Tish's outrageous taxpayer-footed legal fees: Letters
The Issue: Albany Democrats' bill that would allow Letitia James access to a taxpayer fund for legal fees.
If a New York official commits a fraud that is not tied to his or her official government duties, why should taxpayers be on the hook for their criminal activity ('Rotten scheme vs. NYers,' Editorial, May 8)?
Again, this assumes the activity of a government official in question is not duty-related, such as with Attorney General Letitia James — who is being investigated for her own allegedly fraudulent mortgage activity.
By no stretch of the imagination can personal mortgage fraud be considered attorney-general-related work.
Clearly, this budget proposal is designed to protect James, and probably other Democratic officials. It will basically absolve her of taking personal responsibility for her actions.
If she is shown to be a 'criminal,' New Yorkers should not have to pay for it.
Harold Fishman
Manhattan
This is as an outrage against New York's taxpayers.
At a time when New York's congressional delegation is attempting to expand the federal tax deduction for state and local taxes, asking taxpayers to subsidize Tish James' legal bills goes too far for decent Americans.
David Levine
Hobe Sound, Fla
There's already a mechanism in place where taxpayers foot legal bills —it's called a public defender's office.
First, James will need to be arrested, charged and indicted. Then, if she is truly needy and cannot pay for her defense, the court can assign a public defender.
Considering that James' mantra is 'no one is above the law,' why should she be granted special treatment? Is she more privileged than any other financially challenged defendant?
Frank Russo
Centereach
Abbe Lowell, the defense attorney for Letitia James, is apparently so expensive that a state attorney general's salary certainly can't cover the fees that defending her will generate. This may explain why language was inserted into the state budget deal that would allow taxpayer dollars to bankroll James' legal defense costs.
Meanwhile, James claims she is fighting to safeguard the rights and well-being of millions.
Julia Lutch
Davis, Calif.
Let me get this straight: An individual who happens to be the New York attorney general may have committed mortgage fraud, and the taxpayer is responsible for covering her legal fees.
Bless our legislators. They insult and offend, yet still get elected.
Jerry Chiappetta
Monticello
The Issue: Bill Gates' plan to give away his $200 billion fortune over the next 20 years.
The next time the useless idiots on campus call for the end of capitalism, they should be reminded of what Bill Gates and Warren Buffett pledged and are already in the midst of carrying out ('Clean bill of wealth,' May 9).
They are giving away billions of dollars that our economic system allowed them to accumulate to help millions of people live longer and more useful lives. No other financial system comes close.
Bravo to Gates, Buffett and other successful capitalists for their philanthropy. And bravo to the American system which makes it all possible.
Mel Young
Boca Raton, Fla.
Think what you want about his politics, but Gates giving away most of his fortune to help solve world problems, particularly those that affect the less fortunate, is an admirable thing.
In contrast, what does President Trump give of himself? He is forever on the grift, looking to line his pockets.
Mitch Berkowitz
Philadelphia, Pa.
Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
NYC Public Advocate Jumaane Williams claims Trump is exciting ‘white supremacy' across nation, slams Adams at protest
Public Advocate Jumaane Williams told a cheering crowd at a Manhattan protest Thursday that 'white supremacists' are thrilled with the way the country's headed under President Trump's leadership, while questioning where Mayor Eric Adams was during ICE raids in the city. 'All the white supremacists are excited,' he said to whoops and hollers in agreement at the Foley Square protest against Trump's travel ban. 5 Public Advocate Jumaane Williams accused the president and the mayor in a speech he delivered at a protest in Foley Square. Mauro/X Advertisement Williams shook his fist and demanded to know what Adams was doing while New Yorkers were getting 'kidnapped,' a reference to ICE arrests. He also criticized the mayor's position on NYPD brass golfing with Trump earlier this week. 'We're in a scary situation and I have to call out the fact that Mayor Eric Adams is nowhere to be found in a city full of immigrants,' he said to boos. Advertisement 'Where are you?' Williams yelled. 5 Public Advocate Jumaane Williams frequently compares anyone criticizing him to President Trump. ALEXANDER DRAGO/POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Williams has long used the bully pulpit of his office to attack the mayor. When calls for Adam's resignation were at fever pitch in the wake of his federal indictment last September, Williams relished the possibility of taking over as mayor. The city's charter stipulates that the Public Advocate is next in the line of succession if the current mayor can no longer serve. Advertisement Surrounded by protesters holding signs that read 'Immigrants Are New York!' and 'No Travel Ban,' Williams lashed out against the president and the mayor, while referencing the clashes in Los Angeles. 5 Public Advocate delivered a speech critical of Mayor Eric Adams at a protest in Foley Square Thursday. Mauro/X 'We're in some tough situations,' he said. 'But I believe in the resolve of a better America. I believe in those of us – even in the dark times — who refuse to allow the darkness to overwhelm us.' When Williams finished speaking, a few counter-protesters approached the crowd and started shouting 'no more cheap labor' and 'the days of cheap labor are over.' Advertisement 5 Counter-protesters shouted that 'the days of cheap labor' are over after Jumaane Williams finished his speech. Oliya Scootercaster/X The far left activist turned politician is leading in the polls in his bid for a second term as Public Advocate, an office described as the city's ombudsman. He is leading with a double-digit margin even in the most hostile polls in a contentious race against Assembly Member Jenifer Rajkumar, who represents Queens' 38th district. 5 NYPD leadership defused a tense showdown at a protest against President Trump's travel ban in Foley Square. Oliya Scootercaster/X The two clashed in the hour-long final debate Thursday night. In the final debate, Rajkumar attacked Williams for being lazy at his job. 'It's not enough to sleep until noon and then write a press release criticizing Mayor Adams,' she said. Williams responded with a familiar trope of his when under attack: comparing Rajkumar to Adams, whom he routinely compares to Trump. Advertisement 'When you don't know how this office works or what to do with it. You come up with Trumpy attacks that you get from Twitter, or you get from Mayor Eric Adams,' Williams shot back at his challenger. The citywide position doesn't hold much power, but it has been the launching pad to more prestigious political office. Attorney General Letitia James and former Mayor Bill de Blasio both held the position.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘High price': Grim warning after AUKUS move
Australia will have 'a very high price to pay if AUKUS fails', opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor says. The warning came after the US Department of Defence launched a review of the trilateral pact with Australia and the UK to ensure it aligned with Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. The Albanese government has brushed off concerns the move signals waning US support for the alliance with Canberra, with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles saying it was 'natural that the (Trump) administration would want to examine this major undertaking'. But with AUKUS the centrepiece of Australia's defence strategy over the first half of this century, it has offered little reassurance. 'This is an incredibly important alliance,' Mr Taylor said on Friday. 'It's an incredibly important capability, both in terms of the submarine capability and the technology capability … and this must be a top priority of the government.' He said the Albanese government had 'many questions to answer'. 'What discussions has Richard Marles already had? To what extent is our lack of defence spending a driver of this review? When will the Prime Minister meet with the President to actually discuss this face-to-face?' he queried. 'These are questions we need answers to, and they're questions that go to the heart of making sure that AUKUS is a success and that we ensure that we have peace through deterrence in our region.' NewsWire understands Anthony Albanese was set to meet the US President on the sidelines of the upcoming G7. But US State Department sources said a time had not been set and the situation was 'fluid'. 'No submarines' Canberra has already spent billions laying the groundwork to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines and train personnel to crew them under AUKUS. Washington has committed to supply up to five Virginia-class submarines starting in 2032. But sluggish submarine production has put the US on track to face a shortage early next decade. To help bolster production, Australia has agreed to inject $4.6bn into the US defence industrial base. Mr Marles said on Thursday he was 'confident' the production rate was on track. 'And we are seeing real progress – increases in both production and sustainment – associated with what we're doing with AUKUS and what the Americans themselves are doing,' Mr Marles told the ABC. 'That's what is set out in the agreement that we already have with the United States, which forms part of the treaty that we now have between the US and the UK. 'I think it's completely appropriate for this administration to have a look at all of the facts and figures around that.' Malcolm Turnbull, who was prime minister during Mr Trump's first term, took a different view. Also speaking to the ABC, he said it was 'very likely' Australia would end up 'having no submarines'. 'The latest numbers given to the congress by the navy on 11 March this year was that the rate of production is 1.1 per annum,' Mr Turnbull said. 'They need to get to two by 2028 to be able to meet their own requirements, and to 2.33 to meet their own plus Australia's. 'And they have not been able to lift production rates despite the expenditure of over $10bn over the last six or seven years.'So they've got a real problem there.' Mr Trump can renege on Washington's AUKUS commitments if they put US national security at risk.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Trump's 'peacemaker' pledge takes big hit as Israel strikes Iran
By Gram Slattery and Matt Spetalnick WASHINGTON (Reuters) -On the campaign trail, U.S. President Donald Trump promised to end the world's hottest conflicts and usher in global peace, but nearly five months in, with Israel attacking Iran and bloodshed in Gaza and Ukraine unabated, those hopes are in shambles. U.S. ally Israel struck dozens of Iranian targets in a dramatic and multi-faceted attack on Thursday that analysts say threatens to eventually spiral into an all-out regional war. The strikes appear to be a snub to Trump, who had repeatedly pushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to attack Iran, though the president himself had threatened to bomb the Gulf nation if nuclear talks failed. "Trumpian diplomacy is one of the first casualties of these attacks," said Brett Bruen, a former foreign policy adviser to Democratic President Barack Obama. "He has struggled to even get close to a ceasefire (in Gaza), let alone peace in any major conflict. Iran was looking the most promising - and Netanyahu just spoiled it." The White House, the Israeli embassy in Washington and Iran's U.N. mission did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The strikes are also a rebuke of Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy and close aide, who has been working intensively with Iranian negotiators towards a diplomatic solution to curb its nuclear program. Witkoff had sought unsuccessfully to persuade Netanyahu to remain patient while U.S.-Iran negotiations proceeded. Those talks have been deadlocked. Some Trump allies privately acknowledge that his diplomatic efforts had been faltering even before Israel's attack. His second term in office started with what seemed like a foreign policy win. Shortly before Trump's inauguration, Witkoff worked with aides to then-President Joe Biden to secure a long-sought ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas militants. But that accord fell apart in weeks. The U.S. has also made little discernible progress toward a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, whose conflict Trump vowed to end before even taking office. And his administration has taken no visible steps toward expanding the Abraham Accords, a landmark pact brokered in Trump's first term to forge diplomatic ties between Israel and several Arab neighbors. "SPIRAL OF ESCALATION" As Trump has struggled to seal peace accords, foreign policy divisions have opened inside his own administration. Dozens of officials, from the National Security Council to the Pentagon to the State Department, have been jettisoned amid the infighting. Even before Israel's attack, several administration officials had begun to privately question if Witkoff, who lacks diplomatic experience but has emerged as Trump's top negotiator, had overstayed his welcome. As Israel's attacks unfolded on Thursday, some prominent Democrats expressed frustration that Trump had scrapped during his first term a deal between the United States, Iran and European allies forged during the Obama administration. Trump and Republicans had condemned that deal, saying it would not have kept a nuclear bomb out of Tehran's hands. Democrats fault Trump for not yet coming up with a credible alternative. "This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy said in a post on X. Whether Thursday's strikes will trigger a regional conflict remains unclear. Even so, analysts said, Tehran could see U.S. assets in the region as legitimate targets. For example, Tehran-aligned Houthi rebels in Yemen could resume their bombing campaign against ships transiting the Red Sea. Also unclear is Israel's ability to permanently impede Iran's nuclear program. Analysts doubt in particular the ability of Israel to destroy Iran's Fordow enrichment plant, which is buried deep underground. While Israel could probably do extensive damage, experts say a more lasting blow would require U.S. military assistance, which U.S. officials said was not provided. Another question mark is just how effectively Tehran can respond. Israel has indicated that it has targeted several Iranian leaders in the bombing campaign, which is expected to continue in coming days. All these factors will decide if the blow to Trump's aspirations to be seen as a global peacemaker will be a terminal one, or merely a setback. "If Israel is to be taken at its word that tonight's strikes were the first round in an all-out Israeli campaign against Iran's nuclear and missile programs, Iran's regime is now knee-deep within a potentially existential, life-or-death moment," said Charles Lister, head of the Syria Initiative at the Middle East Institute. "That paints tonight's strikes in a whole new, unprecedented light and makes the risk of a major spiral of escalation far more real than what we've seen play out before."
