logo
The road ahead after the NCAA settlement comes with risk, reward and warnings

The road ahead after the NCAA settlement comes with risk, reward and warnings

NBC Sports13-06-2025
ORLANDO, Fla. — Two days after the approval of a groundbreaking $2.8 billion antitrust settlement, thousands of athletic directors and department personnel traveled to Orlando, Florida, for the annual National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics convention.
The hot topic, of course, was the influx of changes both threatening and beneficial for schools across the country. According to NCAA President Charlie Baker, approval of the settlement may be the biggest change in college sports history. On July 1, schools that opt in to the settlement will embark on a new era of revenue sharing, changing the game both on and off the field.
Rewards
A handful of convention attendees breathed a sigh of relief on Friday night when U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken announced her decision. It's a quick turnaround and a period of trial and error is anticipated, but Division I athletic directors welcomed the news.
'The best thing is clarity,' UCLA athletic director Martin Jarmond said. 'The best thing about July 1 is we now have clarity on the rules of engagement, what we're allowed to do, how we can move forward. Does it solve everything? No, it doesn't. But when you have clarity, you can operate more efficiently and effectively.'
Kentucky AD Mitch Barnhart was relieved to get the agreement in hand.
'We've been trying for so long to be part of this,' Barnhart said. 'Maybe, just maybe, on July 1, we'll sort of all know where we are on this one.'
Barnhart added that the College Sports Commission, an entity that will enforce compliance and set market value for NIL deals, will be a major positive.
'The College Sports Commission and the way that is coming around gives us guardrails and enforcement in a way that we can move forward collectively, together, for college sports,' Barnhart said.
Risks
In a settlement where high-revenue sport athletes have the most to gain, Title IX has emerged as a topic to watch.
The 75-15-5-5 formula has emerged as a popular revenue-sharing formula, meaning that schools are likely to allocate 75% of revenue-share funds to football, 15% to men's basketball, 5% to women's basketball and the remaining 5% dispersed to other programs. If a school spent the full $20.5 million allowed this coming year, that would mean a breakdown of $15.4 million for football, $3.1 million for men's hoops and about $1 million each for women's hoops and everyone else.
Montoya Ho-Song, an attorney for Ackerman LLP who specializes in higher education issues, expects Title IX lawsuits to come, just like one filed this week by eight female athletes. The area has shifted again under President Donald Trump, with guidance suggesting the federal government won't hold schools to rigid requirements to distribute proceeds equitably between men and women.
'There are definitely going to be legal challenges related to this revenue-sharing model. I always tell my clients, look, your student athletes' perceptions are their reality. If they think that they are not being treated equally, they will raise those concerns,' Ho-Song said.
She warned that the 75-15-5-5 formula shouldn't be a one size fits all and suggested dividing revenue based on how it comes in isn't a valid argument. The majority of rev-share funds going to football and basketball programs, especially when coupled with losing records, will inevitably stir the pot.
'Just because there is a 75-15-5-5 budget breakdown, that does not mean that that's going to work on all campuses,' she said. 'The analysis under Title IX is making sure that it is available and everyone has the same type of access to non-grant funds. So, you do have to figure out a way to creatively divvy up those funds, but always keep in mind, if someone feels as if they're not being treated correctly, then that is always a legal risk.'
Warnings
Attorney Mit Winter, a college sports law specialist with Kennyhertz Perry, said it is paramount that athletic departments present an organized, united front.
Since the launch of name, image, and likeness compensation four years ago, Winter said, he has encountered several instances where athletic departments are giving conflicting statements and numbers to current and prospective athletes. That can lead to legal headaches, too.
'You need to have a plan that everyone is on board with and that everyone knows,' Winter said. 'As a school, you don't want to have a situation where five different people are talking to an athlete about how much they're going to pay him or her. I think that needs to be much more formalized. The coach, assistant coaches, GM, everybody needs to be on the same page.'
St. Bonaventure men's basketball general manager Adrian Wojnarowski and coach Mark Schmidt know exactly what their roles are — and aren't.
'I will never talk to a player or a parent or an agent about playing time, their role,' Wojnarowski said. 'During the season, if someone is disappointed in playing time and they call, the only conversation I'm having with a family member is supporting the head coach, supporting the coaching staff. And in the end, that's a conversation for their son to have with the head coach. Then economically, we have to have one clear message in negotiations and finances.'
Impacts
There are concerns that the revenue-sharing era will have multiple impacts on college rosters.
Few athletic directors were willing to talk in any detail about plans for their campuses, but some of the moves have already begun in the search for more money to fulfill the details of the NCAA settlement: UTEP dropped women's tennis, Cal Poly discontinued swimming and diving, Marquette added women's swimming and Grand Canyon shuttered its men's volleyball program. The athletic director at Cal noted the school expects to lose about 100 athletes.
Just how many of the so-called non-revenue sports — the ones that often feed U.S. Olympic teams — will be affected is also a concern. And many programs will need to find a niche that works for them, even if that means not consistently contending for national championships.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Do preseason award watch lists help your NFL Draft stock?
Do preseason award watch lists help your NFL Draft stock?

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Do preseason award watch lists help your NFL Draft stock?

It starts around the same time that college football media days begin. It ends right about the same time that game previews for week zero get published. We're talking about college football preseason award watch list season. Every mid-July, these press releases proliferate, and they circulate every single business day until mid-August. On one hand, they're kind of meaningless and pointless. Yet on the other hand, they serve a lot of different interests, and they serve them well. Making a preseason award watch list is the football equivalent of declaring your college major as "Pre-Law" or "Pre-Med." It's not an accomplishment, it's a statement of intent. Just when the annual summer lull in the sports calendar reaches its most unbearable point, they start showing up. Various organizations and committees comprise them, and then soon blast them out in press releases. Sports Information Directors, at their least busy point of the entire year, then post them on social media and blast 'em out in mass emails. From there, the laziest and least creative of media outlets then recycle them; sometimes even verbatim! And that is the growth/life cycle of an award watch list. They give people who want to talk about college football year round, something to do and say at the time of the year when we all miss college football the most. So they do inspire content for creators (the quality of which is debatable) and generate favorable media coverage for college football programs. But do they do actually do anything for individual players? Results may vary. The Doak Walker award, given to the nation's top running back, has 102 names on its watch list this summer. There are only 135 teams in FBS. So basically, if you are expected to carry the football in a 2025 college football game, congratulations! You are ON THE LIST! Yes, this is the NCAA version of a participation trophy. However, making a shorter list, like say the Manning award, which only has 27 names on it, is obviously much more prestigious. Fun fact: the most hyped up player in college football, this Texas fella named Arch Manning, did not make the Manning award watch list. To quote French Enlightenment philosopher Voltaire: 'The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy nor Roman, nor an Empire.' And if you're somebody who is trying to get on the national radar, award watch lists certainly help. Yes, your play will determine how far you move up the prospect rankings, but you still need to get on the map, somehow, someway, to begin with. They don't matter too much to the players that we already know are very elite, like say Illinois cornerback Xavier Scott. Or for guys like Justice Haynes, who play a glamor position (running back) for a blue blood (Michigan) after having done so at another blue blood (Alabama) However, if you're obscure and/or unproven, award watch lists are definitely your friend. From there, you can let your performances and results do the talking, and then you can impress at Pro Day or combine and then go from there.

Panthers great Cam Newton to have jersey number retired by Auburn
Panthers great Cam Newton to have jersey number retired by Auburn

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Panthers great Cam Newton to have jersey number retired by Auburn

Before he was a Carolina Panthers legend, Cam Newton was a University of Auburn legend. So before there was a No. 1, there was a No. 2. But that won't be the case, at least for the Tigers' football program, any longer—as the school announced on Monday that they will retire Newton's No. 2 jersey this upcoming season. Newton's lone year at Auburn is regarded as one of, if the not greatest season in college football history. That storybook 2010 campaign saw the Atlanta, Ga. native pass for 2,908 yards and 30 touchdowns and run for 1,473 yards and 20 more scores en route to a landslide victory of the Heisman Trophy and the second-ever national championship in Auburn's history. His efforts helped him become the first overall selection of the 2011 NFL draft—a pick made, of course, by the Panthers. Auburn is set to officially retire Newton's number on Oct. 11, before the Tigers take on the Georgia Bulldogs at Jordan-Hare Stadium. Newton will be the fourth Tiger to have his number retired—joining Bo Jackson, Pat Sullivan and Terry article originally appeared on Panthers Wire: Panthers great Cam Newton to have jersey number retired by Auburn

Leaders At IMG Academy Propose New Collegiate Athletics Model
Leaders At IMG Academy Propose New Collegiate Athletics Model

Forbes

time2 hours ago

  • Forbes

Leaders At IMG Academy Propose New Collegiate Athletics Model

When the NCAA House Settlement struck the collegiate athletic landscape this summer, there was genuine fear on what this would mean for athletic departments and sport programs outside of men's football, basketball, and women's basketball. This occurred as key elements in the back pay and revenue share prioritized the aforementioned sports based on many of the Power Four institutions stated best practices. Additionally, even though Judge Wilken urged and required the preservation of roster spots in the House Settlement against the NCAA's desires, there has been expressed concern from athletes, coaches, parents, and fans about the status of programs in this new era, especially Olympic sport and women's programs. Recently, new legislation from Congress labeled the SCORE Act, as well as the current Presidential Administration has also tried to address the concern over roster spots and opportunities. However, leaders at IMG Academy, Brent Richard and Drew Weatherford have proposed an innovative and unexpected solution, instead of cutting sports or programs, athletic departments should be adding them. Reasons for Collegiate Athletic Expansion Richard, CEO of IMG Academy and Weatherford, former Florida State University quarterback and now managing partner at Weatherford Capital along with IMG Board member, believe that in the new collegiate athletic system, sports and athlete spots do not need to be cut, but yet expanded. At the core of their argument is the idea that currently the House Settlement prioritizes a small percentage of the NCAA institutions, as only approximately 70 schools are part of the Power Four compared to over 350 total Division I institutions, more than 300 Division II, and more than 430 Division III schools. Richard expanded on this idea stating, 'Press, conversation, and the primary changes in college sports are related to a few sports and really a handful of conferences that generate a lot of entertainment revenue. And you'd think, based on the number of article, it's very popular. These stories go wide and they make for really good headlines. But the truth is that you'd think that when you talk to people, the misconception is that this represents all of college sports.' Richard continued, 'This conversation represents about 2% of college sports athletes. I want to be clear, it's really important that we get that right for those 2% of college athletes. At the same time, you can't just blanket all of college sports with some of these changes. And so I think the misconception that we're trying to point out is that there's 500,000 college student athletes out there, yet, most of the conversations center around the 2%. We just need to make sure that when we're creating a new model for the 2%, which is what's happening, that it doesn't come with negative consequences to the other 98%.' However Richard and Weatherford feel that this way of thinking is a missed opportunity based on the numbers generated in youth and high school sports. Richard explained, 'Historically, there's eight million high school student athletes or almost 60% of every high school student is an athlete, that means 60% of every kid going into college was playing sports in high school.' However, only roughly 500,000 student-athletes play NCAA varsity sports. According to Richard, 'The basic question, and common sense question is, is there demand for more than 500,000 roster spots or less? And the answer is very clearly. There's demand for more.' Thus according to the IMG Academy leaders, this missed demand could be generating more campus enrollment and revenue for these institutions. Richard said, 'I think the fairly obvious idea that we should be talking about is adding more participation and at the very least, given that setup it it should be just a real red line that the answer should not be reducing student-athletes.' Components of the Proposed New Model As stated above, Richard and Weatherford feel that collegiate athletic departments should inflate their sport offerings as this could help create and increase revenue for their institutions. Weatherford detailed, 'There's this illusion that these non-revenue sports are more of a drag financially than they really are just because of the way that they account for tuition, right, like they they count the expense, but then they don't count the revenue to offset the expense from tuition.' He continued that many sports teams have student-athletes paying full tuition and linking back to the number of youth and high school athletes more could or would pay to attend institutions where they could play sports in college,"Now parents are paying for their kids to play elite travel sports from the time they're eight. So there's an argument to be made that, in addition to tuition, parents would be willing to pay extra fees for their students to play sports in college--- I actually believe they would." Multiple Division Model Within the Same Institution Furthermore Weatherford and Richard advocated for a model that would allow for multiple teams in a single sport but within different divisions, similar to a junior varsity and varsity team that sports like baseball have used for decades. According to Weatherford this could allow coaches to develop and recruit talent from their own programs to fill the varsity spots, leaving them less reliant on the transfer portal, 'It's their own farm system. [Varsity head coaches] they don't have to necessarily coach two teams, they can have someone else coach the team, but they recruit the DII player in the same way that the DI players.' He continued this could make the general public and fans happier who have struggled with the constant movement of the transfer portal, 'I think what the whole universe would love is, it would make every school less reliant on the transfer portal. Think about the impacts of this if you're able to recruit an additional 30 players and develop them. A lot of coaches would say, 'hey, I'd rather pick a known quantity from the D2 team or from the JV team to elevate to the varsity team their junior year.' Then go get someone out of the transfer portal.' Weatherford further explained this could increase facility usage which he believes is a major problem at most institutions, 'I think it just looks fiscally very irresponsible to have these facilities on campus that are utilized 10% of the time. These are taxpayer dollars being spent and donor dollars being spent to build multi-million dollar facilities and they're being utilized like 10 or 15% of the time. So that doesn't seem very responsible.' Richard and Weatherford understand this is an uphill battle and comes with larger ramifications as adding and cutting sports is also impacted by Title IX regulations, as these collegiate institutions are bound to federal standards, but both leaders are recommending that college athletics look at a more inclusive approach that allows more athletes to compete, not less.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store