&w=3840&q=100)
Delhi University blames glitch after 'Muslim' listed as language on form
Screenshots of the form spread rapidly on social media, prompting academics, civil-society groups and political commentators to accuse the university of conflating religion with language and sidelining a key marker of India's cultural heritage. In a statement, DU said the mistake was 'inadvertent' and purely clerical. 'The University of Delhi sincerely regrets the inadvertent error in its admission form. We acknowledge your concerns and are committed to addressing them. However, attributing ulterior motives to this entirely unintentional oversight is unwarranted. We request all not to vitiate the University's diverse and harmonious environment,' the statement read.
The portal was temporarily taken offline, corrected to include Urdu, and restored. University officials have not offered a detailed explanation of how the dropdown was generated.
Faculty say 'problem runs deeper'
Several faculty members dismissed the idea that the episode was a routine glitch. 'This is not an innocent mistake,' Abha Dev Habib, a former Executive Council member, told news agency ANI. 'Conflating religion with language is ignorant and dangerous.'
Mithuraaj Dhusiya, who also serves on the Executive Council, warned that mistakes like these damage the university's inclusive image. "Urdu is an essential part of India's cultural heritage," Dhusiya said.
At Kirori Mal College, professor Rudrashish Chakraborty called the portrayal of 'Muslim' as a language 'a worrying attempt to misrepresent India's largest minority community". He stressed that Urdu is a secular language spoken by Indians of many faiths.
Beyond the dropdown error, teachers have questioned the terminology DU employs on official forms. 'The term 'mother tongue' is colloquial. Academic institutions should instead use 'native language' or 'first language' for clarity,' a professor from the English department said.
DU launches course on love, jealousy
Earlier this month, Delhi University announced that it will introduce a unique course titled 'Negotiating Intimate Relationships' for undergraduate students across disciplines from the 2025–26 academic session. Designed by the Department of Psychology, it will address Gen-Z's struggles with love, breakups, and emotional health. 'The course will cover romance, friendship, jealousy, and heartbreak,' DU said.
With three lectures and a tutorial each week, it is open to Class XII graduates with basic psychology knowledge. The initiative follows a spate of violent crimes in Delhi linked to toxic relationships, underscoring the urgent need for emotional literacy among youth.
(With agency inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Aurangabad bench of HC refers caste certificate recall powers to larger bench
MUMBAI: The Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court on Monday asked a larger bench to decide whether caste scrutiny committees in Maharashtra can cancel their own orders if a caste validity certificate is found to have been obtained through fraud, misrepresentation or suppression of facts. Aurangabad bench of HC refers caste certificate recall powers to larger bench The reference was made by justices Manish Pitale and YG Khobragade while hearing petitions by four residents of Jamb village in Nanded district — Santosh Anil Kolhe, Sham Anil Kolhe, Sharad Arunrao Kolhe and Balaji Arunrao Kolhe. They had challenged a May 15, 2025 order of the Kinwat-based Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee (Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar headquarters) cancelling their caste validity certificates for alleged fraud and concealment of information. Appearing for the petitioners, advocate Pratap V. Jadhavar argued that the Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000 gives scrutiny committees no legal power to review or recall their own decisions. He cited earlier high court rulings — Rakesh Bhimashankar Umbarje and Bharat Nagu Garud — which held that once a validity certificate is issued, the committee becomes functus officio (a legal term meaning its job in that matter is finished) and only the High Court can overturn it under Article 226 of the Constitution. Countering this, additional government pleaders SP Sonpawale and Saie S Joshi said that certificates obtained by fraud cannot be allowed to stand, even if the 2000 Act is silent on recall powers. They relied on the Rajeshwar Baburao Bone case, in which the High Court and Supreme Court upheld cancellation of a fraudulently obtained caste certificate, stressing that fraud vitiates all legal acts. The bench noted that different benches of the High Court have taken conflicting views on the issue. While unchecked recall powers could unsettle vested rights, the judges said, the inability to correct fraudulent outcomes would undermine the caste verification process. They observed that scrutiny committees, being quasi-judicial bodies with some powers of a civil court, are often better placed than writ courts to assess factual fraud in caste claims. 'It cannot be countenanced,' the court remarked, 'that validity certificates obtained on falsehoods, fabrications or suppression of material facts cannot be reopened when such fraud is noticed subsequently.' Citing the need for an authoritative ruling, the bench framed five questions for the larger bench, including: Whether scrutiny committees under the 2000 Act have the power to recall orders obtained by fraud or misrepresentation. If so, what limits and safeguards should apply to prevent misuse. Whether such safeguards could include requiring prior leave of the High Court. And whether earlier rulings in Umbarje and Garud should be revisited on this point. The matter will now go to the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court to assign it to a larger bench.
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rahul reiterates vote fraud charge, slams EC
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday responded to the Election Commission's demand that he submit an affidavit outlining his allegations of voter fraud, saying he had already taken an oath on the Constitution in Parliament. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, LoP in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah, Deputy CM DK Shivakumar, and AICC General Secretaries KC Venugopal and Randeep Singh Surjewala, along with other leaders, during the party's 'Vote Adhikar Rally', at Freedom Park in Bengaluru on Friday. (PTI PHOTO) Gandhi alleged that the EC and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had worked together to manipulate voter rolls and hide evidence of large-scale irregularities in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. The Congress leader was addressing supporters and party workers at the 'Vote Adhikar Rally' in Bengaluru. 'The Election Commission is asking me to submit an affidavit and give information under oath. But I have already taken an oath inside Parliament while holding the Constitution,' Gandhi told the crowd, accusing the poll body of withholding crucial records, including booth-level videography and electronic voter lists. He claimed these records were deliberately kept from scrutiny to cover up wrongdoing during the polls. 'The EC and BJP together have stolen the Lok Sabha from Karnataka,' he alleged, adding that voter roll websites in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Bihar were taken down to prevent public scrutiny. He said repeated requests for polling booth videos and electronic rolls were rejected and that the law was later amended to require videos be erased after 45 days. Gandhi linked his allegations to an internal Congress survey before the general elections, which had predicted a lead in 16 Karnataka seats but ended with the party winning just nine. He listed five ways in which the alleged fraud took place: creation of duplicate voters, fake or invalid addresses, bulk registrations at single addresses, unclear photographs, and misuse of Form 6 meant for first-time voters. Releasing findings from a party probe into Mahadevapura Assembly constituency under the Bengaluru Central seat, Gandhi said there was '100% proof' that one lakh votes had been 'stolen.' According to him, some voters were registered in multiple states and 'authorised to cast ballots' in more than one location. 'Our research in the last six months by tallying every voter identity photo with lakhs of photographs has shown fake and invalid addresses have been created,' he said. He demanded that the EC release electronic voter lists and polling-day videography for the past decade across the country, claiming such disclosure would reveal 'the Prime Minister of India became PM by stealing votes.' Gandhi called the alleged manipulation 'a criminal act against the people of Karnataka' and urged the state government to investigate EC officials who, he alleged, inserted thousands of fake names into the rolls. 'You cannot hide evidence. You will have to face the opposition,' he said. Gandhi also alleged that a similar pattern had occurred in Maharashtra, where the BJP won the Assembly elections just four months after the Lok Sabha polls. 'We discovered that 1 crore new voters, who had not participated in the Lok Sabha polls, cast their votes in the Maharashtra Assembly election,' he claimed, saying these votes 'primarily went to the BJP,' and that 'wherever these new voters cast their ballots, the BJP won.' Chief minister Siddaramaiah echoed Gandhi's charges, demanding Prime Minister Narendra Modi's resignation. 'He has no moral right to continue in his post. Rahul Gandhi's 'vote fraud' expose has shown that he has stolen seats to remain in power,' he said. Deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar said Gandhi wanted 'legal banks' to be established to protect voters' rights at the booth level, assuring that such a mechanism would be set up on the lines of blood banks. BJP state president BY Vijayendra dismissed the allegations, calling Gandhi a 'desperate leader' who had failed to earn the public's trust. 'I pity Rahul Gandhi. He is a desperate leader who has failed continuously to gain the confidence of the people of this country… Failed Rahul Gandhi has alleged malpractices and blamed the Election Commission,' he said. He also cited a past incident when Mamata Banerjee, as an MP, was suspended from Parliament for alleging that thousands of illegal Bangladeshi migrants had been added to voter rolls in Bihar, saying the Congress was now 'following the same path.'
India Today
23 minutes ago
- India Today
Former top court judge says judiciary, free media can keep government in check
Former Supreme Court Judge Justice Abhay Oka on Friday said that fundamental rights are 'always under threat' regardless of whether an emergency is declared. He was speaking at a Mumbai Press Club event on 'Holding the government to account: the role of an independent judiciary and free press.'He said that only a fiercely independent judiciary and media can keep the executive in Oka stressed the importance of the right to shelter, calling for its enforcement not just in Mumbai but across cities. 'I am not defending illegal encroachments, but people have a right to affordable accommodation,' he said. Referring to former CJI DY Chandrachud's remark that the judiciary is not the opposition, Justice Oka said it was misunderstood. 'If the executive acts within the Constitution, courts cannot say 'you could have done better.' That's the opposition's role,' he allegations of partiality, he said perceptions that those close to power get relief require a 'systematic study' of bail orders and case priorities. Regarding the collegium, he said no system is perfect, but a better alternative must be evolved before replacing declined to comment on the recent case involving Justice Verma, citing his role in the decision, but noted judges are protected from immediate FIR registration to safeguard judicial independence, adding, 'Someday, citizens must think about it.'On whether judges should advise on protest topics, he said courts must only check if the right under Article 19(1)(a) is violated, regardless of the protest's subject. 'As a judge, I may dislike a speech, drama, or comedy act, but my duty is to see if a violation has occurred, not to judge the content,' he said, adding that shaping public opinion is the media's Oka also flagged high pendency as a constraint on the judiciary, limiting its ability to take up suo motu matters. Remembering freedom fighter Bal Gangadhar Tilak's sedition trial, he quoted Tilak's defence that feeling offended does not make something seditious unless it meets legal requirements and that being unpopular with the government is not grounds for prosecution. 'These lines remain relevant even after 117 years,' Oka on the collegium system, Justice Oka said, "Somebody may say that the collegium system is wrong But we have to evolve a better system to replace the colleague system. No system can be perfect, every system will have it's flaws. The judiciary has its flaws, the executive has its flaws so we have to find a better system."- EndsTune InMust Watch
