County disperses $7 million to municipalities for affordable housing
COUNTY OF WELLINGTON –Some feel that giving local municipalities funds to address the affordable housing gap in the community might be more of a curse than a blessing.
Following
staff recommendations
at an Administration, Finance and Human Resources Committee Tuesday afternoon, councillors narrowly approved dividing the approximately $7 million previously raised for the recently-cancelled
Continuum of Care project
between all of the municipalities of Wellington County.
The City of Guelph is not receiving funds.
According to CAO Scott Wilson, each local municipality is eligible for up to $1,000,000 to develop housing to address the availability gap between low-end market housing and subsidized housing, as determined by each local municipal council.
The project must have all local permissions in place by Dec. 31, 2027, or the funds will be forfeited.
This follows Coun. Andy Lennox
requesting
a comprehensive assessment of the affordable housing proposals already presented to the county's Attainable Housing Taskforce Working Group.
Proposing a deferral, Lennox was concerned that the recommendation delegates responsibility down to local municipalities 'with no care or concern about their ability to deliver on this.'
The deferral failed 3:2 (for: Warden Chris White, Coun. James Seeley and Coun. Earl Campbell, against: Coun. Diane Ballantyne, Coun. Andy Lennox)
Lennox later asked for a community scan of who might be able to deliver or partner with the County of Wellington, as was originally proposed, to ensure they have enough information to ensure the plan isn't a failure.
'I don't want to put a fund together, say we're going to pass this off to the local municipalities and they don't have the capacity to do it. That's setting ourselves up for failure ... I think we're just fooling ourselves if we're going to put this money out there and not try and ensure that it's going to deliver on the result that we want,' said Lennox.
Agreeing with Lennox, Coun. Diane Ballantyne said she's unsure how helpful it would be for every municipality to get $1 million since some have smaller populations and tax contributions.
Talking about equity versus equality, Ballantyne also questioned why staff didn't recommend pursuing one of the four alternate housing development models presented in the report.
The models included were:
'The demand for affordable housing, while it exists everywhere, is going to be more acute in some areas as opposed to others,' said Ballantyne. 'I question the cookie-cutter approach to the $1 million to each municipality.'
Warden Chris White said the money is meant to be a starting point, and they didn't provide recommendations because they wanted to give each municipality the freedom to meet their individual needs.
'I didn't want something too restrictive, it's essentially wide open,' said Wilson. 'Whatever a municipality wants to pursue is permitted ... it (the report) is not designed to support any model in particular.'
Supporting the recommendations, Coun. James Seeley shared concerns about the 'very tight' timeline and asked whether staff could soften the deadlines to give developers more wiggle room if necessary approvals slow a project down.
Wilson disagreed, arguing that extensions are too much and he'd prefer a solid deadline because it puts pressure on developers to get something done and gives staff some assurance.
'That's over two years to get that all in line,' said Wilson. 'We're trying to do something reasonably quickly because of the urgency of providing housing. I would think it'd be all hands to the pump and everybody would work together to get that done.'
Commenting that they're on the right track, Coun. Campbell Cork said he was disappointed to see the inclusion of affordable rentals in the report, asking for more emphasis on homeownership because that's where he sees the gap.
'I think the concept of getting equity in your living place or your home is the key to it being successful,' said Cork. 'I would've been thrilled to see a model that said 100 per cent homeownership as the end goal of it all.'
Sharing some of Cork's concerns about the inclusion of affordable rentals in a plan focused on attainable housing, Coun. Matthew Bulmer suggested a density target.
'We all talk about wanting to improve affordability,' said Bulmer. 'The cases we've reviewed identified that increasing density is key to driving affordability.'
Isabel Buckmaster is the Local Journalism Initiative reporter for GuelphToday. LJI is a federally-funded program.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Why Medicaid Needs A Text Message Exemption Now
Man standing outside, texting. (Photo by) A fierce debate rages over the Big, Beautiful Bill (BBB) and its impact on Medicaid beneficiaries. While House Speaker Mike Johnson recently claimed millions "will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so," the reality is the bill's work requirements will create administrative barriers that will result in coverage losses due to poorly informed Medicaid beneficiaries. These communication barriers can be addressed by modifications to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The TCPA, a decades-old law governed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), prohibits automated text messages without prior consent. The law has created a culture of confusion and risk aversion in healthcare administration. Healthcare administrators like lawyers and compliance officers view text messaging as a litigation minefield, while patients and families who need timely, accessible communication freely use digital messaging for everything else. This creates a glaring disconnect: people communicate through text messaging across all demographics, including Medicaid beneficiaries, yet Medicaid managed care organizations and state agencies continue relying on antiquated communication methods because they fear litigation from murky TCPA regulations. The FCC has already provided guidance permitting digital communication for Medicaid eligibility and enrollment. However, this guidance needs to extend further and establish an explicit, indisputable exemption for all Medicaid programs and Medicaid-related services. This clarity will provide authority that helps prevent unnecessary coverage losses due to communication failures. It will also lead to a welcome alignment between how health agencies communicate and how people want to communicate. As new work requirements loom, we can either continue prioritizing risk management gray areas over beneficiary communication needs, or we can adapt our approaches to align with the digital channels people use and prefer. We don't need to speculate about the impact of poor communication with beneficiaries because we witnessed it recently. During the 2023 Medicaid redetermination process, people were required to re-enroll to demonstrate their eligibility. The problem wasn't eligibility; it was communication. According to Kaiser, half of Medicaid enrollees were unaware of the process or knew little about it. Millions lost coverage not because they were ineligible, but because they didn't know about re-enrollment deadlines or couldn't navigate the bureaucratic documentation requirements. Many only discovered they'd lost coverage when they showed up for medical care. These coverage losses were avoidable with better, more efficient communication. After 25 years serving a patient population that is 90-95% Medicaid beneficiaries, I understand these are busy people juggling multiple responsibilities. The majority work in gig economy jobs, minimum wage positions, or jobs that don't provide affordable health insurance. Many work multiple jobs and communicate primarily via text message. When Medicaid agencies rely on outdated methods like snail mail and email, critical information gets lost. We have an excellent, accessible tool to address these communication inefficiencies. It is text messaging and we are afraid to use it. To address texting limitations and improve communication with the Medicaid population, Abner Mason, a digital health entrepreneur and longtime advocate for text messaging in healthcare, aims to establish the Medicaid Texting Coalition. The coalition will collaborate with and advise federal agencies to exempt Medicaid from TCPA restrictions. Mason says, "Texting is the primary and preferred mode of communication for all Americans, including Medicaid beneficiaries, and we must use it to improve health outcomes and, if the time comes, to allow efficient communication to verify work status." If we care about reducing the impact of the BBB on Medicaid enrollment, an obvious and politically feasible strategy is to exempt Medicaid programs from TCPA restrictions immediately. The technology exists and the solution is straightforward. Medicaid needs a TCPA exemption now because the freedom to text is among our best hopes for minimizing the unnecessary impacts of potential work requirements.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mackinaw City dinner attracts several GOP hopefuls
MACKINAW CITY — "I've been doing these things for 20 years and this is by far the best lineup of any Republican dinner in the state this year when you look at who is attending," said Republican Party consultant Dennis Lennox. Lennox is referring to the Straits Area Lincoln Day Dinner scheduled for Saturday, June 7 at Audie's Restaurant in Mackinaw City. Two congressmen, 2026 gubernatorial candidates and several state lawmakers — all Republicans — are scheduled to attend. "It's a who's who of Republicans in Northern Michigan. It's not often that Northern Michigan political events attract the kind of lineup that we have," said Lennox. U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga and U.S. Rep. Jack Bergman are expected at the dinner. Huizenga's appearance comes as some state Republicans are encouraging him to run for the U.S. Senate in 2026. Republican gubernatorial candidates including state senate minority leader Aric Nesbitt, former attorney general Mike Cox and Kevin Rinke are listed on the roster. Rinke has yet to announce officially but is widely expected to do so. Northern Michigan lawmakers including State Sen. John Damoose and Representatives Parker Fairbairn and Cam Cavitt are also set to attend. Subscribe Check out our latest offers and read the local news that matters to you Lennox said the dinner came about because of a newly formed GOP-centric political action committee called Friends of Up North that will support Republican Party principles in the region. "There was a need to bring Republicans together from across the region. The dinner will have 150 attendees and it is a sellout," Lennox said. He said participants will come from 12 counties in the state, ranging from Eaton in the south to Ontonagon in the Upper Peninsula. "Traditionally the way it works is candidates for statewide office typically hit Northern Michigan in the year preceding an election," said Lennox. "The reality is once you get closer to the election there are not as many votes in Northern Michigan, so candidates tend to spend the election year in the more populated areas." — Contact Paul Welitzkin at pwelitzkin@ This article originally appeared on The Petoskey News-Review: Straits Area Lincoln Day Dinner in Mackinaw City attracts several GOP hopefuls
New York Times
6 hours ago
- New York Times
What to Know About Trump's New Travel Ban
President Trump on Wednesday announced a travel ban on citizens of 12 countries, mostly in Africa and the Middle East, aiming to prevent or severely limit their entry to the United States. The policy is similar to a ban that Mr. Trump implemented in 2017, during his first term. It is the latest move in the administration's crackdown on immigration, and was set to take effect on Monday. What countries are on the list? A full travel ban will affect citizens of the following countries: Afghanistan Chad Republic of Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Myanmar Somalia Sudan Yemen Partial restrictions will apply to citizens of other countries, meaning they cannot come to the country permanently or apply for certain visas. They are: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela What is the administration saying? Mr. Trump, who announced the ban in a proclamation, said it was intended to protect 'the national security and national interest of the United States and its people.' It is his latest effort to further restrict immigration since returning to office in January, coming after his administration blocked asylum seekers at the Southern border, barred international students from Harvard University and ordered immigration raids across the country. Cabinet officials in April had identified a list of countries where vetting and screening information surrounding visa applicants was 'deficient' enough to warrant a full or partial suspension, the action said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
