LA protests: Trump vows to 'liberate' city as mayor imposes curfew
The mayor of Los Angeles has imposed a night-time curfew for part of downtown as a fifth day of clashes over President Donald Trump's immigration raids erupted in America's second-biggest city.Karen Bass said she was declaring an emergency as businesses were being vandalised and looted. Nearly 200 people were arrested in the city on Tuesday.Trump defended his decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to LA, vowing to "liberate" the city and prevent it being "conquered by a foreign enemy".The immigration raids that triggered the protests last Friday are continuing with National Guard troops now protecting border control agents on enforcement operations.
Chaotic protests also sprung up on Tuesday night in cities around the country, from Seattle to Chicago:Texas Governor Greg Abbott sent National Guard troops to San Antonio, where immigration rallies are being plannedIn Atlanta, Georgia, riot police used tear gas on protesters who fired fireworks towards officers at a demonstration attended by hundreds Several thousand anti-Trump protesters took to the streets of New York City, marching into lower ManhattanLA's mayor told reporters earlier: "I have declared a local emergency and issued a curfew for downtown Los Angeles to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting."The order affects one-square-mile of LA where the protests have been concentrated and will be in effect beginning on Tuesday night from 20:00 PST (04:00 GMT) until Wednesday morning at 06:00 PST. Live updates from the protestsLos Angeles police responding to the protests made 197 arrests on Tuesday, up from 114 on Monday, 40 on Sunday and 27 on Saturday, Bass told Tuesday's press conference. The mayor said 23 businesses had been looted on Monday night, though she did not provide an estimate of financial losses to the city from all the at-times violent disorder. "We reached a tipping point," she said of her decision to impose a curfew.The unrest has been restricted to pockets of the sprawling city. For much of Los Angeles it was a normal Tuesday as tens of thousands of children went to school, commuter traffic choked the streets and tourists strolled Hollywood Boulevard.LA police chief Jim McDonnell said the curfew was "not about silencing voices", but was a necessary measure to save lives and safeguard property.
Bass also said Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had provoked the unrest by conducting raids on Latino areas in the city in recent days. "If [the raids are] going to go on for 30 days, and that's what the rumour is, and, if we want to see our city peaceful again, I will call upon the administration one more time to end the raids," she said. On Tuesday, National Guard troops, who were previously guarding federal buildings, began assisting ICE agents with their "daily enforcement operations", a spokesperson for the agency told the BBC. Marines were guarding federal officials and property on Tuesday, Marines Corps General Eric Smith said. They do not have arrest authority. Everything we know about the demonstrationsTrump's deportation drive is perfect storm in city of immigrantsCould Trump invoke the Insurrection Act?The military deployment to the LA area will cost $134m (£99m), the Pentagon said. Addressing troops at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, Trump described the protests as a "full-blown assault on peace and public order".The Republican president said he plans to use "every asset at our disposal to quell the violence and restore order right away".In televised remarks on Tuesday night, California's Governor Gavin Newsom hit back at Trump's unusual deployment of the military for a domestic law-enforcement matter."This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard, at risk," he says.Earlier in the day a federal court denied an emergency request from California to block the use of troops sent to Los Angeles. District Judge Charles Breyer scheduled a hearing on the motion for Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
JP Morgan maintains 2025 forecast for oil prices in low-to-mid $60s
June 12 (Reuters) - JP Morgan downplayed geopolitical concerns on Thursday and maintained its base case forecast for oil prices to stay in the low-to-mid $60s through 2025 and $60 in 2026, but said certain worst-case scenarios could send prices surging to double those levels. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States was moving personnel out of the Middle East because it "could be a dangerous place". He also said the U.S. would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Iran has said its nuclear activity is peaceful. Increased tension with Iran has raised the prospect of disruption to oil supplies, with both sides set to meet on Sunday. The geopolitical risk premium is already at least partially reflected in current oil prices, which are just under $70, trading about $4 higher than their estimated fair value of $66 for June, JP Morgan said in a Thursday note. However, the analysts drew attention to certain worst-case scenarios, where the impact on supply could potentially extend beyond a 2.1 million barrels per day reduction in Iranian oil exports. Attention is focused on the risk that a broader Middle East conflict could close the Strait of Hormuz, or provoke retaliatory responses from major oil producing countries in the region. "Under this severe outcome, we estimate oil prices could surge to the $120-130/bbl range," they said. Brent crude futures were trading near $68.76 per barrel on Thursday, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were at $67.14 per barrel. If nuclear negotiations fail and conflict arises with the United States, Iran will strike American bases in the region, Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday, days ahead of a planned sixth round of Iran-U.S. nuclear talks. The U.N. nuclear watchdog's board of governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations on Thursday and Tehran announced counter-measures, as tensions rose in the Middle East.
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Israel ‘ready to strike Iran' as US evacuates bases and embassies
Israel is considering launching a military strike against Iran in the coming days without American support, according to Western officials. The officials said fears of either no deal or a weak deal between Donald Trump, the president of the United States, and the Islamic Republic to curtail its nuclear programme had forced Israeli strategists to consider a unilateral attack against Tehran. It comes as the UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors found that Iran had broken its non-proliferation agreement for the first time in 20 years. The governors demanded Iran provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Iran is believed to have enriched uranium to at least 60 per cent, putting it within 'sprint' distance of a potential nuclear device. In response to the ruling, the Islamic Republic said it had no choice but to respond by establishing a new enrichment facility in a 'secure location' and 'significantly' increasing its production of enriched uranium. Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, said: 'We are replacing all of these first-generation machines with sixth-generation advanced machines' at the Fordow uranium enrichment plant south of Tehran. He added this means 'our production of enriched material will increase significantly'. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran will not abandon its right to uranium enrichment because of mounting frictions in the region, adding that a 'friendly' country had alerted Tehran over a potential military strike by Israel. The official said the tensions were aimed at influencing Tehran to 'change its position about its nuclear rights' during talks with the US on Sunday in Oman. US-Iran negotiations to curb Tehran's programme have been continuing for several weeks now. There had been indications in recent days that the two sides might be close to closing on a framework that includes provisions about uranium enrichment that Israel views as unacceptable. However, Mr Trump told a New York Post podcast on Wednesday he was 'less confident' about the prospects of a deal, having accused Tehran of adopting a hardline position. Israel, which is not a party to the discussions, has demanded a complete dismantling of Iran's nuclear programme. The US is now 'on alert' for the possibility of an Israeli strike, Western officials told US media outlets, with officials preparing to send home non-essential staff and families in its embassies in the Middle East, ahead of a potential Iranian retaliation. The embassy in Baghdad is currently planning an 'ordered evacuation', according to sources. The White House has also ordered its other missions within range of Iranian missiles to provide risk assessments. The United Kingdom Maritime and Trade Organisation has issued a warning urging vessels using the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz to exercise heightened caution. Military and intelligence chiefs have been concerned for several months that Mr Trump might strike a 'soft' deal with Iran that does not guarantee the Jewish state's long-term security – in order to establish his legacy as a peacemaker. The broad consensus in Israel has been that a unilateral strike on Iran would be unthinkable. Despite a slight cooling of relations with Mr Trump in recent weeks, it is thought unlikely Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, would be willing to embarrass his greatest ally in the middle of negotiations. Additionally, while Israel reportedly has the military capability to set Tehran back, it is thought that only with US support could they be sure of profoundly damaging the programme. The US alone has the capability to sustain an air campaign over several days; it has crucial refuelling aircraft, plus strategic bombers that can drop clusters of specialist munitions that have the best chance of punching through the thick rock that protects some of Iran's nuclear development sites. Iran also has large stockpiles of non-nuclear ballistic missiles which it would likely launch at Israel in retaliation. While Israel has a sophisticated missile defence system, this can be overwhelmed by a large barrage, and it would require active US support in protecting its cities. Despite the desirability of US support, Israeli military chiefs are understood to be frustrated that their ideal window for an attack is closing, while Mr Trump's talks force them to sit on their hands. Israel destroyed a key Iranian S-300 aerial defence system last year, while Hezbollah in Lebanon is all but defeated, reducing the chance of a meaningful retaliation against Israel's northern border communities. However, it is thought that neither advantage will last indefinitely. In April, The New York Times revealed that Mr Trump had, some weeks earlier, warned Mr Netanyahu off a unilateral strike as early as this spring. In his first term, he pulled the US out of a multinational agreement that relaxed economic sanctions on Iran in return for curbs on its enrichment process, brokered by Barack Obama. The aim of that deal was to keep Iran at least 12 months away from being able to build a nuclear warhead. Since Mr Trump upended the deal, Tehran has enriched uranium to about 60 per cent. Although it claims that this is for civilian purposes, numerous experts and watchdogs say there is no justifiable military purpose for such highly enriched uranium. US officials are reportedly concerned that, if pushed, Iran could engineer a 'crude' nuclear bomb in a matter of weeks. However, it would likely have to be delivered on a truck or a ship, as miniaturising it on to a ballistic missile would take longer and be more likely to be detected by the US and Israel.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
GM to invest $4B in US plants amid tariffs for Mexican-produced cars
America's best-selling carmaker is putting US factories back in the spotlight. General Motors announced plans to invest $4 billion in American manufacturing capacity that will help shift vehicle production from Mexico to the United States. The company said late Tuesday that the investment will be made over the next two years and is for its gas and electric vehicles. CEO Mary Barra said in a statement on Tuesday that GM is committed to making two million vehicles annually in the US and supporting American jobs. Last year, GM built 889,072 cars in Mexican factories, including the gas and electric Chevy Equinox and Blazer. Soon, freshly-built gas-powered Chevrolet Blazer and Chevrolet Equinox models will roll out of American plants. Both are expected to come state-side starting in 2027. The Blazer will be produced at GM's Spring Hill, Tennessee plant, while the Equinox will be made at its Kansas City, Kansas facility. GM will also begin making gas-powered full-size SUVs and light duty pickup trucks at its Orion Township, Michigan plant. The move is a bit of an about-face: the company was exclusively producing high-rolling EVs from the plant , including the GMC Hummer, Cadillac Lyriq, and the Chevy Silverado EV. It's the second recent rejigging for GM's EV plants in a month. The company recently announced plans to invest over $800 million to build new V-8 engines in a Buffalo, New York plant that was building batteries. Electric vehicles will remain a major focus for GM, which just reported a record sales month for its Chevy EVs . But GM's manufacturing shift is the automaker's latest move to navigate President Donald Trump's automotive tariffs. In April, the President signed an executive order that partially relaxed his previously-set 25 percent import levies on all cars and their parts. But, despite the relaxed rules, the tariffs loomed heavily over automakers that chose not to bring manufacturing back to the US. Barra recently warned that the company expected a $4 to $5 billion line item to pay for the tariffs this year alone. She didn't say if the automaker would pass those costs on to consumers. However, independent analysts say the tariffs will raise prices, reduce sales and make US production less competitive worldwide . Moving production back to the US still might not shield American consumers from higher prices, experts warned. 'The challenge for GM will be the higher labor costs,' David Whiston, an automotive analyst at Morningstar, told 'The higher costs might need to be passed down to dealers and consumers.' Still Whiston said the company will likely remain profitable this year, despite the major investments and tariff costs. The company agrees. But it recently slashed its earnings forecast because of President Trump's policies. It could also force other major carmakers — namely Stellantis — to bring more manufacturing capacity back to the US. The bigger intrigue, Whiston said, will be the impact on Korean and Japanese automakers like Toyota , Honda, Nissan , Hyundai, and Kia. 'If their governments can't get a carveout for autos, then they have to decide between two difficult options,' he said. 'Do they eat tariffs for a few years and hope they go away once Trump leaves office, or do they take the expensive and more permanent route of adding plants?'
