
RMAF team to inspect Kuwait's F/A-18 hornets in September
RMAF chief General Datuk Seri Muhamad Norazlan Aris said preparations had been made for the evaluation visit as they had received approval from the United States, the original equipment manufacturer (OEM), for third-party transfer documentation.
"So far, I do not see any issues because we have received approval for the documentation transfer. We have also prepared a team to go there.
"They have given us a window to come and inspect the aircraft in September. From that time, the team will need a few weeks, less than a month, to go through the documents because there are things we need to look at. As everyone knows, these are used aircraft," he said at a press conference after his inaugural command to the RMAF.
Norazlan said the assessment was necessary to ensure the RMAF can maintain the aircraft in the long run.
"We really need to examine many aspects. Buying is one thing, but maintaining it in the future is another.
"There is no point in buying in large quantities if we cannot maintain them because we need these aircraft for our operations," he said.
On the delivery timeline of the Kuwaiti Hornets, Norazlan said it would depend on Kuwait's own aircraft acquisition.
"The delivery timeline is very much subject to Kuwait's acquisition of the F/A-18E and F aircraft. From what I understand, if they receive four, they will hand over four to us. If they receive eight, they will hand over eight," he said.
He said that timing remained a key factor.
"If it takes five, six, seven years, then maybe it is no longer viable.
"For now, our current fighter replacement plan remains relevant for the next 10 to 15 years. The actual replacement will happen after that. Meanwhile, to fill the gap, acquiring the Kuwaiti Hornets is suitable, subject to the evaluation by our team later," he said.
Previously, it was reported that Malaysia's bid to acquire F/A-18 Hornet fighter jets from Kuwait had moved a step closer to reality following approval from the United States.
Then RMAF chief General Tan Sri Asghar Khan Goriman Khan confirmed that Washington had granted the necessary clearance for the deal.
The long-anticipated deal involves around 30 Hornets, a mix of single-seat F/A-18Cs and twin-seat F/A-18Ds, currently in service with the Kuwaiti Air Force.
Defence Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin had previously said the aircraft, originally acquired by Kuwait in the 1990s, are generally in good condition.
During his visit to Kuwait last October, Mohamed Khaled had said the Gulf nation expressed no objections to Malaysia's request to procure its Hornet jets.
Malaysia currently operates eight F/A-18D Hornets and 18 Sukhoi Su-30MKMs in its combat aircraft arsenal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Can you ever be completely sure your clothes weren't made in a sweatshop?
The only way a fashion brand can ensure that a factory abides by the rules is to fully own it. The fact is, many companies also contract out to factories that sometimes then subcontract. Photo: Freepik Ever since the 2013 disaster at Rana Plaza in Bangladesh, the deadliest accident in the history of the garment industry, it has been impossible for anyone to deny knowing that there is a labour crisis in the modern fashion world. It is one that prioritises the constant production of more and cheaper stuff over the safety and livelihoods of many of the people employed to make that stuff. Since then, a variety of laws and private agreements have been put in place to supposedly change this reality, but in fact every year seems to bring new revelations about fashion brands being caught for working with manufacturers that enforce sweatshop conditions. Once upon a time these revelations centred primarily on fast-fashion or mass-fashion brands working with factories far overseas, but lately, they have also come from luxury houses that are working with factories in Italy. Brands such as Dior, Armani, Valentino, Montblanc and Loro Piana have all gotten in trouble because of factories in Italy said to be operating with abusive conditions. Often the factories that have been subcontracted by factories the luxury brands officially employ, though similar stories have been made public since the release of the 2007 documentary Luxury Slaves . Read more: Has luxury fashion lost its appeal? Signs of shopper fatigue persist This is particularly jarring, because for years luxury brands justified their high price tags by pointing to the quality of both the materials and the labour as well as the know-how involved in creating their products. The implication was that part of what you were paying for was the security that what you were buying was made in a responsible way, by people who were fairly paid for their expertise. This is why 'Made in Italy' and 'Made in France' became synonyms for 'made well'. Not anymore. These days, policing supply chains can feel like playing Whac-a-Mole. As soon as one bad actor is exposed, another one pops up. If you want to know how bad it is, check out the investigations of a nongovernmental organisation called Transparentem that is focused on stopping modern slavery. It has looked into the supply chains of more than 100 apparel companies. So what's a consumer to do? It's not enough to check to see if a brand claims to demand a code of conduct by their suppliers. The only way a brand can ensure that a factory abides by the rules is to fully own it. And while brands such as Louis Vuitton and Hermes do, many companies also contract out to factories that sometimes then subcontract. A lot of them, it turns out, don't have complete pictures of where their products are made. As luxury has spread, the fashion supply chain has become ever more far-flung and complicated. Often single factories cannot produce the quantities demanded to ensure growth. As sales slow and consumers rebel against the constantly rising prices of handbags and cashmere coats, companies have to increase their profit, and some have done it by paying less on the back end. Indeed, Ben Skinner, the founder of Transparentem, recommends looking at a 2023 benchmarking study conducted by the Business & Human Rights Resource Center and KnowTheChain. He said that the study 'found that many luxury brands scored poorly, with brands such as Burberry, Ferragamo, LVMH (owner of Loro Piana) and Prada ranking near the bottom'. Read more: 'Moving far too slow': Fashion labels lag behind on sustainability pledges In the end, the safest approach for those looking for certainty about how their clothes are made would be to think small and local. Companies such as Alabama Chanin offer clothes handmade by artisans in the community, using cotton sourced, ginned and dyed by onshore mills. It's the fashion equivalent of 'know your own food'. The products are more expensive because of it, but it may be a taste worth acquiring. – ©2025 The New York Times Company/Vanessa Friedman This article originally appeared in The New York Times.


New Straits Times
2 days ago
- New Straits Times
F&N 3Q net profit falls to RM84.81mil on weaker earnings, unrecognised tax assets
KUALA LUMPUR: Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd's (F&N) net profit fell to RM84.81 million in the third quarter ended June 30, 2025 from RM121.62 million in 3Q 2024. The decrease in profit after tax resulted from lower earnings and unrecognised deferred tax assets concerning the current year's dairy farm losses, the company said in a Bursa Malaysia filing today. Revenue also dropped 4.5 per cent to RM1.24 billion from RM1.30 billion previously, primarily due to lower revenue contribution from both food and beverages (F&B) in Malaysia and Indochina, reflecting cautious post-festive consumer sentiment and lower tourist arrivals in Thailand. "Strong double-digit export growth to other markets helped cushion the decline, although exports to Cambodia were affected by the Thailand-Cambodia border closure," it said. On prospects, F&N said the economic conditions across Malaysia and Indochina remain uncertain, shaped by cautious consumer sentiment, rising cost pressures and geopolitical tensions. "In response to the Thailand-Cambodia border clashes, the group activated safety protocols and implemented alternative export routes to Cambodia, including shipping from Malaysia, to ensure supply continuity. "In light of these developments, the group is maintaining proactive vigilance, refining its procurement and sales strategies and continuing to focus on innovation and healthier product offerings," it added. -- BERNAMA


Malay Mail
3 days ago
- Malay Mail
Capital A, AirAsia X delay AAAGL share deal closing to Aug 31
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 1 — Capital A Bhd and AirAsia X Bhd (AAX) have mutually agreed to further extend the AirAsia Aviation Group Ltd (AAAGL) and AirAsia Bhd's (AAAGL) cut-off date under both companies' share sale and purchase agreements (SSPAs), respectively, from July 31, 2025 until Aug 31, 2025 or such other date as mutually agreed. The extension is for Capital A and AAX to satisfy the remaining AAAGL and AAB conditions precedent. 'This is to allow additional time for the Capital A and AAX to, among others, obtain the approval and/or consent of the relevant authorities, financiers/lenders and/or third parties as well as for AAX to finalise the definitive terms with the identified investors in relation to AAX's proposed pre-completion private placement exercise,' the companies said in a filing with Bursa Malaysia. Meanwhile, AAX yesterday agreed to extend the period for the satisfaction or fulfilment of the relevant conditions precedent under the SSPAs which remain unsatisfied up to August 31, 2025. 'This is to allow more time for the company and the vendor (Capital A) to, among others, obtain the approvals and consents of the relevant authorities, financiers/lenders and/or third parties as well as for the company to finalise the definitive terms with the identified investors in relation to the proposed private placement,' it added. — Bernama