What Senate Bill 233 and the Georgia Promise Act means for those in Richmond County
This gives eligible families $6,500 for private school tuition or home school expenses.
'The money goes to the parent to use it for whatever purpose they want to use it as it relates to that child's education,' State Rep. Karlton Howard said.
The Governor's Office of Student Achievement released a list last month of public schools that qualify for new vouchers — which were created by the State Legislature last year.
'It passed last year; it was designed to help 21,000 students in Georgia. But there was some semantics in the language that were challenged in court, and as it turns out, now there are 400,000 students that qualify for the same funds,' Rep. Howard said.
Those students are from schools that are in the lowest 25th percentile– calculated by the College and Career Ready Performance Index individual scores from previous school years. And it includes dozens of Richmond County Schools.
'Of the state average scores, then that school qualifies– any student at that school qualifies for the $6,500 dollar scholarship. But they're– again like I said– but the issue became, now if there is only one school in the school system that is a failing school in the lower 25 percentile, the whole system qualifies,' Rep. Howard said.
He also says he believes this could make it hard for public schools– especially some in Richmond County.
'That QBE Formula has not been addressed or modified in over 40 years– about 40 years. Which means schools are not being funded properly, first of all, and if they're properly funded, I think we can do better. Teachers need more pay, there need to be more facilities up to date, they need to have more security. And there's a lot more they can do if they had more funding.'
If your student attends one of the schools on the list – you can submit an application for the Georgia Promise Scholarship by the April deadline. To find out if your student is eligible just visit.
If you would like to learn more about Senate Bill 233: Georgia Promise Scholarship Public School List Calculation Guide2.pdf
To view the list of eligible schools visit: Georgia Promise Scholarship Public School List.pdf
For further information visit: Georgia Promise Scholarship Public School List FAQs.pdf
Richmond County School System Interim Superintendent Dr. Malinda Cobb says, Monday, in a statement:
'We strongly believe that our schools have outstanding educators and students who have grown greatly over the past few years. We've achieved historic increases in our graduation rate, had several schools exit federal improvement lists, and released information about CCRPI that shows widespread improvement across elementary, middle, and high schools for all measured components in career and college readiness for the third year in a row. We've made great strides and understand that we have more progress to make in closing gaps.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
15 hours ago
- CNN
Gavin Newsom thanks you for your attention to redistricting
Gavin Newsom knows the popular image of him is of a smooth talker with slicked-back hair, the wealthy liberal who co-owns a vineyard. He knows, regarding the presidential ambitions he's hardly hiding, that the biggest question he would face out of the gate is whether he could sell Americans on wanting California to represent their future rather than seeing it as the place where the wackiest liberal dreams go to run wild. The redistricting fight that Newsom and the state legislature are launching Monday could, he and his inner circle believe, give him all the rebuttals he needs. If it succeeds. Newsom is already raising money and preparing for an onslaught of Republican cash aimed at defeating the November ballot initiative California legislators expect to enact as quickly as Thursday, asking voters to allow a gerrymander of five new Democratic seats in the US House. He has started making plans for what he assumes will be President Donald Trump's retaliation against him for trying to erase Republican gains in Texas. He recently spent an hour on the phone trying to smooth over former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who created California's independent redistricting commission and has made fighting gerrymandering one of his post-politics priorities. (It may not have helped: Schwarzenegger posted a deliberately cryptic photo Friday of himself lifting weights in a T-shirt reading: 'F*** The Politicians: Terminate Gerrymandering.') Democrats often talk about fighting Trump more. Newsom now has yet another actual fight to have. Newsom told CNN that he feels 'blessed' to have the chance and that he's worried Democrats are undermining voters' faith with inspiring but ultimately empty promises. 'It's faith and works,' he said in an interview hours after he formally launched his redistricting push with a vow to fight 'fire with fire.' 'You go to church. It's, as you pray, move your feet. It's passion and action.' 'I don't want to go to another candlelight vigil. I don't want to hold hands. People need to do something. 'Do something!' I hear it. 'Do something.' People are done with us. If I give another speech and I don't follow up with something, I'm done. And (Trump's Republicans) are going to roll us over,' Newsom said. Aides to several of Newsom's potential presidential primary rivals told CNN they weren't going to address directly what the governor is doing. But all the people already thinking about the bigger political picture for Democrats know what this showdown could mean for him. 'What do you mean he can't win a general election?' one of Newsom's strategists told CNN, asking the question they know he'll confront and speaking anonymously to discuss the internal thinking about how this would reverberate. 'He just helped us take back the House. If this wins, and the Democrats win, he's a winner: a leader of the opposition, and an effective leader.' Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the San Francisco-based former House speaker who has long been a Newsom booster and is already helping him fundraise for the ballot initiative campaign, said that after Trump started the unusual mid-decade redistricting push, 'you throw a punch, you better be ready to take punch — for the children, as I always say, and for our democracy.' 'When this came along, it provided a vehicle like none other,' Pelosi said. 'And people who had been saying, 'Give me something to do, what can I do?' or, 'Why aren't we doing more?' are now really very excited about the leadership that is being provided by California under the leadership of Gavin.' Just a few months ago, after calling a post-election special session of the legislature to pass several 'Trump-proofing' laws, Newsom began to reach out to the president. First came the devastating Los Angeles wildfires. Newsom, exhausted and frantic by the scale of the destruction and what rebuilding would entail, spent days in a command center managing the response but also apoplectic about the misinformation he saw spreading on social media, often from the Trump directly and with signal-boosting from Elon Musk. Still, he showed up at the airport to greet the newly inaugurated president and kissed the first lady on the cheek, then spent 90 minutes in the Oval Office, pleading for disaster aid. Then was what came off to many allies and rivals as a journey of self-exploration via podcasting. He seemed to switch his position on transgender rights to better match the Democratic backlash that set in after those questions helped take down his old rival Kamala Harris. He invited on MAGA celebrities Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon, saying he was looking for common ground. Many Democrats felt betrayed. Others dismissed Newsom as being purely opportunistic. Even people who worked for him said that he seemed adrift, following his own sense of what he wanted to do, and he needed to decide whether he wanted his future to be on the iTunes charts or in the White House. Weeks before standing up to the president's June immigration enforcement crackdown in Los Angeles, Newsom introduced massive social services cuts for the state budget, which he said were the only way to deal with the coming shortfalls under Trump. At the time, Lorena Gonzalez, a Democratic former member of the State Assembly and now powerful California Labor Federation president, told CNN that Newsom was behaving like 'a San Diego Republican of the 2000s or 2010s.' Responding to Trump that way, Gonzalez told CNN in June, 'is a choice. It's not a choice I would make.' Gonzalez was one of the speakers at Thursday's redistricting kickoff in Los Angeles, introducing Newsom in lionizing terms, while Sen. Alex Padilla called him 'the person who has brought us together for this fight of all fights.' A few minutes later US Rep. Maxine Waters said he was showing 'the kind of leadership that's going to determine the future of this country.' And underscoring both the Trump administration's crackdown in California and Newsom's feeling that retaliation is coming, Border Patrol agents arrived outside the rally to detain people with cameras rolling. For those who wanted more pushback right away in Trump's second presidency, Newsom is ringing a little hollow now. 'I'm very glad that Gavin Newsom has abandoned the 'sit down with our mortal enemies for podcasts' phase of his political career,' said one top Democratic strategist starting to think through the 2028 race, asking for anonymity to not speak directly toward a candidate's calculations. 'But his turnabout here speaks to the fundamental problem he has with the Democratic electorate: He says and does what he thinks is right for him in the moment as opposed to what is right for the country.' Newsom's response: 'Give me a goddamn break. What a bulls*** comment.' He was riled up, calling himself 'the guy who's done more progressive policy than anybody,' ticking through his record on expanding health care, raising the minimum wage, building housing, and enacting a wide range of larger social, racial and economic justice initiatives. 'They can't be serious, because they're not serious, because they don't know what the hell they're talking about,' Newsom said, saying he's still the same man who as San Francisco mayor first made headlines 20 years ago for officiating the first legal gay marriages in the country. 'I've been hiding in plain sight. It's, like, really? You've now discovered something that's been there the whole time,' Newsom said. 'I think it's maybe a secret power because, you know, get ready.' Many Democratic governors who tangled with Trump through the pandemic walked away chastened, believing they could never work with him again. Newsom said he got everything he asked for even after the last intense wildfires. He said he started out wanting to believe that he could work with Trump again until that meeting in the Oval Office in February, when it quickly hit him that the president is 'a different person.' Trump, Newsom said, kept talking about himself, pointing to a picture of Franklin Roosevelt and talking about running for a third term like Roosevelt did before the US Constitution was amended with a two-term limit. 'It was maniacal,' Newsom said. 'You felt those authoritarian tendencies coming in a way that even — when I say even, in quotes — even in the first term, were not as present.' As for hosting Kirk or Bannon on his podcast, Newsom said it's ridiculous to argue he was doing anything to platform people who already have huge followings. 'Just because you turn your back, they're going to disappear? How naïve is that? How stupid? Give me a break,' Newsom said. 'We need to understand what makes them tick, what motivates them.' Plus, Newsom said, there are areas of agreement, like when he felt Bannon seemed in favor of California's tax system. Maybe there's some opportunity for Democrats there, too. Newsom's podcast, for all the snickering it caused, is at breakthrough levels of listeners. His email list is generally considered the second-best in Democratic politics, only after Harris' from the presidential campaign. His press office's social media account has become a multi-aide operation itself and shifted to a Trump-aping full-time troll, complete with schoolyard nicknames and 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!' sign-offs. Asked last week by a reporter to defend the tone he's adopted online, Newsom said, 'If you have issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns with what he's putting out as president,' decrying what he said was the 'normalization' of that approach even as he noted he was 'pleased with the attention.' Newsom is fundraising. He will campaign hard through November. He will hope that a combination of Democratic turnout, a pitch about giving voters the voice in redistricting, and the reaffirmation of the independent redistricting commission for future cycles will get him to victory. The next fight is already on his mind, as he says he will make sure the University of California, Los Angeles, does not agree to a settlement with the Trump administration – 'we'll never settle out, like Harvard appears to be selling out,' he said. But Newsom said he already knows what he will say if he loses this one. 'I'll tell people: I put it all on the line. Did what I thought was right. And you know what? I value your opinion. I value your point of view. And I pray for all of us,' Newsom said. 'Because, you know, God help us if we're not successful. And I mean it. You may have enjoyed one of your last free and fair elections. And it will be a free and a fair election, despite these guys showing up in masks.'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Judges debate Georgia's ban on giving snacks, water to voters
The Brief A panel of federal appeals court judges heard oral arguments over Georgia's ban on providing food and water to voters waiting in line outside their polling place. In 2023, a judge restricted part of the state's election bill, saying that the provision that bars people from offering food and drink within 25 feet of any person in line is probably unconstitutional because that zone is tied to the location of voters. Civil rights groups argue that the law shuts off expressive conduct and violates the First Amendment. The state argued that it was necessary to prevent voter distraction and intimidation. A federal appeals court is debating whether Georgia's ban on providing food and water to voters waiting in line violates the First Amendment. In court on Wednesday, the groups behind the lawsuit asked the panel of three judges to uphold a lower court's ruling that part of the restrictions were probably unconstitutional. The backstory The ban is just one piece of SB 202, a 98-page bill containing dozens of changes to state voting law passed in 2021. Other changes included shortening the time to request a mail ballot, rolling back the COVID-19 pandemic-driven expansion of ballot drop boxes and reducing early voting before runoff elections. Voting rights groups, who have filed a lawsuit challenging multiple parts of the law, argued that the provision infringes on their free speech rights and should be blocked. In 2022, a judge declined to restrict the ban, saying that, while the groups may prevail in part of their challenge, it was too close to the November general election to block any part of the provision. One year later, the judge chose to temporarily block one aspect of the restrictions, saying that the provision that bars people from offering food and drink within 25 feet of any person in line is probably unconstitutional because that zone is tied to the location of voters and could stretch thousands of feet from the polling place. As part of that ruling, US District Judge J.P. Boulee also stopped the requirement that voters put their birthdates on the envelopes of their absentee ballots. What they're saying During oral arguments, the debate centered on whether passing out snacks and water should be protected under the constitutional right to free speech. Attorney Davin Rosborough, who is representing the civil rights groups, told the judges that the sharing of food or drinks was a form of speech. "[The law] absolutely shuts off this form of expressive conduct," he said. "It absolutely prevents the voters." He said that the testimony they provided as evidence showed that the act was encouraging and did not show an attempt to sway voters to any political message. The other side The state had argued that the provision was necessary to protect against conditions at polling places that could raise worries over potential illegal campaigning or voter distractions. "The reason you have a buffer zone is because you don't want a situation where people get in line to vote and they are accosted by a bunch of confusing, distracting, and possibly intimidating things," Solicitor General Stephen Petrany said. He said there was no specific reason that distributing food and drinks would constitute freedom of speech that should be protected. "We want people to be able to stand in line and be basically unobstructed," he said. What's next The arguments are expected to take months before a final decision is made. The Source Information for this article came from oral arguments and previous FOX 5 reporting. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Ron Howard Gets Some Hate After Giving ‘Cowardly' Responses To Questions About JD Vance
Director Ron Howard seems to want to think about anything other than politics — especially when it comes to Vice President JD Vance. In an interview published Wednesday, Vulture asked the filmmaker what he thinks about the legacy of his 2020 film, 'Hillbilly Elegy.' 'I don't think about it,' Howard said. 'I know it's a mixed bag and probably quite culturally divided. I also know that reviews were bad and the audience-reaction rating was pretty good.' 'Hillbilly Elegy' is based on Vance's best-selling 2016 memoir of the same name, which propelled him to national fame. Howard worked with the then-venture capitalist on the movie and spent time with him while they were promoting the film. Despite Howard's rather neutral response about his film, Vulture continued to press the topic of Vance, asking the director if he's 'able to reconcile the person you knew and the character in the movie with the person you see now?' 'Am I able to reconcile? Well, it's happened, so I know what I've observed,' Howard said. 'It remains a bit of a surprise to me. I would not have seen it coming, and I wouldn't have expected his rhetoric to be as divisive as it sometimes is. By the way, I'm not following him or listening to every word.' The 'Frost/Nixon' director's implication that he tunes out politics — or at least, Vance — to some degree seemed to irk a few people on X, formerly Twitter — considering Vance is now President Donald Trump's vice president. 'May we all have the luxury of non-thought!' one user said. 'Sorry Ron, but you can no longer sit on the fence in these times,' another said. 'this is such a cowardly answer,' a third echoed. The consequences of Trump's policies — which range from weak jobs numbers to forced disappearances — have trickled into Howard's own industry. CBS suspiciously canceled the 'Late Show' last month after host Stephen Colbert criticized parent company Paramount's recent settlement with Trump. The president has publicly threatened others in the entertainment business, including but not limited to Joy Behar, Jimmy Kimmel and Beyoncé. Howard did, however, offer Vulture a few tidbits about Vance that have nothing to do with the policies he's helping to peddle. Vance was indeed 'frustrated' by critics panning 'Hillbilly Elegy,' the director confirmed. 'He felt that, just as reviews had kind of turned on the book, his involvement was in some way tainting or coloring the critical response, and he resented it,' Howard said. The 'Beautiful Mind' director also admitted that Vance's 'run for Senate and the strategy he's chosen to follow' are not what he expected. Howard revealed that he did text Vance shortly after the 2024 presidential election. 'I did one text, after the election,' Howard said. 'Which was just sort of 'Godspeed. Try to serve us well.'' Related... JD Vance Just Addressed Trump's Comments On Who Will Be His Supposed MAGA 'Heir' JD Vance Sends A Clear Message To Elon Musk Following His Public Feud With Trump JD Vance Wonders If Other VPs Had This Much 'Excitement' — Social Media Says, 'Ask Mike Pence'
