Billionaires Are Buying 2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks That Wall Street Analysts Say Can Soar Up to 240%
Several billionaire hedge fund managers bought shares of Palantir and/or Upstart in the first quarter -- stocks where certain analysts anticipate substantial upside.
Palantir is successfully tapping demand for artificial intelligence (AI) with government and commercial customers, but the stock trades at a very expensive valuation.
Upstart is generating attractive returns for lenders by helping them quantify credit risk with artificial intelligence, and the stock trades at a very reasonable valuation.
10 stocks we like better than Palantir Technologies ›
Large asset managers are required to disclose their equity holdings in quarterly Forms 13F. Investors can use those filings to track which stocks billionaires are buying. For instance, several hedge fund managers bought Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) and Upstart (NASDAQ: UPST) in the first quarter, as detailed below:
Chris Rokos of Rokos Capital Management bought 55,809 shares of Palantir, starting a new position.
Philippe Laffont of Coatue Management added 521,887 shares of Upstart, increasing his stake 150%.
Ken Griffin of Citadel Advisors bought 902,486 shares of Palantir, increasing his position 204%. He also added 202,094 shares of Upstart, increasing his stake 618%.
Paul Tudor Jones of Tudor Investment bought 149,191 shares of Palantir, increasing his position 573%. He also added 13,729 shares of Upstart, increasing his stake 28%.
Importantly, certain Wall Street analysts see tremendous returns ahead for shareholders. Dan Ives at Wedbush Securities expects Palantir to be a $1 trillion company within three years, which implies 240% upside from its current market value of $294 billion. And Dan Dolev at Mizuho Securities recently set Upstart with a target price of $85 per share, which implies 85% upside from its current share price of $46.
In its earliest days, Palantir built bespoke data analytics solutions for the U.S. intelligence community. But the company now focuses on developing modular software platforms for customers across the commercial and government sectors. Its core products (Gotham and Foundry) let customers integrate complex information and extract nuanced insights with machine learning models and analytical tools.
Importantly, in 2023, Palantir introduced an adjacent Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) that adds support for large language models and natural language processing. In other words, AIP lets organizations infuse their data analytics workflows with generative AI. Forrester Research recently recognized Palantir as a technology leader in artificial intelligence and machine learning platforms.
Palantir looked strong in the first quarter. Customer count increased 39% to 769, and the average spend per existing customer increased 24%. In turn, revenue rose 39% to $884 million, and non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) earnings jumped 62% to $0.13 per diluted share. Management attributed the strong performance to demand for its AI platform.
Wall Street estimates Palantir's adjusted earnings will increase at 31% annually through 2026. That makes the current valuation of 270 times earnings look outrageously expensive.
Investors can look at this stock in two ways: On one hand, I think Dan Ives is right in saying Palantir will be a trillion-dollar company eventually. On the other hand, I also believe the stock is due for a sharp correction.
Patient investors comfortable with volatility can reconcile those opposing views by purchasing a very small position today. And if the stock drops sharply in the coming months, they can consider buying more shares at cheaper valuations.
Upstart has developed a lending platform that leans on artificial intelligence to help banks and credit unions quantify credit risk more accurately than traditional credit scores. Its business benefits from a network effect in that every data point -- whenever a borrower makes or misses a payment -- makes its machine learning models more effective.
Upstart reported solid financial results in the first quarter, beating expectations on the top and bottom lines. Loan originations more than doubled, revenue increased 67% to $2.1 billion, and non-GAAP net income was $0.30 per diluted share, up from a loss of $0.31 per diluted share in the same quarter last year.
Nevertheless, Upstart stock crashed after the earnings report, likely because investors are worried about the lending environment. Tariffs imposed by the Trump administration threaten to slow economic growth, perhaps to the point of recession. That would be bad news for Upstart because banks are usually more conservative about extending credit during periods of economic upheaval.
However, that creates an opportunity for patient investors. Wall Street expects adjusted earnings to grow at 195% annually through 2026, which makes the current valuation of 140 times earnings look reasonable. Even if the consensus is overly optimistic, Upstart still lets lenders approve more borrowers at lower rates, which should drive demand for its platform in the long run.
Importantly, Upstart-powered loans originated in the last eight quarters have beat the two-year Treasury yield by an average of 8 percentage points. That very attractive return should bring more lenders to the platform and help the company capitalize on its $3 trillion addressable market. So, while shareholders may not see 85% returns in the next year, given the uncertain economic environment, I expect the stock to perform well over the next five years.
Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $638,985!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $853,108!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 978% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Trevor Jennewine has positions in Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Palantir Technologies and Upstart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Billionaires Are Buying 2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks That Wall Street Analysts Say Can Soar Up to 240% was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ira Winderman: How the Thunder came to own the NBA (and the Heat's draft future)
MIAMI — Salt meet wound. Not only will the Oklahoma City Thunder be playing in this year's NBA Finals, but so will a team holding a considerable stake of the Miami Heat's draft future. In this case, it's one and the same. Advertisement When the 2025 NBA Finals open Thursday at Paycom Center, the team in the home colors will be the team in possession of the Heat's 2025 first-round pick, the Heat's 2027 second-round pick, the Heat's 2029 second-round pick and the Heat's 2030 second-round pick. To say the tables have been turned since the Heat's Big Three of LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh defeated the Thunder in the 2012 NBA Finals would be an understatement, with the Thunder having supplanted the Heat as a touchstone franchise. Yes, the Heat went on to win not only those 2012 NBA Finals but also the following NBA Finals against the San Antonio Spurs. And, yes, the Heat since have made another pair of visits since to the NBA Finals. But it's not as if the Thunder fell off the face of the playoff race in the interim, with trips to conference finals in 2014 and '16 and then all the way back up to the conference semifinals a year ago, before this 68-14 roughshod run through the regular season and then this playoff success. Advertisement And, along the way — perhaps in a lesson worth heeding by the Heat in their current state — offering a lesson that there is nothing wrong with taking a break. Prior to this OKC revival, the Thunder were 22-50 in 2020-21, 24-58 in 2021-22 and 40-42 in 2022-23, before the jump back up to 57-25 a season ago. Stepping back to step forward has never quite been a Pat Riley gait, admitting just weeks ago he had been complicit in a pair of tanks over his three-decade stewardship, otherwise pedal to the metal, even when all the gears weren't necessarily aligned. And unlike with the Thunder's trove of draft picks, the Heat consistently have instead dealt many away in the hope of something closer to instant gratification (hello, Terry Rozier). Advertisement But as much as anything is the type of move made by the Thunder that Riley arguably has never made over his 30 seasons, selling high to set up the future. Exhibit A (or, more to the point, non-Exhibit A) stands as holding on a bit too long with Jimmy Butler and realizing February's middling return. This, of course, also is where the drawing of parallels needs to be allowed to breathe, because the Thunder's franchise-altering trade was once-in-a-decade stuff, or even beyond. On July 10, 2019, days after the Heat had wrapped up their acquisition of Butler from the Philadelphia 76ers in yet another of Riley's win-now moves, the Thunder swung the deal that now again has Oklahoma City as a center of the NBA universe. On that date, the Thunder dealt Paul George to the Los Angeles Clippers for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Danilo Gallinari, the 2021 first-round pick that turned into Tre Mann, the 2022 first-round pick that turned into Jalen Williams, a 2023 first-round pick that turned into Dillon Jones, the No. 15 pick in this year's draft that will come from the Heat, a pick swap this June from the Clippers (moving up from No. 30 to No. 24) and the Clippers' 2026 first-round pick. Advertisement As in 2025 NBA Most Valuable Player Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. As in 2025 third-team All-NBA selection Jalen Williams. As in enough remaining draft capital to trade for another star, if need be. No, the Heat were not getting for 35-year-old Jimmy Butler in February what the Thunder in 2019 got for 29-year-old Paul George. And for those who believe the Heat should have acted sooner, they also weren't getting anything close to that for 34-year-old Jimmy Butler last summer, either. About as close as you can find to that in this millennium arguably was the Celtics' 2013 trade of what remained of Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce to the Brooklyn Nets for what turned into the draft selections of Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown. Advertisement As for those future Heat picks now held by the Thunder, the selection at No. 15 in this year's draft traveled to Oklahoma City from the Butler trade in 2019; the 2027 second-rounder due came from the Heat's 2021 acquisition of Trevor Ariza from the Thunder; the 2029 second-rounder due from the Heat came from the 2023 salary dump of Victor Oladipo to the Thunder, which also cost the Heat their 2030 second-round pick. So as good as it currently stands for Oklahoma City, and for as ominous as it currently stands for the Heat, while watching the 2025 NBA Finals keep in mind ... the Heat also are funding the Thunder's future. (Or simply watch the Panthers in the Stanley Cup Final instead.) ____

Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
23andMe founder says Fortune 500 company backs new buyout offer
The founder of 23andMe has asked a federal bankruptcy court judge to reopen an auction for the genetic testing company, saying she has the Sign in to access your portfolio


CBS News
26 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump's "one big beautiful bill" holdout Sen. Rand Paul says "the math doesn't really add up"
Washington — Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, said Sunday that "the math doesn't really add up" on the cost of President Trump's "one big beautiful bill," while outlining his opposition as the legislation moves to the Senate this week. "I think they're asking for too much money," Paul said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." Paul is among a handful of Senate Republicans who have expressed opposition to the centerpiece legislation of Mr. Trump's second term agenda that addresses the president's tax, defense and energy priorities and which the House narrowly approved last month. The Kentucky Republican argued Sunday that with the legislation, "there's going to be a lot of extra money" going toward "padding the military budget" and additional border security when "the President has essentially stopped the border flow without new money and without any legislation." But Paul's red line, he indicated, is on the legislation's provision that would to raise the debt ceiling. The House-passed bill includes a $4 trillion debt ceiling hike, while the Senate's budget blueprint contained a $5 trillion increase. And Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told congressional leaders earlier this month that the federal government could be unable to pay its bills as soon as August if Congress doesn't act. Paul has advocated for removing the debt ceiling provision from the bill and voting on the issue separately. Paul said he wants to vote for the legislation and its tax components should the debt ceiling component be removed, saying "in all likelihood, I can vote for what the agreement is on the rest of the bill, and it doesn't have to be perfect to my liking." But for him, the debt ceiling increase is a nonstarter. "If I vote for the $5 trillion debt, who's left in Washington that cares about the debt?" Paul said. "The GOP will own the debt once they vote for this." Congressional Republicans have sought to raise the debt ceiling as part of the broader budget package because the reconciliation process that governs the bill allows them to move forward without support from across the aisle. Separating the debt ceiling component from the broader bill would mean Senate Republicans would have to negotiate with Democrats, giving them an opportunity to extract leverage despite the GOP majorities in Congress. Still, Paul argued that the Republicans who support the spending increase should be the ones responsible for voting for a debt ceiling increase, noting that Democrats have historically supported raising the debt limit as well. The Kentucky Republican has also proposed smaller increases that suspend the debt limit for a matter of months, forcing lawmakers to verify that spending cuts have been implemented before approving a further hike. Mr. Trump warned Paul about opposing the legislation in a post on Truth Social Saturday, saying "Rand will be playing right into the hands of the Democrats, and the GREAT people of Kentucky will never forgive him!" Meanwhile, Bessent, who also appeared Sunday on "Face the Nation," pushed back on the bill's forecasted impact on the deficit, pointing to income from tariffs among other things that he said will improve the full picture. The treasury secretary said changes to the bill will be "the Senate's decision," noting that he's been working closely with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, whom he said has been "doing a fantastic job." "Everyone said that Speaker Johnson would not be able to get this bill out of the House with his slim majority – he got it out, " Bessent said. "Leader Thune has a bigger majority, and this is with President Trump's leadership." Asked about the administration's red lines as the bill heads to the Senate, Bessent pointed to some of the president's campaign promises, including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, among others, which he said would "have to stay in." On the debt limit, Bessent urged that "the United States of America is never going to default." But he declined to specify an X date, or the date the U.S. will run out of money to pay its bills. "That is never going to happen," he added. "We are on the warning track, and we will never hit the wall."