12th Annual Edition of the BeyondTrust Microsoft Vulnerabilities Report Reveals Record-Breaking Year for Microsoft Vulnerabilities
ATLANTA, April 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- BeyondTrust, the global cybersecurity leader protecting Paths to Privilege ™, today released its annual Microsoft Vulnerabilities Report, revealing a record-breaking number of reported Microsoft vulnerabilities in 2024. Despite ongoing security improvements, attackers continue to exploit key weaknesses, particularly those related to privilege escalation and remote code execution. The 2025 report provides an in-depth analysis of data from security bulletins publicly issued by Microsoft throughout the previous year, providing valuable information about vulnerability trends and the evolving threat landscape to help organizations understand, identify, and address the risks within their Microsoft ecosystems.
Key findings from the 2025 report include:
Although the total number of vulnerabilities has risen, the longer-term trend shows the pace of growth appear is stabilizing. This, combined with the continued downward trend toward fewer critical vulnerabilities, suggests Microsoft's security initiatives and improvements in the security architecture of modern operating systems are paying off.
However, while vulnerability growth appears steady, the report also highlights the complexity of securing today's vast and diverse ecosystems, where evolving technologies, features, and interdependencies continue to introduce risk.
Key predictions and takeaways from this year's report include:
Despite the changing threat landscape, some security fundamentals remain unchanged:
1) Software vulnerabilities are as inevitable as death and taxes
2) Enforcing least privilege remains one of the most effective strategies to reduce risk—even against zero-days and reverse-engineered patches
3) Defense-in-depth strategies that combine prevention with detection and response offer the strongest protection—including against modern, identity-based threats.
'This year's data offers a clear reminder that the threat landscape isn't slowing down—it's rapidly evolving,' said James Maude, Field Chief Technology Officer at BeyondTrust. 'The sustained dominance of Elevation of Privilege vulnerabilities highlights how valuable privileges are to attackers and why they will continue to target identities with privileges to move laterally and gain access to critical systems. These trends reinforce the need for organizations to focus not just on patching, but on securing the underlying Paths to Privilege™ across their environments to reduce the attack surface of every identity and point of access.'
The BeyondTrust Microsoft Vulnerabilities Report serves as a trusted resource for organizations to better understand the Microsoft vulnerability landscape, prioritize patching strategies, and strengthen their identity security posture against modern threats. Download the full 2025 Microsoft Vulnerabilities Report here.
About BeyondTrust
BeyondTrust is the global cybersecurity leader protecting Paths to Privilege™. Our identity-centric approach goes beyond securing privileges and access, empowering organizations with the most effective solution to manage the entire identity attack surface and neutralize threats, whether from external attacks or insiders.
BeyondTrust is leading the charge in transforming identity security to prevent breaches and limit the blast radius of attacks, while creating a superior customer experience and operational efficiencies. We are trusted by 20,000 customers, including 75 of the Fortune 100, and our global ecosystem of partners.
Learn more at www.beyondtrust.com.
Follow BeyondTrust:
X: https://twitter.com/beyondtrust
Blog: https:// www.beyondtrust.com/blog
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/beyondtrust
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/beyondtrust
For BeyondTrust:
Mike Bradshaw
Connect Marketing for BeyondTrust
P: (801) 373-7888
E: [email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft Tops $3.5 Trillion Market Cap, Beats Nvidia
Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) hit a new high as its market capitalization topped $3.5 trillion, edging out Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and solidifying its lead among the Magnificent Seven. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with MSFT. Shares of Microsoft climbed to a record $467.68 on Thursday, up 0.8%, before adding another 0.6% on Friday to push its market cap past $3.5 trillion. Nvidia wasnt far behind, trading up 1.3% on Friday with a market cap of $3.47 trillion, while Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) also breached the $3 trillion mark with a 1% gain to reach $3.02 trillion. Microsofts stock has outpaced the broader Nasdaq (IND), rising 11% year-to-date compared to the indexs modest sub-1% gain. The software giant has been powered by robust growth in its cloud unit, Azure, where revenue jumped 28% year-over-year in Q3 FY25, and by its deepening partnership with OpenAI, which has driven strong demand for AI-powered services. Bernstein Societe Generale Group raised its price target on Microsoft to $540 from $520, citing significant upside potential as Azure continues to scale and AI integration expands across enterprise offerings. Bernstein analysts retained their Outperform rating, noting that Microsofts diversified revenue streamsfrom Office 365 subscriptions to LinkedIn and gamingprovide a hedge against macro uncertainties. Nvidias gains have been fueled by surging demand for its H100 and H200 GPUs, which dominate the AI data-center market, helping it close the gap with Microsoft. Apples performance, meanwhile, reflects resilient iPhone sales and growing services revenue, which has climbed 17% year-over-year to $21 billion in Q2 FY25. Why It Matters: Microsofts $3.5 trillion valuation underscores the escalating AI and cloud war between the tech titans, where gains in enterprise adoption and AI partnerships can translate directly into market-cap milestones. The battle for supremacy now hinges on execution in generative AI, data-center infrastructure and enterprise software integrations. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
Xbox console games are suddenly showing up inside the Xbox PC app
Something strange is going on with Microsoft's Xbox app on Windows. Over the past few days, the Xbox PC app has started showing Xbox console games inside the library. While you can't install games like the original Alan Wake for Xbox 360, it shows up if you own it as part of the 'My PC Games' list inside the Xbox PC app. I don't believe this is a simple bug, but more the result of Microsoft's plans to more closely combine its Xbox and Windows stores. I wrote about this effort in March, when I revealed in Notepad that Microsoft is working with Asus on a Project Kennan handheld. 'It's part of a larger effort from Microsoft to unify Windows and Xbox towards a universal library of Xbox and PC games,' I wrote at the time. So, is xbox cooking??? That's my whole console library right there 👀 — Even When The Heart Stops, The Pain Lingers (@Gaming4all98) June 7, 2025 This effort also involves enabling Steam and Epic Games Store games to be visible in the Xbox PC app library. Microsoft accidentally revealed mockup images showing Steam games in the Xbox PC library earlier this year, and at the time sources familiar with the company's plans told me Microsoft was working on an Xbox app update that will show every game you have installed on your PC. Microsoft has also been working on making the Xbox app the home of PC gaming over the past year, and it has recently started referring to its Xbox PC app as simply 'Xbox PC.' This new branding first showed up in Microsoft's announcement of Gears of War: Reloaded, and a new gameplay trailer for MIO: Memories In Orbit also shows off the Xbox PC branding and logo that we're going to see whenever Microsoft wants to let PC players know the game is available on its Microsoft Store. Microsoft is also combining ' the best of Xbox and Windows together ' for handhelds, in changes that we should see later this year. Microsoft is in desperate need of a response to SteamOS, particularly as PC makers like Lenovo are starting to put SteamOS on their own handheld gaming PCs. All of these Xbox PC changes and the handheld work means we're probably close to seeing exactly how Microsoft lists additional games in the Xbox PC app. The big question will be whether Xbox console games will actually be playable on PC, and Microsoft may need to leverage its cloud infrastructure for that unless it has an emulation breakthrough ready to finally make the dream of playing old Xbox games on PC a reality.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Are We Paying Too Much Attention To Machines?
Are we paying too much attention to machines? As we delve into everything that artificial intelligence can do today, we also run into some questions about what we choose to offer to the technology. In some ways, you could boil this down to talking about the attention mechanism. Stephen Wolfram is a renowned data scientist and mathematician who often talks about the ways that AI curates human attention, or the ways that we can direct it to focus on what's useful to us. Here's a bit of what he said in a recent talk that I wrote about a few weeks ago: 'Insofar as we humans still have a place, so to speak, it's defining what it is that we want to do, and that's something that you can specify that more precisely computationally,' Wolfram said. 'That's how you get to (the answer) that is precisely what we want.' Interested in the intersection of human and AI attention, I typed the following question into Microsoft Copilot: 'are we paying too much attention to machines?' Here are the five fundamental sources that the model used to reply. The first one is from one of our own authors at Forbes, Curt Steinhorst, who asked: how will we keep people at the center of business? 'We seem to believe that we are only one 'life hack' away from limitless productivity, that the skilled use of human focus can be reduced to a productivity system, and that if we simply want it bad enough, we can beat the machines at their own game,' Steinhorst writes. 'But this attitude amounts to a passive indictment of our innate humanity, and it is a problem. We will never catch machines and digital tools in the ways they excel—but there is reason to believe that technology will never catch up to humanity in the ways that we excel. The key is to understand and nurture the differences, rather than pursue the parallels.' The second source Copilot shows is a scientific paper in the International Journal of Information Management that asks: what is it about humanity that we can't give away to intelligent machines? I'm going to quote from the conclusions of the study: 'Humans must retain the role of meaningful, responsible critique of the design and application of AI, and the intelligent machines it can create. Critique is a vital concept that humanity can retain as a means to ensure liberation from intelligent machines. Suppose intelligent machines are used to help shape decision processes in life-changing situations, such as criminal court proceedings, or to aid emergency care first responders in disaster situations. In that case, they should serve only as referees or expert guides and not as decision-makers. It is critical that such machine 'referees' or 'guides' should be subject to constant human critique. Second, a human must be kept in the loop of intelligent machine decision-making processes. This involvement is vital to preserve our ability to systematically reflect on the decisions we make, which ultimately influence our individuality, a central feature of humanism.' I think that's useful, too. The third source is a LinkedIn piece from Shomila Malik noting that the brain looks for information about 4 times per second, and talking about how our human attention is paid. I think this is leading toward the next piece that I'll summarize next. Here, there's sort of an emphasis on prolific media and stimulus 'flooding the zone' and overwhelming our human attention spans. There's an interesting proposition in the fourth link that I found talking about the recent work of pioneers like Ezra Klein. The author also reveals a theory from professor of psychiatry Joel Nigg. In a nutshell, it's that our attention is being degraded through attentional deficits caused by things like a pathogenic environment, inadequate sleep, unhealthy diets, air pollution, lack of physical activity, other health conditions, overwork, excessive stress, early trauma, relationship strains, and smoking cigarettes. In the last of the links at the New York Times, Stephen Hawking is quoted, saying artificial intelligence could be a real danger and explaining the problem that way: 'It could design improvements to itself and outsmart us all,' Hawking theorized. I'll let that comment speak for itself. (Be sure to check out Hawking's words on 'killer machines' and frightening scenarios, and remember, this guy is a renowned scientist.) In a recent talk at Imagination in Action, David Kenny talked about applying lessons from IBM Watson's performance on Jeopardy, and other landmarks of AI design. In general, he noted, we're moving from the era of inductive reasoning, to one of deductive and affective reasoning. He mentioned a weather app giving probabilities in percentages, rather than a clear answer, and the need to prompt engineer in order to get results from LLMs, instead of just accepting whatever they say the first time. A new generation, he said, is generally becoming more trustful of AI for data on medical conditions, relationships, financial strategies, and more. 'There's just been an enormous trust put in this,' he said. 'It's all working for them on a very personalized basis. So we find that there are people getting their own information.' Human interactions, he said, like dating and marriage, are reducing, and people trusting the machines more can be good, or in his words, 'super-dangerous.' '(Humans need to) build critical thinking skills, build interpersonal skills, do things like this that bring them together with each other, spend time with each other in order to take full advantage of the AI, as opposed to ceding our agency to it,' he said. 'So while the last 15 years were largely about technical advances, and there's a lot of technical advances we're going to see today and invest in, I think it's even more urgent that we work on the human advances, and make sure that technology is actually bringing communities back together, having people know how to interact with each other and with the machine, so that we get the best answer.' And then he went back to that thesis on inductive versus deductive reasoning. 'It takes a humility of being able to understand that we're no longer about getting the answer, we're about getting to the next question,' Kenny said. For sure, there's a need to celebrate the human in the loop, and the inherent value of humanity. We can't give everything away to machines. All of the above tries to make some through lines in what we can give away and what we can keep. Maybe it's a little like that Marie Kondo thing, where if it sparks joy, we reserve it for human capability, and if we need help, we ask a machine. But this is going to be one of the balancing acts that we have to do in 2025 and beyond, as we reckon with forces that are, in human terms, pretty darn smart.
