‘Cruel' criminalisation of women over abortion must end, says MP ahead of vote
She said the UK's 'Victorian' abortion law is 'increasingly used against vulnerable women and girls' and that her amendment is the 'right change at the right time' and a 'once-in-a-generation' opportunity to bring change.
Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability.
It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant.
Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law, the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019.
Ms Antoniazzi said her proposed 'narrow, targeted' measure does not change how abortion services are provided or the rules under the 1967 Abortion Act.
She said: 'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help. As I have said it before, and I will say it again, just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.'
She added that her amendment is backed by 180 MPs from across the Commons and 50 organisations including the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG).
The MP assured her colleagues the current 24-week limit would remain, abortions would still require the approval and signatures of two doctors, and that healthcare professionals 'acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now'.
A separate amendment has also been put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy and goes further by not only decriminalising abortion, but also seeks to 'lock in' the right of someone to have one and protect those who help them.
Ms Creasy's amendment will also be debated but 'will fall' if Ms Antoniazzi's is passed by MPs, the Commons heard.
Referring to Ms Creasy's amendment, Ms Antoniazzi said while she agreed 'more comprehensive reform of abortion law is needed', such change of that scale should take place through a future separate piece of legislation.
Conservative MP and Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh, speaking against both amendments, described them as 'not pro-woman' and argued they 'would introduce sex-selective abortion'.
DUP MP Carla Lockhart insisted 'both lives matter', saying the proposed amendments 'would be bad for both women and unborn children'.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, who is not present for Tuesday's vote, outlined her opposition to both amendments in a letter to constituents, saying while she believes safe and legal abortions are part of female healthcare, the amendments 'unnecessary' and 'dangerous'.
The issue of women investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions has come to the fore in recent times with prominent cases such as those of Nicola Packer and Carla Foster.
Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home.
She told jurors during her trial, which came after more than four years of police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks.
The case of Ms Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, with senior judges saying that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences is 'unlikely' to be a 'just outcome'.
MPs had previously been due to debate similar amendments removing the threat of prosecution against women who act in relation to their own pregnancy at any stage, but these did not take place as Parliament was dissolved last summer for the general election.
The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) has urged MPs to vote against both amendments, saying they would bring about 'the biggest expansion of abortion since 1967″.
Alithea Williams, the organisation's public policy manager, said: 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers.
'Both amendments would allow abortion up to birth, for any reason.
A separate amendment, tabled by Conservative MP Caroline Johnson proposes mandatory in-person consultations for women seeking an abortion before being prescribed at-home medication to terminate a pregnancy.
She said her amendment aims to make sure women and girls are safe when they access abortion services.
She told the Commons: 'I'm not trying to limit people's access to what is clinically legally available. I'm trying to make sure that people are safe when they do so.'
She said the change she has proposed would be to protect women who have been trafficked and forced into sex work or those who have been sexually abused and where a perpetrator is attempting to cover up their crimes by causing a termination.
But Ms Antoniazzi said remote access to abortion care was 'safe, effective and reduces waiting times', and that such a change would 'devastate abortion access in this country'.
The changes being debated this week would not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands north of the border.
On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines.
The Government has previously said it is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
What the UK's migration numbers really show
The number of asylum seekers housed in government hotels has risen in the first year under Labour, piling further pressure on Sir Keir Starmer to get a grip on the growing number of people making dangerous Channel crossings. It follows a High Court ruling on Tuesday that banned the use of The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, for asylum seekers after lawyers argued it had become a 'feeding ground for unrest' following a string of violent protests at the site. As Labour braces for a fresh round of legal action from revolting councils seeking similar bans in their areas, new Home Office figures reveal that the number of people claiming asylum in the past year soared to a record 111,000, while small boats continue to cross the Channel at increasing rates. The government has been repeatedly accused of failing to tackle immigration, with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage saying the 'public is right to be very angry' over the rise in asylum seekers being housed in hotels and shadow home secretary Chris Philp claiming ministers had 'lost control of our borders'. Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick has claimed that the country 'is well past breaking point', while Tory leader Kemi Badenoch questioned whether it would be possible to 'set up camps' for migrants, rather than housing them near local communities. While the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels is up eight per cent year-on-year, the numbers have been consistently falling since December last year. The number of people in hotels - 32,059 - is also significantly lower than the peak of over 56,000 under the Tory government in September 2023. Labour has also made progress on cutting the backlog of asylum claims and speeding up the number of deportations, with enforced returns up by 25 per cent and an increasing number of criminals deported in the year to June. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said on Thursday that the numbers showed Labour had 'strengthened Britain's visa and immigration controls, cut asylum costs, and sharply increased enforcement and returns'. The bad news: asylum claims and small boats at record levels The number of migrants being housed temporarily in hotels has risen by eight per cent to 32,059 in the year to June. This was up from 29,585 at the same point last year, when the Conservatives were in power, but down from 32,345 in March, and has been falling since last December. That figure is still far below the peak of 56,000 asylum seekers living in hotels in September 2023. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp slammed 'weak' ministers for there being 'more immigrants in hotels than at the time of the election'. But Labour has blamed the Tories, with Ms Cooper on Thursday saying the party 'inherited a broken immigration and asylum system that the previous government left in chaos'. The party has said it is committed to ending the use of asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament and had already reduced asylum costs by 11 per cent. Enver Solomon, chief executive of charity the Refugee Council, said that 'there's still far too many people in hotels', adding: "Everyone agrees that hotels are the wrong answer – they cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo and are flashpoints in communities.' The rising numbers in hotels come as a record number of people – 111,084 – submitted claims for asylum in the year ending June 2025, the highest number for any 12 months since records began in 2001. Small boat migrants – numbers of which have topped 50,000 so far this year under Labour – accounted for 39 per cent of these claims, but many thousands of people also claimed asylum after travelling to the UK on legal visas. In the year 2025 so far, some 6,700 people have claimed asylum after coming to the UK to study, and 5,900 people after arriving for work. Most applicants were from Pakistan, accounting for 10.1 per cent, followed by claimants from Afghanistan and Iran. Labour has made progress on slashing the backlog, with the number of people awaiting a decision continuing to fall. The total number waiting was 70,532 in June this year, down from more than 90,000 at the end of 2024, after the former Tory government stopped processing applications while they waited to see if they could send people to Rwanda under their failed deportation scheme. The numbers waiting for more than 12 months for a decision are also falling significantly, although some 19,000 are still waiting. Mr Solomon, of the Refugee Council, said that the government can be proud of the "genuine achievement" of bringing down the numbers but warned that "this good work is being put at risk by poor-quality decisions", with "nearly half of appeals" succeeding. Marley Morris, at the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), agreed that there were 'signs of progress' since the Home Office sped up processing times. However, she said it needs to 'improve the quality of initial decision making and speed up the appeals process', and expand the 'stock of temporary accommodation' available for migrants to reduce spending on hotels, which cost £2.1bn in 2024-25. One area where Labour is making real progress is in the significant upturn in deportations. Enforced removals have increased by 25 per cent, with 9,100 people returned to their country of origin in the year to June. Voluntary returns - those leaving without enforcement - are also up by 13 per cent, with 26,761 people opting to leave the UK. This brings the total number of removals to over 35,000 in the year to June. There has also been a significant increase in assisted returns, where the Home Office provides support or even financial incentives for migrants to leave the UK. That figure has nearly doubled from 4,032 to 9,227. Earlier this year, The Independent revealed that the Home Office had paid £53m for assisted returns in the past four years, with each migrant receiving up to £3,000. The Home Office has reallocated some 1,000 staff to immigration enforcement, which it notes may have boosted returns. In particular, an increasing number of foreign criminals are being deported, with 5,265 offenders returned – around half of which were EU nationals. Earlier this year, the prime minister announced that specialist immigration enforcement teams were being sent into prisons to 'speed up the removal of prisoners who have no right to be in this country'. The latest figures are the highest number of criminals removed in years, but are still below the peak in 2016. Migrants and asylum-seekers coming from Albania, Romania, Brazil, and India are among the top nationalities being deported, figures show. But the top return destination for migrant removals is France, with 8,403 people sent there in the past year. The government's new one-in, one-out deal with France will allow a small number of migrants to be returned after crossing the Channel. But the numbers are small – understood to be around 50 people a week – and so far none are known to have been sent back.
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour rakes record £100 BILLION of taxes in July as Rachel Reeves plots new raid on middle classes to repair 'chronically weak' public finances
Labour raked in a record £100 billion of taxes last month – but fears are growing that Rachel Reeves is coming for more with the public finances in 'chronically weak condition'. The haul - the highest ever for July - was boosted by Rachel Reeves' employer national insurance raid. However, that policy is also blamed for making it harder for firms to hire and pushing up unemployment. Ms Reeves' tax hike saw national insurance bring in an extra £2.6 billion last month compared to last year and £9.5 billion extra for the financial year to date. It helped the government bring July's borrowing – the gap between tax revenues and spending – to a lower than expected £1.1 billion. That is down from £3.4 billion in July last year. However, total borrowing for the financial year so far, from April to July, is running at £60 billion, £6.7bn ahead of 2024. Even as the tax take surges, spending is ballooning thanks to pay rises for civil servants and Britain's soaring benefit bill. Meanwhile, Britain's debt pile stands at a staggering £2.89 trillion, or 96 per cent of the size of the economy. And the cost of servicing that debt so far this year is £41 billion. Economists think the Chancellor will need to put up taxes even further at this autumn's Budget as she looks to close a gap of £50 billion to meet fiscal rules that commit her to bring down borrowing and debt. That is fuelling speculation that she could stage raids on property tax, pension lump sums or inheritance tax, or carry out a 'stealth' hike by freezing income tax thresholds. Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith said: 'With the amounts being squeezed out of taxpayers at record highs yet the Chancellor still craving more, either she quits her addiction to higher public spending or someone needs to send her to rehab.' Experts said the public finances remain fragile after U-turns on welfare reforms and winter fuel payments wrecked the Chancellor's plans and as traders in UK bonds, known as gilts, lose faith in Labour – pushing up the cost of borrowing to levels not seen since the 1990s. Meanwhile, economic growth is slowing and doubts are growing about whether Britain's dismal productivity growth – the ability to work more effectively and get more done per hour – can be restored to the levels needed to sustain a recovery. That looks increasingly likely to spell further painful tax rises in October's budget. Elliott Jordan-Doak, senior UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said: 'The big picture remains that the public finances are in chronically weak condition. 'The Chancellor faces surging gilt yields and a likely productivity downgrade from the OBR [Office for Budget Responsibility] in the October forecast round. 'The litany of policy U-turns has only compounded the Government's fiscal woes.' Alex Kerr, UK economist at Capital Economics, said: 'Today's release does little to brighten the gloomy outlook ahead of the Budget later this year.' Mr Kerr estimates the Chancellor may have to raise as much as £27 billion. 'Given that she is struggling to stick to existing spending plans and we doubt the gilt market will tolerate big increases in borrowing, most of that will have to be funded by tax rises.' Matt Swannell, chief economic advisor to the EY ITEM Club, said: 'The rising cost of government debt, changes to welfare reform and the possibility of a less optimistic growth forecast will very likely see tax rises introduced at the Autumn Budget if fiscal rules are to be met.' Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said: 'Far too much taxpayer money is spent on interest payments for the longstanding national debt. 'That's why we're driving down government borrowing over the course of the parliament – so working people don't have to foot the bill and we can invest in better schools, hospitals, and services for working families.'
Leader Live
26 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Labour Party membership falls by almost 200,000 in five years
Figures published on Thursday showed the party had shed another 37,215 members over the course of 2024, around 10% of its total membership at the start of the year. The losses bring Labour's membership to 333,235 at the end of last year, well down on its recent peak of 532,046 at the end of 2019. But the party is still the largest in the UK, despite a surge in membership for Reform UK. Nigel Farage's party did not include a membership figure in its own accounts, published by the Electoral Commission on Thursday, but a ticker on Reform's website said it had 234,460 members. The Liberal Democrats suffered a slight fall in membership from 86,599 to 83,174 despite recording its best electoral results, while the Greens gained around 5,000 new members. The Conservative Party does not routinely publish its membership figures in its annual accounts, but did record an increase in income from membership fees of around £500,000. Some 131,680 people were eligible to vote in the Tory leadership election last year, 40,000 fewer than in the 2022 contest. Thursday's accounts also showed both main parties reporting deficits for the year after the most expensive general election in British history. Labour recorded a loss of £3.8 million after spending £94.5 million over the course of the year, while the Conservatives spent £52 million and lost £1.9 million. Smaller parties fared better. The Liberal Democrats and Reform UK recorded surpluses of £1.1 million and £1.5 million respectively, and the Greens enjoyed a £232,457 surplus. While most of the details were published by the Electoral Commission on Thursday, Labour's figures were published on the party's own website after it was late submitting its accounts to the watchdog. It is understood that unforeseen administrative delays were responsible for the late submission, while a party spokesman said they expected the Electoral Commission to publish the document 'imminently'. The Electoral Commission said Labour's 'failure to meet the submission deadline' would be 'considered in line with our enforcement policy'. Labour general secretary Hollie Ridley and treasurer Mike Payne said last year's loss reflected 'the need to respond at pace to shifting circumstances in the general election campaign'. It follows a loss of £851,000 in 2023 and comes despite incomes from donations more than doubling to £39.4 million. Meanwhile, the Conservatives' loss came as its income fell by more than £9 million, including a reduction in income from donations. Tory chairman Nigel Huddleston and treasurer Catherine Latham said the party would now make 'substantial investments in digital media infrastructure and staff and volunteer training' as it moved to create a 'more dynamic and nimbler organisation'. The Liberal Democrats reported £12.6 million in income for 2024, while Reform UK reported £10.8 million and the Greens £5.2 million.
