The DJI Power 2000 is my new favorite mid-sized, high-power portable power station
The DJI Power 2000 Portable Power Station is a great device for those who want ample power and capabilities without sacrificing portability. It has a large 2,048Wh battery, 3,000W of output, and a really nice selection of ports. Its 30-amp AC outlet can even power an RV!
When an outage occurs or you need power during your adventures, nothing is a lifesaver quite like a power station. I've been testing some of the best ones around, and the latest one I've had my hands on is the Power 2000 from DJI, the popular drone and gimbal maker.
While a very trusted brand in other industries, DJI isn't widely recognized for its portable power stations, and the truth is previous models didn't do much to differentiate themselves from the competition. But spoiler alert: this one is pretty cool. Let's dig into the details and see if this will be your battery of choice.
DJI Power 2000 battery and output
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
Let's start with the battery capacity, which is among the essential features of these massive battery beasts. The DJI Power 2000 Portable Power Station comes with a 2,048Wh battery. To put things into perspective, that's enough to charge an average phone about 118 times, or a laptop 18 times. It can also run a microwave for 2.6 hours.
Additionally, it has a maximum stable output of 3,000W. High-power appliances like air fryers, microwaves, and kettles usually use about 1,200W to 1,800W, so this one can even be enough to run small to medium air conditioners.
Of course, I didn't have time to charge my phone 118 times, but I did test it with other high-power appliances. I started with a couple at a time; I plugged in my microwave, kettle, and fridge simultaneously and then ran them all at the same time. This gave me an output of 2,000W on the battery, and it could run them all continuously for a bit under an hour — about 53 minutes, to be exact.
Still, that isn't using it to its limits, right? So instead, I plugged a secondary power station (the Ampace Andes 1500) and limited its charge to about 830W. The idea was to get close to 3,000W. Again, I turned them all on, and the DJI Power 2000 powered them without a hiccup for nearly 35 minutes, outputting close to 2,850W. This is kind of unbelievable; it is a lot of power and output for a device of this size.
I also took it outside to power a Sylvox outdoor TV I've been testing recently. The TV uses a bit over 200W continuously, and using the DJI Power 2000, I would have been able to run it between eight to nine hours. I am busy, so I didn't watch for that long, but that estimate is lovely!
The DJI Power 2000 is kind of unbelievable; it has a lot of power and output for a device of its size.
The cool thing is that it has Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) mode. This means that you can plug your electronics into it, and if there is an outage, the battery will automatically activate in 0.01 seconds and keep them running. I simulated an outage switching a breaker off, and it worked perfectly.
When it's time to recharge, you can do so in multiple ways. Of course, you can plug it into an AC outlet and recharge it at 1,800W, which should juice up the battery in about 1.5 hours. You can also charge it using your car, and it can be even faster if you have the right accessories. A 1kW super-fast charger can refill it in 145 minutes, and a 1.8kW solar/car super-fast charger reduces the time to just 75 minutes.
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
I like having off-the-grid options. Given that you buy the DJI Solar Panel Adapter Module, the unit supports up to a whopping 1,800W of solar power input. I got to test this with a single 100W solar panel. It was nice and portable, but 100W wasn't enough to move the needle in recharging. It's a nice option if you're in a sunny place and want to extend the battery life a bit, though. Otherwise, you might want to get more panels or more powerful ones.
Let's talk ports!
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
One thing I didn't like about the DJI Power 1000 was that it needed more ports. Two AC outlets, two USB-A ports, two USB-C connections, and two SDC proprietary DJI ports didn't seem like much for a high-capacity portable power station.
This time around, the selection is much nicer. You get four AC outlets, one of which is a powerful 30-amp port for RVs. Yes, you could power an RV with this little guy! This kind of feature is usually reserved for the bigger guys, such as the Anker SOLIX F3800 series or the Jackery Explorer 5000 Plus. It's also rare in medium power stations, so finding the port here was a pleasant surprise.
The DJI Power 2000 has an ample port selection, including a 30-amp AC port. This is usually reserved for the bigger guys!
While I have no RV, I did use the 30-amp port to recharge an Anker SOLIX F3000 Portable Power Station that I've also been testing, and it worked perfectly. I just had to slow down the charging speed to the DJI Power 2000's 3,000W max output.
It also has a nice selection of four USB-C and four USB-A ports. Two USB-C ports can reach 140W, making it possible to charge laptops, tablets, and more with ease. The other two max out at 65W, which is still plenty fast. The USB-A connections can reach 24W each.
Additionally, it has a couple of SDC ports. This is DJI's proprietary port, which is meant to fast-charge DJI batteries. Additionally, they can be used for expansions, such as the solar panel adapter module or additional batteries.
The DJI Power 2000 is impressively good for its size
All things considered, this is easily among the most capable power stations of this size and weight. It measures 448 × 225 × 324 mm (17.64 x 8.86 x 12.76 in) and weighs 22 kg (48.50 lbs).
At this size and weight, I would compare it to something like an Ampace Andes 1500, which measures 436 × 195 × 335 mm (17.16 x 7.68 x 13.19) and weighs 16.54 kg (36.46 lbs).
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
Sure, the DJI Power 2000 is a bit larger and heavier, but you get quite a bit more. The Ampace Andes 1500's battery is smaller at 1,462Wh, the stable output is lower at 2,400W, it has two USB-C ports, and while it has four AC outlets, there won't be a 30-amp port in there. DJI's battery has no AC outlet, though. That said, I hardly ever use that port, and some of you DJI users might prefer the addition of the SDC ports.
Sure, the DJI Power 2000 is a bit larger and heavier, but you get quite a bit more than what the competition offers.
Also, here's one personal comment about the power station's design that I wish other brands would copy: I happen to like that the DJI Power 2000 has all ports on one side. This makes it easy to plug everything into it without having to turn the battery around to find ports on the other sides. Everything is always laid out right in front of you, even the charging port.
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
If I had to complain about anything, it would be that DJI's new power station needs a secondary accessory to use a solar panel. This is an extra expense; most other power stations have such ports built in. That said, the DJI Solar Panel Adapter Module can be attached to the side, so you can make it feel like it is integrated.
I also wish the power station had wheels and a handle, as it is getting to that weight where it isn't really easy to carry around easily. It's OK for short walks, but carry it for about five minutes and you'll start breaking a sweat and switching hands. But of course, DJI also sells you a DJI Power Series Hand Truck separately, too.
DJI Power 2000 Portable Power Station review verdict: Is it worth it?
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
The DJI Power 2000 Portable Power Station retails for $1,899. Its closest competitors are the $1,999 Anker SOLIX F2000, $2,199 Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus, and the $1,399 Ampace Andes 1500. The Anker and Jackery options are great, but they are also more expensive, and the benefits aren't really huge. To us, the real competitor here is the Ampace Andes 1500, which is a bit smaller but also slightly less capable. That said, it is also $500 less!
The trick here is that DJI power station deals can be common. For example, it just came out and is $1,299 as of this writing. If you can catch a deal like this one, it is definitely the uncontested winner.
The DJI Power 2000 Portable Power Station aims to position itself somewhere in the middle. It is pretty portable, but it packs plenty of power. This makes it an excellent alternative for those who don't mind carrying a nearly 50-pound battery in exchange for stunning performance. It can run multiple appliances all at once, even high-power ones.
The DJI Power 2000 positions itself well right in the middle of the power station market.
There is a very nice selection of ports, and current DJI users will also benefit from the SDC connections, which can also add extra ports and functionality using DJI's modules. And thanks to the 30-amp port, it can even be a great portable acquisition for RV owners or anyone who could use such a standard.
Overall, I would recommend this one to those who can't make do with the smaller power stations, but also don't need the gigantic, super-powerful ones. It's easy to hide away under the bed, in a medium cabinet, or a small closet, and it will be a handy battery that can handle all your main electronics during an outage. Additionally, it will be able to handle any picnic or shorter camping trip. I can honestly say it is my favorite for those who want to carry their power station relatively easily, but would rather not sacrifice performance.
DJI Power 2000 Portable Power Station
Large 2,048Wh capacity • Max 3,000W output • Wide variety of ports
MSRP: $1,899.00
The DJI Power 2000 Portable Power Station is a great device for those who want ample power and capabilities without sacrificing portability. It has a large 2,048Wh battery, 3,000W of output, and a really nice selection of ports. Its 30-amp AC outlet can even power an RV! See price at AmazonSee price at DJI Store
Positives
Cons
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
16 minutes ago
- CNET
We Love This Garmin Instinct 2 Solar Smartwatch and It's Now a Massive $136 Off at Walmart
It's back-to-school season and for many, this is a great time to reset and refocus on academic and personal goals. If you're into fitness and want to keep better track of your step count, then you know that Apple and Samsung dominate the smartwatch sector. Though these tech companies make great wearable pieces, Garmin is also behind some pretty neat smartwatches. Right now we've spotted the Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch for just $264 at Walmart, which saves you a massive $136. If you prefer Amazon, you an score the same watch for $264 with Amazon Prime. Though there's no set deadline for either of these deals, we suggest acting fast if you're interested. The Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch has a 45mm case and its watch band adjusts from 5.3 inches to up to 9.1 inches. The watch features multiple apps that track your step count, VO2 max and other sports activities so you can get an accurate picture of your progress. The Garmin Instinct 2 smartwatch includes a 3-axis compass and navigation programs, such as GPS, GLONASS and Galileo, which offer advanced readings that let you confidently trek in challenging environments. You can also sync this watch with a compatible smartphone and get notifications. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. The Garmin Instinct 2 is renowned for its solar charging capacity and long battery life of up to 54 hours. Keep in mind that you need a clear sky for at least 3 hours for a solar charge, but this is still a great watch for days-long hiking or outdoor adventures. Its power manager helps you track battery life, and your purchase includes a charging cable for when solar charging is unavailable. Looking for more wearable tech but not sure if this deal is for you? Check out our list of the best smartwatch so you can find one that works for you. Why this deal matters The Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch offers a battery life of 54 hours, solar charging capacity and loads of apps that will help you track your fitness statistics. It's a massive $136 off at Walmart for a limited time and makes a great alternative to Apple or Samsung smartwatches if you've been looking for one. Now is also a great time to save on this smartwatch and potentially avoid price hikes due to tariffs.
Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Office Hellscapes And AI Process Mapping
Why are human workplaces so disorganized? In some ways, it's a question people have been asking themselves ever since the first cubicle dwellers rose up from the primordial swamp - whenever that was. We know that larger systems tend to be disordered, especially if they're administrated by humans. Just go read Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, and it might remind you of the modern office – people and products and materials strewn about a gigantic footprint, with very little centralized control. You get the same kind of idea reading the most recent piece by Ethan Mollick on the site where he posts his essays, One Useful Thing. I always follow his posts, interested in his emerging take on the technologies that are so new to all of us. Mollick has MIT ties, and an excellent track record looking at the AI revolution from a fresh perspective. The Office Dilemma Human wothis most recent piece, he talks about process mapping and how AI can help people to sort through the disorganization of a business. Think of a company with 100 or more employees, and probably a dozen locations. The first thing you tend to find is that sense of disorder. Mollick talks about a 'Garbage Can' principle, which posits that most businesses are a collection of disparate processes thrown into a large, disorganized bin. To me, you could use the analogy of what programmers used to call 'DLL hell' in the earlier days of the Internet. DLLs are digital libraries. Their application was often chaotic and disordered. There were dependencies that would flummox even the most seasoned engineers, because things were complicated and chaotic. That's what a large company is often like. Everyone for Themselves Mollick also pointed to some numbers that I've seen in various studies, and presented at conferences where we've talked about AI over the past year. His number was 43% – the number of employees who are using AI in the workplace. But as Mollick points out, and as I've heard before, most of them are using AI in personal ways. The use of the tools is not ordered across an organization – it's piecemeal. It's people using an AI tool like you would use a hammer, or a saw, or a drill, or a lathe --- largely in an unsupervised way. However, in general, it seems AI is largely catching on, especially when it comes to product development. You have resources like this one from the Texas Workforce Commission, referencing thousands of AI jobs. So even if there's not much centralized AI in the boardroom, there is abundant AI in business processes. It's just that those processes may or may not be unified. The Bitter Lesson Then Mollick references something called the 'Bitter lesson' that's attributed to Robert Sutton in 2019. It's the idea that AI will prove to be cognitively superior to humans without a lot of poking and prodding – but given enough time and compute, the system will find its own way to solve problems. That phrase, problem solving, is what people have been saying is the unique province of humans. It's the idea that AI can do the data-crunching, but people are still doing the creative problem-solving. Well, that bastion of human ingenuity doesn't seem that safe anymore. Mollick references the early days of chess machine evolution, where eventually Deep Blue beat Kasparov. He notes that there are two ways to go about this – you can program in innumerable chess rules, and have the system sort through them and apply them, or you can just show the system thousands of chess games, and it will make those connections on its own. Back to Machine Learning Principles Reading through this, I was reminded of the early days of machine learning, where people talked a good bit about supervised versus unsupervised learning. We often used the analogy of fruit in a digital software program enhanced with machine learning properties. Supervised learning would be labeling each fruit with its own tag – banana – apple - or grapes. The program would then learn to correlate between its training data and new real-world data. That comparison would be its main method. And that comparison isn't hugely cognitive. It follows the tradition of deterministic programming. The unsupervised version would be simply to tell the program that bananas are yellow and long, that grapes are purple or green and have clusters, and the apples are red or green and round. Then the system goes out, looks at the pictures and applies that logic. The interesting thing here is taking that analogy to the bitter lesson. Is AI more powerful if it simply analyzes reams of training data without applied logic? Or is it more powerful if it can actually distinguish between various kinds of outcomes based on requested logical processes? Which came first: the chicken or the egg? The theory of the bitter lesson seems to be that the system can actually do better through supervised learning. But that supervision doesn't necessarily have to be human oversight. The machine gets a practically infinite set of training data, and makes all of its own conclusions. That's contrasted to an approach where people tell the machine what to do, and it learns based on those suggestions. Back in the era of supervised versus unsupervised learning, the unsupervised learning seemed more powerful. It seemed more resource-intensive. But AI might finally show us up just by doing things in a more efficient way – if I can use one more analogy, it's the traditional idea of the Laplace demon, an invention of the physicist Pierre-Simon Laplace who suggested that if you know enough data points, you can predict the future. In other words, brute force programming is king. We learned a lot of this in the big data age, before we learned to use LLMs, and now we're seeing the big data age on steroids. In Conclusion I also found a very interesting take at the end of Mollick's essay where he talks about businesses going down one or the other avenue of progress. Sure enough, he suggested that these companies are playing chess with each other – that one of these chess teams consists of companies using AI to be logical, and that another chess team consists of businesses using it for brute force programming and classification. If all of this is a little hard to follow, it's because we're pretty securely in the realm of AI philosophy here. It makes you think about not just whether AI is going to win out over human workers, but how it's going to do it. I forgot to mention the exponential graph that Mollick includes showing that we're closer to AGI then most people would imagine. Let's look back at the end of this year and see how this plays out.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
iPhone Fold leaker just spilled the beans on screen sizes — and it's worse than we thought
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. If rumors are to be believed, Apple will finally dive into the foldable phone market in 2026 with the much-rumored iPhone Fold. Rumors have been all over the place when it comes to the the screen size of this unreleased device, but seemed to have settled on around 7.7 inches for the interior panel. That claim was backed up today (July 25) by regular leaker Digital Chat Station, who posted on Weibo that the iPhone Fold would feature a 7.7-inch unfolded screen and a cover display of 5.49-inches. This isn't the first time Digital Chat Station has made that claim, previously saying it came from an iPhone Fold prototype. "The screen size of the first foldable iPhone has been revealed," DCS said in this most recent machine-translated post. "5.5-inch outer screen + 7.7-inch inner screen." They added that the current prototype has shrunk a bit from the February version. It's an iota smaller than recent rumors that had the device featuring a 7.8-inch internal display, similar to numbers from Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo who reported the same measurements back in March. Kuo also believes the phone will measure between 9 and 9.5mm thick when folded and 4 and 4.5mm when opened. Small screen compared to rivals While thin, the iPhone Fold would be thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold 7 which measures 4.2mm when unfolded and 8.9mm closed. If those numbers are true it would additionally make Apple's device smaller than a number of the best foldable phones available including Samsung's newly released Fold, which features an 8-inch unfolded screen and a 6.5-inch exterior display. The upcoming Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — which we're expecting to see at Google's August 20 event — is supposed to feature a 6.4-inch exterior display while retaining the same 8-inch inner screen as the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. The Oppo Find N5 features a huge 8.12-inch inner display alongside a 6.62-inch front screen. iPad-esque The iPhone Fold's smaller screen may not be a deal breaker, as rumors hint that Apple is looking for customized display ratio of 4:3, similar to the iPad. This would make the foldable iPhone more familiar to Apple fans who have used iPads before. Plus, Apple is reportedly developing iOS 27 for foldable phones which takes inspiration from the latest version of iPadOS. Apple is years behind its rivals when it comes to foldable phones, but the company is allegedly obsessed with only releasing one once a creaseless display was possible. Reportedly, that finally became possible thanks to a partnership with Samsung Display. More from Tom's Guide iOS 26 preview — I've been testing Apple's biggest update in over a decade Apple glasses patent reveals a new feature to improve comfort — but it looks bizarre Apple rumored to release 6 new iPhone models starting next year — including iPhone Fold
