Exclusive Trump's tariff plan signals historic break from global trade: Yergin
A new tariff regime set to be unveiled within hours by US President Donald Trump marks what may be the single most dramatic break from the global economic order since the end of World War II. According to renowned author and economic historian Daniel Yergin, we are witnessing a 'reversal of an eight or nine decade trend' away from free trade, ushering in a new era defined by tariff walls, trade nationalism, and protectionism.
Speaking to Al Arabiya News' Hadley Gamble on the eve of what is expected to be a major announcement from Trump detailing a sweeping new American tariff regime, Yergin warned that the assumptions underpinning decades of global economic integration were now being overturned.
'I've heard the Secretary of Commerce say what we want to do is build a tariff wall around the United States,' said Yergin. 'We're kind of going back to the years of William McKinley at the end of the 19th century, which was a very complicated time because you had a couple of major financial panics at the same time.'
Yergin, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and Vice Chairman of S&P Global, is one of the most influential voices in energy and geopolitics. His books, including The Prize, The Quest, and The New Map, are considered foundational texts for understanding global energy systems and their geopolitical implications.
'What we're seeing,' he added, 'is a reversal of an eight or nine-decade trend that began in 1934 under Franklin Roosevelt… to a view that the United States has been taken advantage [of], even though the United States has been doing better than any of the other industrial nations. And so we're at a great turn in history.'
This new period of economic nationalism, Yergin said, is deeply intertwined with the US-China rivalry. He noted that protectionist instincts were already present during the Biden administration but have become more pronounced under Trump.
'The Biden administration was also rather protectionist… famously, Joe Biden did not invite Tesla and Elon Musk to the electric vehicle summit at the White House in 2021, allegedly because it was not a union shop,' he said.
The tariffs are likely to reshape global supply chains and the future of advanced manufacturing. But Yergin cautioned that while announcements of new American factories abound, the jobs may not follow.
'The factories that will be built – this is an age of robotics. They're not going to be bringing jobs. This is not going to take us back to Detroit or Cleveland or Youngstown, Ohio. These are going to be different types of factories.'
Yergin described the unfolding trade war as part of a much broader 'great recalibration' – a moment in which countries are being forced to re-evaluate not only their trading relationships, but also their energy systems, economic structures, and geopolitical alignments.
On the energy front, Yergin delivered a sobering assessment. 'The energy transition is in need of a major rethink,' he told Gamble. 'A lot of the expectations, a lot of the planning, a lot of the spending was really crystallized during COVID, when demand was down and prices were down… And the consequence of that is that you had these straight lines, linear lines, that went to 2050 net zero, when almost half the world's emissions were not even covered by them.'
Far from displacing fossil fuels, he argued, the rise of renewables has come alongside a resurgence in oil and coal.
'2024 wind and solar were at the highest levels they ever were. 2024 oil and coal were at the highest levels they were ever. And natural gas would have been there, except for Russia's invasion of Ukraine,' he said.
Despite enormous political capital invested in green agendas, the numbers tell a different story: 'In the latest data we had – in 2022, 81 percent of the world's energy was hydrocarbons. In 2023 it was 80.5 percent. A one half of 1 percent change.'
That sluggish progress, Yergin explained, is not merely a failure of will, but a reflection of scale and feasibility.
'The numbers used for the Baku UN conference would say about 5 percent of world GDP over a number of years has to be spent [on the transition]. Now, developing countries don't have 5 percent of their GDP.'
Even developed nations are constrained.
'In Washington… there's this problem of this $36.5 trillion debt where the interest payments are greater than defense spending. So, you know, just the money's not there to do [it] on scale.'
Added to that, the growing electricity demands of artificial intelligence threaten to increase fossil fuel reliance.
'We saw this at the [CERAWeek] energy conference – electricity for AI. And in the United States, that means more natural gas going into it.'
Yergin warned that all these dynamics point to an energy future that is messy, uneven, and politically fraught.
'The notion that you're just going to draw a line and get to net zero by 2035 – that's why we say the energy transition is going to be multi-dimensional. It's going to unfold at different paces in different regions, with different mixes of technology and of critical importance, different priorities by different governments.'
Those different priorities are already leading to divergent strategies. In Europe, the rise of populism is fueling a backlash against regulatory excess and green targets.
'You're going to see it a lot in the battles over the budget, and you're also going to see it in the rise of the populist parties.'
Russia, according to Yergin, wasn't without its problems either. Sanctions had not stopped the war economy. It had, however, said Yergin, driven Moscow into the arms of Beijing.
'Russia's basically become an economic dependency of China,' he said.
Yergin concluded by reiterating his view, the world had entered an unpredictable new phase. The long-dominant assumptions about free trade, clean energy, and global integration are now under siege.
'It is recalibrating and reassessing and recognizing that those simple graphs that go to 2050 – [that] is not the way the world's going to go,' he stated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Scuffles erupt in Los Angeles as soldiers sent by Trump fan out
Demonstrators torched cars and scuffled with security forces in Los Angeles on Sunday as police kept protesters away from the National Guard troops President Donald Trump sent to the streets of America's second-biggest city. Unrest broke out for a third day, with protesters angry at action by immigration officials that has resulted in dozens of arrests of what authorities say are illegal migrants and gang members. The raids -- which began in broad daylight on Friday in a city with a large Latino population -- were always likely to spark reaction among the public in the liberal city. But opponents say Trump, who has made clamping down on illegal migration a key plank of his second term, was deliberately stoking tensions with his deployment of California's National Guard, a stand-by military usually controlled by the state's governor, Gavin Newsom. 'We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved,' Newsom wrote on X. 'This is a serious breach of state sovereignty -- inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California,' he added. At least three self-driving Waymo cars were burned on Sunday, with two others vandalized as protesters roamed around a limited area in downtown Los Angeles. Traffic was halted on a key freeway for over an hour while scores of people thronged the roadway. They were moved off by California Highway Patrol officers, who used flash-bangs and smoke grenades. But after a limited early confrontation between federal agents from the Department of Homeland Security and a few dozen protesters at a detention center, the clashes all involved local law enforcement. By early afternoon LAPD officers established containment lines some distance from federal buildings, preventing contact between angry demonstrators and the scores of armed National Guardsmen from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, who had gathered in helmets and camouflage gear. As night fell a few dozen people -- many wearing masks and hoodies -- remained in hotspots, with some lobbing projectiles and fireworks. Law enforcement have arrested at least 56 people over two days, and three officers have suffered minor injuries, LAPD said. 'Troops everywhere' Trump, asked about the use of troops, was unrepentant, hinting instead at a more widespread deployment in other parts of the country. 'You have violent people, and we are not going to let them get away with it,' he told reporters. 'I think you're going to see some very strong law and order.' Responding to a question about invoking the Insurrection Act -- which would allow the military to be used as a domestic police force -- Trump said: 'We're looking at troops everywhere. We're not going to let this happen to our country.' US Northern Command, part of the Department of Defense responsible for national defense, said 'approximately 500 Marines... are in a prepared-to-deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support' the ongoing federal operations. The National Guard is frequently used in natural disasters, and occasionally in instances of civil unrest, but almost always with the consent of local authorities. Trump's deployment of the force -- the first over the head of a state governor since 1965 at the height of the civil rights movement -- was criticized by Democrats, including former vice president Kamala Harris who called it 'a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos.' 'Intimidation' But Republicans lined up behind Trump to dismiss the pushback. 'I have no concern about that at all,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson, accusing Newsom of 'an inability or unwillingness to do what is necessary.' Demonstrators told AFP the purpose of the troops did not appear to be to keep order. 'I think it's an intimidation tactic,' Thomas Henning said. 'These protests have been peaceful. There's no one trying to do any sort of damage right now and yet you have the National Guard with loaded magazines and large guns standing around trying to intimidate Americans from exercising our First Amendment rights.' Marshall Goldberg, 78, told AFP that deploying Guardsmen made him feel 'so offended.' 'We hate what they've done with the undocumented workers, but this is moving it to another level of taking away the right to protest and the right to just peaceably assemble,' he said. Raids by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency in other US cities have triggered small-scale protests in recent months, but the Los Angeles unrest is the biggest and most sustained against Trump's immigration policies so far. A CBS News poll taken before the Los Angeles protests showed a slight majority of Americans still approved of the crackdown.


Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Iran Says No Sanctions Relief in US Nuclear Proposal
Iran's parliament speaker said on Sunday that the latest US proposal for a nuclear deal does not include the lifting of sanctions, state media reported as negotiations appeared to have hit a roadblock. The two foes have held five rounds of Omani-mediated talks since April, seeking to replace a landmark agreement between Tehran and world powers that set restrictions on Iran's nuclear activities in return for sanctions relief, before US President Donald Trump abandoned the accord in 2018 during his first term, said AFP. In a video aired on Iranian state TV, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said that "the US plan does not even mention the lifting of sanctions". He called it a sign of dishonesty, accusing the Americans of seeking to impose a "unilateral" agreement that Tehran would not accept. "The delusional US president should know better and change his approach if he is really looking for a deal," Ghalibaf said. On May 31, after the fifth round of talks, Iran said it had received "elements" of a US proposal, with officials later taking issue with "ambiguities" in the draft text. The US and its Western allies have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, a charge Iran has consistently denied, insisting that its atomic program was solely for peaceful purposes. Key issues in the negotiations have been the removal of biting economic sanctions and uranium enrichment. Tehran says it has the right to enrich uranium under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while the Trump administration has called any Iranian enrichment a "red line". Trump, who has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign of sanctions on Iran since taking office in January, has repeatedly said it will not be allowed any uranium enrichment under a potential deal. On Tuesday, Iran's top negotiator, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, said the country "will not ask anyone for permission to continue enriching uranium". IAEA meeting According to the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state in the world that enriches uranium up to 60 percent -- close to the 90 percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei on Wednesday rejected the latest US proposal and said enrichment was "key" to Iran's nuclear program. The IAEA Board of Governors is scheduled to meet in Vienna starting Monday and discuss Iran's nuclear activities. On Sunday the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran warned it could reduce its level of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog if it adopts a resolution against it. "Certainly, the IAEA should not expect the Islamic Republic of Iran to continue its broad and friendly cooperation," the Iranian agency's spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi told state TV. Araghchi on Friday accused European powers of "opting for malign action against Iran at the IAEA Board of Governors", warning on X that "Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights". A quarterly report from the IAEA issued last week cited a "general lack of cooperation" from Iran and raised concerns over undeclared nuclear material. Tehran has rejected the report as politically motivated and based on "forged documents" it said had been provided by its arch foe Israel.

Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump's US travel ban goes into effect against citizens of 12 nations
President Donald Trump's sweeping new travel ban came into effect early Monday immediately after midnight, barring citizens from a dozen nations from entering the United States and reviving a divisive measure from his first term. The move is expected to disrupt refugee pathways and further restrict immigration as the Trump administration expands its crackdown on illegal entries. Many of the nations covered by the restrictions have adversarial relations with the United States, such as Iran and Afghanistan, while others face severe crises, like Haiti and Libya. In announcing his restrictions last week, Trump said the new measure was spurred by a recent 'terrorist attack' on Jews in Colorado. The group had been protesting in solidarity with hostages held in Gaza when they were assaulted by a man the White House said had overstayed his visa. That attack, Trump said, 'underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted' or who overstay their visas. The move bans all travel to the United States by nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, according to the White House. Trump also imposed a partial ban on travelers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Some temporary work visas from those countries will be allowed. New countries could be added, Trump warned, 'as threats emerge around the world.' Mehria, a 23-year-old woman from Afghanistan who applied for refugee status, said the new rules have trapped her and many other Afghans in uncertainty. 'We gave up thousands of hopes and our entire lives... on a promise from America, but today we are suffering one hell after another,' she told AFP. World Cup, Olympics, diplomats excluded The ban will not apply to athletes competing in the 2026 World Cup, which the United States is co-hosting with Canada and Mexico, or in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, Trump's order said. Nor will it apply to diplomats from the targeted countries. United Nations rights chief Volker Turk warned that 'the broad and sweeping nature of the new travel ban raises concerns from the perspective of international law.' US Democratic lawmakers and elected officials blasted the ban as draconian and unconstitutional. 'I know the pain that Trump's cruel and xenophobic travel bans inflict because my family has felt it firsthand,' congresswoman Yassamin Ansari, who is Iranian-American, posted Sunday on X. 'We will fight this ban with everything we have.' Rumors of a new travel ban had circulated following the Colorado attack, with Trump's administration vowing to pursue 'terrorists' living in the United States on visas. US officials said suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national according to court documents, was in the country illegally having overstayed a tourist visa, but that he had applied for asylum in September 2022. Trump's new travel ban notably does not include Egypt. His proclamation said Taliban-ruled Afghanistan and war-torn Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Yemen lacked 'competent' central authorities for processing passports and vetting. Iran was included because it is a 'state sponsor of terrorism,' the order said. For the other countries, Trump's order cited an above-average likelihood that people would overstay their visas.