Surfrider Releases 2024 'Clean' Water Report and It's…A Doozy
Topping the list. Hawaii offers not one but two swimming holes that mark the lowest water quality found within the greater U.S. of A. Kahalu'u, on Oahu, saw a 92% high-bacteria rate this past year, which, if data means anything to you, suggests that setting so much as a stubbed toe in that waterway is to invite vicious wrath that knows no bounds—you would be far from the first sorry soul to slowly and agonizingly make your grave by taking your chances there.
Also high on the list, with more than half of sample analyses finding unsafe bathing conditions are: Park View Kayak Launch in Miami, Florida, (90%); Imperial Beach, San Diego (82%); Linda Mar Beach in Pacifica, California (71%); South Sound Thea Foss Floating Dock (64%); and Ballard Park in Melbourne, Florida.
But Surfrider isn't just highlighting the doom and gloom of all these grim findings, they're addressing upstream sources of pollution that are often a leading cause of supercharged bacterial blooms: gardens. The Ocean Friendly Gardens' (OFG) initiative works to educate the public on better, safer, and cleaner gardening solutions that prevent excessive runoff of fertilizers containing nitrates and phosphates, the super-catalyzers for bacteria growth.While Surfrider's Blue Water Task Force's (BWTF) report analyzes over 10,000 water samples from hundreds of beaches, increasing their number of tests thanks to new labs in Isabela, Puerto Rico, Waianae High School on Oahu, Coos Bay in Oregon, and a relaunch of California's Sonoma County Chapter.
'Last year, 80% of beaches and sampling sites tested (483 of 604) yielded at least one high bacteria result that exceeded state health standards,' a Surfrider press release reads. That is a decidedly depressing number that, again, might make you think twice about paddling out at your local peak this summer.
Lest we get too dour on all this, though, know that Surfrider and its supporters are being proactive in more ways than the aforementioned: 'Through grassroots campaigns and programs, Surfrider is working hard to ensure that the beaches and ocean are clean and safe for all people to enjoy for generations to come. Learn more about how Surfrider's national network of coastal advocates is fighting at the local, state, and federal levels to protect clean water in the 2024 Clean Water Annual Report.'Surfrider Releases 2024 'Clean' Water Report and It's…A Doozy first appeared on Surfer on May 28, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
3 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
China is expanding into digital currencies, hoping to promote use of its ‘people's money'
BANGKOK — China has been expanding use of digital currencies as it promotes wider use of its yuan, or renminbi, to reflect its status as the world's second-largest economy and challenge the overwhelming sway of the U.S. dollar in international trade and finance. However, restrictions on access to Chinese financial markets and limits on convertibility of the yuan, or 'people's money,' are big obstacles blocking its global use. Still, Hong Kong already has stablecoin regulations and some Chinese experts are pushing for regulations to prepare for a possible stablecoin pegged to the yuan. Officials at the People's Bank of China and State Council Information Office in Beijing did not immediately respond to requests for comment on a Reuters report that the State Council, or Cabinet, is preparing to issue a plan for internationalizing the yuan that might include a yuan stablecoin. In the U.S., President Donald Trump has made cryptofriendly policies a priority for his administration. He signed a law, the GENIUS Act, last month regulating stablecoins. Stablecoins are digital currencies whose value is linked to a specific currency such as the U.S. dollar. They can be used as a substitute in situations where currency transactions might be difficult or costly. They are different from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin in that their only purpose is to be a means of payment, not an investment meant to be traded to gain value. Dollar stablecoins are typically bought and sold for $1 each. They are based on a reserve equal to their value, but are issued by private institutions, not central banks like the U.S. Federal Reserve. Stablecoins are not Digital Central Bank Currencies, which are digital versions of currencies issued by central banks. They are based on blockchain-based distributed ledgers. They are 'stable' in the sense that their value is anchored to the currency they are based on. Critics of stablecoins say that since they are essentially a proxy for ordinary currencies that can bypass banking systems and safeguards set up to manage traditional financial transactions they may be most useful for illegal purposes. China launched its own digital yuan, the e-CNY issued by its central bank, on a trial basis in 2019, and McDonalds was an early participant in that project. Chinese regulators have banned mining, trading and other dealings in private, decentralized digital currencies like Bitcoin, while encouraging use of the digital yuan. The nearly universal use of electronic payments has facilitated use of the e-CNY in the Chinese mainland, with some cities using it to pay wages of civil servants. State media reported that as of July 2024, there were 7.3 trillion yuan worth of transactions using the currency in areas where it is being used on a trial basis. China has also been promoting use of e-CNY in Africa, as it expands business dealings on the continent. But e-CNY are not stablecoins. Experts say regulations are needed to safely manage use of stablecoins and to ensure they could be used smoothly with bank accounts and payment systems. Hong Kong, a former British colony that has its own financial markets, currency and partly autonomous legal system, enacted a stablecoin law that took effect on Aug. 1. Aimed at attracting wealthy investors who want to use digital currencies and other financial products, it requires that a stablecoin linked to the Hong Kong dollar must be equal to the Hong Kong dollar reserves for that digital currency. As a global duty-free port and financial hub, Hong Kong has often served as a base for trying out paths toward liberalizing Chinese financial markets. But new regulations specifically governing yuan stablecoin would be needed if such a digital currency were issued for use in Hong Kong, Liu Xiaochun, deputy director of the Shanghai Institute of New Finance, recently wrote in a report on the Chinese financial website China's currency is not freely convertible in world financial markets and its stringent controls on foreign exchange are the biggest hindrance toward making the yuan a global currency, experts say. According to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or SWIFT, as of June, the yuan was the sixth most active currency for global payments by value, with a share of 2.88%. Its use peaked in July 2024 at about 4.7%. It's used more often in trade financing, where it accounts for nearly 6% of such dealings, according to that report. The lion's share of yuan transactions take place in Hong Kong. The U.S. dollar's share as a global payment currency was over 47% as of June, followed by the euro, the British pound, the Canadian dollar and the Japanese yen, the report said.
6 hours ago
China is expanding into digital currencies, hoping to promote use of its 'people's money'
BANGKOK -- China has been expanding use of digital currencies as it promotes wider use of its yuan, or renminbi, to reflect its status as the world's second-largest economy and challenge the overwhelming sway of the U.S. dollar in international trade and finance. However, restrictions on access to Chinese financial markets and limits on convertibility of the yuan, or 'people's money,' are big obstacles blocking its global use. Still, Hong Kong already has stablecoin regulations and some Chinese experts are pushing for regulations to prepare for a possible stablecoin pegged to the yuan. Officials at the People's Bank of China and State Council Information Office in Beijing did not immediately respond to requests for comment on a Reuters report that the State Council, or Cabinet, is preparing to issue a plan for internationalizing the yuan that might include a yuan stablecoin. In the U.S., President Donald Trump has made cryptofriendly policies a priority for his administration. He signed a law, the GENIUS Act, last month regulating stablecoins. Stablecoins are digital currencies whose value is linked to a specific currency such as the U.S. dollar. They can be used as a substitute in situations where currency transactions might be difficult or costly. They are different from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin in that their only purpose is to be a means of payment, not an investment meant to be traded to gain value. Dollar stablecoins are typically bought and sold for $1 each. They are based on a reserve equal to their value, but are issued by private institutions, not central banks like the U.S. Federal Reserve. Stablecoins are not Digital Central Bank Currencies, which are digital versions of currencies issued by central banks. They are based on blockchain-based distributed ledgers. They are 'stable' in the sense that their value is anchored to the currency they are based on. Critics of stablecoins say that since they are essentially a proxy for ordinary currencies that can bypass banking systems and safeguards set up to manage traditional financial transactions they may be most useful for illegal purposes. China launched its own digital yuan, the e-CNY issued by its central bank, on a trial basis in 2019, and McDonalds was an early participant in that project. Chinese regulators have banned mining, trading and other dealings in private, decentralized digital currencies like Bitcoin, while encouraging use of the digital yuan. The nearly universal use of electronic payments has facilitated use of the e-CNY in the Chinese mainland, with some cities using it to pay wages of civil servants. State media reported that as of July 2024, there were 7.3 trillion yuan worth of transactions using the currency in areas where it is being used on a trial basis. China has also been promoting use of e-CNY in Africa, as it expands business dealings on the continent. But e-CNY are not stablecoins. Experts say regulations are needed to safely manage use of stablecoins and to ensure they could be used smoothly with bank accounts and payment systems. Hong Kong, a former British colony that has its own financial markets, currency and partly autonomous legal system, enacted a stablecoin law that took effect on Aug. 1. Aimed at attracting wealthy investors who want to use digital currencies and other financial products, it requires that a stablecoin linked to the Hong Kong dollar must be equal to the Hong Kong dollar reserves for that digital currency. As a global duty-free port and financial hub, Hong Kong has often served as a base for trying out paths toward liberalizing Chinese financial markets. But new regulations specifically governing yuan stablecoin would be needed if such a digital currency were issued for use in Hong Kong, Liu Xiaochun, deputy director of the Shanghai Institute of New Finance, recently wrote in a report on the Chinese financial website China's currency is not freely convertible in world financial markets and its stringent controls on foreign exchange are the biggest hindrance toward making the yuan a global currency, experts say. According to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or SWIFT, as of June, the yuan was the sixth most active currency for global payments by value, with a share of 2.88%. Its use peaked in July 2024 at about 4.7%. It's used more often in trade financing, where it accounts for nearly 6% of such dealings, according to that report. The lion's share of yuan transactions take place in Hong Kong. The U.S. dollar's share as a global payment currency was over 47% as of June, followed by the euro, the British pound, the Canadian dollar and the Japanese yen, the report said.
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Suffers Major Immigration Legal Blow
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal judge in Illinois has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration that sought to block the state's workplace privacy law on the grounds that it conflicted with federal immigration enforcement. In a ruling issued on August 19, Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected the administration's arguments, finding that the Illinois Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act is not preempted by federal immigration law. Why It Matters The ruling matters because it draws a clearer boundary between federal immigration power and state authority over workplace regulation. By rejecting the Trump administration's effort to use immigration law to override Illinois' privacy protections, Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman reaffirmed that states retain broad authority to govern employment relationships. The decision safeguards workers' procedural rights in the hiring process, could set a precedent for other states considering similar measures, and marks a significant check on the expansion of federal enforcement authority. An "Immigration Parking and US Citizenship" sign is displayed outside a parking garage, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025, in Chicago. (Aaron M. Sprecher via AP) An "Immigration Parking and US Citizenship" sign is displayed outside a parking garage, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025, in Chicago. (Aaron M. Sprecher via AP) Aaron M. Sprecher/AP What To Know The case centered on whether federal law—particularly the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA)—supersedes state-level employment protections. The administration argued that provisions of Illinois' law regulating the use of the federal E-Verify system and protecting employees during the employment verification process interfered with federal immigration authority. Coleman disagreed, concluding that the state law "is not expressly preempted by IRCA and does not intrude upon the federal government's constitutional powers in the space of immigration and foreign affairs." She added that the government's "broad interpretation of its power to regulate matters of immigration would swallow the historic powers of the states over employment-related issues". The Federal Government's Argument The Trump administration claimed that several provisions of Illinois' privacy law—including penalties for violations related to E-Verify—constituted sanctions on employers of unauthorized workers and therefore fell under IRCA's preemption clause. That provision bars states from imposing civil or criminal sanctions on employers who hire or recruit unauthorized workers/aliens. The Justice Department also argued that Illinois' law, by imposing notification requirements and other conditions on the use of E-Verify, conflicted with the federal goal of deterring unauthorized employment. At oral argument, however, Coleman noted that government lawyers struggled to identify precisely which sections of Illinois law they believed were preempted. In her ruling, she wrote that the administration's interpretation of IRCA's preemption clause was "broad to the point of absurdity." Judge's Reasoning Coleman emphasized that employment regulation has historically been a power of the states. "States possess broad authority under their police powers to regulate the employment relationship to protect workers within the State," she wrote, citing Supreme Court precedent. The judge found that Illinois' law does not penalize employers for hiring unauthorized workers but rather regulates how employers use verification systems and ensures employees' rights are respected during that process. "A person's immigration or work authorization status is irrelevant to determine whether an employer has violated any of the provisions of the act," Coleman explained. She further rejected the administration's conflict preemption argument, which claimed that Illinois' law undermined federal objectives. The government suggested that the state's notification rules could encourage unauthorized workers to evade detection. Coleman dismissed this as "simply too speculative a basis on which to rest a finding of pre-emption." Broader Implications The ruling represents a significant legal setback for Trump's immigration agenda, which has frequently sought to expand federal authority over state and local policies. By upholding Illinois' privacy protections, the court reaffirmed the principle that federal power over immigration does not automatically override state employment laws. The decision may carry consequences beyond Illinois. Other states have enacted or considered similar laws governing the use of E-Verify and employee privacy. Coleman's opinion suggests that such measures, when designed to regulate employment rather than immigration status, may withstand federal challenges. Newsweek contacted the Department of Justice for comment via email outside of regular working hours on Wednesday. What People Are Saying Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman wrote in her ruling that Illinois' workplace privacy law "is not expressly preempted by IRCA and does not intrude upon the federal government's constitutional powers in the space of immigration and foreign affairs." She added that the administration's interpretation of federal law was, "broad to the point of absurdity." Kyle Cheney of Politico wrote on X, August 20, 2025, "A federal judge in Illinois has thrown out the Trump administration's lawsuit against the state that claims IL's workforce privacy law conflicts with federal immigration enforcement." In a broader context, legal scholars and state officials have long debated the limits of federal power in immigration enforcement. Ilya Somin, professor of law at George Mason University, told the Washington Post in 2017: "Trump and future presidents could use [the executive order] to seriously undermine constitutional federalism by forcing dissenting cities and states to obey presidential dictates, even without authorization from Congress. The circumvention of Congress makes the order a threat to separation of powers, as well." What Happens Next The Trump administration is expected to appeal to the Seventh Circuit, with a possible path to the Supreme Court. For now, Illinois' workplace privacy law remains in effect, and the ruling could inspire other states to adopt similar protections while intensifying debates over federal versus state authority. Judge Coleman emphasized that federal immigration power "is not without limits," and that preemption requires a clear conflict. By leaving Illinois' law intact and denying an injunction, the ruling marks a notable legal setback for Trump's immigration strategy.
