logo
Reeves tax raid blamed as UK suffers dramatic growth downgrade

Reeves tax raid blamed as UK suffers dramatic growth downgrade

Telegraph7 hours ago

Britain's leading business group has slashed its UK growth forecasts after Rachel Reeves's tax raids slammed the brakes on the economy.
The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) expects GDP to grow by just 1.2pc this year and 1pc next year, down from the 1.6pc and 1.5pc previously predicted.
Louise Hellem, the CBI's chief economist, suggested the rising cost of employment in the wake of the Chancellor's Budget last October, which has hammered the private sector, had contributed to the downgrade.
She said: 'Those decisions at the autumn Budget to increase taxes on National Insurance contributions alongside the increases in the national living wage have had a material impact on business decisions.
'They have made costs of being in the UK increase and they have meant many businesses have had to make tough choices, particularly on hiring decisions – they are pausing those.'
Ms Reeves's £25bn raid raised the rate of tax employers pay on their workers' wages from 13.8pc to 15pc, and cut the threshold at which the levy kicks in – making it more expensive to hire part-time staff in particular.
Ms Hellem urged the Chancellor to seek ways to make the tax system more efficient instead of raiding businesses yet again in the 2025 Budget scheduled for the autumn, as weak growth raises fears that another black hole will open up in the public finances over the coming months.
Global uncertainty
The CBI also warned that businesses are struggling with Donald Trump's trade war. Exporters are suffering directly from the taxes applied to their sales into the US, while uncertainty is hitting growth in the wider global economy and undermining confidence in investment decisions.
Sustained geopolitical turmoil, including the strikes between Israel and Iran, add to the sense of uncertainty which threatens business investment.
Martin Sartorius, economist at the CBI, said: 'All of these global events lead to a huge amount of volatility in global markets, leading to a more risk-averse mindset, so businesses might be thinking more about whether they want to invest, given currency fluctuations and the interest rate outlook.
'Given how much tariffs have chopped and changed over the last few months, some firms are just saying it is better to scenario plan and to wait and see, because if they suddenly shift their operations from one country to another, maybe they will find out in a day, a week, a month, that tariffs or other restrictions are hitting that location.'
Britain's GDP grew by 0.7pc in the first three months of the year, boosted in part by a surge in exports as American importers sought to bring in goods before tariffs added to their price.
The CBI's economists expect quarterly growth to slow over the course of this year then recover into 2026 as rising wages, slowing inflation and lower interest rates allow households to spend more money.
The analysts predict the Bank of England will cut its base rate from 4.25pc today to 3.5pc in a year's time.
Borrowing rules
The growth forecast downgrade came as Helen Miller, from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned the Chancellor that the changes to the borrowing rules 'is not a get-out-of-jail-free card' for extra spending.
Speaking before MPs on Tuesday, she said: 'The fiscal rules are supposed to be a constraint on what you can do – they are not meant to be a target to say we've freed up this space, now let's spend it all.
'We are still borrowing money. That comes with cost, it comes with debt interest costs.'
Ms Reeves changed the fiscal rules last year to allow her to borrow another £50bn, including by changing the targeted measure of public debt to offset financial assets against borrowing. The rules also allow borrowing for investment, but not for day-to-day government spending.
'It matters what you are borrowing for. There is a fiscal rule [which is] trying to be a constraint, it is not a get-out-of-jail free card, it doesn't mean that once you have got that constraint you can always just borrow up to the maximum, spend it on what you like and that is ok,' Ms Miller said.
'You still have to do hard yards of thinking what are you borrowing for, for what purpose, is it a good use of borrowing.'
A Treasury spokesman said: 'We're investing in Britain's renewal through our Plan for Change to make working people better off, and the spending review set out how we'll deliver jobs and growth – including plans to improve city region transport, a record investment in affordable homes and funding Sizewell C.
'We have also secured deals with the EU, US and India to help lower costs for businesses and we have stabilised the public finances helping interest rates to fall four times since July.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Transport secretary confirms HS2 delay, calling the project an 'appalling mess'
Transport secretary confirms HS2 delay, calling the project an 'appalling mess'

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Transport secretary confirms HS2 delay, calling the project an 'appalling mess'

Update: Date: 13:09 BST Title: Has the government reduced asylum hotels to 'just over 200'? Content: By Tom Edgington Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner claimed the government had reduced the number of hotels used to house asylum seekers since coming to power. She said: '400 hotels [under the Conservatives] which we've reduced to just over 200 hotels in the first 12 months of us being in government'. It's hard to test Rayner's claim though because the Home Office does not routinely make this data available. Earlier this year, BBC Verify submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) request for the data. The response revealed that hotel use peaked at 398 in September 2023, under the previous Conservative government. When Labour came to power, that number had reduced to 212. However, our FOI showed the number had increased to 218 in December 2024. It is possible that the number has reduced to 'just over 200' since then - as Rayner claims - but this is not available to check on the Home Office website. BBC Verify has contacted the Home Office and asked them to provide the latest figures. Update: Date: 13:05 BST Title: Mistakes were made in delivery of HS2, shadow transport secretary says Content: Shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon is next up in the House of Commons to speak. He says "mistakes were made" in the delivery of HS2. Bacon says costs more than doubled and the project was "repeatedly delayed". "It has long been apparent that HS2 was not going according to plan," he says. He describes a report that was released under the previous government that raised "serious concerns" about the HS2 project. As a result of that, the-then government announced the cancellation of the northern leg of HS2, with money being diverted to a "multitude of transport projects". He concludes by addressing the planning system in general, noting legal challenges HS2 faced. He asks whether the government is looking at ways to minimise legal challenges when it comes to national infrastructure. Update: Date: 12:58 BST Title: HS2 project an 'appalling mess but we will sort it out' - transport secretary Content: Heidi Alexander says the level of failure in the HS2 project cannot stand. "We will learn the lessons of the past 15 years, and restore our reputation of delivering world-class infrastructure projects," she says to a relatively empty chamber. "Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management," she says, adding that there are also allegations of fraud. "It is an appalling mess, but it is one we will sort out," she adds. Update: Date: 12:55 BST Title: Transport secretary says government accepts all recommendations after HS2 review Content: Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is delivering her statement in the Commons on HS2. She says that a government-commissioned review led by senior infrastructure delivery adviser James Stewart was a "tough independent look at how the Department for Transport and Government delivers major projects". She adds that the government accepts all of its recommendations. She says the government are already delivering on those, especially on addressing five key areas. She lists them as: Talking about a separate assessment by Mark Wild, she says she sees "no route by which trains can be running by 2033 as planned". "It gives me no pleasure to deliver news like this," she adds. Update: Date: 12:47 BST Title: Key takeaways from grooming gangs report - a recap Content: Becky MortonPolitical reporter Shadow home secretary Chris Philp quizzed deputy prime minister Angela Rayner on the government's response to grooming gangs in his first set of questions during PMQs. As a reminder, a review into abuse carried out by grooming gangs in England and Wales was published on Saturday. The government asked Baroness Casey to carry out the audit, examining existing data and evidence on the nature and scale of group-based child sexual abuse, in January. Here are some of its key findings and recommendations: For more on the report, you can read my piece here. Update: Date: 12:44 BST Title: HS2 will be delayed again, transport secretary expected to say Content: Pivoting to the HS2 update now, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is speaking in the Commons - she's expected to says the high speed railway will be delayed beyond its target date of 2033. There is "no reasonable way to deliver" the railway line on schedule and within budget, she is expected to say. She is likely to say that that Mike Brown, the former commissioner of Transport for London, has been appointed the new chair of HS2 Ltd. Update: Date: 12:41 BST Title: A deceptively polite tone to start - but it didn't last Content: Helen CattPolitical correspondent They started out with a deceptively restrained and polite tone, as Chris Philp raised the experiences of grooming gang victims and asked for assurances about the scope of the planned inquiry. That tone didn't last. The ensuing exchanges led the Labour backbencher Sarah Champion to criticise 'point scoring on all sides'. As a former Home Office Minister, Philp was on solid turf prodding the government over grooming gangs and over small boat crossings, a situation which Downing Street has this week said is 'deteriorating'. He didn't really manage to wrong foot Angela Rayner. As he is a former Home Office minister, it was all too easy for her to point to the Conservatives' own record and label him as a 'Johnny come lately' who hadn't solved problems when in power. Update: Date: 12:39 BST Title: SNP challenges Rayner on 'disability cuts' Content: The SNP's deputy Westminster leader Pete Wishart says the government is today introducing legislation that, he claims, will "push another 250,000 people into poverty". He asks if Labour MPs will lose the whip if they vote against "disability cuts". Rayner says Labour is committed to ending child poverty, and runs through measures they have taken on the issue, including "free school meals" and a "living wage rise". She then accuses the SNP of "decades of failure". Update: Date: 12:36 BST Title: Rotherham MP calls out 'point scoring' on both sides Content: Brian WheelerReporting from the House of Commons Silence as Labour's Sarah Champion, the Rotherham MP who has campaigned on behalf of grooming gang victims and had been calling for an inquiry, asks her says she has been 'floored' by the point scoring 'on all sides' on this issue. Update: Date: 12:35 BST Title: Lib Dems quiz Rayner on UK's position on Israel-Iran war Content: Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper asks a question about Donald Trump possibly leading the US to join the war between Israel and Iran. She begins her question by saying the UK "blindly followed the US" in the 2003 Iraq war. If the US joins the conflict between Israel and Iran, she asks, will the Labour government promise not to "blindly follow" the US into war "again". Rayner says the UK agrees with Trump that Iran must never have nuclear weapons, and continues to support a "diplomatic approach". Update: Date: 12:31 BST Title: Starmer on his way back to the UK now Content: Chris MasonPolitical editor Meanwhile, here on the prime minister's plane, we are an hour-ish from getting back to the UK from the G7 Summit in Canada. While Angela Rayner answers questions, Keir Starmer grabs a late breakfast after a few hours broken sleep over the Canadian tundra, Greenland ice and Atlantic water. International diplomacy done - for now. There is a Nato Summit in the Netherlands next week and the Middle East related phone calls are relentless. Domestic politics returns. Update: Date: 12:29 BST Title: 'Johnny Come Lately,' Rayner gets in the final word Content: Brian WheelerReporting from the House of Commons Rayner dubs Chris Philp a 'Johnny Come Lately' as she has the final word in her clash with the shadow home was a spirited debut by Philp but didn't really shift the dial. Update: Date: 12:28 BST Title: I take no lectures from the Tories, Rayner says Content: For his final question, shadow home secretary Philp pushes on scrapping the Human Rights Act. Philp asks: "Why does the government side with foreign criminals and not the British public?" Rayner replies saying Philp and the Tories had "14 years of failure" before adding: "I take no lectures". This video can not be played 'Her mission to rebuild Britain is not going very well' - Philp jabs. Update: Date: 12:26 BST Title: Fiery clash between Rayner and Philp over immigration and housing Content: This video can not be played In a fiery retort, Philp says he doesn't know how Rayner has the "brass neck" to say Labour is getting illegal immigration under control. Amid raucous shouts, the speaker calls for quiet. Philp says Home Office suppliers are offering above market deals to landlords to get hold of their properties for people who have arrived in the UK on small boats. He says this is happening while "hard-pressed" young people struggle to rent and buy. Why are you prioritising this, he asks. Rayner says immigration increased fourfold under the previous Conservative government, causing a backlog that led to the use of 400 asylum hotels to house immigrants that cost £1m a day. She says the government has reduced that number to "just over 200 hundred hotels" in the first 12 months of the year, adding Labour have started building the homes the Tories "failed" to deliver. Update: Date: 12:23 BST Title: Jabs fly between the two deputy PMs Content: Brian WheelerReporting from the House of Commons Chris Philp jabs his finger on his folder as he accuses Rayner of having a 'brass neck'. MPs on both sides seem to be enjoying this knockabout. Update: Date: 12:22 BST Title: Philp challenges Rayner on scrapping Rwanda scheme Content: Philp says that since the Rwanda plan was scrapped, illegal immigration across the Channel has gone up by more than 30%. So far this year, 2025 has been the "worst" for illegal crossings, he says before asking if Rayner now accepts a removals deterrent is needed. Rayner disputes Philp's claims that the Rwanda scheme deterred small boat crossings. "It's absolute rubbish," she says. She says the Tories lost control of borders and Labour is taking control. Update: Date: 12:19 BST Title: Rayner accuses Tories of losing 'control of our borders' Content: Philp is up again and is now addressing small boat crossings across the English Channel. He says a "significant number" of grooming gang perpetrators were non-UK nationals or were asylum seekers. He asks Rayner if she accepts the "small boat crisis" is an issue of public safety as well as immigration. Rayner says her government has overseen major arrests to tackle people smuggling gangs. In the past month alone, she says, a ringleader who smuggled 4,000 migrants had been jailed for 25 years. She then points directly across the aisle at Philp. "He was the man at the heart of the Home Office when immigration soared, we lost control of our borders," she says. Update: Date: 12:16 BST Title: Philp asks if PM will apologise for accusing Tories of 'jumping on a far-right bandwagon' Content: Shadow home secretary Philp gets back to his feet for a second time and presses the government on grooming gangs. "I do have to raise the language the prime minister used in January," Philp says, noting that Starmer accused the Tories of "jumping on a far-right bandwagon". Philp asks Rayner if she will apologise for what the prime minister said. Rayner says Starmer acted and brought actions in 2012, and says the data from the previous Conservative government was "inaccurate" and "not complete". Update: Date: 12:14 BST Title: Inquiry into grooming gangs will have statutory powers - Rayner Content: This video can not be played Rayner thanks Philp for his "tone", adding it is right to look at what happened over the last few decades regarding the grooming gangs, to restore the confidence people need in the inquiry. We will take that forward "at speed," she says. She adds the inquiry, led by Baroness Casey, will be "independent, have statutory powers" and will implement the Jay report - an independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham. Update: Date: 12:11 BST Title: Philp questions Rayner on grooming gangs Content: This video can not be played Shadow home secretary Philp begins by saying that yesterday he and his party leader met with survivors of the "rape gang scandal". He says the survivors told them that authorities "deliberately covered up the systematic rape of young girls and some boys by gangs of predominantly Pakistani-heritage men". He says the survivors said they would only have confidence in an inquiry that is independently led and has full statutory powers, and he asks Rayner if she can give those assurances.

‘I'm a millionaire fleeing Britain – a Reeves U-turn would stop me leaving'
‘I'm a millionaire fleeing Britain – a Reeves U-turn would stop me leaving'

Telegraph

time34 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

‘I'm a millionaire fleeing Britain – a Reeves U-turn would stop me leaving'

I have a spreadsheet open in front of me on my computer, detailing the exact number of days I have left to stay in the UK this tax year. The reason? Labour's changes to non-doms inheritance tax rules. The changes are so costly that they have forced me to reconsider where I live. When my days in the UK run out, I will not spend time in some tax haven; I'll just go back home to South Africa and work out the next steps. If Rachel Reeves reverses the inheritance tax change for non-doms, I would unequivocally stay and grow my venture capital business in the UK. I know so many other millionaires in my situation. Many have left but still have properties here and have not yet completely settled in their new homes. Half of these people would rush back if the rules around paying inheritance tax on worldwide assets changed, because we are all upset to leave and feel forced. But the Chancellor must act quickly before it is too late. I want to keep investing in growth companies like I did with quantum computing start-up Oxford Ionics, which last week sold for $1.1bn (£820m) to a US firm. But after raising £500m to invest in Britain's most exciting start-ups since I arrived here in 2019, my future investment will now be elsewhere. This money will likely help grow companies in mainland Europe instead. It is a shame, as Oxford and Cambridge are where the most exciting cutting-edge projects are happening. But I am sadly certainly not going to bring any more money to the UK if I cannot stay. Refugee to millionaire I know people will say: 'It's just inheritance tax. What does it matter if you are dead?' My businesses are my life's work. I want them to secure my sons' futures. I grew up with very little, fleeing communist Poland as a child refugee with my parents and two siblings when the country started running out of food in the early 1980s. The only way to get out was to flee with fake papers. We spent the whole of 1981 in a migrant camp in Austria, where my parents applied to countries accepting refugees. We ended up in South Africa without knowing anything about the country or the apartheid regime. We didn't speak English and had $500 to our name. In the next years, we were just about surviving. I studied actuarial science at university because that was the only way to get a bursary, and we had no money for schooling. After working for a couple of insurance companies, I realised I'm not diplomatic enough to be a corporate employee. So I ended up in the world of start-ups and decided to start my own company. I gambled everything on it, putting my house up as collateral. It is today one of South Africa's large financial services groups. I came to the UK for security reasons in 2019, after speaking out against corruption in Jacob Zuma's government and being left fearing for my life. Pushed out London has become my home. I had hoped to live here for the rest of my life. Being forced to leave for reasons outside my control feels much like grief. The impact goes beyond just my own personal circumstances. I have had to let 12 casual household staff go – gardeners, cleaners, builders. While I still have a venture capital firm, Braavos, in Britain, I will not hire anyone new here. Over time, I may have to think about relocating it. I put my flat in Kensington on the market five months ago, but because so many like me are leaving there are hardly any buyers. I'm considering putting my house that I love up for sale too, but for now I am holding out for a miracle. If there is none, I will be forced to go once my 90 days in Britain this tax year are up. I'm leaving on the strong advice of my tax advisers, as the new rules around inheritance are unworkable for me. For one, South Africa has foreign exchange controls. That means if I were to die under current rules, South Africa may refuse to release the funds to settle a huge inheritance tax bill in Britain. Even ignoring the difficulty of getting the money out, my wealth is mainly held in the form of shares in the financial services company Sygnia, which I founded and built in South Africa. My sons would be forced to sell those shares quickly. If you want to sell anything fast, you'll have to do so with a big discount, which would devalue the company. How can this be good for the economy? If Reeves changes her mind, I would immediately cancel my plans to leave. I could rehire all of my household staff, take my property off the market and focus on raising funds for another investment fund to boost British growth companies.

Winter fuel payment update as SNP Government reveals which pensioners will lose out
Winter fuel payment update as SNP Government reveals which pensioners will lose out

Daily Record

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Winter fuel payment update as SNP Government reveals which pensioners will lose out

Pensioners with an income of more than £35,000 will have the payment clawed back through the tax system. SNP Ministers will take back winter fuel payments from better off pensioners on more than £35,000 a year. The clawback mirrors the approach being pursued by the UK Government. ‌ The winter fuel payment policy has been in chaos after Chancellor Rachel Reeves initially withdrew between £200 and £300 from around ten million pensioners. ‌ She eventually u-turned and settled on a system where pensioners with an income of less £35,000 would receive their payment. With the policy devolved, SNP First Minister John Swinney said this week that no pensioner would be worse off than south of the border. His Social Security Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has now provided more details of the Pension Age Winter Heating Payments (PAWHP). Depending on age, pensioners with an income of less than £35,000 will receive either £203.40 or £305.10 per household, more than they would in England. This move will see over 720,000 Scots pensioners benefit, but the SNP Government will hold talks with Whitehall about recovering PAWHP from older people with incomes above the £35,000 threshold. Somerville said: 'The UK Government 's decision to cut the Winter Fuel Payment last winter was a betrayal of millions of pensioners, and their recent U-turn is welcome if belated. ‌ 'Following careful consideration of the options available, the Scottish Government will mirror the approach taken by the UK Government. We will bring forward regulations to ensure that, from this winter onwards, all pensioners will receive either £203.40 or £305.10 per household, depending on age. 'We are in discussion with the UK Government to extend the proposed arrangements in England and Wales to recover payments from those pensioners with an individual income of more than £35,000 through the tax system. The intention is that the payment will be recovered automatically, and pensioners will not need to register with HMRC for this or take any further action. 'This approach ensures a higher level of support which those most in need will receive. Over 720,000 Scottish pensioners are estimated to benefit from the higher payment.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store