Cameron Norrie vs Novak Djokovic start time and how to watch French Open live today
Novak Djokovic takes on Cameron Norrie for a place in the French Open quarter-finals.
The 38-year-old had endured a largely frustrating clay-court season in the build-up to Paris, and split from coach Andy Murray after a poor run of results.
Advertisement
But Djokovic won in Geneva and he has carried that form into Roland Garros, where he has not yet dropped a set in three routine wins.
Remarkably, Djokovic has not failed to make the quarter-finals at the French Open since 2009, and he will be desperate to keep that run going with a victory over Norrie.
The 29-year-old came through an all-British clash in the third round as he beat Jacob Fearnley, extending a tournament that began with a first-round win over 11th seed Daniil Medvedev.
Norrie has largely struggled for form in recent months but there has been a welcome upturn in performances in Paris, and a shock win here would earn him only a second Grand Slam quarter-final appearance.
Advertisement
Djokovic and Norrie met ten days ago in Geneva, when the Serbian won in three sets in the semi-finals.
Norrie vs Djokovic start time
Cameron Norrie vs Novak Djokovic at Roland Garros will take place today, Monday, June 2, 2025.
It is scheduled to be third on Philippe-Chatrier, following on from matches involving Coco Gauff and Jessica Pegula.
Norrie and Djokovic are therefore likely to take to the court at around 2pm BST.
How to watch Norrie vs Djokovic
TV channel: The French Open will be broadcast live on TNT Sports in the UK.
Live stream: TNT Sports subscribers can also use Discovery+ to stream the action in full live online.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Watch: Lorenzo Musetti kicks ball at line judge but escapes with warning
Lorenzo Musetti was frustrated at times against Frances Tiafoe and responded well to win in four sets - Getty Images/Adam Pretty Italian No 2 Lorenzo Musetti put himself at risk of disqualification when he kicked a loose ball into the body of a line judge. Yet Musetti got away with a warning from the chair umpire – an outcome which surprised a number of observers – and then went on to defeat Frances Tiafoe to move into the French Open semi-finals. Tiafoe described the lack of action as 'comical' in his post-match press conference. 'Obviously he did that and nothing happened,' Tiafoe said. 'I think that's comical, but it is what it is. Nothing happened, so there's nothing really to talk about. Obviously it's not consistent, so it is what it is.' Advertisement Meanwhile, Rennae Stubbs, the former world doubles No 1, wrote on the X: 'Musetti is VERY LUCKY to be still on court right now. You cannot kick a ball and it hit the lines person and not be defaulted. I know he didn't mean it but no one does, man, this is BAD! And he's out there playing right, knowing he could easily have been in the locker room!' The obvious point of comparison was the ejection of Novak Djokovic from his fourth-round match at the 2020 US Open for flicking a ball into the neck of a line judge. The Musetti ball probably did not travel as quickly as Djokovic's did, but the greater difference lay in where it landed, which was on the body rather than such a sensitive area as the throat. The judge in question barely seemed to notice the contact, whereas in 2020, the unfortunate Laura Clark immediately collapsed to the ground, struggling to breathe. Another disqualification made headlines at the French Open two years ago when Japanese doubles player Miyu Kato tried to pass a ball to a ball girl with her racket, but ended up hitting her on the head and moving her to tears. Advertisement At the time, Alex Corretja, the commentator and former French Open finalist, said that 'it was too strict to disqualify her because it [the flight of the ball] was very slow'. Kato later described the penalty as 'unjust' but an appeal to tournament organisers was rejected. As for Musetti, he was behind in the second set at the time of Tuesday's incident, and seemed particularly irritated when Tiafoe held serve to move to a 5-3 advantage. Tiafoe could be seen pointing out the judge to the umpire, and then discussing what had happened, before the code-violation warning was eventually announced. Yet Musetti recovered his composure and began to move ahead in the match, eventually closing out a 6-2, 4-6, 7-5, 6-2 victory to earn a place in the last four. Advertisement 'It's a process of growing, not just inside the court but especially off the court,' he said during his on-court interview. 'Last year I became a father. I think that gave me an extra responsibility and I now approach things in a more professional way, not just on the court in matches but in my daily routine.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
French Open recap: Lorenzo Musetti avoids default after kicking ball into linesperson
The Athletic Welcome to the French Open briefing, where will explain the stories behind the stories on each day of the tournament. On day 10, tennis' bizarre relationship with unsportsmanlike conduct took another twist, the wind whipped up the clay on Court Philippe-Chatrier, and Roland Garros' decision to keep line judges came under scrutiny. Why did Musetti avoid being defaulted from his quarterfinal? Lorenzo Musetti is headed to the semifinals of the French Open, but he could easily be heading home. Advertisement Musetti, the occasionally feisty Italian, cruised through the first set of his quarterfinal against Frances Tiafoe on Tuesday afternoon. In the second, things started to go south. His slice backhand wasn't biting. His forehand was flying. Tiafoe had gotten used to his spins and was outplaying him. As the second set wound down, Musetti vented by kicking a ball toward the back wall of Court Philippe-Chatrier. It accidentally whacked a line judge near her shoulder. The ball wasn't moving particularly fast, but sending a ball in flight in anger and hitting anyone with it, much less a line judge, comes with a ball abuse penalty that can include being ejected from the tournament. Tennis is weird about defaults — the ultimate penalty for bad behavior, which involves automatically losing the match. Whether or not a player smacks a ball in frustration, or throws or kicks it like Musetti, the penalty more often than not is outcome-based. If the person struck is in distress, the player gets defaulted, they are allowed to continue. But per the rulebook, that should be irrelevant. 'Players shall not violently, dangerously or with anger hit, kick or throw a tennis ball while on the grounds of the tournament site except in the reasonable pursuit of a point during a match (including warm-up). Advertisement 'For purposes of this rule, abuse of balls is defined as intentionally or recklessly hitting a ball out of the enclosure of the court, hitting a ball dangerously or recklessly within the court or hitting a ball with disregard of the consequences.' The problem with the logic currently applied is that it gives players credit for being in control of something which they are not in control of. Smashing or kicking a ball into a crowd of people or an enclosed space is risky. Whether or not it hits someone with a glancing blow or square on is pure luck. On this occasion, chair umpire Timo Janzen let Musetti off with a warning. Tiafoe complained, but to no avail. Novak Djokovic was defaulted from the 2020 U.S. Open when he whacked a ball that inadvertently hit a line judge in the throat. Two years ago at Roland Garros, doubles player Miyu Kato and her partner were defaulted after Kato accidentally hit a ball kid in the neck when returning a ball to her — not even swatting it in frustration. Advertisement Kato originally received a warning, but her opponents complained and the supervisor ultimately disqualified Kato and her partner, Aldila Sutjiadi of Indonesia. The year before, Romania's Irina-Camelia Begu accidentally bounced her racket into the crowd. It hit a small child, who started crying but his parents said he was fine. She received a warning. If all this sounds a bit inconsistent, it is. Tiafoe was still annoyed with Janzen's handling of the situation an hour after the end of the match. He called the decision 'comical.' 'He did that and nothing happened,' Tiafoe said. 'Obviously it's inconsistent.' Musetti said later he was scared that he was going to get booted from the tournament. 'I did not want to harm anybody,' he said. 'There was no intention about it.' How Court Philippe-Chatrier turned into a dust bowl Sports stadiums can be weird places when it comes to wind. The air can be nearly still four stories up, but swirling about at court level. Advertisement That was Court Philippe-Chatrier on Tuesday, the second quarterfinal day for the men and the women. There were several moments during Iga Świątek's match against Elina Svitolina when the players had to stop and turn their heads away from the wind to avoid getting a mouthful of red dust. Players talk about feeling like small bugs in the cavernous stadium, which seats just 15,000. The stands slope gently outward, leaving a low broad opening at the top, while the retractable roof slides over from just one side, leaving a big opening at the top for gusts to get in. This was not as bad as 2019, when gusts measured at nearly 50 mph (and Rafael Nadal) sent Roger Federer packing in their semifinal. But it was not great. In tennis, wind direction can be just as important as its speed. Wind will make serving difficult regardless, but it has its clearest impact when it is blowing parallel to the sidelines, rather than perpendicular. At one end, players have to be wary of overhitting with the breeze at their back. On the other, they have to be mindful of how much it will hold up their shots. The player receiving a ball with wind behind it needs to react quicker; if it's slowing a ball down, their footwork needs to take them to it and adjust to any sudden changes of direction. Advertisement If air is buffeting around a stadium every which way, things get a little more chaotic. Świątek said the worst wind she has experienced was at Wimbledon, where she has problems on the grass even when it's still, but this was rough. 'In the second set, it got pretty crazy,' Świątek said. 'I never had that here, but in the first set it wasn't that bad. I think it kind of slowed down also at the end of the match.' Of course she thought that: she served three aces in the final game of her 6-1, 7-5 win. This was the day that the French Open's line-judge decision caused controversy From the start of play, it's felt inevitable that the French Open's decision to opt for line judges over electronic line calling (ELC) would come under scrutiny. Advertisement Mixed events on clay, and every other surface, use ELC, but the tournament opted against it. The France Tennis Federation (FFT) president, Gilles Moretton, said in April that this was because it trusts their industry-leading officials to do a good job, claiming last week that ELC had been shown not to be totally effective at the earlier clay events this year. The downside of no ELC was duly exposed Tuesday when at a critical moment in the quarterfinal between Aryna Sabalenka and Zheng Qinwen, a bad error from the officials could have made a major difference. With Zheng serving at 5-6, 30-30, Sabalenka hit a backhand that looked to have drifted long — so much so that Zheng stopped the point, despite there being no out call. The umpire got off her chair to inspect the mark, and backed up the line judge's call, but television replays using Hawk-Eye technology showed that the ball had actually been 7mm out. ELC has a margin of error, but it is smaller than 7mm. Given the speed at which Sabalenka's ball was traveling, it should have been relatively easy for the line judge to track, but bad errors like this are always possible with humans calling the lines. Zheng was able to hold her serve, so the incorrect call didn't have a material impact on the match, but it's an embarrassing look for the sport that such a critical call at a Grand Slam could have been botched like that. There were a couple of further wrong calls that were at least correctly overruled by the umpire. The FFT did not respond to a request for comment on the officiating errors from the match. Advertisement Later on Chatrier, Tiafoe was involved in a number of heated discussions with the umpire Janzen during his defeat to Musetti. On one occasion in the fifth set, Janzen got off his chair and incorrectly overruled an out call. The players are generally in favour of ELC, partly because while they know it's not completely infallible, there's certainty and no argument. Speaking of arguments, it's getting harder and harder to make one for relying on humans to make these decisions. How Sinner and Alcaraz have climbed the ladder Pretty much everyone who even vaguely follows tennis knows about or remembers the Rafael Nadal vs. Roger Federer Wimbledon final in 2008. Very few remember either of their paths to that final, however. Both were incredibly straightforward, with just one set dropped between them along the way. As the rounds went on, it felt as though each was trying to outdo the other and send out a little statement. Advertisement Something similar is happening here, where the top two seeds Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz are taking it in turns to showcase their title credentials in their bids to set up a meeting in Sunday's final. After Sinner eviscerated Jiří Lehečka Saturday for the loss of just three games, Alcaraz beat a much tougher opponent in Ben Shelton the following day, even if it took him four sets. Sinner then thrashed a similarly ranked opponent to Shelton in Andrey Rublev on Sunday night, losing eight games. Not to be outdone, Alcaraz only gave up five in a 6-0, 6-1, 6-4 battering of American world No. 12 Tommy Paul on Tuesday night. Sinner took two hours to beat Rublev; Alcaraz only took 94 minutes to get past Paul, who was physically hampered but would not have quelled the version of Alcaraz he played even at full fitness. The way it's been going, perhaps Sinner was watching Alcaraz's masterclass against Paul and thinking about how he could improve on it in his own quarterfinal Wednesday. Advertisement So good luck, Alexander Bublik. French Open men's draw 2025 French Open women's draw 2025 Tell us what you noticed on the tenth day… This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Tennis, Women's Tennis 2025 The Athletic Media Company
Fox Sports
an hour ago
- Fox Sports
French Open: Iga Swiatek to face No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka in the semifinals. Alcaraz and Musetti win
Associated Press PARIS (AP) — Iga Swiatek's bid for a record fourth consecutive French Open championship will need to go through No. 1-ranked Aryna Sabalenka after both delivered straight-set victories Tuesday to set up a showdown in the semifinals. Swiatek defeated Elina Svitolina 6-1, 7-5 in the quarterfinals for a 26th consecutive win at Roland-Garros, where the longest unbeaten run by a woman is 29 matches by seven-time tournament champion Chris Evert. Swiatek is trying for her fifth trophy overall on the red clay in Paris, where she has won four of the past five. Sabalenka ousted 2024 Olympic gold medalist Zheng Qinwen 7-6 (3), 6-3 to reach the semifinals in Paris for the second time. All three of Sabalenka's Grand Slam titles came on hard courts — two at the Australian Open and one at the U.S. Open. Having been searching for her best form in recent months and after a tough three-setter in her previous match, Swiatek was in total control at the start against No. 13 seed Svitolina. Swiatek had to work harder in the second set, dropping her serve in the fourth game after hitting two straight unforced errors into the net. But Swiatek broke back immediately and took advantage of Svitolina's poor service game to break again with a thunderous forehand return and move up 6-5. Swiatek sealed the win with an ace. Swiatek has won five of the six matches she has played on clay against Sabalenka. 'The Madrid final against her is one of the best and most exciting finals that I have played,' said Swiatek, who has not won a title or reached a final since her victory at Roland-Garros last year. "It is always a challenge against Aryna." Sabalenka is trying to reach her sixth Grand Slam final, and first at Roland-Garros. 'I'm super excited to go out there and to fight and to do everything I need to get the win,' Sabalenka said. She overcame a shaky start and windy conditions to improve her record against Zheng to 7-1. Sabalenka had lost their most recent contest — at the Italian Open on clay. But she said that setback was a good thing in the middle of an already exhausting season. "I was actually glad I lost that match, because I needed a little break before Roland-Garros,' said Sabalenka, who hasn't dropped a set in this tournament. 'Today, I was just more fresh. I was ready to battle, I was ready to leave everything I had on court to get this win.' What else happened at the French Open on Tuesday? Defending champion Carlos Alcaraz and No. 8 seed Lorenzo Musetti advanced to a semifinal meeting. Alcaraz dropped just five games against No. 12 Tommy Paul, whose right thigh was heavily bandaged and who wasn't able to play his best. Musetti reached his first semifinal at the French Open and second at a Grand Slam tournament with a 6-2, 4-6, 7-5, 6-2 victory over No. 15 Frances Tiafoe. Musetti and No. 1 Jannik Sinner gave Italy two male quarterfinalists at Roland-Garros for the first time since 1973. Who plays at Roland-Garros on Wednesday? Sinner will try to join his countryman in the semifinals by defeating unseeded Alexander Bublik on Day 11, while 24-time major champion Novak Djokovic takes on No. 3 Alexander Zverev at night in the last men's quarterfinal. The two remaining women's quarterfinals start off the day in Court Philippe-Chatrier, with No. 2 Coco Gauff vs. No. 7 Madison Keys in a matchup between two Americans who each has won a Grand Slam trophy, followed by No. 6 Mirra Andreeva vs. 361st-ranked French wild-card entry Lois Boisson. ___ AP tennis:
