logo
Canada's wildfire smoke ‘suffocating,' needs ‘better' management: U.S. reps

Canada's wildfire smoke ‘suffocating,' needs ‘better' management: U.S. reps

Global News09-07-2025
Some U.S. members of Congress are demanding 'better forest management' in Canada, saying 'suffocating' wildfire smoke is dangerous and makes it difficult to 'get outside.'
'As we are entering the height of the fire season, we would like to know how your government plans on mitigating wildfire(s) and the smoke that makes its way south,' Wisconsin Rep. Tom Tiffany and Minnesota Rep. Brad Finstad said in a letter addressed to the Canadian embassy in D.C.
The letter goes on to say it's not the first year Canadian wildfire smoke has been 'an issue.'
Tiffany and Finstad blame 'a lack of active forest management' and arson for the wildfires.
'With all the technology that we have at our disposal, both in preventing and fighting wildfires, this worrisome trend can be reversed if proper action is taken,' they wrote.
Story continues below advertisement
'In our neck of the woods, summer months are the best time to spend time outdoors recreating, enjoying time with family, and creating new memories, but this wildfire smoke makes it difficult to do those things.'
Tiffany, in a post on X, said Minnesota representatives Pete Stauber and Michelle Fischbach, Wisconsin Rep. Glenn Grothman, and Republican Majority Whip and Minnesota Rep. Tom Emmer had joined the letter as well.
Wildfires have been raging across multiple parts of Canada since the spring, with a total of 2,672 to date and about 354 fires currently active.
According to the National Wildland Fire Situation Report from Natural Resources Canada, 105 of those wildfires are uncontrolled.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Canadian federal officials had warned in early June that this wildfire season was expected to be challenging.
1:47
Crews making progress on wildfire near Thompson
The wildfire smoke forecast, provided by BlueSky Canada's FireSmoke app, currently shows wildfire smoke stretching across much of Saskatchewan and Manitoba, but also drifting south into North and South Dakota, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio and other U.S. states.
Story continues below advertisement
In May, Manitoba RCMP made a pair of arson arrests connected to a rash of wildfires spreading across the province at the time.
Last month, several states, including Minnesota, issued air quality warnings, while Nebraska issued a smoke advisory at the time and Wisconsin cautioned people to limit time outdoors.
Wisconsin has not issued another advisory since June 3, while Minnesota's Pollution Control Agency currently lists air quality in the state as good to moderate.
Global News has reached out to the federal government for a response.
Read a full transcript of the letter, addressed to the Canadian embassy in D.C., below.
Dear Ambassador Hillman,
We write to you today on behalf of our constituents who have had to deal with suffocating Canadian wildfire smoke filling the air to begin the summer. As we are entering the height of the fire season, we would like to know how your government plans on mitigating wildfire and the smoke that makes its way south.
As I'm sure you know, this is not the first year Canadian wildfire smoke has been an issue. In 2023, Canada had its worst year for wildfires on record, last year's fire season was considered one of the worst, and this year seems to be a continuation of these previous years.
Story continues below advertisement
While we know a key driver of this issue has been a lack of active forest management, we've also seen things like arson as another way multiple large wildfires have ignited in Canada. With all the technology that we have at our disposal, both in preventing and fighting wildfires, this worrisome trend can be reversed if proper action is taken.
Our constituents have been limited in their ability to go outside and safely breathe due to the dangerous air quality the wildfire smoke has created. In our neck of the woods, summer months are the best time of the year to spend time outdoors recreating, enjoying time with family, and creating new memories, but this wildfire smoke makes it difficult to do all those things.
Canada has been a friendly neighbor of the United States and the states we represent, so given the significance of this issue we urge you to relay this message to your government, in particular Natural Resources Canada and the Canadian Forest Service.
Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to your response.
Tom Tiffany, member of Congress
Brad Finstad, member of Congress
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court finds Ford government's bike lane removal plan would ‘breach' the Charter
Court finds Ford government's bike lane removal plan would ‘breach' the Charter

Global News

time11 minutes ago

  • Global News

Court finds Ford government's bike lane removal plan would ‘breach' the Charter

The Ford government's plan to tear out dedicated bike lanes from three Toronto routes has been deemed to be unconstitutional, according to a ruling by an Ontario court, halting a populist pledge driven by the premier. In his ruling, Superior Court Justice Paul Schabas said the province's move to take out bike lanes would be 'inconsistent' with the constitutional protection of life, liberty and security. The ruling said an updated version of the law, passed in June, would also breach the charter. 'Any steps taken to 'reconfigure' the target bike lanes that removes their protected character for the purpose of installing a lane for motor vehicles in order to reduce congestion, would be in breach of s. 7 of the Charter,' the ruling said. The ruling comes after months of legal wrangling and a court-imposed injunction that has, so far, prevented the province from following through on its promise to scrub Bloor Street West, Yonge Street and University Avenue of its dedicated cycling infrastructure. Story continues below advertisement In an earlier injunction ruling, Justice Schabas cited the public interest in protecting cyclist safety and a lack of evidence backing the government's claim that removing the lanes would reduce congestion. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The Ford government fast-tracked Bill 212 through the Ontario legislature in late 2024, giving itself the power to reject or even reverse the installation of separated bike lanes in any municipality in the province. A cyclists' advocacy group immediately launched a Charter challenge, claiming the law was 'ill-conceived and arbitrary' and would result in an increased number of injuries and deaths. 'This reckless legislative act infringes the rights of people who ride bikes, other road users, and/or pedestrians in the City of Toronto under s. 7 of the Charter by depriving them of life and security of the person contrary to principles of fundamental justice,' the court application, filed by CycleTO, claimed. Ford has long pointed to 'nasty, terrible' bike lanes as one of the sources of traffic congestion and has advocated for separated routes to be moved to secondary routes instead of arterial roads. He has insisted he is not opposed to the infrastructure but believes it should not be added to major routes. In its court application, Cycle Toronto claimed secondary roads 'do not exist,' that there was 'no rational connection' between the government's gridlock-reducing intent and potential effect, and suggested that the government is aware of the potential harms. Story continues below advertisement Cycle Toronto also argued that Bill 212 acknowledged the dangers the law poses since Bill 212 banned cyclists from suing the province if they are injured or killed by a collision on a road where bike lanes were removed. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Transportation said the province is still working with an engineering firm to plan for the eventual removal of the bike lanes — should the government win on any future appeal. 'We will continue with the design work necessary to begin removals of bike lanes and get some of our busiest roads moving, as soon as possible,' a spokesperson for the ministry said in an earlier statement.

Former diplomats call for arms embargo on Israel, recognition of Palestinian state
Former diplomats call for arms embargo on Israel, recognition of Palestinian state

Winnipeg Free Press

time11 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Former diplomats call for arms embargo on Israel, recognition of Palestinian state

OTTAWA – Dozens of former senior Canadian diplomats are calling on Ottawa to recognize a Palestinian state, saying Israel's conduct in the West Bank and Gaza violates Canadian interests and values. In a letter sent to media outlets today, the former diplomats also call on the federal government to impose a full arms embargo on Israel and to give notice it will suspend its trade agreement with Israel if the country doesn't change course. The letter has been signed by 173 former Canadian ambassadors, high commissioners and consuls-general, including some prominent former envoys. They say in the letter the principles Canada stands for 'are being abandoned daily with the massive displacement, indiscriminate bombardment and starvation of Palestinian civilians in Gaza and the violent attacks by extremist settlers in the West Bank.' The former diplomats say recognition of Palestinian statehood would encourage serious peace talks and tell Israel 'that it does not have a veto' on the matter. The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs is mounting a campaign against recognizing a Palestinian state, arguing that 'hollow statehood recognition will only reward and embolden Hamas.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 30, 2025.

‘Pierre's riding to lose': Alberta byelection candidates take part in debate
‘Pierre's riding to lose': Alberta byelection candidates take part in debate

Global News

time40 minutes ago

  • Global News

‘Pierre's riding to lose': Alberta byelection candidates take part in debate

Pierre Poilievre was greeted with cheers and applause by the hundreds of Albertans who showed up to watch a two-and-a-half-hour political debate on a sunny Tuesday evening in July. The Camrose and District Chamber of Commerce hosted a candidates' forum featuring 10 of the people who are vying to represent Battle River-Crowfoot in the Aug. 18 byelection. 'My mission here is to give national leadership to the issues that are of local importance,' Poilievre told the sold-out crowd. The Conservative leader is widely expected to win the sprawling eastern Alberta riding, which is considered one of the safest Tory seats in the country. View image in full screen Damien Kurek won the riding of Battle River-Crowfoot for the federal Conservatives in the last election, but he resigned to allow Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who lost in his Ottawa-area riding, to run in a byelection. Global News Damien Kurek won more than 82 per cent of the vote in the April election. Story continues below advertisement He resigned to allow Poilievre, who lost his own seat in the Ottawa riding of Carleton, the chance to return to the House of Commons in the fall. A crowd of Poilievre's supporters was outside the venue before things got underway, many carrying signs with his name, but inside, the signs had to be put away. View image in full screen Conservative Party of Canada candidate Pierre Poilievre speaks during the Battle RiverÐCrowfoot byelection candidate forum in Camrose, Alta. on Tuesday, July 29, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson The moderator kept a tight schedule, cutting off the microphones of anyone who ran over their allotted time as the candidates answered a range of questions submitted by the public about the economy, health care privatization, electoral reform and immigration. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The candidates seated at a long table on a stage occasionally took aim at Poilievre, particularly for the fact that he does not live in the riding and is running to progress his political career. Story continues below advertisement Liberal candidate Darcy Spady introduced himself by saying, 'I'm from Three Hills, and I don't want to be prime minister' — a line that elicited chuckles from the crowd and from Poilievre when he repeated it. Spady said he wanted to bring local issues to the government caucus and give an electorate that has historically voted Conservative the option of voting in a centrist. 'I'd like to grow the culture so the next generation can say, 'Oh, we can choose a Liberal, a Conservative, a moderate, a NDP,' he said in an interview after the debate. 'The stigma of only voting to the right here, in my home, all my life… I don't like that.' Poilievre argued that electing the leader of a political party is a trade-off — leaders are on the road much of the time, he said. 'The other side, though, is that leader can bring a very powerful megaphone to the local issues of the community,' he added. View image in full screen Independent candidate Bonnie Critchley campaigns in the riding of Battle River-Crowfoot, where Pierre Poilievre is attempting to earn a seat in Camrose, Alta., on Tuesday July 22, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Amber Bracken Independent candidate Bonnie Critchley pointed out in her closing statement that several candidates, including Poilievre, won't be able to vote in the byelection because they don't live in the riding. Story continues below advertisement 'I firmly believe that Mr. Poilievre is too busy with his personal ambitions to give a rat's backside about us,' Critchley said in her closing statement. She got loud cheers from the crowd earlier in the evening as she argued for local representation. 'If you want to run for an area, you need to live here. This longest ballot crap, that's got to stop,' she said. More than 200 candidates were signed up to run in the byelection as of Tuesday, most of whom were sponsored by the Longest Ballot Committee protest group. The group says it's trying to get attention for electoral reform, arguing that Canada needs to end the first-past-the-post system. As a result of the protest, Elections Canada has decided that voters will write in the name of their selected candidate on a modified ballot in the byelection, rather than selecting from a list of 200. The longest ballot group signed up 85 people to run in Carleton during the April election, and ran dozens of candidates in byelections last summer. Poilievre called the Longest Ballot Committee 'a total scam that must be stopped,' and pledged that if he's elected, he will put forward legislative changes to ensure it doesn't happen again. Story continues below advertisement View image in full screen An example of a ballot in the riding of Carleton, where Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre lost his seat in the 2025 federal election. Many of those on the ballot were members of a protest group called the Longest Ballot Committee. Justin Tang/ The Canadian Press In opening and closing statements, a number of candidates said Ottawa takes advantage of Alberta and pledged to try to end equalization. One candidate expressed sympathy for Alberta's separatist movement. There was broad agreement from candidates that, while immigration has historically been important, Canada needs to pull back on the number of people it is letting in. 'We must have more people leaving than coming over the next several years as we bring down our population,' Poilievre said. Green Party candidate Ashley MacDonald and the NDP's Katherine Swampy called immigration one of the country's strengths. Critchley and fellow Independent candidate Sarah Spanier made pitches to voters that they would hold a powerful position as Independent MPs in a minority government, and would leverage that to help the riding. Story continues below advertisement The forum also featured candidates from the People's Party of Canada, the Libertarian Party, the Christian Heritage Party and the United Party of Canada. 'I think we all know this is Pierre's riding to lose here; he's definitely going to win,' MacDonald said in his closing statement. 'So please, take a chance.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store