt is also the author of 14 books, including two New York Times bestsellers. Hewitt worked in the Nixon and Reagan administrations before moving to the private sector.
Hewitt has been a supporter of President Donald Trump's agenda, though he has also been willing to criticize policy approaches that he disagrees with.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started
Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023
Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump floats air support for Ukraine as part of security guarantees
Trump floats air support for Ukraine as part of security guarantees

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump floats air support for Ukraine as part of security guarantees

President Trump is floating providing U.S. pilots and war planes as part of security guarantees for post-war Ukraine as he pushes for an end to Russia's war against the country. Trump has said the U.S. will help Europe craft security guarantees for Ukraine to backstop any peace deal reached with Russia, in lieu of Ukraine joining NATO, a red line for Russia. 'When it comes to security, they are willing to put people on the ground,' Trump said in an interview with Fox News aired Monday evening, referring to Europe. 'We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air because nobody has stuff we have.' White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that Trump has tasked his national security team to 'come up with a framework for these security guarantees that can be acceptable to help ensure a lasting peace and end this war.' 'I won't, certainly, rule out anything as far as military options that the president has at his disposal, I'll let him do that,' she said, but added that the president has 'definitively' ruled out boots on the ground. NATO chief Mark Rutte on Monday said Trump's willingness to involve the U.S. in security gaurantees for Ukraine was a 'breakthrough' in the peace process, though details on America's potential role remain scarce. Trump's floating the possibility for air support could mean American pilots engaged in defensive operations, guarding against Russian missiles, or simply providing support for other aircraft – such as air-to-air refueling or for transportation of military equipment. Defensive operations could risk a confrontation between the U.S. and Russia, a scenario that both Trump and former President Biden before him have been anxious to avoid. Biden turned down Ukraine's requests for no-fly zone following Russia's invasion, over concerns it could escalate the conflict and lead to a direct confrontation between nuclear powers.

Trump's Ukraine diplomacy faces a new hurdle: Where can Putin and Zelenskyy meet?
Trump's Ukraine diplomacy faces a new hurdle: Where can Putin and Zelenskyy meet?

NBC News

time14 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Trump's Ukraine diplomacy faces a new hurdle: Where can Putin and Zelenskyy meet?

A man wanted for war crimes sitting across the table from the leader of the country he invaded? That is the spectacle that President Donald Trump is pushing to arrange in the next few weeks, convinced he can break the deadlock between Russia's Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy with a summit that could help forge an end to the Kremlin's war. The plan, however, is tangled from the start. Some European leaders maintain that no such meeting should take place before Russia agrees to a ceasefire. Many analysts doubt that Putin will actually agree to meet with Zelenskyy. And even if he does, there's the fraught subject of where to hold the negotiations, given that Putin faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC). Kremlin plays it cool Trump revealed Monday that he called the Russian leader 'to begin the arrangements' during his White House meeting with Zelenskyy and a posse of European leaders. The president doubled down Tuesday, telling "Fox & Friends" that he hoped 'Putin is going to be good,' adding: 'I sort of set it up with Putin and Zelenskyy, and you know, they're the ones that have to call the shots. We're 7,000 miles away.' Trump seemed eager to accelerate the timeline of the mooted talks. "I think it will be fairly soon," Finnish President Alexander Stubb told NBC News, adding that he hoped it could happen "within the next two weeks." Moscow, however, poured its customary cold water on the excitement. "We do not reject any formats: neither bilateral nor trilateral," said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. But he warned that any summit would have to be prepared "step by step, gradually, starting with the expert level and then going through all the necessary steps." Lavrov, speaking to State TV channel Rossiya-24, added that "contacts involving top officials must be prepared with the utmost care." Location TBD Zelenskyy said he is "ready" to meet Putin, but it's unclear where such a meeting would take place. Putin faces an arrest warrant, issued by the ICC in 2023, over the alleged war crime of illegally deporting Ukrainian children. That obligates the 125 countries that are party to the court under the Rome Statute to arrest the Russian leader and transfer him to The Hague for trial if he sets foot on their territory. Moscow has repeatedly denied accusations that its forces have committed atrocities in Ukraine, and the Kremlin branded the court decision "null and void." Trump said Monday the location was 'to be determined,' and the search for a neutral venue has already turned into its own diplomatic guessing game. Switzerland, already floated by Stubb and French President Emmanuel Macron as a potential venue, raised its hand. Despite being an ICC signatory, Switzerland could welcome Putin for a summit given that he would be coming for peace purposes, said Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis. 'The goal of receiving Mr. Putin in Switzerland without him being arrested is one hundred percent achievable,' Cassis told Swiss national broadcaster SRF. Austria's leader also offered his country, which stood at the divide of communist Eastern Europe and the capitalist West during the Cold War. "We stand ready to offer our good services," Chancellor Christian Stocker posted on X. Hungary may also be in play. Its parliament voted to quit the ICC in April, which could allow Putin to attend without risk of arrest. Prime Minister Viktor Orban has also remained one of the Kremlin's few friends in Europe amid the war, though that may make it less appealing to Kyiv. But obstacles remain: Any Putin flight to Switzerland or Hungary risks passing over countries that might not be so forgiving if his plane had to make an emergency landing. Safer bets could be Turkey, which has hosted past summits between Ukraine and Russia, or Qatar, which is already used to hosting fraught negotiations between warring parties as the venue for talks between Israel and Hamas. Turkey and Qatar are not members of the ICC. Sergei Markov, a former Kremlin adviser, suggested that a summit could take place at the end of August and that Saudi Arabia could play host. The U.S. is also not an ICC signatory, and Putin and Zelenskyy have traveled there in recent days. Whether a venue will even need to be chosen is another matter. While not 'impossible,' a meeting between the two leaders would be 'a big surprise,' Keir Giles, a senior fellow at the London-based think tank Chatham House, told NBC News. Putin has 'carefully avoided' meeting Zelensky until now, he said in a phone interview, 'because doing so conflicts with his narrative of Ukraine not being a proper country and Zelenskyy not being a legitimate leader." Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, a Berlin-based think tank, echoed those doubts. A meeting would be 'pointless' for Putin and will not happen 'under the current circumstances,' she wrote on X. Putin 'has repeatedly stated that such a meeting would only be possible if there were well-prepared grounds, which in practice means Zelenskyy's acceptance of Russia's terms for ending the war,' she said.

Hillary Clinton: Supreme Court ‘will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion'
Hillary Clinton: Supreme Court ‘will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion'

The Hill

time44 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Hillary Clinton: Supreme Court ‘will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion'

2016 Democratic presidential nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says she believes the Supreme Court is poised to overturn its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which effectively legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, and that unmarried same-sex couples 'ought to consider' tying the knot. 'American voters, and to some extent the American media, don't understand how many years the Republicans have been working in order to get us to this point,' Clinton told Fox News host Jessica Tarlov on Friday in a wide-ranging interview on 'Raging Moderates,' the podcast Tarlov co-hosts with Scott Galloway. 'It took 50 years to overturn Roe v. Wade,' Clinton said. 'The Supreme Court will hear a case about gay marriage; my prediction is they will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion — they will send it back to the states.' 'Anybody in a committed relationship out there in the LGBTQ community, you ought to consider getting married because I don't think they'll undo existing marriages, but I fear they will undo the national right,' she said. In July, Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was briefly jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, formally asked the Supreme Court to revisit its Obergefell decision, which celebrated its 10th anniversary in June. The justices have not yet said whether they will take up the case. If Obergefell were overturned, same-sex marriage rights would still be protected by the Respect for Marriage Act, a bipartisan measure signed by former President Biden in 2022 that requires all states and the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages performed in states where they are legal. 'Zombie laws' against marriage equality in more than half the nation are unenforceable because of the Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell. The Respect for Marriage Act, introduced after Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said the court 'should reconsider' decisions including Obergefell after overturning the federal right to abortion, prevents state statutes and constitutional amendments banning gay marriage from being enforced on already married couples, but it does not render them entirely obsolete. In addition to Thomas, Justice Samuel Alito has also voiced opposition to the Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell, to which he and Thomas dissented in 2015. Last winter, in a five-page statement explaining the court's decision not to involve itself in a dispute between the Missouri Department of Corrections and jurors dismissed for disapproving of same-sex marriage on religious grounds, Alito wrote that the conflict 'exemplifies the danger' he had long anticipated would come from the ruling. 'Namely, that Americans who do not hide their adherence to traditional religious beliefs about homosexual conduct will be 'labeled as bigots and treated as such' by the government,' he wrote. Public support for marriage equality remains at historic highs, though a May Gallup poll showed support among Republicans slipping to 41 percent, the lowest in a decade. In a separate survey conducted by a trio of polling firms in June, 56 percent of Republican respondents said they support same-sex marriage rights.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store